Long non-coding RNA LINC00240 promotes gastric cancer progression via modulating miR-338-5p/METTL3 axis

Role of LINC00240 on T-helper 9 differentiation in allergic rhinitis through influencing DNMT1-dependent methylation of PU.1

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease with increasing prevalence globally. However, the molecular mechanism underlying AR pathogenesis remains largely undefined.

METHODS

Peripheral blood and nasal mucosa samples obtained from patients with AR (n = 22), and ovalbumin-induced AR mouse model (n = 8 per group) were prepared for subsequent detection. qRT-PCR and western blot were used to detect the expression of LINC00240, miR-155-5p, PU.1 and other key molecules. ELISA assay and flow cytometry were employed to evaluate the secretion of IL-9 and T-helper 9 (Th9) cell ratio, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays were employed to further elucidate the regulatory network of LINC00240/miR-155-5p/DNMT1. The methylation of PU.1 promoter was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This signaling axis was further validated in the mouse model of AR.

RESULTS

LINC00240 was downregulated, while miR-155-5p and PU.1 were upregulated in the peripheral blood and nasal mucosa of AR patients, as well as in AR mice. This was accompanied with the increased ratio of Th9 cells and elevated IL-9 secretion. Mechanistically, LINC00240 served as a miR-155-5p sponge, and DNMT1 was a target of miR-155-5p. In addition, DNMT1 mediated the methylation of PU.1 promoter. In vivo studies verified that LINC00240 mitigated AR progression, possibly via miR-155-5p/DNMT1/PU.1-dependent Th9 differentiation.

CONCLUSION

The involvement of LINC00240 in AR pathogenesis is closely associated with Th9 differentiation through modulating DNMT1-dependent methylation of PU.1 by sponging miR-155-5p.

Circ_0001944 depletion inhibits glycolysis and esophageal cancer progression by binding to miR-338-5p to reduce PDK1 expression

Circular RNA (circRNA) plays multiple roles in the development of esophageal cancer (EC). Herein, we investigate the function of circ_0001944 in EC progression and the related mechanism. Expression of circ_0001944, microRNA-338-5p (miR-338-5p), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), E-cadherin and N-cadherin was analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting or immunohistochemistry assay. Cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and migration were investigated by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU), flow cytometry, transwell invasion and wound-healing assays, respectively. Glucose consumption was detected by Glucose Assay Kit. Lactate production was analyzed by Lactate Assay Kit. ATP/ADP ratio was determined by ADP/ATP ratio Assay Kit. The associations among circ_0001944, miR-338-5p and PDK1 were identified by dual-luciferase reporter and RNA pull-down assays. Xenograft mouse model assay was used to explore the role of circ_0001944 on tumor tumorigenesis in vivo. Circ_0001944 and PDK1 expression were significantly upregulated, while miR-338-5p was downregulated in EC tissues and cells in contrast with normal esophageal tissues and cells. Circ_0001944 knockdown inhibited EC cell proliferation, invasion, migration and glycolysis but induced apoptosis. Meanwhile, circ_0001944 depletion suppressed tumor tumorigenesis in vivo. Mechanistically, circ_0001944 bound to miR-338-5p, and miR-338-5p targeted PDK1. In addition, miR-338-5p inhibitors attenuated circ_0001944 depletion-induced effects in EC cells. The regulation of miR-338-5p on EC progression involved the downregulation of PDK1. Further, circ_0001944 controlled PDK1 expression through miR-338-5p. Circ_0001944 knockdown inhibited EC development and glycolysis by regulating the miR-338-5p/PDK1 pathway, providing a promising target for EC therapy.

N6-methylation in the development, diagnosis, and treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks third among cancers in terms of mortality rate worldwide. A clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying the genesis and progression of GC will contribute to clinical decision making. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant among diverse mRNA modification types and regulates multiple facets of RNA metabolism. In recent years, emerging studies have shown that m6A modifications are involved in gastric carcinoma tumorigenesis and progression and can potentially be valuable new prospects for diagnosis and prognosis. This article reviews the recent progress regarding m6A in GC.

Identification of a novel m6A-related lncRNAs signature and immunotherapeutic drug sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks as the fourth leading cause for cancer-related deaths worldwide. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely related with poor prognosis and immunotherapeutic effect in PDAC. The aim of this study is to construct and validate a m6A-related lncRNAs signature and assess immunotherapeutic drug sensitivity in PDAC.

METHODS

RNA-seq data for 178 cases of PDAC patients and 167 cases of normal pancreatic tissue were obtained from TCGA and GTEx databases, respectively. A set of 21 m6A-related genes were downloaded based on the previous report. Co-expression network was conducted to identify m6A-related lncRNAs in PDAC. Cox analyses and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model were used to construct a risk prognosis model. The relationship between signature genes and immune function was explored by single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA). The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were utilized to evaluate the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, the expression levels of 4 m6A-related lncRNAs on PDAC cell lines were measured by the quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The drug sensitivity between the high- and low-risk groups was validated using PDAC cell lines by Cell-Counting Kit 8 (CCK8).

RESULTS

The risk prognosis model was successfully constructed based on 4 m6A-related lncRNAs, and PDAC patients were divided into the high- and low-risk groups. The overall survival (OS) of the high-risk groups was more unfavorable compared with the low-risk groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that the risk prognosis model reasonably predicted the 2-, 3- and 5-year OS of PDAC patients. qPCR analysis confirmed the decreased expression levels of 4 m6A-related lncRNAs in PDAC cells compared to the normal pancreatic cells. Furthermore, CCK8 assay revealed that Phenformin exhibited higher sensitivity in the high-risk groups, while Pyrimethamine exhibited higher sensitivity in the low-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with PDAC were well predicted in the risk prognosis model based on m6A-related lncRNAs, and selected immunotherapy drugs have potential values for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

New insights into the regulation of METTL3 and its role in tumors

As one of the most abundant epigenetic modifications in RNA, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) affects RNA transcription, splicing, stability, and posttranscriptional translation. Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), a key component of the m6A methyltransferase complex, dynamically regulates target genes expression through m6A modification. METTL3 has been found to play a critical role in tumorigenesis, tumor growth, metastasis, metabolic reprogramming, immune cell infiltration, and tumor drug resistance. As a result, the development of targeted drugs against METTL3 is becoming increasingly popular. This review systematically summarizes the factors that regulate METTL3 expression and explores the specific mechanisms by which METTL3 affects multiple tumor biological behaviors. We aim to provide fundamental support for tumor diagnosis and treatment, at the same time, to offer new ideas for the development of tumor-targeting drugs.

The emerging role of m6A modification of non-coding RNA in gastrointestinal cancers: a comprehensive review

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is a series of malignant tumors with a high incidence globally. Although approaches for tumor diagnosis and therapy have advanced substantially, the mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of GI cancer are still unclear. Increasing evidence supports an important role for N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in many biological processes, including cancer-related processes via splicing, export, degradation, and translation of mRNAs. Under distinct cancer contexts, m6A regulators have different expression patterns and can regulate or be regulated by mRNAs and non-coding RNAs, especially long non-coding RNAs. The roles of m6A in cancer development have attracted increasing attention in epigenetics research. In this review, we synthesize progress in our understanding of m6A and its roles in GI cancer, especially esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. Furthermore, we clarify the mechanism by which m6A contributes to GI cancer, providing a basis for the development of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets.

The bidirectional interplay between ncRNAs and methylation modifications in gastrointestinal tumors

The aberrant expression of methylation and ncRNAs, two crucial regulators of epigenetic modifications, has been widely demonstrated in cancer. The complex interplay between them is essential in promoting malignant phenotype, poor prognosis, and drug resistance in GI tumors (including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers). Therefore, we summarize the interrelation process between ncRNAs and methylation modifications in GI tumors, including the detailed mechanism of methylation enzyme regulation of ncRNAs, the molecular mechanism of ncRNAs regulation of methylation modifications, and the correlation between the interactions between ncRNAs and methylation modifications and clinical features of tumors. Finally, we discuss the potential value of ncRNAs and methylation modifications in clinical diagnosis and therapy.

Crosstalk between m6A and coding/non-coding RNA in cancer and detection methods of m6A modification residues

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is one of the most common and well-known internal RNA modifications that occur on mRNAs or ncRNAs. It affects various aspects of RNA metabolism, including splicing, stability, translocation, and translation. An abundance of evidence demonstrates that m6A plays a crucial role in various pathological and biological processes, especially in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In this article, we introduce the potential functions of m6A regulators, including "writers" that install m6A marks, "erasers" that demethylate m6A, and "readers" that determine the fate of m6A-modified targets. We have conducted a review on the molecular functions of m6A, focusing on both coding and noncoding RNAs. Additionally, we have compiled an overview of the effects noncoding RNAs have on m6A regulators and explored the dual roles of m6A in the development and advancement of cancer. Our review also includes a detailed summary of the most advanced databases for m6A, state-of-the-art experimental and sequencing detection methods, and machine learning-based computational predictors for identifying m6A sites.

Novel insights into mutual regulation between N6-methyladenosine modification and LncRNAs in tumors

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A), one of the most common RNA methylation modifications, has emerged in recent years as a new layer of the regulatory mechanism controlling gene expression in eukaryotes. As a reversible epigenetic modification, m⁶A not only occurs on mRNAs but also on Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs). As we all known, despite LncRNAs cannot encode proteins, they affect the expression of proteins by interacting with mRNAs or miRNAs, thus playing important roles in the occurrence and development of a variety of tumors. Up to now, it has been widely accepted that m⁶A modification on LncRNAs affects the fate of the corresponding LncRNAs. Interestingly, levels and functions of m⁶A modifications are also mediated by LncRNAs through affecting the m⁶A methyltransferases (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, METTL16, etc.), demethylases (FTO, ALKBH5) and methyl-binding proteins (YTHDFs, YTHDCs, IGF2BPs, HNRNPs, etc.), which are collectively referred to as "m⁶A regulators". In this review, we summarized the mutual regulation mechanisms between N⁶-methyladenosine modification and LncRNAs in cancer progression, metastasis, invasion and drug resistance. In detail, we focus on the specific mechanisms of m⁶A modification, which is mediated by methyltransferases and demethylases, involves in the regulation of LncRNA levels and functions in the first part. And section two intensively displays the mediation roles of LncRNAs in m⁶A modification via changing the regulatory proteins. At last part, we described the interaction effects between LncRNAs and methyl-binding proteins of m⁶A modification during various tumor occurrence and development.

Comparison of Oncogenes, Tumor Suppressors, and MicroRNAs Between Schizophrenia and Glioma: The Balance of Power

The risk of cancer in schizophrenia has been controversial. Confounders of the issue are cigarette smoking in schizophrenia, and antiproliferative effects of antipsychotic medications. The author has previously suggested comparison of a specific cancer like glioma to schizophrenia might help determine a more accurate relationship between cancer and schizophrenia. To accomplish this goal, the author performed three comparisons of data; the first a comparison of conventional tumor suppressors and oncogenes between schizophrenia and cancer including glioma. This comparison determined schizophrenia has both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting characteristics. A second, larger comparison between brain-expressed microRNAs in schizophrenia with their expression in glioma was then performed. This identified a core carcinogenic group of miRNAs in schizophrenia offset by a larger group of tumor-suppressive miRNAs. This proposed "balance of power" between oncogenes and tumor suppressors could cause neuroinflammation. This was assessed by a third comparison between schizophrenia, glioma and inflammation in asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma (ALRCM). This revealed that schizophrenia shares more oncogenic similarity to ALRCM than glioma.

Emerging Mutual Regulatory Roles between m6A Modification and microRNAs

N⁶-metyladenosine (m⁶A), one of the most common RNA methylation modifications in mammals, has attracted extensive attentions owing to its regulatory roles in a variety of physiological and pathological processes. As a reversible epigenetic modification on RNAs, m⁶A is dynamically mediated by the functional interplay among the regulatory proteins of methyltransferases, demethylases and methyl-binding proteins. In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that m⁶A modification is associated with the production and function of microRNAs (miRNAs). In this review, we summarize the specific kinds of m⁶A modification methyltransferases, demethylases and methyl-binding proteins. In particular, we focus on describing the roles of m⁶A modification and its regulatory proteins in the production and function of miRNAs in a variety of pathological and physiological processes. More importantly, we further discuss the mediating mechanisms of miRNAs in m⁶A modification and its regulatory proteins during the occurrence and development of various diseases.

Knockdown of Long Noncoding RNA LINC00240 Inhibits Esophageal Cancer Progression by Regulating miR-26a-5p

Background

Esophageal cancer is the most prevalent digestive system tumor. Due to a lack of characteristic symptoms and early diagnosis, a confirmed esophageal cancer is typically detected at a progressively harmful stage. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the molecular mechanisms governing the formation and progression of esophageal cancer in order to identify new treatment targets for esophageal cancer early detection.

Methods

We first screened the differentially expressed gene LINC00240 in the TCGA database. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were performed, and a nomogram was constructed for internal validation. The correlation between LINC00240 and immune cells was analyzed using the TIMER database. The possible mechanism of action was explored through GSEA enrichment analysis. Then, in 43 esophageal cancer tissues, paracancour tissues, and cell lines, the LINC00240 expression was found. Transwell assays, CCK-8, and clone formation assays were utilized to assess the impact of LINC00240 on the metastasis of esophageal cancer cells. The binding activity of LINC00240 to downstream miRNAs was assessed using the luciferase reporter gene.

Results

TCGA database showed that LINC00240 expression was increased in cancer tissues compared to adjacent tissues. The C-index of the nomogram is 0.712 (0.666-0.758), and the prediction model has good accuracy. According to the TIMER database, the LINC00240 expression is linked to immune infiltration and may be crucial in encouraging the immune escape of tumor cells. Gene enrichment analysis depicts that LINC00240 could influence the biological events of esophageal cancer by taking part in pathways such as affecting the cell cycle. LINC00240 expression was substantially greater in the plasma of esophageal cancer patients (3.94 ± 1.55) than in the normal control group (2.13 ± 0.89). Plasma expression of LINC00240 was linked to the degree of differentiation (P=0.0345) and TNM stage (P=0.0409). Knocked down LINC00240 inhibited esophageal cancer cells proliferation, lone formation, and invasion. LINC00240 might bind itself to miR-26a-5p and influence its expression. MiR-26a-5p inhibitor can dramatically limit the ability of LINC00240 knockdown on plate colony formation and relocation of esophageal cancerous cells was demonstrated in colony formation and migration experiments.

Conclusion

LINC00240 expression is elevated in esophageal cancerous tissues, and knocking down LINC00240 decreases esophageal cancer cell proliferation, clone formation, invasion, and migration via miR-26a-5p. As a result, LINC00240 could be a novel target for esophageal cancer patients' early diagnosis and treatment.

LncRNA-miRNA axis in tumor progression and therapy response: An emphasis on molecular interactions and therapeutic interventions

Epigenetic factors are critical regulators of biological and pathological mechanisms and they could interact with different molecular pathways. Targeting epigenetic factors has been an idea approach in disease therapy, especially cancer. Accumulating evidence has highlighted function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as epigenetic factors in cancer initiation and development and has focused on their association with downstream targets. microRNAs (miRNAs) are the most well-known targets of lncRNAs and present review focuses on lncRNA-miRNA axis in malignancy and therapy resistance of tumors. LncRNA-miRNA regulates cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis and autophagy in cancers. This axis affects tumor metastasis via regulating EMT and MMPs. Besides, lncRNA-miRNA axis determines sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Based on the studies, lncRNAs can be affected by drugs and genetic tools in cancer therapy and this may affect expression level of miRNAs as their downstream targets, leading to cancer suppression/progression. LncRNAs have both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressor functions in cancer and this unique function of lncRNAs has complicated their implication in tumor therapy. LncRNA-miRNA axis can also affect other signaling networks in cancer such as PI3K/Akt, STAT3, Wnt/β-catenin and EZH2 among others. Notably, lncRNA/miRNA axis can be considered as a signature for diagnosis and prognosis in cancers.

Expression profiles of m6A RNA methylation regulators, PD-L1 and immune infiltrates in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer and has a high death rate. Immunotherapy represented by PD-1 has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methylation of the m6A genes is linked to the onset and progression of numerous cancers, but there are few studies on gastric cancer. The main purpose of this study aims to analyze the relationship between m6A RNA methylation regulators, PD-L1, prognosis and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in gastric cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases were used to acquire transcriptomic data and clinical information from gastric cancer patients. The changes in m6A regulator expression levels in gastric cancer tissues and normal tissues were studied. Consensus clustering analysis was used to separate gastric cancer samples into two categories. We employed Least Absolute Shrinkage, Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and cBioPortal to analyze the m6A regulators, PD-L1 and TIME in gastric cancer. In gastric cancer tissues, the majority of m6A regulatory factors are considerably overexpressed. Two gastric cancer subgroups (Cluster1/2) based on consensus clustering of 21 m6A regulators. PD-L1 and PD-1 expression levels were significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues, and they were significantly linked with METTL3, WTAP, HNRNPD, ZC3H7B, METTL14, FTO, PCIF1, HNRNPC, YTHDF1 and YTDHF2. Cluster1 showed a large increase in resting memory CD4⁺ T cells, regulatory T cells, naïve B cells, active NK cells, and resting Mast cells. Cluster1 and Cluster2 were shown to be involved in numerous critical signaling pathways, including base excision repair, cell cycle, nucleotide excision repair, RNA degradation, and spliceosome pathways. Gastric cancer RiskScores based on prognostic factors have been found as independent prognostic indicators. The amount of tumor-infiltrating immune cells is dynamically affected by changes in the copy number of m6A methylation regulators associated with TIME.

LINC01232 Promotes Metastasis and EMT by Regulating miR-506-5p/PAK1 Axis in Gastric Cancer

Background

Long non-coding RNA LINC01232 plays an important role in the progression of metastasis in several cancers. However, the function of LINC01232 in gastric cancer is limited. Authors aimed to investigate the role and mechanism of LINC01232 in the metastasis of gastric cancer.

Methods

The expression levels and correlation of LINC01232, miR-506-5p, and PAK1 were analyzed by GEPIA or ENCORI, and the abundance of LINC01232 and miR-506-5p was measured in tissues and cells via qRT-PCR, the location of LINC01232 in gastric cells was analyzed by nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation, while the protein levels of PAK1, E-cadherin and vimentin were additionally quantified by Western blotting. Interactions between LINC01232, miR-506-5p, and PAK1 were detected through luciferase reporter assays, qRT-PCR and Western blotting. Cellular viability was evaluated through CCK8 assays, migration ability was measured by transwell assays, invasion ability was tested by wound healing experiment.

Results

LINC01232 was overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues and cells, and mainly located in nucleus. The inhibition of LINC01232 could suppress migration, invasion and EMT of gastric cancer cells. MiR-506-5p was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues and cells. LINC01232 sponged miR-506-5p to accelerate migration and EMT. PAK1 was certified to be a target of miR-506-5p, inhibition of PAK1 could interrupt LINC01232 overexpression-induced migration of gastric cancer cells.

Conclusion

The LINC01232/miR-506-5p/PAK1 axis promotes metastasis of gastric cancer cells.

Noncoding RNAs and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors globally. About 20-30% of patients with gastric cancer show peritoneal implantation metastasis at the first diagnosis. Peritoneal metastasis is responsible for 70% of deaths of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Although there are many ways to treat advanced gastric cancer, the prognosis of patients with recurrence is unsatisfactory. An auxiliary treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), is an internationally recognized recommended treatment for advanced gastric cancer. A series of clinical trials have shown that HIPEC significantly improves the overall survival of patients with cancer. Compared with the cytoreductive surgery (CRS) alone, HIPEC combined with CRS markedly reduced the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer. It has been demonstrated that HIPEC alters transcription of many genes by affecting non-coding RNAs, which may contribute to the suppressive effect of HIPEC on the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins in cancer cells. This paper reviews the recent advances in understanding the role of non-coding RNAs in tumor invasion and metastasis of advanced gastric cancer. We also consider changes in noncoding RNA levels and other molecules in advanced gastric cancer cases treated with HIPEC. We hope that our review will provide a reference for future research on molecular epidemiology and etiology of advanced gastric cancer and promote precise treatment of this malignancy using HIPEC.

Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 662 accelerates the progression of gastric cancer through up-regulating centrosomal protein 55 by sponging microRNA-195-5p

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important players in regulating diverse human diseases, including cancers. Nonetheless, the function of long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 662 (LINC00662) in gastric cancer (GC) carcinogenesis and progression remains to be delineated. In the present study, LINC00662, microRNA-195-5p (miR-195-5p) and centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55) mRNA expression levels were quantified by qRT-PCR. GC cell proliferation, migration and invasion were analyzed by CCK-8, BrdU and Transwell assays. Besides, dual-luciferase reporter and RNA pull-down assays were conducted for verifying the targeting relationships of LINC00662, miR-195-5p and CEP55. The regulatory functions of LINC00662 and miR-195-5p on CEP55 were examined utilizing Western blot. In this study, it was revealed that LINC00662 expression level was elevated in GC tissues and cells. LINC00662 overexpression facilitated the malignant biological behaviors of GC cells whereas knockdown of LINC00662 worked oppositely. In terms of mechanism, LINC00662 targeted miR-195-5p to modulate CEP55 expression. In conclusion, LINC00662 facilitates the malignant biological behaviors of GC cells via miR-195-5p/CEP55 axis, and therefore, it may be a promising target for GC treatment.

Long non-coding RNA HOXA11 antisense RNA upregulates spermatogenesis-associated serine-rich 2-like to enhance cisplatin resistance in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by suppressing microRNA-518a

Long noncoding RNAs (LncRNAs) are closely associated with the chemoresistance of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Previous studies indicated that HOXA11-AS could function as a vital regulator in human cancers. However, the regulatory mechanisms of HOXA11-AS in the chemoresistance of LSCC remain unclear. In this study, it was found that HOXA11-AS expression was upregulated in cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant LSCC tissues and cells. Loss-of-function assays revealed that HOXA11-AS knockdown inhibited the viability, migration, and invasion, but promoted the apoptosis of CDDP-resistant LSCC cells. Meanwhile, we identified miR-518a as a downstream gene of HOXA11-AS in LSCC, and miR-518a silencing reversed the promotive effect of HOXA11-AS knockdown on CDDP sensitivity of LSCC cells. In addition, miR-518a could inhibit spermatogenesis-associated serine-rich 2-like (SPATS2L) expression by direct interaction, and upregulation of SPATS2L abrogated the inhibitory effect of HOXA11-AS silencing or miR-518a overexpression on CDDP resistance of CDDP-resistant LSCC cells. In sum, our results demonstrated that HOXA11-AS enhanced CDDP resistance of LSCC via miR-518a/SPATS2L axis, which might offer novel therapeutic strategies for CDDP-resistant LSCC.