Penicillin-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae: review of moxifloxacin activity

The influence of continuous venovenous haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of multiple oral moxifloxacin administration to patients with severe renal dysfunction

AIM

We investigated single dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in eight venovenous haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Plasma, dialysate and urine pharmacokinetic parameters for moxifloxacin and its main metabolites were calculated after single and multiple (7 days) dosing with 400 mg day(-1).

RESULTS

Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics after a single dose and at steady state (multidose day 7) were comparable in patients with impaired renal function and healthy subjects (geometric mean/%CV AUC mg l(-1) h single dose 37.0/24.3 in haemodialysis patients vs. 29.8/22.6 in healthy subjects, 95% CI for ratio of haemodialysis patients to healthy subjects 99.34%, 154.60%; steady state 40.4/29.1 haemodialysis patients vs. 33.9/20.1 in healthy subjects, 95% CI for ratio of haemodialysis patients to healthy subjects 90/39%, 156.93%). In haemodialysis patients plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin at steady-state were elevated compared with those after a single 400 mg dose (AUC mg l(-1) h, geometric mean/%CV, 40.4/29.1) compared with 37.0/24.3; 95% CI for ratio of steady-state to single dose 87.29%, 136.52%, as were concentrations of metabolite M1 3.21/34.6 compared with 2.02/45.3, 95% CI for ratio of steady state to single dose 14.21%, 175.07%. Haemodialysis cleared about 9% of the dose as unchanged moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

No dose adjustments are required for venovenous haemodialysis patients on oral moxifloxacin therapy.

Isothiazoloquinolones with Enhanced Antistaphylococcal Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Strains: Effects of Structural Modifications at the 6-, 7-, and 8-Positions

We describe the biological evaluation of isothiazoloquinolones (ITQs) having structural modifications at the 6-, 7-, and 8-positions. Addition of a methoxy substituent to C-8 effected an increase in antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and a decrease in cytotoxic activity against Hep2 cells. Removal of fluorine from C-6 or replacement of the C-8 carbon with a nitrogen compromised anti-MRSA activity. When the groups attached at C-7 were compared, the anti-MRSA activity decreased in the order 6-isoquinolinyl > 4-pyridinyl > 5-dihydroisoindolyl > 6-tetrahydroisoquinolinyl. The compound with the most desirable in vitro biological profile was 9-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-8-methoxy-7-(2-methylpyridin-4-yl)-9H-isothiazolo[5,4-b]quinoline-3,4-dione (7g). This ITQ demonstrated (i) strong in vitro anti-MRSA activity (MIC90 = 0.5 microg/mL), (ii) strong inhibitory activities against S. aureus DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, with weak activity against human topoisomerase II, (iii) weak cytotoxic activities against three cell lines, and (iv) efficacy in an in vivo murine thigh model of infection employing MRSA.

Moxifloxacin and azithromycin but not amoxicillin protect human respiratory epithelial cells against streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro when administered up to 6 hours after challenge

We determined the protective effect of moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection of respiratory cells. Moxifloxacin and azithromycin effectively killed intracellular S. pneumoniae strains and protected respiratory epithelial cells significantly even when given 6 h after S. pneumoniae challenge. Amoxicillin was less effective.

In vitro susceptibility of six fluoroquinolones against invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from 1996 to 2001 in Taiwan

A total of 331 invasive nonduplicated Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from three sampling periods during 1996 to 2001 were tested for susceptibility to recently developed fluoroquinolones. Five major serotypes, 23F, 6B, 14, 19F, and 3, were frequently encountered in this collection. Penicillin nonsusceptible isolates constituted 52.9% from 1996 to 1997, 61.6% from 1998 to 1999, and 60.0% from 2000 to 2001. Fifty-seven percent of the isolates were susceptible to cefotaxime, 56.5% to ceftriaxone, 54.1% to cefepime, and 52.6% to cefuroxime. Macrolide-susceptible isolates constituted less than 14% of the total sample, and no vancomycin-resistant isolates were detected. For fluoroquinolones, MIC90 was lowest for gemifloxacin (MIC90 = < or = 0.12 microg/ml), followed by moxifloxacin (MIC90 = 0.25 microg/ml), gatifloxacin (MIC90 = 0.5 microg/ml), sparfloxacin (MIC90 = 0.5 microg/ml), levofloxacin (MIC90 = 1 microg/ml), and ciprofloxacin (MIC90 = 2 microg/ml). All isolates were susceptible to sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin apart from one isolate (0.3%), which was simultaneously resistant to sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin. Mutations at the positions S81F of GyrA and D435N and I460V of ParC were detected for this multiple drug resistant isolate. The in vitro results suggest that recently developed fluoroquinolones are very effective against invasive S. pneumoniae isolates in Taiwan. Nevertheless, emerging fluoroquinolone resistance should be acknowledged and clinicians alerted. Surveillance should be carried out to monitor any changes in antibiotic resistance of S. pneumoniae.

Linezolid and vancomycin, alone and in combination with rifampin, compared with moxifloxacin against a multidrug-resistant and a vancomycin-tolerant Streptococcus pneumoniae strain in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

Potential alternatives, including linezolid, adjunctive rifampin, and moxifloxacin, were evaluated against vancomycin-tolerant (P9802-020) and vancomycin-susceptible clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Vancomycin exhibited maximal killing of 2-log(10) CFU/ml against P9802-020. Linezolid, moxifloxacin, and linezolid plus rifampin exhibited 99.9% killing against both isolates. These alternatives should be considered for further evaluation against vancomycin-tolerant S. pneumoniae.