Signature required: The transcriptional response to tuberculosis

Characterizing the Spectrum of Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Cynomolgus Macaque Model: Clinical, Immunologic, and Imaging Features of Evolution

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection outcomes have been described as active tuberculosis or latent infection but a spectrum of outcomes is now recognized. We used a nonhuman primate model, which recapitulates human infection, to characterize the clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic patterns associated with developing latent M. tuberculosis infection. Four patterns were identified. "Controllers" had normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) without M. tuberculosis growth in bronchoalveolar lavage or gastric aspirate (BAL/GA). "Early subclinicals" showed transient ESR elevation and/or M. tuberculosis growth on BAL/GA for 60 days postinfection, "mid subclinicals" were positive for 90 days, and "late subclinicals" were positive intermittently, despite the absence of clinical disease. Variability was noted regarding granuloma formation, lung/lymph node metabolic activity, lung/lymph node bacterial burden, gross pathology, and extrapulmonary disease. Like human M. tuberculosis infection, this highlights the heterogeneity associated with the establishment of latent infection, underscoring the need to understand the clinical spectrum and risk factors associated with severe disease.

Progress on diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection

One fourth of the global population has been infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and about 5%-10% of the infected individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) will convert to active tuberculosis (ATB). Correct diagnosis and treatment of LTBI are important in ending the tuberculosis epidemic. Current methods for diagnosing LTBI, such as tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), have limitations. Some novel biomarkers, such as transcriptome derived host genes in peripheral blood cells, will help to distinguish LTBI from ATB. More emphasis should be placed on surveillance in high-risk groups, including patients with HIV infection, those using biological agents, organ transplant recipients and those in close contact with ATB patients. For those with LTBI, treatment should be based on the risk of progression to ATB and the potential benefit. Prophylactic LTBI regimens include isoniazid monotherapy for 6 or 9 months, rifampicin monotherapy for 4 months, weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months (3HP regimen) and daily rifampicin plus isoniazid for 3 months (3HR regimen). The success of the one month rifapentine plus isoniazid daily regimen (1HP regimen) suggests the feasibility of an ultra-short treatment strategy although its efficacy needs further assessment. Prophylactic treatment of LTBI in close contact with MDR-TB patients is another challenge, and the regimens include new anti-tuberculosis drugs such as bedaquiline, delamanid, fluoroquinolone and their combinations, which should be carefully evaluated. This article summarizes the current status of diagnosis and treatment of LTBI and its future development direction.

Anti-tuberculosis treatment strategies and drug development: challenges and priorities

Despite two decades of intensified research to understand and cure tuberculosis disease, biological uncertainties remain and hamper progress. However, owing to collaborative initiatives including academia, the pharmaceutical industry and non-for-profit organizations, the drug candidate pipeline is promising. This exceptional success comes with the inherent challenge of prioritizing multidrug regimens for clinical trials and revamping trial designs to accelerate regimen development and capitalize on drug discovery breakthroughs. Most wanted are markers of progression from latent infection to active pulmonary disease, markers of drug response and predictors of relapse, in vitro tools to uncover synergies that translate clinically and animal models to reliably assess the treatment shortening potential of new regimens. In this Review, we highlight the benefits and challenges of 'one-size-fits-all' regimens and treatment duration versus individualized therapy based on disease severity and host and pathogen characteristics, considering scientific and operational perspectives.