Urine Drug Screen Trends from 1998 through 2011 Among Emergency Department Patients Treated in a University Teaching Hospital

Retrospective chart review of substance abuse in patients with psychiatric emergencies in an emerging urban county

Objectives

Substance abuse is common in patients with psychiatric emergencies. To further understand the connection between substance abuse and psychiatric disorders, a retrospective chart review was done that included positive drug screens among patients with psychiatric emergencies and to determine whether there was an association between substances used and the psychiatric diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients seen in an emergency department with psychiatric emergencies was conducted. The review comprised 1000 charts with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, alcohol abuse, or schizoaffective disorder. Data collected included patient demographics, tobacco abuse, chief complaint, arrival mode, voluntary versus involuntary status, suicide attempt on presentation, psychiatric diagnoses, urine drug screen, and ethanol results. Chi-square statistical analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between substances of abuse and psychiatric diagnoses.

Results

Approximately 58% of patients with a history of psychiatric illness had a positive urine drug screen. Of 245 patients with schizoaffective disorder, 69 (28%) were positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 48 (20%) were positive for cocaine. Of 225 patients with depression, 59 (29%) were positive for THC and 33 (15%) were positive for cocaine. Cannabis was the most commonly reported substance used among patients with depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder, and ethanol was most common in patients with ADHD. No significant correlations were found between psychiatric diagnosis and positive drug screens. A statistically significant secondary end point was found that White people using cannabinoids were more likely to attempt suicide than were African American people (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Positive drug screens were common among patients presenting to an ED with psychiatric emergencies. Cannabis was the most commonly reported substance used among patients independent of diagnosis. Ethanol was the most common in patients with ADHD. Urine drug screens are unlikely to provide insights into relationships between specific substance use and psychiatric emergencies.

Community overdose surveillance: Comparing substances collected from the death scene investigation to toxicology results

BACKGROUND

Recent overdose trends are characterized by increased toxicological detection of stimulants with opioids, yet it is unclear whether these substances are mixed prior to consumption or purposefully used simultaneously.

METHODS

Postmortem toxicology data were collected in Marion County, Indiana, from 45 fatal overdose cases involving heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine, or cocaine. Substances found by death scene investigators at the scene of the fatal overdose (57 samples) were tested using high-pressure liquid chromatography mass-spectrometry (LC-MS) technology. We compared toxicology and LC-MS results to understand whether substances contributing to overdose were found in combination or separately at the scene of the overdose.

RESULTS

Comparing toxicology reports with LC-MS results from substances found at the scene of overdose deaths involving opioids and stimulants reveal that deaths are largely the result of the co-use of opioids and stimulants, rather than use of stimulants combined with opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Collecting and testing physical samples from fatal overdose scenes and comparing these to post-mortem toxicology results is a new way to examine polydrug use patterns. This community overdose surveillance method can be used to improve overdose prevention and response efforts.

How Do Clinicians of Different Specialties Perceive and Use Opioid Risk Mitigation Strategies? A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

In response to the opioid crisis, states and health systems are encouraging clinicians to use risk mitigation strategies aimed at assessing a patient's risk for opioid misuse or abuse: opioid agreements, prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), and urine drug tests (UDT). Objective: The objective of this qualitative study was to understand how clinicians perceived and used risk mitigation strategies for opioid abuse/misuse and identify barriers to implementation. Methods: We interviewed clinicians who prescribe opioid medications in the outpatient setting from 2016-2018 and analyzed the data using Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology. Results: We interviewed 21 primary care clinicians and 12 specialists. Nearly all clinicians reported using the PDMP. Some clinicians (adopters) found the opioid agreement and UDTs to be valuable, but most (non-adopters) did not. Adopters found the agreements and UDTs helpful in treating patients equitably, setting limits, and having objective evidence of misuse; protocols and workflows facilitated the use of the strategies. Non-adopters perceived the strategies as awkward, disruptive to the clinician-patient relationship, and introducing a power differential; they also cited lack of time and resources as barriers to use. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that clinicians in certain settings have found effective ways to implement and use the PDMP, opioid agreements, and UDT but that other clinicians are less comfortable with their use. Administrators and policymakers should ensure that the strategies are designed in a way that strengthens the clinician-patient relationship while maximizing safety for patients and that clinicians are adequately trained and supported when introducing the strategies.