Regulatory light chain phosphorylation augments length-dependent contraction in PTU-treated rats

Ischemic preconditioning affects phosphosites and accentuates myocardial stunning while reducing infarction size in rats

Background and aims

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), i.e., brief periods of ischemia, protect the heart from subsequent prolonged ischemic injury, and reduces infarction size. Myocardial stunning refers to transient loss of contractility in the heart after myocardial ischemia that recovers without permanent damage. The relationship between IPC and myocardial stunning remains incompletely understood. This study aimed primarily to examine the effects of IPC on the relationship between ischemia duration, stunning, and infarct size in an ischemia-reperfusion injury model. Secondarily, this study aimed to examine to which extent the phosphoproteomic changes induced by IPC relate to myocardial contractile function.

Methods and results

Rats were subjected to different durations of left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion, with or without preceding IPC. Echocardiograms were acquired to assess cardiac contraction in the affected myocardial segment. Infarction size was evaluated using triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. Phosphoproteomic analysis was performed in heart tissue from preconditioned and non-preconditioned animals. In contrast to rats without IPC, reversible akinesia was observed in a majority of the rats that were subjected to IPC and subsequently exposed to ischemia of 13.5 or 15 min of ischemia. Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed significant differential regulation of 786 phosphopeptides between IPC and non-IPC groups, with significant associations with the sarcomere, Z-disc, and actin binding.

Conclusion

IPC induces changes in phosphosites of proteins involved in myocardial contraction; and both accentuates post-ischemic myocardial stunning and reduces infarct size.

The MYPT2-regulated striated muscle-specific myosin light chain phosphatase limits cardiac myosin phosphorylation in vivo

The physiological importance of cardiac myosin regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation by its dedicated cardiac myosin light chain kinase has been established in both humans and mice. Constitutive RLC-phosphorylation, regulated by the balanced activities of cardiac myosin light chain kinase and myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP), is fundamental to the biochemical and physiological properties of myofilaments. However, limited information is available on cardiac MLCP. In this study, we hypothesized that the striated muscle-specific MLCP regulatory subunit, MYPT2, targets the phosphatase catalytic subunit to cardiac myosin, contributing to the maintenance of cardiac function in vivo through the regulation of RLC-phosphorylation. To test this hypothesis, we generated a floxed-PPP1R12B mouse model crossed with a cardiac-specific Mer-Cre-Mer to conditionally ablate MYPT2 in adult cardiomyocytes. Immunofluorescence microscopy using the gene-ablated tissue as a control confirmed the localization of MYPT2 to regions where it overlaps with a subset of RLC. Biochemical analysis revealed an increase in RLC-phosphorylation in vivo. The loss of MYPT2 demonstrated significant protection against pressure overload-induced hypertrophy, as evidenced by heart weight, qPCR of hypertrophy-associated genes, measurements of myocyte diameters, and expression of β-MHC protein. Furthermore, mantATP chase assays revealed an increased ratio of myosin heads distributed to the interfilament space in MYPT2-ablated heart muscle fibers, confirming that RLC-phosphorylation regulated by MLCP, enhances cardiac performance in vivo. Our findings establish MYPT2 as the regulatory subunit of cardiac MLCP, distinct from the ubiquitously expressed canonical smooth muscle MLCP. Targeting MYPT2 to increase cardiac RLC-phosphorylation in vivo may improve baseline cardiac performance, thereby attenuating pathological hypertrophy.

RLC phosphorylation amplifies Ca2+ sensitivity of force in myocardium from cMyBP-C knockout mice

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the leading genetic cause of heart disease. The heart comprises several proteins that work together to properly facilitate force production and pump blood throughout the body. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) is a thick-filament protein, and mutations in cMyBP-C are frequently linked with clinical cases of HCM. Within the sarcomere, the N-terminus of cMyBP-C likely interacts with the myosin regulatory light chain (RLC); RLC is a subunit of myosin located within the myosin neck region that modulates contractile dynamics via its phosphorylation state. Phosphorylation of RLC is thought to influence myosin head position along the thick-filament backbone, making it more favorable to bind the thin filament of actin and facilitate force production. However, little is known about how these two proteins interact. We tested the effects of RLC phosphorylation on Ca2+-regulated contractility using biomechanical assays on skinned papillary muscle strips isolated from cMyBP-C KO mice and WT mice. RLC phosphorylation increased Ca2+ sensitivity of contraction (i.e., pCa50) from 5.80 ± 0.02 to 5.95 ± 0.03 in WT strips, whereas RLC phosphorylation increased Ca2+ sensitivity of contraction from 5.86 ± 0.02 to 6.15 ± 0.03 in cMyBP-C KO strips. These data suggest that the effects of RLC phosphorylation on Ca2+ sensitivity of contraction are amplified when cMyBP-C is absent from the sarcomere. This implies that cMyBP-C and RLC act in concert to regulate contractility in healthy hearts, and mutations to these proteins that lead to HCM (or a loss of phosphorylation with disease progression) may disrupt important interactions between these thick-filament regulatory proteins.

Functional and structural differences between skinned and intact muscle preparations

Myofilaments and their associated proteins, which together constitute the sarcomeres, provide the molecular-level basis for contractile function in all muscle types. In intact muscle, sarcomere-level contraction is strongly coupled to other cellular subsystems, in particular the sarcolemmal membrane. Skinned muscle preparations (where the sarcolemma has been removed or permeabilized) are an experimental system designed to probe contractile mechanisms independently of the sarcolemma. Over the last few decades, experiments performed using permeabilized preparations have been invaluable for clarifying the understanding of contractile mechanisms in both skeletal and cardiac muscle. Today, the technique is increasingly harnessed for preclinical and/or pharmacological studies that seek to understand how interventions will impact intact muscle contraction. In this context, intrinsic functional and structural differences between skinned and intact muscle pose a major interpretational challenge. This review first surveys measurements that highlight these differences in terms of the sarcomere structure, passive and active tension generation, and calcium dependence. We then highlight the main practical challenges and caveats faced by experimentalists seeking to emulate the physiological conditions of intact muscle. Gaining an awareness of these complexities is essential for putting experiments in due perspective.

Regulatory Light Chains in Cardiac Development and Disease

The role of regulatory light chains (RLCs) in cardiac muscle function has been elucidated progressively over the past decade. The RLCs are among the earliest expressed markers during cardiogenesis and persist through adulthood. Failing hearts have shown reduced RLC phosphorylation levels and that restoring baseline levels of RLC phosphorylation is necessary for generating optimal force of muscle contraction. The signalling mechanisms triggering changes in RLC phosphorylation levels during disease progression remain elusive. Uncovering this information may provide insights for better management of heart failure patients. Given the cardiac chamber-specific expression of RLC isoforms, ventricular RLCs have facilitated the identification of mature ventricular cardiomyocytes, opening up possibilities of regenerative medicine. This review consolidates the standing of RLCs in cardiac development and disease and highlights knowledge gaps and potential therapeutic advancements in targeting RLCs.

Stretch-Induced Biased Signaling in Angiotensin II Type 1 and Apelin Receptors for the Mediation of Cardiac Contractility and Hypertrophy

The myocardium has an intrinsic ability to sense and respond to mechanical load in order to adapt to physiological demands. Primary examples are the augmentation of myocardial contractility in response to increased ventricular filling caused by either increased venous return (Frank-Starling law) or aortic resistance to ejection (the Anrep effect). Sustained mechanical overload, however, can induce pathological hypertrophy and dysfunction, resulting in heart failure and arrhythmias. It has been proposed that angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and apelin receptor (APJ) are primary upstream actors in this acute myocardial autoregulation as well as the chronic maladaptive signaling program. These receptors are thought to have mechanosensing capacity through activation of intracellular signaling via G proteins and/or the multifunctional transducer protein, β-arrestin. Importantly, ligand and mechanical stimuli can selectively activate different downstream signaling pathways to promote inotropic, cardioprotective or cardiotoxic signaling. Studies to understand how AT1R and APJ integrate ligand and mechanical stimuli to bias downstream signaling are an important and novel area for the discovery of new therapeutics for heart failure. In this review, we provide an up-to-date understanding of AT1R and APJ signaling pathways activated by ligand versus mechanical stimuli, and their effects on inotropy and adaptive/maladaptive hypertrophy. We also discuss the possibility of targeting these signaling pathways for the development of novel heart failure therapeutics.

Toward an understanding of the regulation of myofibrillar function

Regulation of muscle contraction has been viewed as principally involving Ca2+ binding to regulatory proteins on the thin filament, but while this is an important element of regulation, the mechanism does not explain the precise matching of muscle performance to the load it must lift or move. Now, it is increasingly evident that mechanisms instrinsic to the thick filament activate myosin cross-bridges as the force or load on a muscle increases. Both thick and thin filament regulatory mechanisms are featured in this special issue of the Journal of General Physiology .