1
|
Villafuerte CJQ, Swaminath A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Review of Use in the Primary, Cytoreductive and Oligometastatic Settings. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3334. [PMID: 39409955 PMCID: PMC11475850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been increasing in incidence by around 1.5% per year for several years. However, the mortality rate has been decreasing by 1.6% per year, and this can be attributed to stage migration and improvements in treatment. One treatment modality that has emerged in recent years is stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which is an advanced radiotherapy technique that allows the delivery of high-dose radiation to the tumor while minimizing doses to the organs at risk. SBRT has developed a role in the treatment of early-stage, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC. In localized disease, phase II trials and meta-analyses have shown that SBRT provides a very high probability of long-term local control with a low risk of severe late toxicity. In oligometastatic (OMD) RCC, the same level of evidence has similarly shown good local control and minimal toxicity. SBRT could also delay the necessity to start or switch systemic treatments. Medical societies have started to incorporate SBRT in their guidelines in the treatment of localized disease and OMD. A possible future role of SBRT involves cytoreduction. It is theorized that SBRT can lower tumor burden and enhance immune-related response, but it cannot be recommended until the results of the phase II trials are published.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valtersson J, Vogsen M, Graumann O, Pietersen PI. Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of a solitary subpleural lung metastasis from breast cancer. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256256. [PMID: 37857535 PMCID: PMC10603477 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
This case presents CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation as a treatment option in a patient with oligometastatic breast cancer who previously had received standard-of-care treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Before cryoablation, the patient received two systemic lines of therapy, several surgeries and radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. The cryoablation was performed in a single 7 mm subpleural oligometastatic lesion 42 months after diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. It was performed without complications, and the patient experienced no complaints or discomfort after the procedure. A 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month follow-up fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT scans showed no sign of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Valtersson
- UNIFY - Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marianne Vogsen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Graumann
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- UNIFY - Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pia Iben Pietersen
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- UNIFY - Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barbour AB, Kirste S, Grosu AL, Siva S, Louie AV, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Teh BS, Psutka SP, Weg ES, Chen JJ, Zeng J, Gore JL, Hall E, Liao JJ, Correa RJM, Lo SS. The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Primary Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3672. [PMID: 37509333 PMCID: PMC10377531 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized renal cell carcinoma is primarily managed surgically, but this disease commonly presents in highly comorbid patients who are poor operative candidates. Less invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are effective, but require percutaneous or laparoscopic access, while generally being limited to cT1a tumors without proximity to the renal pelvis or ureter. Active surveillance is another management option for small renal masses, but many patients desire treatment or are poor candidates for active surveillance. For poor surgical candidates, a growing body of evidence supports stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a safe and effective non-invasive treatment modality. For example, a recent multi-institution individual patient data meta-analysis of 190 patients managed with SABR estimated a 5.5% five-year cumulative incidence of local failure with one patient experiencing grade 4 toxicity, and no other grade ≥3 toxic events. Here, we discuss the recent developments in SABR for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma, highlighting key concepts of appropriate patient selection, treatment design, treatment delivery, and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Liga Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Evan Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duus LA, Junker T, Rasmussen BS, Bojsen JA, Pedersen AL, Anthonsen A, Lund L, Pedersen M, Graumann O. Safety, efficacy, and mid-term oncological outcomes of computed tomography-guided cryoablation of T1 renal cancer. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:814-820. [PMID: 35297745 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221081825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cryoablation is a promising minimally invasive, nephron-sparing treatment of small renal carcinoma (RCC) in co-morbid patients. PURPOSE To assess the safety, efficacy, and cancer-specific outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided cryoablation of stage T1 (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective evaluation of 122 consecutive patients with 128 tumors treated with cryoablation during 2016-2017. All patients had biopsy-verified T1 RCC. RESULTS Median age was 69 years (IQR=59-76); 69% were male. Median tumor size was 26 mm (± 20-33); 9% were stage T1b. Mean follow-up time was 36.3±12.0 months. In total, 14 (11%) procedures led to complications, of which 4 (3%) were intraoperative, 5 (4%) appeared ≤30 days and 5 (4%) >30 days after treatment. Major complications arose after 4 (3%) procedures. Statistically significant associations were found between major complications and stage T1b (P = 0.039), RENAL score (P = 0.010), and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.004). Residual tumor was detected after 4 (3%) procedures and 5 (4%) tumors had local tumor progression. Of 122 patients, 3 (2%) advanced to metastatic disease. Significant statistical associations were found between local tumor progression and T1b stage tumors and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.05 and P = 0.004, respectively). For patients with T1a tumors, the one- and three-year disease-free survival was 98% and 95%, respectively, and for T1b 100% after one year and 75% after three years. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment of stage T1 RCC and suggests that in selecting candidates for cryoablation of RCC, the tumor characteristics are more critical than patients' baseline health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise A Duus
- Department of Radiology, 11286Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense C, Denmark.,Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark.,OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, SDU, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Theresa Junker
- Department of Radiology, 11286Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense C, Denmark.,Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark.,OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, SDU, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Benjamin S Rasmussen
- Department of Radiology, 11286Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense C, Denmark.,Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jonas A Bojsen
- Department of Radiology, 11286Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense C, Denmark.,Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark
| | - Allan L Pedersen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark
| | - Andrea Anthonsen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark
| | - Lars Lund
- Department of Urology, OUH, Odense C, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Research, SDU, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Michael Pedersen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark.,Comparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ole Graumann
- Department of Radiology, 11286Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense C, Denmark.,Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, 6174University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense C, Denmark.,OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, SDU, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diagnostic Strategies for Urologic Cancer Using Expression Analysis of Various Oncogenic Surveillance Molecules—From Non-Coding Small RNAs to Cancer-Specific Proteins. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12157390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Urinary-tract-related tumors are prone to simultaneous or heterogeneous multiple tumor development within the primary organ. Urologic tumors have a very high risk of recurrence in the long and short term. This may be related to the disruption of homeostasis on the genetic level, such as the induction of genetic mutations due to exposure to various carcinogenic factors and the disruption of cancer suppressor gene functions. It is essential to detect the cancer progression signals caused by genetic abnormalities and find treatment therapies. In this review, we discuss the usefulness of tumor-expressing clinical biomarkers for predicting cancer progression. Furthermore, we discuss various factors associated with disturbed intracellular signals and those targeted by microRNAs, which are representative of non-coding small RNAs.
Collapse
|