Immune responses to the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in immunocompromised adults: a comprehensive overview

Current status of immunisation for herpes zoster

Herpes zoster (HZ) is increasingly common in the aging and is experienced by approximately one in three people in their lifetime. It is also relatively common in immune-compromised people. Acute HZ causes severe pain, reduced quality of life and severe complications, including prolonged pain, or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and ocular zoster, which may rarely progress to blindness. In severely immune-compromised people disseminated zoster may affect the brain and liver. A second-generation vaccine, the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine, consisting of recombinant viral glycoprotein E and the Adjuvant System 01 (AS01B), now offers >90% efficacy against HZ and associated complications in immune-competent people. Efficacy persists above 80% for 11 years. In severely immune-compromised patients, the vaccine is safe with efficacy and/or immunogenicity of 68-87%. There is also excellent immunogenicity for those on JAK inhibitors and corticosteroid therapy. The vaccine offers a paradigm for successful and durable immunization in the aging and immune-compromised.

Vaccination Coverage for Medically Indicated Vaccines in a Convenience Sample of Severely Immunocompromised Patients with COVID-19: An Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, the number of immunocompromised patients (ICPs) has increased significantly. ICPs have an impaired immune system, making them susceptible to complicated infections. To protect them from infections, ICPs are eligible to receive several medically indicated vaccines. To obtain insight into the uptake of these medically indicated vaccines, we determined the coverage of these vaccines in ICPs.

METHODS

This observational cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands, from September 2021 to April 2022. All adult ICPs admitted for COVID-19 were asked to complete a questionnaire on their vaccination history (pneumococcal, herpes zoster, human papillomavirus vaccination, influenza, and COVID-19 vaccines) and history of vaccine-preventable infections. In addition, patients' vaccination history was reviewed in medical files.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients completed the questionnaire and were included. Although all patients had an indication for pneumococcal vaccination, only 22 received it (19%). Coverage for herpes zoster was low (1%, 1/106 eligible patients). Coverage for human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV) was also low (40%, two out of five eligible patients). In contrast, 92% of patients received vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, and 77% of patients received seasonal influenza vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Although coverage for influenza and COVID-19 vaccination was high in ICPs, coverage for other medically indicated vaccines was low. Identifying which factors contributed to high COVID-19 and influenza vaccine uptake can help to improve vaccination rates for the other recommended vaccines. Clear guidelines for clinicians and the removal of organizational obstacles are needed to improve vaccination coverage.

Towards personalized prevention of Herpes zoster infection in patients with hematologic diseases or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a position paper from an <I>ad hoc</I> Italian expert panel

The identification of patients at high risk of Herpes zoster (HZ) requiring a preventive strategy with antiviral prophylaxis and anti-HZ vaccine is a clinically relevant issue in patients with immunological impairment. The absence of trials comparing vaccination to pharmacological prophylaxis or defining their sequential use makes the optimal preventive strategy uncertain. This article presents the results of group discussion among a panel of experts convened ad hoc to review the literature regarding antiviral prophylaxis and vaccine efficacy and safety in populations with malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases, and in subjects submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The expert panel used consensus methodology and proposed solutions for preventive strategies, producing advice for the management of the most relevant unmet clinical needs. This comprehensive overview aims to support the practice of pharmacological and vaccination-based HZ prevention and inform the design and conduct of new studies in the field.

Immunogenicity of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), consisting of varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) and the AS01B adjuvant system, effectively prevents herpes zoster (HZ). In the absence of a well-defined correlate of protection, it is important to monitor the RZV immune response, as a proxy of clinical effectiveness.

METHODS

This systematic review examined post-vaccination parameters: humoral and cell-mediated immunity, avidity index, geometric mean concentration of antibody (GMC), and immunity persistence. The meta-analysis used a random-effects model, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 37 included articles, after one month from RZV-dose 2, the pooled response rate for anti-gE humoral immunity was 95.2% (95%CI 91.9-97.2), dropping to 77.6% (95%CI 64.7-86.8) during immunosuppression. The anti-gE cell-mediated immunity-specific response reached 84.6% (95%CI 75.2-90.9). Varying factors, such as age, sex, coadministration with other vaccines, prior HZ, or live-attenuated zoster vaccine, did not significantly affect response rates. RZV induced a substantial increase in gE avidity. Immunity persistence was confirmed, with more rapid waning in the very elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review indicates that RZV elicits robust immunogenicity and overcomes immunocompromising conditions. The findings underscore the need for further research, particularly on long-term immunity, and have the potential to support HZ vaccination policies and programs.

Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Risk of Flares Among Older Adults with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Persons with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). In 2018, CDC recommended a highly efficacious vaccine, recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), for prevention of HZ in immunocompetent ≥50 years-olds. We estimated RZV vaccination among adults age ≥50 years with IMIDs during 2018-2019 and examined possible vaccine-related flares following RZV.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of IMID patients using medical claims data from IBM® MarketScan® (age 50-64 years) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare (age ≥65 years). Presumed flares were defined as hospitalization/emergency department visit for their respective IMIDs, or steroid treatment with a short-acting oral glucocorticoid or parenteral glucocorticoid injection. We conducted a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis to examine a temporal association between RZV and flares.

RESULTS

Among enrollees with IMIDs, 14.8% of 55,654 MarketScan and 43.2% of 160,545 Medicare enrollees received ≥1-dose of RZV during 2018-2019. Two-dose series completion was 76.6% in MarketScan and 85.4% in Medicare enrollees. In the SCCS analysis, 10% and 13% developed flares in the control as compared to 9% and 11-12% in the risk window following 1- or 2-doses of RZV among MarketScan and Medicare enrollees, respectively. We found no statistically significant increase in flares following RZV administration for any IMID in either age group following RZV dose-1 or dose-2.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an increase in presumed flares following RZV vaccination. Among adults aged ≥50 years with IMIDs, a substantial proportion received RZV compared to general zoster coverage estimates and series-completion was high. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Herpes zoster in patients with solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Tweetable abstract

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a vaccine-preventable disease, but the role of the vaccine in cancer patients during immunotherapy (ICIs) is still unknown. The clinical and economic consequences of HZ and the increased use of ICIs require a greater awareness by the oncologist.