Speech auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant recipients in relation to rehabilitation outcomes

Electrophysiological study of visual processing in children with cochlear implants

Electrophysiological studies of congenitally deaf children and adults have reported atypical visual evoked potentials (VEPs) which have been associated with both behavioral enhancements of visual attention as well as poorer performance and outcomes in tests of spoken language speech processing. This pattern has often been interpreted as a maladaptive consequence of early auditory deprivation, whereby a remapping of auditory cortex by the visual system ultimately reduces resources necessary for optimal rehabilitative outcomes of spoken language acquisition and use. Making use of a novel electrophysiological paradigm, we compare VEPs in children with severe to profound congenital deafness who received a cochlear implant(s) prior to 31 months (n = 28) and typically developing age matched controls (n = 28). We observe amplitude enhancements and in some cases latency differences in occipitally expressed P1 and N1 VEP components in CI-using children as well as an early frontal negativity, N1a. We relate these findings to developmental factors such as chronological age and spoken language understanding. We further evaluate whether VEPs are additionally modulated by auditory stimulation. Collectively, these data provide a means to examine the extent to which atypical VEPs are consistent with prior accounts of maladaptive cross-modal plasticity. Our results support a view that VEP changes reflect alterations to visual-sensory attention and saliency mechanisms rather than a re-mapping of auditory cortex. The present data suggests that early auditory deprivation may have temporally prolonged effects on visual system processing even after activation and use of cochlear implant.

Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants

PURPOSE

This research examined the expression of cortical auditory evoked potentials in a cohort of children who received cochlear implants (CIs) for treatment of congenital deafness (n = 28) and typically hearing controls (n = 28).

METHOD

We make use of a novel electroencephalography paradigm that permits the assessment of auditory responses to ambiently presented speech and evaluates the contributions of concurrent visual stimulation on this activity.

RESULTS

Our findings show group differences in the expression of auditory sensory and perceptual event-related potential components occurring in 80- to 200-ms and 200- to 300-ms time windows, with reductions in amplitude and a greater latency difference for CI-using children. Relative to typically hearing children, current source density analysis showed muted responses to concurrent visual stimulation in CI-using children, suggesting less cortical specialization and/or reduced responsiveness to auditory information that limits the detection of the interaction between sensory systems.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that even in the face of early interventions, CI-using children may exhibit disruptions in the development of auditory and multisensory processing.

Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in cochlear implant users: a systematic review of acquisition parameters, analysis, and outcomes

PURPOSE

To characterize the acquisition parameters, analysis, and results of the frequency-following response (FFR) in cochlear implant users.

RESEARCH STRATEGIES

The search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Ovid Technologies, PubMed, SciELO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and gray literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies on FFR in cochlear implant users or that compared them with normal-hearing people, with no restriction of age, were included. Secondary and experimental studies were excluded. There was no restriction of language or year of publication.

DATA ANALYSIS

The data were analyzed and reported according to the stages in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 2020. The methodological quality was analyzed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Divergences were solved by a third researcher.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one study was comparative, whose control group comprised normal-hearing people. The variations in acquisition parameters were common and the analysis predominantly approached the time domain. Cochlear implant users had different FFR results from those of normal-hearing people, considering the existing literature. Most articles had low methodological quality.

CONCLUSION

There is no standardized FFR acquisition and analysis protocol for cochlear implant users. The results have a high risk of bias.