Junctional trafficking and restoration of retrograde signaling by the cytoplasmic RyR1 domain

Endoplasmic Reticulum-Plasma Membrane Junctions as Sites of Depolarization-Induced Ca2+ Signaling in Excitable Cells

Membrane contact sites between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and plasma membrane (PM), or ER-PM junctions, are found in all eukaryotic cells. In excitable cells they play unique roles in organizing diverse forms of Ca2+ signaling as triggered by membrane depolarization. ER-PM junctions underlie crucial physiological processes such as excitation-contraction coupling, smooth muscle contraction and relaxation, and various forms of activity-dependent signaling and plasticity in neurons. In many cases the structure and molecular composition of ER-PM junctions in excitable cells comprise important regulatory feedback loops linking depolarization-induced Ca2+ signaling at these sites to the regulation of membrane potential. Here, we describe recent findings on physiological roles and molecular composition of native ER-PM junctions in excitable cells. We focus on recent studies that provide new insights into canonical forms of depolarization-induced Ca2+ signaling occurring at junctional triads and dyads of striated muscle, as well as the diversity of ER-PM junctions in these cells and in smooth muscle and neurons.

Junctophilins 1, 2, and 3 all support voltage-induced Ca2+ release despite considerable divergence

In skeletal muscle, depolarization of the plasma membrane (PM) causes conformational changes of the calcium channel Ca_V1.1 that then activate RYR1 to release calcium from the SR. Being independent of extracellular calcium entry, this process is termed voltage-induced calcium release. In skeletal muscle, junctophilins (JPHs) 1 and 2 form the SR–PM junctions at which voltage-induced calcium release occurs. Previous work demonstrated that JPH2 is able to recapitulate voltage-induced calcium release when expressed in HEK293 cells together with Ca_V1.1, β1a, Stac3, and RYR1. However, it is unknown whether JPH1 and the more distantly related neuronal JPH3 and JPH4 might also function in this manner, a question of interest because different JPH isoforms diverge in their interactions with RYR1. Here, we show that, like JPH2, JPH1 and JPH3, coexpressed with Ca_V1.1, β1a, Stac3, and RYR1 in HEK293 cells, cause colocalization of Ca_V1.1 and RYR1 at ER–PM junctions. Furthermore, potassium depolarization elicited cytoplasmic calcium transients in cells in which WT Ca_V1.1 was replaced with the calcium impermeant mutant Ca_V1.1(N617D), indicating that JPH1, JPH2, and JPH3 can all support voltage-induced calcium release, despite sequence divergence and differences in interaction with RYR1. Conversely, JPH4-induced ER–PM junctions contain Ca_V1.1 but not RYR1, and cells expressing JPH4 are unable to produce depolarization-induced calcium transients. Thus, JPHs seem to act primarily to form ER–PM junctions and to recruit the necessary signaling proteins to these junctions but appear not to be directly involved in the functional interactions between these proteins.

Neuronal junctophilins recruit specific CaV and RyR isoforms to ER-PM junctions and functionally alter CaV2.1 and CaV2.2

Junctions between the endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane that are induced by the neuronal junctophilins are of demonstrated importance, but their molecular architecture is still poorly understood and challenging to address in neurons. This is due to the small size of the junctions and the multiple isoforms of candidate junctional proteins in different brain areas. Using colocalization of tagged proteins expressed in tsA201 cells, and electrophysiology, we compared the interactions of JPH3 and JPH4 with different calcium channels. We found that JPH3 and JPH4 caused junctional accumulation of all the tested high-voltage-activated Ca_V isoforms, but not a low-voltage-activated Ca_V. Also, JPH3 and JPH4 noticeably modify Ca_V2.1 and Ca_V2.2 inactivation rate. RyR3 moderately colocalized at junctions with JPH4, whereas RyR1 and RyR2 did not. By contrast, RyR1 and RyR3 strongly colocalized with JPH3, and RyR2 moderately. Likely contributing to this difference, JPH3 binds to cytoplasmic domain constructs of RyR1 and RyR3, but not of RyR2.