1
|
Dranseika V, Nichols S, Strohminger N. Which kind of sameness? Disambiguating two senses of identity with a novel linguistic task. Cognition 2023; 238:105545. [PMID: 37419066 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
When people report that a person's identity has changed, what do they mean by this? Recent research has often assumed that participants are indicating a change in numerical, rather than qualitative, identity. Investigations into this matter have been hampered by the fact that English has no clear way to demarcate one type of identity from the other. To resolve this matter, we develop and test a novel task in Lithuanian, which has lexical markers for numerical and qualitative identity. We apply this task to intuitions about changes in moral capacities, which has previously shown to lead to high ratings in identity change. We discover that, when people say that a morally altered person is dramatically different, they mean the person is qualitatively transformed, but numerically intact. We conclude that this methodology is a valuable tool not only for illuminating the specific phenomenon of the moral self, but for general use in studying folk ascriptions of identity persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vilius Dranseika
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Poland.
| | - Shaun Nichols
- Department of Philosophy, Cornell University, United States of America.
| | - Nina Strohminger
- Department of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kimball TG, Hune ND, Shumway ST, Bradshaw SD. Exploring the Long-term 12-Step Collegiate Recovery Experiences of Emerging Adults: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2022.2068990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G. Kimball
- Department of Community, Family and Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole D. Hune
- Department of Community, Family and Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Sterling T. Shumway
- Department of Community, Family and Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Spencer D. Bradshaw
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vickstrom CR, Snarrenberg ST, Friedman V, Liu QS. Application of optogenetics and in vivo imaging approaches for elucidating the neurobiology of addiction. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27:640-651. [PMID: 34145393 PMCID: PMC9190069 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The neurobiology of addiction has been an intense topic of investigation for more than 50 years. Over this time, technological innovation in methods for studying brain function rapidly progressed, leading to increasingly sophisticated experimental approaches. To understand how specific brain regions, cell types, and circuits are affected by drugs of abuse and drive behaviors characteristic of addiction, it is necessary both to observe and manipulate neural activity in addiction-related behavioral paradigms. In pursuit of this goal, there have been several key technological advancements in in vivo imaging and neural circuit modulation in recent years, which have shed light on the cellular and circuit mechanisms of addiction. Here we discuss some of these key technologies, including circuit modulation with optogenetics, in vivo imaging with miniaturized single-photon microscopy (miniscope) and fiber photometry, and how the application of these technologies has garnered novel insights into the neurobiology of addiction.
Collapse
|
4
|
Finlay M, Starmans C. Not the same same: Distinguishing between similarity and identity in judgments of change. Cognition 2021; 218:104953. [PMID: 34784500 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
What makes someone the same person over time? There are (at least) two ways of understanding this question: A person can be the same in the sense of being very similar to how they used to be (similarity), or they can be the same in the sense of being the same individual (numerical identity). In recent years, several papers have claimed to explore the commonsense notion of numerical identity. However, we suggest here that these researchers have instead been studying similarity. We develop a novel method that uses simple intuitions about objects to illustrate these two notions of "same person", and then asks which concept applies to instances of personal change. Across 4 studies (N = 2446), we find that these previously documented intuitions are best understood as reflecting judgments about similarity, not identity (Experiments 1 and 2). We then use this method to explore the situations in which participants do perceive a change in numerical identity. We find that when a person's entire brain (Experiments 3 and 4) or soul (Experiment 4) has been replaced with that of another person, the majority of participants judge that numerical identity has changed. However, we also note that a substantial minority of participants denied that identity had changed, opening new questions about the role of the body in intuitive judgments of personal identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Finlay
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tuck N, Glenn LM. Cultivating conscience: Moral neurohabilitation of adolescents and young adults with conduct and/or antisocial personality disorders. BIOETHICS 2021; 35:337-347. [PMID: 33609403 PMCID: PMC8247950 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Individuals diagnosed with conduct disorder (CD) in childhood and adolescence are at risk for increasingly maladaptive and dangerous behaviors, which unchecked, can lead to antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in adulthood. Children with CD, especially those with the callous unemotional subgroup qualifier ("limited prosocial emotions"/DSM-5), present with a more severe pattern of delinquency, aggression, and antisocial behavior, all markings of prodrome ASPD. Given this recognized diagnostic trajectory, with a pathological course playing out tragically at the individual, familial, and societal level, and lack of effective remediation via current standards of care, we posit an alternate treatment approach; case-specific compulsory moral habilitation aimed at rectifying the undeveloped affective domain of adolescents and young adults suffering from these disorders. We begin with a brief historical overview of response to mental illness, review CD and ASPD diagnostic criteria and treatment limitations, and posit a unique neurohabilitative approach that focuses on the absent affective moral development of these populations. Next, we invoke a public health safety argument to justify case-specific compulsory moral habilitation, discuss neurotechnologies to be considered in treatment, and conclude with ethical considerations and suggestions for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Tuck
- Albany Medical CollegeAlden March Bioethics InstituteAlbanyNew YorkUnited States
- Molloy CollegePhilosophy DepartmentRockville CentreNew YorkUnited States
| | - Linda MacDonald Glenn
- Albany Medical CollegeAlden March Bioethics InstituteAlbanyNew YorkUnited States
- University of California Santa Cruz, Crown CollegeSanta CruzCaliforniaUnited States
- California State University Monterey BaySeasideCaliforniaUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Earp BD, Demaree-Cotton J, Dunn M, Dranseika V, Everett JAC, Feltz A, Geller G, Hannikainen IR, Jansen LA, Knobe J, Kolak J, Latham S, Lerner A, May J, Mercurio M, Mihailov E, Rodríguez-Arias D, Rodríguez López B, Savulescu J, Sheehan M, Strohminger N, Sugarman J, Tabb K, Tobia K. Experimental Philosophical Bioethics. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 11:30-33. [PMID: 32096728 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1714792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Earp
- Department of Philosophy, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Yale-Hastings Program in Ethics and Health Policy, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York, USA.,Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Michael Dunn
- The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vilius Dranseika
- Institute of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Jim A C Everett
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Adam Feltz
- Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Gail Geller
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ivar R Hannikainen
- Department of Law, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lynn A Jansen
- Center for Ethics, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Joshua Knobe
- Department of Philosophy, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Julia Kolak
- Department of Philosophy, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephen Latham
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Adam Lerner
- Center for Bioethics, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Joshua May
- Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Mark Mercurio
- Program for Biomedical Ethics, Yale Medical School, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Emilian Mihailov
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.,Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Julian Savulescu
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Sheehan
- The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nina Strohminger
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathryn Tabb
- Department of Philosophy, Bard College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Tobia
- Department of Philosophy, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Yale Law School, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|