1
|
Caradus JR. Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants. GM CROPS & FOOD 2023; 14:1-41. [PMID: 37690075 PMCID: PMC10761188 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2252947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Innovation in agriculture has been essential in improving productivity of crops and forages to support a growing population, improving living standards while contributing toward maintaining environment integrity, human health, and wellbeing through provision of more nutritious, varied, and abundant food sources. A crucial part of that innovation has involved a range of techniques for both expanding and exploiting the genetic potential of plants. However, some techniques used for generating new variation for plant breeders to exploit are deemed higher risk than others despite end products of both processes at times being for all intents and purposes identical for the benefits they provide. As a result, public concerns often triggered by poor communication from innovators, resulting in mistrust and suspicion has, in turn, caused the development of a range of regulatory systems. The logic and motivations for modes of regulation used are reviewed and how the benefits from use of these technologies can be delivered more efficiently and effectively is discussed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Blake CE, Monterrosa EC, Rampalli KK, Khan ANS, Reyes LI, Drew SD, Dominguez-Salas P, Bukachi SA, Ngutu M, Frongillo EA, Iruhiriye E, Girard AW. Basic human values drive food choice decision-making in different food environments of Kenya and Tanzania. Appetite 2023; 188:106620. [PMID: 37271253 PMCID: PMC10423943 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Increased access to a variety of foods in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) has led to greater autonomy in food choice decision-making. Autonomy allows individuals to make decisions through negotiation of considerations in ways that are consistent with basic values. The aim of this study was to identify and describe how basic human values drive food choice in two diverse populations with transitioning food environments living in the neighboring East African countries of Kenya and Tanzania. Secondary data analysis was carried out on focus group discussions conducted with men and women in Kenya (n = 28) and Tanzania (n = 28) as part of prior studies on food choice. A priori coding based on Schwartz's theory of basic human values was conducted, followed by a narrative comparative analysis, which included review by original principal investigators. Values of conservation (security, conformity, tradition), openness to change (self-directed thought and action, stimulation, indulgence), self-enhancement (achievement, power, face), and self-transcendence (benevolence-dependability and -caring) were prominent drivers of food choice in both settings. Participants described how values were negotiated and highlighted existing tensions. For example, the value of tradition was cited as important in both settings but changing food contexts (e.g., new foods, diverse neighborhoods) increased prioritization of values like stimulation, indulgence, and self-directed thought and action. The application of a basic values framework was useful for understanding food choice in both settings. A focused understanding of how values drive food choice decision-making in the context of changing food availability in LMICs is essential for the promotion of sustainable healthy diets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Blake
- University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Eva C Monterrosa
- Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Krystal K Rampalli
- University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | | | - Ligia I Reyes
- Cornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
| | - Shiny Deepika Drew
- University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Paula Dominguez-Salas
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, London, UK; International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Salome A Bukachi
- Institute of Anthropology, Gender and African Studies (IAGAS), University of Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Mariah Ngutu
- Institute of Anthropology, Gender and African Studies (IAGAS), University of Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Edward A Frongillo
- University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Elyse Iruhiriye
- University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Amy Webb Girard
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ewa WG, Agata T, Milica P, Anna B, Dennis E, Nick V, Godelieve G, Selim C, Naghmeh A, Tomasz T. Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security. GM CROPS & FOOD 2022; 13:218-241. [PMID: 35996854 PMCID: PMC9415543 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Achieving global food security is becoming increasingly challenging and many stakeholders around the world are searching for new ways to reach this demanding goal. Here we demonstrate examples of genetically modified and genome edited plants introduced to the market in different world regions. Transgenic crops are regulated based on the characteristics of the product in many countries including the United States and Canada, while the European Union, India, China and others regulate process-based i.e. on how the product was made. We also present the public perception of state-of-the-art plant gene technologies in different regions of the world in the past 20 years. The results of literature analysis show that the public in Europe and North America is more familiar with the notion of genome editing and genetically modified organisms than the public in other world regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyczewska Agata
- Laboratory of Animal Model Organisms, Institute of Biorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Beniermann Anna
- Biology Education, Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eriksson Dennis
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
- Department of Biotechnology, INN University, 2318 Hamar, Norway
| | - Vangheluwe Nick
- Euroseeds, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, (Technologiepark 71), Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Cetiner Selim
- The Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Turkey
| | - Abiri Naghmeh
- The Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|