REC drives recombination to repair double-strand breaks in animal mtDNA

Evolution and maintenance of mtDNA gene content across eukaryotes

Across eukaryotes, most genes required for mitochondrial function have been transferred to, or otherwise acquired by, the nucleus. Encoding genes in the nucleus has many advantages. So why do mitochondria retain any genes at all? Why does the set of mtDNA genes vary so much across different species? And how do species maintain functionality in the mtDNA genes they do retain? In this review, we will discuss some possible answers to these questions, attempting a broad perspective across eukaryotes. We hope to cover some interesting features which may be less familiar from the perspective of particular species, including the ubiquity of recombination outside bilaterian animals, encrypted chainmail-like mtDNA, single genes split over multiple mtDNA chromosomes, triparental inheritance, gene transfer by grafting, gain of mtDNA recombination factors, social networks of mitochondria, and the role of mtDNA dysfunction in feeding the world. We will discuss a unifying picture where organismal ecology and gene-specific features together influence whether organism X retains mtDNA gene Y, and where ecology and development together determine which strategies, importantly including recombination, are used to maintain the mtDNA genes that are retained.

Linear DNA-driven recombination in mammalian mitochondria

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) recombination in animals has remained enigmatic due to its uniparental inheritance and subsequent homoplasmic state, which excludes the biological need for genetic recombination, as well as limits tools to study it. However, molecular recombination is an important genome maintenance mechanism for all organisms, most notably being required for double-strand break repair. To demonstrate the existence of mtDNA recombination, we took advantage of a cell model with two different types of mitochondrial genomes and impaired its ability to degrade broken mtDNA. The resulting excess of linear DNA fragments caused increased formation of cruciform mtDNA, appearance of heterodimeric mtDNA complexes and recombinant mtDNA genomes, detectable by Southern blot and by long range PacBio® HiFi sequencing approach. Besides utilizing different electrophoretic methods, we also directly observed molecular complexes between different mtDNA haplotypes and recombination intermediates using transmission electron microscopy. We propose that the known copy-choice recombination by mitochondrial replisome could be sufficient for the needs of the small genome, thus removing the requirement for a specialized mitochondrial recombinase. The error-proneness of this system is likely to contribute to the formation of pathological mtDNA rearrangements.

Absence of both MGME1 and POLG EXO abolishes mtDNA whereas absence of either creates unique mtDNA duplications

Both POLG and MGME1 are needed for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) maintenance in animal cells. POLG, the primary replicative polymerase of the mitochondria, has an exonuclease activity (3'→5') that corrects for the misincorporation of bases. MGME1 serves as an exonuclease (5'→3'), producing ligatable DNA ends. Although both have a critical role in mtDNA replication and elimination of linear fragments, these mechanisms are still not fully understood. Using digital PCR to evaluate and compare mtDNA integrity, we show that Mgme1 knock out (Mgme1 KK) tissue mtDNA is more fragmented than POLG exonuclease-deficient "Mutator" (Polg MM) or WT tissue. In addition, next generation sequencing of mutant hearts showed abundant duplications in/nearby the D-loop region and unique 100 bp duplications evenly spaced throughout the genome only in Mgme1 KK hearts. However, despite these unique mtDNA features at steady-state, we observed a similar delay in the degradation of mtDNA after an induced double strand DNA break in both Mgme1 KK and Polg MM models. Lastly, we characterized double mutant (Polg MM/Mgme1 KK) cells and show that mtDNA cannot be maintained without at least one of these enzymatic activities. We propose a model for the generation of these genomic abnormalities which suggests a role for MGME1 outside of nascent mtDNA end ligation. Our results highlight the role of MGME1 in and outside of the D-loop region during replication, support the involvement of MGME1 in dsDNA degradation, and demonstrate that POLG EXO and MGME1 can partially compensate for each other in maintaining mtDNA.

Genome copy number predicts extreme evolutionary rate variation in plant mitochondrial DNA

Nuclear and organellar genomes can evolve at vastly different rates despite occupying the same cell. In most bilaterian animals, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evolves faster than nuclear DNA, whereas this trend is generally reversed in plants. However, in some exceptional angiosperm clades, mtDNA substitution rates have increased up to 5,000-fold compared with closely related lineages. The mechanisms responsible for this acceleration are generally unknown. Because plants rely on homologous recombination to repair mtDNA damage, we hypothesized that mtDNA copy numbers may predict evolutionary rates, as lower copy numbers may provide fewer templates for such repair mechanisms. In support of this hypothesis, we found that copy number explains 47% of the variation in synonymous substitution rates of mtDNA across 60 diverse seed plant species representing ~300 million years of evolution. Copy number was also negatively correlated with mitogenome size, which may be a cause or consequence of mutation rate variation. Both relationships were unique to mtDNA and not observed in plastid DNA. These results suggest that homologous recombinational repair plays a role in driving mtDNA substitution rates in plants and may explain variation in mtDNA evolution more broadly across eukaryotes. Our findings also contribute to broader questions about the relationships between mutation rates, genome size, selection efficiency, and the drift-barrier hypothesis.

Two mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms modulate cardiolipin binding and lead to synthetic lethality

Genetic screens have been used extensively to probe interactions between nuclear genes and their impact on phenotypes. Probing interactions between mitochondrial genes and their phenotypic outcome, however, has not been possible due to a lack of tools to map the responsible polymorphisms. Here, using a toolkit we previously established in Drosophila, we isolate over 300 recombinant mitochondrial genomes and map a naturally occurring polymorphism at the cytochrome c oxidase III residue 109 (CoIII109) that fully rescues the lethality and other defects associated with a point mutation in cytochrome c oxidase I (CoIT300I). Through lipidomics profiling, biochemical assays and phenotypic analyses, we show that the CoIII109 polymorphism modulates cardiolipin binding to prevent complex IV instability caused by the CoIT300I mutation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of genetic interaction screens in animal mitochondrial DNA. It unwraps the complex intra-genomic interplays underlying disorders linked to mitochondrial DNA and how they influence disease expression.

Evidence that Alzheimer's Disease Is a Disease of Competitive Synaptic Plasticity Gone Awry

 Mounting evidence indicates that a physiological function of amyloid-β (Aβ) is to mediate neural activity-dependent homeostatic and competitive synaptic plasticity in the brain. I have previously summarized the lines of evidence supporting this hypothesis and highlighted the similarities between Aβ and anti-microbial peptides in mediating cell/synapse competition. In cell competition, anti-microbial peptides deploy a multitude of mechanisms to ensure both self-protection and competitor elimination. Here I review recent studies showing that similar mechanisms are at play in Aβ-mediated synapse competition and perturbations in these mechanisms underpin Alzheimer's disease (AD). Specifically, I discuss evidence that Aβ and ApoE, two crucial players in AD, co-operate in the regulation of synapse competition. Glial ApoE promotes self-protection by increasing the production of trophic monomeric Aβ and inhibiting its assembly into toxic oligomers. Conversely, Aβ oligomers, once assembled, promote the elimination of competitor synapses via direct toxic activity and amplification of "eat-me" signals promoting the elimination of weak synapses. I further summarize evidence that neuronal ApoE may be part of a gene regulatory network that normally promotes competitive plasticity, explaining the selective vulnerability of ApoE expressing neurons in AD brains. Lastly, I discuss evidence that sleep may be key to Aβ-orchestrated plasticity, in which sleep is not only induced by Aβ but is also required for Aβ-mediated plasticity, underlining the link between sleep and AD. Together, these results strongly argue that AD is a disease of competitive synaptic plasticity gone awry, a novel perspective that may promote AD research.