Effects of transdermal estrogens on endothelial function in postmenopausal women with coronary disease

Use of MHT in women with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review assesses the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using methodology from a previous Cochrane review. Quality assessment used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale, respectively. From 5647 studies identified, 29 (23 RCTs and six observational studies) were included. Most studies were conducted in North America or Europe and investigated oral estrogens. Participants were older with varying frequency of cardiac risk factors and underlying CVD. No significant difference was observed between MHT users and controls regarding primary outcomes of non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death or stroke. No difference in frequency of angina, heart failure and transient ischemic attacks was observed. Inconsistent effects of MHT on angiographic progression were seen and varied with glycemic status. Estradiol had a positive effect on flow-mediated dilatation. Limited studies identified differing effects of MHT on cardiac risk factors, varying with estrogen preparation. This study confirms no benefit of MHT for secondary CVD prevention, highlighting evidence limitations and the importance of shared decision-making when managing menopausal symptoms in women with CVD.

The benefits and risks of menopause hormone therapy for the cardiovascular system in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Menopause hormone therapy (MHT), as an effective method to alleviate the menopause-related symptoms of women, its benefits, risks, and potential influencing factors for the cardiovascular system of postmenopausal women are not very clear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate cardiovascular benefits and risks of MHT in postmenopausal women, and analyze the underlying factors that affect both.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from 1975 to July 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) that met pre-specified inclusion criteria were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently. A meta-analysis of random effects was used to analyze data.

MAIN RESULTS

This systematic review identified 33 RCTs using MHT involving 44,639 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 60.3 (range 48 to 72 years). There was no significant difference between MHT and placebo (or no treatment) in all-cause death (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.09, I2 = 14%) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.97, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.14, I2 = 38%) in the overall population of postmenopausal women. However, MHT would increase the risk of stroke (RR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.41,I2 = 0%) and venous thromboembolism (RR = 1.86, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.50, I2 = 24%). Compared with placebo, MHT could improve flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) (SMD = 1.46, 95%CI 0.86 to 2.07, I2 = 90%), but it did not improve nitroglycerin-mediated arterial dilation (NMD) (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI - 0.08 to 0.62, I2 = 76%). Compared with women started MHT more than 10 years after menopause, women started MHT within 10 years after menopause had lower frequency of all-cause death (P = 0.02) and cardiovascular events (P = 0.002), and more significant improvement in FMD (P = 0.0003). Compared to mono-estrogen therapy, the combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone would not alter the outcomes of endpoint event. (all-cause death P = 0.52, cardiovascular events P = 0.90, stroke P = 0.85, venous thromboembolism P = 0.33, FMD P = 0.46, NMD P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

MHT improves flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) but fails to lower the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events, and increases the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women. Early acceptance of MHT not only reduces the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events but also further improves FMD, although the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis is not reduced. There is no difference in the outcome of cardiovascular system endpoints between mono-estrogen therapy and combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone.

Treatment for the menopause in Central America: use, knowledge, perceptions and attitudes among urban living middle-aged women

BACKGROUND

Data on social and personal aspects of Central America are lacking in relation to hormone therapy (HT) and other treatments for the menopause.

OBJECTIVE

To gain information regarding the treatment of the menopause (HT/alternative): use, knowledge, perceptions and attitudes among middle-aged Central American women.

METHODS

A total of 720 urban living women (35-65 years) from six Central American countries (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama) were surveyed with a structured questionnaire that included socio-demographic data and information regarding the menopause and its treatment.

RESULTS

Participating countries displayed significant socio-demographic differences. Forty-one percent of all women were postmenopausal and 5.8% had no education at all. Knowledge regarding menopausal treatment options varied; while 27.2% (196/720) indicated HT as an option a higher rate (36.3%) either did not respond or answered not knowing anything. HT use for the whole sample was rather low 2.7% with differences seen among countries. 13.8% (27/196) indicated to have been on HT but abandoned treatment because of medical indication (51.9%), undesired side effects (29.6%) and costs (11.1%). While more than 50% considered HT served to replace hormones a smaller percentage (<14%) referred HT as bad for health, reduces cancer risk or has many side effects. 9.3% (67/720) acknowledged the existence of phytoestrogens as a menopausal treatment option, considering them as natural estrogens and good for health in 38.8% and 25.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HT use in this mid-aged series was rather low in which the demography of Central America may be related factors. Education to women and physicians should be encouraged.

Hormone therapy for the management of the menopause in Ecuador: perception, use and knowledge among middle-aged women

BACKGROUND

There is scant data on social and personal aspects related to the use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) in Latin America.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain information regarding menopausal HT, i.e. use, perception, level and sources of knowledge, and to determine factors affecting several of these issues among middle-aged women of Guayaquil, Ecuador.

DESIGN

A total of 349 women (nursing staff), aged 40 years or more, were included in the present cross-sectional study. Participants completed a structured questionnaire including details related to HT and the reasons for not using it, as well as demographic and psychosocial data.

RESULTS

Only 50.1% of women considered HT beneficial. Current and former HT use was low (1.7% and 14.3%, respectively) and mean HT duration among former users was short (mean +/- standard deviation: 1.0 +/- 1.4 years). Women responded that the main reasons for not using HT were being asymptomatic (49.0%), non-established menopause (30.4%) and physician's advice (27.2%). Only 28.9% of women considered having enough information regarding HT, whereas a high percentage (93.1%) indicated willingness to participate in educational sessions addressing this issue. For most of the women the main sources of information were physicians, educational sessions and television. Logistic regression analysis determined that women with lower income and HT information did not consider HT beneficial at a higher rate than their counterparts. Premenopausal women and those with lower income were more prone to never HT use. Age and professional level were found to be confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

HT use in this population was low; hormonal status, economic income and level of HT information determined its use and benefit awareness.

Long-term estrogen deficiency lowers regional blood flow, resting systolic blood pressure, and heart rate in exercising premenopausal women

The cardiovascular consequences of hypoestrogenism in premenopausal women are unclear. Accordingly, the influence of menstrual status and endogenous estrogen (E(2)) exposure on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and calf blood flow in young (18-35 yr) regularly exercising premenopausal women with exercise-associated menstrual aberrations was investigated. Across consecutive menstrual cycles, daily urinary ovarian steroid levels were analyzed, and the area under the curve was calculated to determine menstrual status and E(2) exposure. BP, HR, blood flow, vascular conductance, and resistance were measured at baseline and following ischemic calf exercise. Exercising subjects consisted of 14 ovulatory (ExOv), 10 short-term (anovulatory and <or=100 days amenorrhea; ST-E(2) Def), and 8 long-term (>100 days amenorrhea; LT-E(2) Def) E(2)-deficient women. Nine sedentary ovulatory subjects (SedOv) were also studied. All groups were similar in age (24.8 +/- 0.7 yr), height (164.8 +/- 1.3 cm), weight (57.9 +/- 0.9 kg), and body mass index (21.3 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2)). E(2)-deficient groups had lower (P < 0.002) E(2) exposure compared with ovulatory groups. Resting systolic BP, HR, blood flow, and vascular conductance were lower (P < 0.05) and vascular resistance higher (P < 0.05) in LT-E(2) Def compared with both ovulatory groups. Peak ischemic blood flow, vascular conductance, and HR were also lower (P < 0.05) and vascular resistance higher (P < 0.05) in LT-E(2) Def compared with all other groups. Our findings show that exercising women with long-term E(2) deficiency have impaired regional blood flow and lower systolic BP and HR compared with exercising and sedentary ovulatory women. These cardiovascular alterations represent markers of altered vascular function and autonomic regulation of which the long-term effects remain unknown.

Cardiovascular risk in women: the impact of hormone replacement therapy and prospects for new therapeutic approaches

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in women. Observational studies of hormone replacement therapy (HT) and data from women with premature ovarian failure have provided support for the principle that estrogen confers protection against the development of CVD in premenopausal women. However, randomised, controlled trials investigating HT in postmenopausal women have failed to demonstrate a benefit of HT in the primary or secondary prevention of CVD. Nevertheless, HT may be effective if targeted at younger perimenopausal women. Research aimed at investigation of the cellular mechanisms of estrogen may result in the discovery of new therapeutic targets that may be able to harness the potential beneficial effects of estrogens in the cardiovascular system. An improved understanding of the distinct processes in the clinical presentation and progress of CVD in women will help develop new targets and enhance the use of current established drugs.

Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

This review comprises the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natural and synthetic estrogens and progestogens used in contraception and therapy, with special consideration of hormone replacement therapy. The paper describes the mechanisms of action, the relation between structure and hormonal activity, differences in hormonal pattern and potency, peculiarities in the properties of certain steroids, tissue-specific effects, and the metabolism of the available estrogens and progestogens. The influence of the route of administration on pharmacokinetics, hormonal activity and metabolism is presented, and the effects of oral and transdermal treatment with estrogens on tissues, clinical and serum parameters are compared. The effects of oral, transdermal (patch and gel), intranasal, sublingual, buccal, vaginal, subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of estrogens, as well as of oral, vaginal, transdermal, intranasal, buccal, intramuscular and intrauterine application of progestogens are discussed. The various types of progestogens, their receptor interaction, hormonal pattern and the hormonal activity of certain metabolites are described in detail. The structural formulae, serum concentrations, binding affinities to steroid receptors and serum binding globulins, and the relative potencies of the available estrogens and progestins are presented. Differences in the tissue-specific effects of the various compounds and regimens and their potential implications with the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy are discussed.

Effects of low-dose continuous combined HRT on vascular function in women with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Improvement in vascular endothelial function is widley cited as a beneficial effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at increased cardiovascular risk and have impaired endothelial function. Any benefits of HRT on endothelial function in this group are of particular interest.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed effects on vascular function of oral 17beta oestradiol (1 mg) and norethisterone (0.5 mg) in postmenopausal women with T2DM.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

ASSESSMENTS

Twenty-eight women had pulse wave velocity (PWV) and adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 assessed before and after three months' treatment. Twenty-four women also had gluteal fat biopsy for assessment of resistance vessel function (using wire myography).

RESULTS

HRT did not affect PWV, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 or carbachol response. Effects of L-NAME and indomethacin on carbachol sensitivity were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This HRT preparation had no detectable effect on these measures of endothelial function in women with T2DM.