Once-daily inhaled budesonide for the treatment of asthma: clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic explanation

Budesonide Attains Its Wide Clinical Profile by Alternative Kinetics

The introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) changed over a few decades the treatment focus of mild-to-moderate asthma from bronchodilation to reduction in inflammation. This was achieved by inhaling a suitable corticosteroid (CS), giving a high, protracted airway concentration at a low total dose, thereby better combining efficacy and tolerance than oral therapy. Successful trials with the potent, lipophilic "skin" CS beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) paved the way, suggesting that ICSs require a very low water solubility, prolonging their intraluminal dissolution within airways. The subsequent ICS development, with resulting clinical landmarks, is exemplified here with budesonide (BUD), showing that a similar efficacy/safety relationship is achievable by partly alternative mechanisms. BUD is much less lipophilic, giving it a 100-fold higher water solubility than BDP and later developed ICSs, leading to its more rapid intraluminal dissolution and faster airway and systemic uptake rates. In airway tissue, a BUD fraction is reversibly esterified to intracellular fatty acids, a lipophilic conjugate, which prolongs airway efficacy. Another mechanism is that the rapidly absorbed bulk fraction, via short plasma peaks, adds anti-inflammatory activity at the blood and bone marrow levels. Importantly, these plasma peaks are too short to provoke systemic adverse actions. Controlled clinical trials with BUD changed the use of ICS from a last resort to first-line treatment. Starting ICS treatment immediately after diagnosis ("early intervention") became a landmark for BUD. An established dose response made BUD suitable for the treatment of patients with all degrees of asthma severity. With the development of the budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler (BUD/FORM), BUD contributed to the widely used BUD/FORM maintenance and reliever therapy (MART). Recent studies demonstrated the value of BUD/FORM as a generally recommended as-needed therapy for asthma ("anti-inflammatory reliever", AIR). These abovementioned qualities have all influenced international asthma management and treatment guidelines.

Efficacy and Tolerability of an Inhaled Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator - AZD5423 - in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Phase II Study Results

AZD5423 is a novel, inhaled, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator (SGRM), which in an allergen challenge model in asthma patients improved lung function and airway hyper-reactivity. In the current trial, AZD5423 was for the first time tested in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this double-blind, randomized and parallel group study, we examined airway and systemic effects of two doses of AZD5423, inhaled via Turbuhaler for 12 weeks, in 353 symptomatic patients with COPD (average pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1) at screening was 50-52% of predicted normal). Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was primary variable, with other lung function parameters plus symptoms and 24-hr plasma cortisol being secondary variables. Plasma concentrations of AZD5423 were also measured. Effects were compared against placebo and a reference glucocorticoid receptor agonist control. Neither AZD5423, at doses which have shown to be efficacious in allergen-induced asthma, nor the reference control, at double the approved dose, had any clinically meaningful effect in the patient population studied in regard to lung function or markers of inflammation. Both GR modulators were well tolerated and did suppress 24-hr cortisol. This study suggests that the selected population of patients with COPD does not respond to treatment with AZD5423 as regards lung function, while showing the expected systemic effects. It cannot be ruled out that a favourable lung function response of AZD5423 can be evoked using another experimental setting and/or within a different population of patients with COPD.

Effect of two administration routes of Shenmai Injection () on pulmonary gas exchange function after tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect between nebulized and intravenous administration of Shenmai Injection () on pulmonary gas exchange function of patients following tourniquet-induced lower limb ischemia-reperfusion.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery were randomized into three groups using the closed envelop method: Shenmai Injection was administered 30 min before tourniquet inflflation by nebulization [0.6 mL/kg in 10 mL normal saline (NS)] in the nebulization group or by intravenous drip (0.6 mL/kg dissolved in 250 mL of 10% glucose) in the intravenous drip group, and equal volume of NS was given intravenously in the NS group; 15 in each group. Arterial blood gases were analyzed, serum levels of malonaldehyde (MDA) and interleukine-6 (IL-6) and interleukine-8 (IL-8) were determined using the method of thiobarbituric acid reaction and enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay respectively just before tourniquet inflflation (T0), and at 0.5 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 6 h (T3) after tourniquet deflflation.

RESULTS

Compared with baselines at T0, MDA levels signifificantly increased at T2, T3 in the NS group and at T3 in the nebulization group, and IL-6 and IL-8 levels were signifificantly increased at T2, T3 in NS, the intravenous drip and the nebulization groups (P <0.05). Arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) at T3 was decreased, while alveolararterial oxygen tension showed difference (PA-aDO₂) at T3 in the NS group; RI at T3 in both intravenous drip and the nebulization groups were enhanced (P <0.05). Compared with the NS group, MDA and IL-8 levels at T2, T3, IL-6 at T3 in the intravenous drip group, and IL-8 at T3 in the nebulization group were all remarkably increased (P <0.05). Additionally, MDA level at T3 in the nebulization group was higher than that in the intravenous drip group (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of Shenmai Injection provided a better protective effect than nebulization in mitigating pulmonary gas exchange dysfunction in patients following tourniquet-induced limb ischemia-reperfusion.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose ciclesonide for the treatment of severe asthma

Asthma severity is classified according to the level of treatment required to control symptoms. Inhaled corticosteroids are the recommended first-line therapy for the treatment of persistent asthma, and when asthma remains uncontrolled, one option is to increase the inhaled corticosteroids dose. However, there is a concomitant risk of increasing local and systemic adverse events, which may impact patient adherence and physician prescribing practices. Ciclesonide is delivered as a prodrug, has high peripheral lung deposition and high protein-binding capabilities, and is rapidly eliminated from the systemic circulation. This article reviews the use of high-dose ciclesonide in patients with severe asthma and considers whether the pharmacology of ciclesonide translates into it being an efficacious and well-tolerated option for patients requiring a step-up in their asthma treatment.

Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: on-demand or continuous use

Continuous inhaled corticosteroid treatment is highly effective in children and adults with mild persistent asthma, although some therapeutic benefits are not lost if treatment is delayed. Many patients do not adhere to continuous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, but rather take them intermittently, usually at the time of increased symptoms. Based on these observations it has been proposed that for patients with mild persistent asthma inhaled corticosteroids should be used on-demand when symptoms are troublesome, rather than on a continuous basis. The article reviews the pharmacological properties of inhaled corticosteroids used in clinical trials of on-demand treatment, as well as the evidence for the efficacy and safety of on-demand compared with continuous inhaled corticosteroid treatment of mild persistent asthma in adults and children. The place of on-demand treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in the management of asthma is discussed, as well as future directions for different management strategies for this group.

The impact of oral versus inhaled glucocorticoids on allergen specific IgE testing in experimentally asthmatic cats

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are palliative for allergic asthma, but allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT), which relies on identification of allergens, represents a potentially curative treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine if oral or inhaled GCs would interfere with identification of sensitizing allergens. The hypothesis was that oral but not inhaled GCs would interfere with accurate allergen-specific IgE identification determined by skin and serum testing in experimentally asthmatic cats. Asthma was induced in 18 cats using Bermuda grass allergen (BGA). Cats (n=6/group) were randomized to receive oral GCs (10mg prednisolone q 24 h), inhaled GCs (600 μg budesonide q 24 h) or placebo (q 24 h PO) for one month. Intradermal skin testing (IDST) and serum BGA-specific IgE were measured prior to, during and after treatment. A paired t test was used to compare groups pre- and post-treatment (P<0.05 significant). IDST reactivity was eliminated in 4/6, 3/6, and 1/6 cats receiving oral GCs, inhaled GCs, and placebo respectively. Two weeks after stopping treatment, IDST was again positive in all cats. Serum IgE reactivity to BGA was not significantly diminished by any treatment. In conclusion, a two-week withdrawal from GCs is adequate for IDST, but may not be necessary for serum IgE testing.

Topical budesonide via mucosal atomization device in refractory postoperative chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Nebulized budesonide (Pulmicort Respules, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) provides control of respiratory tract inflammation in asthmatic patients. The Mucosal Atomization Device (MAD; Wolfe-Tory Medical, Salt Lake City, UT) is a novel sinonasal atomization device.

METHODS

Uncontrolled case series of postoperative patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who received budesonide via MAD was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients with a mean age of 53.5 years met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 31.5 weeks (SD 17.55; range, 8 to 80 weeks). Overall, patient and physician global assessments demonstrated moderate to significant improvement. Average daily oral prednisone usage among patients who took systemic steroids (n = 27) was reduced from 7.96 to 1.94 mg/day without relapse of polyps, mucosal edema, and nasal discharge. Prednisone use was reduced to zero in 16 patients and reduced or stabilized in 10 other patients.

CONCLUSION

Topical budesonide via MAD may reduce the need for systemic prednisone and improve both physician and patient global assessment scores in postoperative CRS patients. Additional investigation is warranted to exclude placebo effect, spontaneous resolution, and regression to the mean as responsible factors for the reported findings.

Relative systemic availability of budesonide in patients with asthma after inhalation from two dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

To improve dosing consistency and product features, budesonide inhalation powder delivered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI) (DPI-A 200 microg) was redesigned to include lactose, a newly shaped mouthpiece, and a new dose indicator (DPI-B). Budesonide DPI-B is available in two strengths (90 microg, 180 microg).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative rate and extent of the systemic availability of budesonide inhaled via DPI-A and DPI-B and test for systemic absorption bioequivalence.

METHODS

Adults (n = 37) with asthma as defined by the American Thoracic Society were randomized in an open-label, crossover, single-center, single-dose study to budesonide DPI-A 200 microg x 4 inhalations, budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4 inhalations, or budesonide DPI-B 90 microg x 8 inhalations, on 3 days, each separated by a washout period of >or= 5 days. Plasma samples were collected immediately before and up to 12 h after dosing. Primary pharmacokinetic variables were area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)); plasma concentration at 12 h (C(12h)) and time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) were secondary variables. Treatments were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for their AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) ratios fell between 80 and 125%. Adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

The 90% CIs for the ratios of AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) for budesonide DPI-A 200 microg and DPI-B 180 microg and for both budesonide DPI-B strengths fell between 80% and 125% (AUC(0-infinity): budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-A 200 microg x 4: 96.3% [90% CI: 90.9, 102.1]; budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-B 90 microg x 8: 92.2% [90% CI: 87.0, 97.7]; C(max): (budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-A 200 microg x 4: 100.4% [95% CI: 92.1, 109.4]; budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-B 90 microg x 8: 94.4% [90% CI: 86.6, 102.9]). No differences in C(12h) and T(max) were found between treatments. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide DPI-A 200 mug and DPI-B 180 mug have systemic absorption bioequivalence, and DPI-B 90 microg and 180 microg are dose-strength equivalent when administered at the same dose. These results may not be generalized to all patients with asthma, as this analysis included only patients with mild-to-moderate asthma aged >or= 19 years.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via two dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

The dry powder inhaler (DPI) device for budesonide inhalation powder 200 microg (DPI-A) was redesigned to improve dosing consistency and provide new features (budesonide inhalation powder 90 microg and 180 microg; DPI-B).

OBJECTIVE

Two multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies compared the efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via each DPI versus placebo, and the systemic exposure of budesonide from each device.

METHODS

Asthmatic adults with mild-to-moderate asthma (N = 621) and patients 6-17 years with mild asthma (N = 516) received budesonide DPI-B 360 microg or DPI-A 400 microg twice-daily (total daily dose 720 microg or 800 microg), budesonide DPI-B 180 microg or DPI-A 200 microg once daily (total daily dose 180 microg or 200 microg), or matching placebo. Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and secondary variables (asthma symptoms, beta(2)-adrenergic agonist use, peak expiratory flow [PEF], and withdrawals due to worsening asthma) versus placebo were measured.

RESULTS

In both studies, FEV(1) significantly (p < 0.05) improved for all active treatments versus placebo except once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 mug in adults. In the adult study, significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvements in all secondary variables occurred with all active treatments versus placebo. In the pediatric/adolescent study, improvements in AM/PM PEF were significantly (p <or= 0.011) greater with twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus placebo. Numerically fewer patients in all active-treatment groups withdrew due to worsening asthma versus placebo. Adverse event profiles were similar among groups. In the pediatric/adolescent study, no significant differences in mean 24-h urine cortisol or cortisol: creatinine ratio assessments were observed between the active treatment groups and the placebo group. Although pharmacokinetic variables were generally similar across subgroups in the adult (n = 77) and pediatric/adolescent (n = 32) studies, pairwise treatment comparisons of twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus DPI-A 400 microg and once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 microg versus DPI-A 200 microg showed large variability for the area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval and the maximum detected drug plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of budesonide DPI-A and DPI-B versus placebo were demonstrated across the low to medium inhaled corticosteroid dose range in children >or= 6 years with very mild asthma and adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The study is limited by the evaluation of only two doses for each product in both studies. Additionally, the studies were not designed to test equivalence or noninferiority between the active products. Pharmacokinetic characterization was limited because of the small sample sizes.

Evidence of the in vivo esterification of budesonide in human airways

AIMS

Budesonide, unlike fluticasone propionate, undergoes fatty acid esterification in the lungs, and there is a need to characterize fully the distribution and fate of the two drugs after inhalation in humans.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized study was performed in adults undergoing whole lung or lobar resection resulting from lung cancer. Patients were given single 1000-mug doses of both budesonide and fluticasone propionate via dry powder inhalers before surgery. Tissue samples from peripheral and central lung, an ex vivo bronchial brush sample and intercostal muscle, together with plasma samples, were taken during surgery and analysed by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Lung tissue samples were obtained from 22 patients at surgery, 1-43 h after drug dosing. Budesonide was detectable from earliest sampling in central and peripheral lung tissue up to 10 h (in six of 22 samples), fluticasone propionate up to 22 h after inhalation (in 16 of 22 samples), and budesonide oleate up to 43 h after inhalation (in 21 of 22 samples). Budesonide, but not fluticasone propionate, was detected in intercostal muscle for up to 10 h after inhalation. Bronchial brush samples showed the presence of fluticasone propionate for up to 18 h, suggesting the presence of undissolved drug powder particles in the airway lumen.

CONCLUSION

Sustained retention of esterified budesonide in the lungs supports the prolonged duration of action of budesonide and suitability for once-daily administration.

Do airway clearance mechanisms influence the local and systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids?

The role of airway clearance in inhaled drug therapy is complex. Disease-induced bronchoconstriction results in a central drug-deposition pattern where mucociliary clearance is most efficient. When drug-induced bronchodilation is achieved, deposition and uptake becomes more peripheral, and because there is less mucociliary clearance in the periphery, this will lead to an unintentional increase in lung exposure and enhance the risk of systemic side effects. In addition, mucociliary clearance is pathologically reduced in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Among inhaled corticosteroids, rate of dissolution and lung uptake differs considerably. For the slowly dissolving, lipophilic steroids, the contribution of mucociliary clearance to these findings appears significant, and variability in lung and systemic exposure resulting from variable mucociliary function appears to be amplified. In addition, dose optimisation of non-stable asthma becomes more complex. The present review highlights the impact of mucociliary clearance on inhaled corticosteroid disposition and identifies critical areas where more research is needed.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide 160 microg once daily vs. budesonide 400 microg once daily in children with asthma

Ciclesonide is an onsite-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. This study compared the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life (QOL) of ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator; nominal dose 200 microg) vs. budesonide 400 microg (nominal dose) in children with asthma. Six hundred and twenty-one children (aged 6-11 yr) with asthma were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily (via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler and AeroChamber Plus spacer) or budesonide 400 microg once daily (via Turbohaler) both given in the evening for 12 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional measurements included change in daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), change in asthma symptom score sum, change in use of rescue medication, paediatric and caregiver asthma QOL questionnaire [PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ, respectively] scores, change in body height assessed by stadiometry, change in 24-h urinary cortisol adjusted for creatinine and adverse events. Both ciclesonide and budesonide increased FEV1, morning PEF and PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ scores, and improved asthma symptom score sums and the need for rescue medication after 12 wk vs. baseline. The non-inferiority of ciclesonide vs. budesonide was demonstrated for the change in FEV1 (95% confidence interval: -75, 10 ml, p = 0.0009, one-sided non-inferiority, per-protocol). In addition, ciclesonide and budesonide showed similar efficacy in improving asthma symptoms, morning PEF, use of rescue medication and QOL. Ciclesonide was superior to budesonide with regard to increases in body height (p = 0.003, two-sided). The effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was significantly different in favor of ciclesonide treatment (p < 0.001, one-sided). Both ciclesonide and budesonide were well tolerated. Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily and budesonide 400 microg once daily were effective in children with asthma. In addition, in children treated with ciclesonide there was significantly less reduction in body height and suppression of 24-h urinary cortisol excretion compared with children treated with budesonide after 12 wk.

Differences in Endogenous Esterification and Retention in the Rat Trachea between Budesonide and Ciclesonide Active Metabolite

The airway retention of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCs) depends largely on their lipophilicity. Inhaled budesonide (BUD) becomes highly lipophilic reversibly by the formation of esters acting as a reservoir of active BUD. Ciclesonide (CIC) was also reported to form esters after hydrolysis to active metabolite (CIC-AM). We have investigated lipophilicity and airway retention of BUD, CIC/CIC-AM, fluticasone propionate (FP), and mometasone furoate (MF), and compared esterification of BUD and CIC-AM and its contribution to GC airway retention. Rat tracheas were preincubated with the esterification inhibitor cyclandelate or vehicle. A (3)H-GC ( approximately 10(-7) M: BUD, CIC, CIC-AM, FP, MF) was added for 20 min. After incubation, one half of the trachea was used for analysis of GC uptake and the other to analyze GC release during 3 h in drug-free medium. GC species in trachea halves were analyzed by radiochromatography. At 20 min, the uptake of BUD was similar to that of CIC/CIC-AM; however, the BUD-ester pool was 9-fold greater (p < 0.01). BUD overall retention in trachea at 3 h was greater than that of other GCs (p < 0.01), and the BUD-ester pool was 3-fold greater than the CIC-AM-ester pool (p < 0.01). Cyclandelate decreased the initial BUD- and CIC-AM-ester pools (p < 0.01), and reduced the overall retention of BUD at 3 h (p < 0.01) but not of CIC-AM. Thus, BUD becomes esterified in the airways more promptly and to a greater extent than CIC-AM, and BUD esterification prolongs BUD airway retention. In contrast, airway retention of CIC-AM and CIC seems to be determined mainly by their lipophilicity, similar to FP and MF, which are not esterified.

Once versus twice daily budesonide metered-dose inhaler in children with mild to moderate asthma: effect on symptoms and bronchial responsiveness

BACKGROUND

Simplifying dosing regimens could improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. However, there is little information on the effectiveness of once-daily budesonide, administered through a metered dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer, on asthma symptoms and pulmonary function in asthmatic children.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of once-daily versus twice-daily doses of inhaled budesonide on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in asthmatic children. This study was a randomized, single-blind, parallel clinical trial. Patients received budesonide from an MDI either 800 microg as a daily dose or fractionated in 400 microg twice a day for 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using tests for independent and paired samples.

RESULTS

In both groups, asthma symptoms significantly decreased. However, the improvement in asthma symptoms, decrease in BHR and treatment adherence were significantly greater in the once-daily group than in the twice-daily group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in spirometric parameters, morning peak expiratory flow or plasma cortisol values.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily administration of 800 microg of inhaled budesonide administered by MDI plus spacer was more effective in controlling symptoms and improving BHR than fractionating the dose to 400 microg twice daily. The differences observed in this study could have been due to the greater adherence to treatment in patients in the once-daily group.

A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a new lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has shown efficacy in previous placebo-controlled and comparative studies in patients with persistent asthma. It is important to compare new treatments with existing ICSs to obtain relative data concerning their efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide QD with budesonide BID in patients with asthma.

METHODS

This 12-week, randomized study was conducted at 62 study sites across Europe. Male and female patients aged 12 to 75 years with primarily mild to moderate asthma were enrolled. This study was double blind with respect to the ciclesonide dose and open label for budesonide, as placebofor budesonide was not available. Patients were randomly assigned to receive inhaled ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg QD (morning) or budesonide 200 microg BID for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability assessments were performed at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 12. The primary end point was the change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by monitoring of standard laboratory variables (hematology and biochemistry); physical examination, including vital signs; reporting of adverse events (AEs); and 24-hour urinary cortisol as a measure of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients were randomized (301 men, 253 women; mean age, 41.3 years; ciclesonide 80 microg QD, 182 patients; ciclesonide 320 microg QD, 195; budesonide 200 microg BID, 177). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, including age, sex, weight, and (FEV1) were similar between the 3 groups. Compared with baseline values, week-12 FEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] [SEM] A, +0.267 [0.035], +0.256 [0.033], and +0.355 [0.034] L, respectively; all, P<0.001) and morning PEF (LSM [SEM] Delta, +12 [5], +17 [4], and +21 [4] L/min, respectively; all, P<or=0.008) were significantly improved with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID. At 12 weeks, ciclesonide was found to be noninferior to budesonide with regard to mean changes from baseline in (FEV1) (intent to treat [ITT]: 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.192 to 0.015; 97.5 CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.200 to 0.001) and morning PEF (ITT. 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -22 to 5; 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -17 to 10). Similar findings were seen in the per-protocol population. Week-12 daily, daytime, and nighttime asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were significantly decreased from baseline in all 3 treatment groups (all, P<0.001). The prevalences of AEs were similar across all 3 treatment groups. Week-12 mean urinary cortisol excretion was statistically similar to baseline with both ciclesonide doses (Delta, -0.54 and +0.16 nmol/mmol creatinine with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD, respectively) but was significantly reduced from baseline with budesonide (Delta, -1.42 nmol/mmol creatinine; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study in patients with primarily mild to moderate asthma suggest that ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD were similar to budesonide 200 microg BID in improving pulmonary function, controlling asthma symptoms, and reducing the need for rescue medication use. Unlike budesonide, ciclesonide was not associated with significant urinary cortisol suppression in these patients.

Airway selectivity: an update of pharmacokinetic factors affecting local and systemic disposition of inhaled steroids

Topical corticosteroids remain the most efficacious single treatment for asthma and rhinitis, despite the emergence of newer drugs in recent years. The antiinflammatory properties of these products, combined with the targeting of formulations and optimization of the intrinsic pharmacokinetic features of the newer corticosteroid molecules has resulted in substantially improved airway selectivity. This review sets out to summarize the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids that are important for the achievement of high levels of airway selectivity, with additional focus on the use of prodrugs/softdrugs relative to those of conventional corticosteroid molecules, mechanisms (such as esterification) by which retention at the target site is achieved while minimizing systemic exposure, and the role of plasma protein binding.

Clinical comparability between the CFC and HFA budesonide pressurised metered-dose inhalers in paediatric patients with asthma: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide (Pulmicort) versus the conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) pMDI formulation in paediatric patients with asthma.

METHODS

This was a Phase III, multicentre, 12-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study involving children (6-12 years of age) with mild to moderate asthma. Patients received either budesonide HFA pMDI or budesonide CFC pMDI 200 mug twice daily, with or without a spacer (NebuChamber/Nebunette). Primary efficacy endpoint: mean percentage change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in FEV(1) per cent of predicted normal, forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate, asthma symptoms and use of rescue medication.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients received treatment (HFA 77, CFC 82). For mean percentage change in FEV(1) from baseline to week 12, the difference between the treatments (CFC pMDI - HFA pMDI) was -3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.0% to 1.8%) for the full analysis set and was not affected by spacer use. The upper CI was < 10% (the predefined non-inferiority margin), so non-inferiority was demonstrated. Improvements in the secondary efficacy endpoints with both budesonide formulations were not significantly different. In both groups there were similar numbers of adverse events and no evidence of oral candidiasis at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with budesonide HFA pMDI is effective and well tolerated in children with asthma and is clinically comparable to budesonide CFC pMDI.