The diagnostic effect of sequential detection of ADA screening and T-SPOT assay in pleural effusion patients

Application of Adenosine Deaminase and γ-Interferon Release Assay in Pleural Fluid for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion in Patients Over 40 Years Old

Background

In patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) of various ages, the diagnostic accuracy of pleural biomarkers varies, and there are insufficient studies specifically in different age groups. Therefore, we investigated the adenosine deaminase cut-off value and its combination with the gamma interferon release assay for the diagnosis of TPE among patients aged ≥40 years.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 198 patients who underwent medical thoracoscopy and were admitted to the hospital between 2015 and 2020 with exudative pleural effusion and either fever, night sweats, fatigue, cough, or other clinical manifestations was performed. The medical thoracoscopy, ADA, and T-SPOT results were analysed in the pleural fluid. The patients were divided into groups based on age: 18-39, 40-59, and 60-87.

Results

The best cut-off values of ADA were 29.5, 31.5 and 19.5 U/L, respectively, for the aged 18-39, aged 40-87 and aged 60-87 groups. The accuracy of 31.5 U/L was higher than 40 U/L for aged ≥40 years (86 vs 83%). The ADA diagnostic accuracy was higher than that of people under 40 years (83 vs 77%) when cut-off value of ADA was 40 U/L, but the IGRA accuracy was lower than that of people under 40 (87 vs 91%). The sensitivity of ADA or IGRA detection in patients over 40 years was 99%, and the specificity was 78%. The ADA specificity combined with IGRA for TPE was the highest (100%) in the ≥40 age group, and the sensitivity was 69%.

Conclusion

Our study revealed the best cut-off values of ADA for TBE in different age groups. Combining ADA and IGRA in pleural fluid improves the detection rate of TPE in patients over 40 years of age with exudative pleural effusion. ADA combined with IGRA increases specificity, and ADA or IGRA increases sensitivity substantially.

Diagnostic performance of adenosine deaminase for abdominal tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aim

Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a common type of extrapulmonary TB with an insidious onset and non-specific symptoms. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels increase rapidly in the early stages of abdominal TB. However, it remains unclear whether ADA serves as a diagnostic marker for abdominal TB.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search for relevant articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to April 2022. First, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool-2 (QUADAS-2), to evaluate the quality of the included articles. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models were then utilized to analyze pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In addition, we explored a subgroup analysis for potential heterogeneity and publication bias among the included literature.

Results

Twenty-four articles (3,044 participants, 3,044 samples) which met the eligibility criteria were included in this study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ADA for abdominal TB detection were 93% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 95% (95% CI: 0.93-0.96), respectively. PLR and NLR were 18.6 (95% CI: 14.0-24.6) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12), respectively. DOR and AUROC were 236 (95% CI: 134-415) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), respectively. Furthermore, no heterogeneity or publication bias was found.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis found ADA to be of excellent diagnostic value for abdominal TB and could be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022297931.

The diagnostic value of T cell spot test and adenosine deaminase in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous infection of T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) have a high diagnostic value in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy. However, there were major differences in existing research in regard to the clinical application of the two trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and ADA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched to compare diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by T-SPOT.TB and ADA. The search period was from inception to August 31, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-disc 1.4, Revman 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize overall diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

10 qualified original research studies were included, with a total of 2075 patients, of which were 1391 tuberculous pleurisy and 684 non-tuberculous pleurisy. The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of T-SPOT.TB were as follows: sensitivity, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90; I² = 92.7%); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82; I² = 93.7%); PLR, 4.49 (95% CI: 2.29-8.80; I² = 94.9%); NLR, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.30; I² = 94.3%), DOR, 35.72 (95% CI: 11.15-114.47; I² = 91.5%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9283 (95% CI: 0.8912-0.9654). The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ADA were as follows: sensitivity, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.62-0.67; I² = 98.2%); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.92; I² = 69.4%); PLR, 6.12 (95% CI: 4.71-7.96; I² = 11.9%); NLR, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.12-0.89; I² = 99.5%), DOR, 23.18 (95% CI: 12.75-42.14; I² = 66.7%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9208 (95% CI: 0.9029-0.9387).

CONCLUSION

Both T-SPOT.TB and ADA had high value in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was higher than ADA, but the specificity of ADA was higher than T-SPOT.TB. On the whole, T-SPOT. TB had similar diagnostic accuracy to ADA.

Use of T-SPOT.TB for the diagnosis of unconventional pleural tuberculosis is superior to ADA in high prevalence areas: a prospective analysis of 601 cases

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common extrapulmonary manifestation and may have lasting effect on lung function. However conventional diagnostic tests for TPE register multiple limitations. This study estimates diagnostic efficacy of the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA: T-SPOT.TB) in TPE patients of different characteristics.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, single-centre study including all suspected pleural effusion patients consecutively enrolled from June 2015 to October 2018. Through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, technical cut-offs and the utility of T-SPOT on pleural fluid (PF) were determined and analysed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to obtain the independent risk factors for TPE, and evaluated the performance of the T-SPOT assay stratified by risk factors in comparison to ADA.

RESULTS

A total of 601 individuals were consecutively recruited. The maximum spot-forming cells (SFCs) of early secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) and culture filtrate protein-10 (CFP-10) in the PF T-SPOT assay had the best diagnostic efficiency in our study, which was equal to ADA (0.885 vs 0.887, P = 0.957) and superior to peripheral blood (PB), with a sensitivity of 83.0% and a specificity of 83.1% (The cut-off value was 466 SFCs/10⁶ mononuclear cells). Among the TPE patients with low ADA (< 40 IU/L), the sensitivity and specificity of PF T-SPOT were still 87.9 and 90.5%, respectively. The utility of ADA was negatively related to increasing age, but the PF T-SPOT test had a steady performance at all ages. Age (< 45 yrs.; odds ratio (OR) = 5.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.59-8.78; P < 0.001), gender (male; OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.75-2.88; P < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (< 22; OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.30-2.88; P = 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of TB by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Notably, when stratified by risk factor, the sensitivity of PF T-SPOT was superior to the sensitivity for ADA (76.5% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.016) and had noninferior specificity (84.4% vs. 96.9%, P = 0.370).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the PF T-SPOT assay can effectively discriminate TPE patients whose ADA is lower than 40 IU/L and is superior to ADA in unconventional TPE patients (age ≥ 45 yrs., female or BMI ≥ 22). The PF T-SPOT assay is an excellent choice to supplement ADA to diagnose TPE.