Successful dose escalation of tofacitinib for refractory dermatomyositis and interstitial lung disease with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies

Baricitinib for anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease: a case series and literature review on Janus kinase inhibitors for the disease

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5-DM) is frequently complicated by progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD), the prognosis of which is poor, and management is a major challenge. We treated three patients with anti-MDA5-DM-associated ILD (anti-MDA5-DM-ILD) using the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, baricitinib, which improved lung opacities and saved two patients. We reviewed 6 patients with anti-MDA5-DM-ILD who had been treated with tofacitinib at our institution. Five of the patients survived, although discontinuation of tofacitinib due to complications was frequently observed. In addition, a literature search of patients with anti-MDA5-DM-ILD who were treated with JAK inhibitors yielded 21 articles involving 79 cases. All patients except one were treated with tofacitinib, and the survival rate was 75.9%. Although not statistically confirmed, the deceased patients tended to be older and had higher ferritin levels. A total of 92 complications were observed, 11 of which resulted in JAK inhibitor discontinuation. Cytomegalovirus reactivation comprised a substantial percentage of all complications and of those patients who required JAK inhibitor discontinuation. Five cases with fatal infective complications were also observed. While tofacitinib has been proposed to be a therapeutic option for anti-MDA5-DM-ILD, other JAK inhibitors, including baricitinib, are a treatment option. Further investigation is warranted to optimize treatment of anti-MDA5-DM-ILD.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in treating polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a single-arm systemic meta-analysis

Introduction

We performed a single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM)/ polymyositis (PM).

Methods

Relevant studies from four databases were systematically searched until April 25, 2023. The primary endpoint was Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and other outcomes were Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) and Creatine Kinase (CK). According to the type of JAK and medication regimen, we conducted subgroup analyses. The registration number in PROSPERO was CRD42023416493.

Results

According to the selection criteria, we identified 7 publications with a total of 91 patients. Regarding skin lesions, the CDASI decreased by 17.67 (95% CI: -20.94 ~ -14.41). The CK increased by 8.64 U (95% CI: -28.25 ~ 45.53). About muscle lesions, MMT increased by 10.31 (95% CI: -2.83 ~ 23.46). Subgroup analysis revealed that different types of JAK inhibitors had various degrees of reduction. CDASI in patients treated with RUX had the lowest one [-20.00 (95% CI: -34.9 ~ -5.1)], followed by TOF [-18.29 (95% CI: -21.8 ~ -14.78)] and BAR [-11.2 (95% CI: -21.51 ~ -0.89)]. Additionally, the mean reduction in CDASI in patients treated with TOF alone was 16.16 (95% CI: -21.21 ~ -11.11), in combination with other immunosuppressants was 18.59 (95% CI: -22.74 ~ -14.45). For safety evaluation, one patient developed Orolabial HSV, and two patients developed thromboembolism events.

Discussion

In summary, this meta-analysis demonstrated that JAK inhibitors can potentially treat DM/PM without severe adverse reactions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416493, identifier CRD42023416493.

Tofacitinib for new-onset adult patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 gene antibody positive dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in adult anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 gene (Anti-MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (DM) patients and evaluate the effects of tofacitinib on peripheral lymphocyte subsets.

METHODS

An open-label study was conducted of 15 new-onset, untreated adult patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM for tofacitinib with a dose of 5mg twice per day. The primary outcome was defined by the total improvement score after treatment for 6 months, classified according to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) response criteria for adult DM and polymyositis. Secondary outcomes after 6 months treatment comprised the change in predicted forced vital capacity, the percentage of predicted carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, ferritin level and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Disease responses occurred in 10 patients (71.4%) after 6 months. The median total improvement score was 43.75 (41.875-59.375). Two patients achieved major improvement, seven achieved moderate and one minimal. The serum ferritin level (p = 0.008), DLCO% (p = 0.009) was improved and a marked increase in total lymphocyte cells (p = 0.045) and CD8+ T cells (p = 0.006) was measured after 6 months treatment compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib demonstrates efficacy for new-onset, untreated adult patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM and stimulates proliferation of peripheral lymphocyte subsets (especially total lymphocyte cells and CD8+ T cells) after 6 months treatment. Further studies are warranted to validate the current findings. Key Points • Treatment of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 gene antibody positive dermatomyositis is always challenging. • This prospective, open-label clinical trial demonstrates tofacitinib is an effective and safe agent for new-onset adult patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM. • Tofacitinib treatment results in an increase in peripheral lymphocyte numbers, especially CD8+ T cells at 6 months compared with pre-treatment levels.

Efficacy and safety of dose escalation of tofacitinib in refractory anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5-DM) is frequently complicated with rapidly progressive-interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). The prognosis of MDA5-DM with RP-ILD is mostly poor despite intensive treatment with a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and single conventional immunosuppressants. It was reported that the triple therapy (high-dose glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus) was more effective than a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and stepwise addition of immunosuppressants. In addition, the efficacy of tofacitinib 10 mg/day for MDA5-DM with RP-ILD refractory to the triple therapy was suggested. However, the effect of those therapies was evaluated only in comparison to the historical control. Moreover, more importantly, there are still refractory patients even if treated with those therapies. In this case series, we report six MDA5-DM cases with RP-ILD in which the dose of tofacitinib was increased from 10 mg to 20 mg/day due to poor response to the triple therapy, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg/day. Four of six patients improved after dose escalation of tofacitinib, while two non-responders died. All six patients developed at least one infection including five cases of cytomegalovirus reactivation, one pulmonary aspergillosis, one herpes zoster and one herpes simplex keratitis. These cases suggest that the dose escalation of tofacitinib can be an option for MDA5-DM patients refractory to 10 mg/day of tofacitinib and other immunosuppressants although the risk of infection is a concern. The risk-benefit balance of the dose escalation of tofacitinib should be carefully assessed in each case.

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Update on dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes and comments on current knowledge in dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification of dermatomyositis has been challenging by the discovery of clinicopathological features associated with dermatomyositis-specific antibody (DMSA) that were not incorporated in the original criteria. These features include but may not be limited to the presence of perifascicular necrosis in anti-Mi-2 dermatomyositis; presence of diffuse nonperifascicular sarcoplasmic myxovirus resistance protein A expression in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis; and dermatomyositis sine dermatitis in anti-NXP-2 dermatomyositis. Variations and subclassifications within the same DMSA subtypes are observed: anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis is clinically subcategorized into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic subgroups; concurrent anti-CCAR1 and anti-TIF1-γ positivity identify anti-TIF1-γ-positive patient with a lower risk for cancer-associated myositis. Owing to distinct IFN1-signaling pathway activation in dermatomyositis, JAK-STAT inhibitor - the pathway-targeted therapy, have been studied with promising results in refractory dermatomyositis and some new-onset dermatomyositis. In addition, the potential serum biomarkers for IFN1 pathway activation are being investigated for their performance in monitoring the disease activity and the efficacy of the treatment.

SUMMARY

DMSA, evidence of prominent IFN1 pathway activation, and risk/severity-associated biomarkers would likely play major roles in future dermatomyositis classification, disease monitoring, and treatment decision.

Advancements in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Dermatomyositis: A Review of the Literature

Background

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune diseases that present with a wide variety of cutaneous manifestations. In both cases, first-line therapy includes topical corticosteroids. Patients may present with more widespread disease requiring systemic treatments, including corticosteroids, traditional immunosuppressants, or antimalarials. Due to their complex nature, both CLE and DM remain difficult to treat and continue to cause significant distress to patients.

Objective

To summarize the most recent literature on the safety and efficacy of novel treatment modalities for CLE and DM.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on PubMed using search terms “(dermatomyositis) AND (treatment)” and “(cutaneous lupus) AND (treatment)”. Additional search terms included specific names of biologic agents, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (apremilast), and JAK inhibitors.

Results

JAK inhibitors, PDE-4 inhibitors, and biologics have shown promise in reducing cutaneous symptoms of both CLE and DM, including reduction in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), and Disease Activity Score (DAS).

Conclusion

While there have been recent advancements in the treatment for CLE and DM, further research and clinical trials are required to better elucidate which therapy is best for individual patients.

Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part II. Dermatomyositis and Scleroderma

The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The second article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for dermatomyositis and scleroderma that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.

Short-term effectiveness of baricitinib in children with refractory and/or severe juvenile dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the short-term effectiveness safety of baricitinib in children with refractory and/or severe juvenile dermatomyositis (rsJDM) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study, including 20 children with rsJDM. They were all treated using baricitinib combined with steroids and other immunosuppressive agents. The childhood myositis assessment scale (CMAS) and PRINTO remission criteria were used to evaluate the disease severity and treatment outcome at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after initiation of baricitinib.

RESULTS

The skin rash improved in 95% of patients (19/20) at week 24, with a significant decrease of skin-DAS at weeks 12 (6.0 vs. 2.0, p < 0.05] and week 24 [6.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.05) by median statistics. The CMAS score increased significantly at week 12 (41.0 [29.0, 44.0] vs. 46.0 [42.0, 52.0], p < 0.05) and week 24 (41.0 [29.0, 44.0] vs. 50.0 [45.0, 52.0], p < 0.05), as did the manual muscle testing (MMT)-8 score at week 24 (73.0 [610, 76.0] vs. 79.0 [77.0, 80.0], p < 0.05). At 24 weeks, the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were achieved in 75% (15/20) and 15% (3/20), respectively. The dose of corticosteroids (CS) decreased by 37% from the baseline (0.53 [0.42, 1.00] mg/kg) to week 12 (0.33 [0.18, 0.40] mg/kg) (p < 0.05), and by 49% at week 24 (p < 0.05). No serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Baricitinib combined with traditional immunosuppressants treatment was efficacious in rsJDM. Add-on therapy of baricitinib was helpful for tapering CS dose. No serious side effects were observed in this study.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Anti-MDA5 Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose of the Review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders. The presence of different autoantibodies allows clinicians to define distinct phenotypes. Antibodies against the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 gene, also called anti-MDA5 antibodies, are associated with a characteristic phenotype, the clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. This review aims to analyze the different pharmacological options for the treatment of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies.

Recent Findings

Evidence-based therapeutic recommendations suggest that the best initial approach to treat these patients is an early combination of immunosuppressive drugs including either glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors or a triple therapy adding intravenous cyclophosphamide. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, could be useful according to recent reports. High ferritin plasma levels, generalized worsening of pulmonary infiltrates, and ground-glass opacities should be considered predictive factors of a bad outcome. In this scenario, clinicians should consider rescue therapies such as therapeutic plasma exchange, polymyxin-B hemoperfusion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or even lung transplantation.

Summary

Combined immunosuppressive treatment should be considered the first-line therapy for patients with anti-MDA5 rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Aggressive rescue therapies may be useful in refractory patients.

Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Severe Interstitial Lung Disease Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease characterized by chronic symmetrical erosive synovitis and extra-articular manifestations, including interstitial lung disease (ILD), whose treatment is nowadays challenging due to high infectious risk and possible pulmonary iatrogenic toxicity. Janus kinase inhibitors, namely, tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, are the latest drug class for the treatment of RA with a good safety profile. We present the case of a patient with RA-ILD successfully treated with tofacitinib. A 52-year-old man was referred to our multidisciplinary clinic for rheumatic and pulmonary diseases for an active erosive seropositive RA and progressive ILD. Previous treatments were GC, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, etanercept, withdrawn after ILD detection, and tocilizumab, discontinued due to relapsing infections. After our evaluation, we proposed rituximab in addition to low-dose GC and hydroxychloroquine, ineffective on joint involvement. Therefore, we proposed tofacitinib which allowed us to control joint involvement, stabilize ILD improving respiratory symptoms, and manage the frequent infectious episodes that occurred initially. The short half-life and rapid-acting of tofacitinib are two helpful characteristics regarding this aspect. Despite limited data from randomized trials and real-life, tofacitinib could represent a safe therapeutic option for RA-ILD patients. Longitudinal studies are required to confirm this encouraging report.

Management of Myositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, including polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), and clinically amyopathic DM (CADM), are a diverse group of autoimmune diseases characterized by muscular involvement and extramuscular manifestations. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major pulmonary involvement and is associated with increased mortality in PM/DM/CADM. The management of PM-/DM-/CADM-associated ILD (PM/DM/CADM-ILD) requires careful evaluation of the disease severity and clinical subtype, including the ILD forms (acute/subacute or chronic), because of the substantial heterogeneity of their clinical courses. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of myositis-specific autoantibodies’ status, especially anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) and anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies, in order to evaluate the clinical phenotypes and treatment of choice for PM/DM/CADM-ILD. Because the presence of the anti-MDA5 antibody is a strong predictor of a worse prognosis, combination treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporin A (CsA)) is recommended for patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM/CADM-ILD. Rapidly progressive DM/CADM-ILD with the anti-MDA5 antibody is the most intractable condition, which requires immediate combined immunosuppressive therapy with GCs, CNIs, and intravenous cyclophosphamide. Additional salvage therapies (rituximab, tofacitinib, and plasma exchange) should be considered for patients with refractory ILD. Patients with anti-ARS antibody-positive ILD respond better to GC treatment, but with frequent recurrence; thus, GCs plus immunosuppressants (TAC, CsA, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil) are often needed in order to achieve favorable long-term disease control. PM/DM/CADM-ILD management is still a therapeutic challenge for clinicians, as evidence-based guidelines do not exist to help with management decisions. A few prospective clinical trials have been recently reported regarding the treatment of PM/DM/CADM-ILD. Here, the current knowledge on the pharmacologic managements of PM/DM/CADM-ILD was mainly reviewed.

JAK-inhibitors for dermatomyositis: A concise literature review

Refractory dermatomyositis (DM) is defined as cases that do not show improvement after initial treatment with two different immunosuppressives combined with corticosteroids with or without intravenous immunoglobulins. In recent years, few studies have reported a positive response to the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-inhibitors) for the treatment of refractory DM. A systematic literature review was performed for articles studying the use of JAK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory DM. We identified 38 females and 15 males treated with JAK-inhibitors without serious side effects. Tofacitinib was the most frequently used JAK-inhibitor followed by ruxolitinib. Significant improvement in CDASI score, muscle strength, body weight, and skin lesions were reported in most of the studies. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 15 months without relapse. Therefore, the use of JAK-inhibitors looks promising in the treatment of refractory DM and further high volume research may be required to validate the current concept. As only case reports and series were identified without direct comparison for review, there is a potential risk of bias. Despite these limitations, we believe that the result of this analysis allows a better understanding of treatment options for refractory DM and will help generate a hypothesis that can be further tested.