1
|
Moulia DL, Dopson SA, Vagi SJ, Fitzgerald TJ, Fiebelkorn AP, Graitcer SB. Readiness to Vaccinate Critical Personnel During an Influenza Pandemic, United States, 2015. Am J Public Health 2017; 107:1643-1645. [PMID: 28817330 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the readiness to vaccinate critical infrastructure personnel (CIP) involved in managing public works, emergency services, transportation, or any other system or asset that would have an immediate debilitating impact on the community if not maintained. METHODS We analyzed self-reported planning to vaccinate CIP during an influenza pandemic with data from 2 surveys: (1) the Program Annual Progress Assessment of immunization programs and (2) the Pandemic Influenza Readiness Assessment of public health emergency preparedness programs. Both surveys were conducted in 2015. RESULTS Twenty-six (43.3%) of 60 responding public health emergency preparedness programs reported having an operational plan to identify and vaccinate CIP, and 16 (26.2%) of 61 responding immunization programs reported knowing the number of CIP in their program's jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS Many programs may not be ready to identify and vaccinate CIP during an influenza pandemic. Additional efforts are needed to ensure operational readiness to vaccinate CIP during the next influenza pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle L Moulia
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Stephanie A Dopson
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Sara J Vagi
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Amy Parker Fiebelkorn
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Samuel B Graitcer
- Danielle L. Moulia and Thomas J. Fitzgerald are with IHRC, Inc and Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Stephanie A. Dopson and Sara J. Vagi are with the Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC. Amy Parker Fiebelkorn and Samuel B. Graitcer are with Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iskander J, Strikas RA, Gensheimer KF, Cox NJ, Redd SC. Pandemic influenza planning, United States, 1978-2008. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19:879-85. [PMID: 23731839 PMCID: PMC3713824 DOI: 10.3201/eid1906.121478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
During the past century, 4 influenza pandemics occurred. After the emergence of a novel influenza virus of swine origin in 1976, national, state, and local US public health authorities began planning efforts to respond to future pandemics. Several events have since stimulated progress in public health emergency planning: the 1997 avian influenza A(H5N1) outbreak in Hong Kong, China; the 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States; the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome; and the 2003 reemergence of influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in humans. We outline the evolution of US pandemic planning since the late 1970s, summarize planning accomplishments, and explain their ongoing importance. The public health community's response to the 2009 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic demonstrated the value of planning and provided insights into improving future plans and response efforts. Preparedness planning will enhance the collective, multilevel response to future public health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Iskander
- Office of the Associate Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Mailstop D50, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duncan IG, Taitel MS, Zhang J, Kirkham HS. Planning influenza vaccination programs: a cost benefit model. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2012; 10:10. [PMID: 22835081 PMCID: PMC3453509 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2011] [Accepted: 07/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although annual influenza vaccination could decrease the significant economic and humanistic burden of influenza in the United States, immunization rates are below recommended levels, and concerns remain whether immunization programs can be cost beneficial. The research objective was to compare cost benefit of various immunization strategies from employer, employee, and societal perspectives. Methods An actuarial model was developed based on the published literature to estimate the costs and benefits of influenza immunization programs. Useful features of the model included customization by population age and risk-level, potential pandemic risk, and projection year. Various immunization strategies were modelled for an average U.S. population of 15,000 persons vaccinated in pharmacies or doctor’s office during the 2011/12 season. The primary outcome measure reported net cost savings per vaccinated (PV) from the perspective of various stakeholders. Results Given a typical U.S. population, an influenza immunization program will be cost beneficial for employers when more than 37% of individuals receive vaccine in non-traditional settings such as pharmacies. The baseline scenario, where 50% of persons would be vaccinated in non-traditional settings, estimated net savings of $6 PV. Programs that limited to pharmacy setting ($31 PV) or targeted persons with high-risk comorbidities ($83 PV) or seniors ($107 PV) were found to increase cost benefit. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the scenario-based findings. Conclusions Both universal and targeted vaccination programs can be cost beneficial. Proper planning with cost models can help employers and policy makers develop strategies to improve the impact of immunization programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian G Duncan
- Clinical Outcomes & Analytic Services, Walgreens Co,, 1415 Lake Cook Rd,, MS L444, Deerfield, IL, 60015, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
McCormick JB, Yan C, Ballou J, Salinas Y, Reininger B, Gay J, Calvillo F, Wilson JG, Lopez L, Fisher-Hoch SP. Response to H1N1 in a U.S.-Mexico border community. Biosecur Bioterror 2011; 8:233-42. [PMID: 20825334 DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Public health experts from a county health department and a school of public health collaborated to establish a simple, functional surveillance system to monitor swine-origin influenza virus as it crossed from Mexico into a Texas border community during the 2009 pandemic. The draft national and state preparedness plans were found to be cumbersome at the local level, so a simple, more practical real-time surveillance and response system was developed, in part by modifying these documents, and immediately implemented. Daily data analyses, including geographical information system mapping of cases and reports of school and daycare absences, were used for outbreak management. Aggregate reports of influenzalike illness and primary school absences were accurate in predicting influenza activity and were practical for use in local tracking, making decisions, and targeting interventions. These simple methods should be considered for local implementation and for integration into national recommendations for epidemic preparedness and response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B McCormick
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Brownsville Regional Campus, Brownsville, Texas 78520, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pribble JM, Fowler EF, Kamat SV, Wilkerson WM, Goldstein KM, Hargarten SW. Communicating emerging infectious disease outbreaks to the public through local television news: public health officials as potential spokespeople. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2010; 4:220-5. [PMID: 21149218 DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2010.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess how West Nile virus (WNV) was reported to the American public on local television news and identify the main factors that influenced coverage. METHODS A representative sample of WNV stories that were reported on 122 local television news stations across the United States during October 2002, covering 67% of the nation's population, were coded for self-efficacy, comparative risk scenarios, symptoms and recommendations, high-risk individuals, and frame. In addition, public service professionals (PSPs) interviewed in the segments were identified. Comparisons were made between stories in which a PSP was interviewed and stories without an interview with respect to discussion of the 5 variables coded. RESULTS Of the 1,371 health-related stories captured during the study period, 160 WNV stories aired, the second most common health topic reported. Forty-nine of the 160 WNV stories contained at least 1 of the 5 reporting variables. Forty-two PSPs were interviewed within 33 unique WNV stories. Public health officials composed 81% of all PSP interviews. Stories containing a public health official interview had 15.2 times (odds ratio 15.2, confidence interval 5.1-45.9) higher odds of reporting quality information, controlling for station affiliate or geographic location. CONCLUSIONS Emerging infectious disease stories are prominently reported by local television news. Stories containing interviews with public health officials were also much more likely to report quality information. Optimizing the interactions between and availability of public health officials and the local news media may enhance disaster communication of emerging infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Pribble
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Suite H-3200, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-5770, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rosselli RT, Davis MK, Simeonsson K, Johnson M, Goode B, Casani J, MacDonald PDM. An academic/government partnership to provide technical assistance with pandemic influenza planning to local health departments in North Carolina. Public Health Rep 2010; 125 Suppl 5:92-9. [PMID: 21137135 DOI: 10.1177/00333549101250s513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2006, the North Carolina Division of Public Health (NC DPH) required all 85 local health departments (LHDs) in North Carolina to develop a pandemic influenza plan. Because few LHDs had experience in developing such plans, NC DPH engaged in a unique partnership with an academic center, the North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness (NCCPHP), to provide technical assistance to local planners. This article describes the technical assistance program implemented by NCCPHP, the use of technical assistance by local planners, subsequent completeness of local pandemic influenza plans, and lessons learned throughout the program. We discuss selected topic areas (surveillance, vaccine/antiviral, and vulnerable populations) observed within local pandemic influenza plans to highlight the variability in planning approaches and identify potential opportunities for state and local standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Rosselli
- North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness, North Carolina Institute for Public Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 8165, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8165, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nicholas D, Patershuk C, Koller D, Bruce-Barrett C, Lach L, Zlotnik Shaul R, Matlow A. Pandemic planning in pediatric care: a website policy review and national survey data. Health Policy 2010; 96:134-42. [PMID: 20137826 PMCID: PMC7132461 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2009] [Revised: 01/07/2010] [Accepted: 01/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigates current policies, key issues, and needs for pandemic planning in pediatrics in Canada. METHODS Online pandemic plans from national, provincial and territorial government websites were reviewed to identify: plans for children and families, and psychosocial and ethical issues. A survey was administered to gather participants' perspectives on the needs in pediatric planning, as well as important elements of their organizations' and regions' pandemic plans. A thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative survey responses. RESULTS The majority of existing plans did not adequately address the unique needs of pediatric populations, and mainly focused on medical and policy concerns. Several gaps in plans were identified, including the need for psychosocial supports and ethical decision-making frameworks for children and families. Similarly, survey respondents identified parallel gaps, in their organization's or region's plans. CONCLUSIONS Although many plans provide guidelines for medical and policy issues in pediatrics, much more work remains in psychosocial and ethical planning. A focus on children and families is needed for pandemic planning in pediatrics to ensure best outcomes for children and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nicholas
- Faculty of Social Work (Central and Northern Alberta Region), University of Calgary, #444 11044-82 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
There is little known about the impact of the timing of influenza vaccine administration on seroconversion in patients on chemotherapy. Recommendations for other vaccines state that the vaccines should be readministered several months after the completion of chemotherapy outside of the stem cell transplant setting. This is not often possible with the influenza vaccine because of its seasonal nature. To examine whether certain times during chemotherapy are more favorable for seroconversion, we examined vaccine responses in a cohort of children on chemotherapy. Pediatric patients on chemotherapy were recruited over the 2006 to 2008 influenza vaccine seasons. Sixty-eight acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 3 acute myeloid leukemia, and 18 sarcoma patients were evaluated. Clinical and laboratory features were recorded. The hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay was used to define serotype-specific responses. Seroconversion rates varied according to the type of chemotherapy during the vaccination period. In some cases, there was a late rise in titer, suggesting that a wild-type infection had occurred, leading to an estimate of vulnerability of this population. In patients with ALL, responses to the vaccine were greater when it was given early in the course of treatment. We conclude that seroconversion rates are well below the rates cited for the general population. The 3 acute myeloid leukemia patients had a particularly poor response to the vaccine. In the case of ALL patients, it may be possible to adjust the timing of the vaccine to optimize the response.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim CS, Pile JC, Lozon MM, Wilkerson WM, Wright CM, Cinti S. Role of hospitalists in an offsite alternate care center (ACC) for pandemic flu. J Hosp Med 2009; 4:546-9. [PMID: 20013856 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Recent concerns about an influenza pandemic have highlighted the need to plan for offsite Alternate Care Centers (ACCs). The likelihood of a successful response to patient surges will depend on the local health systems' ability to prepare well in advance of an influenza pandemic. Our health system has worked closely with our state's medical biodefense network to plan the establishment of an ACC for an influenza pandemic. As hospitalists have expanded their roles in their local health systems, they are poised to play a major role in planning for the next influenza pandemic. Hospitalists should work with their health system's administration in developing an ACC plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5376, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- W Paul Glezen
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mair M, Grow RW, Mair JS, Radonovich LJ. Universal influenza vaccination: the time to act is now. Biosecur Bioterror 2006; 4:20-40. [PMID: 16545022 DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Annual influenza epidemics create a significant public health burden each year in the United States. That influenza continues to pose a public health threat despite being largely preventable through vaccination is indicative of continuing weaknesses in the U.S.'s public health system. Moreover, the burden of annual influenza epidemics and the fragility and instability of the capacity to respond to them underscore the U.S.'s ongoing vulnerability to pandemic influenza and highlights gaps in bioterrorism preparedness and response efforts. This article examines the burden of annual influenza epidemics in the U.S., efforts to combat that burden with vaccination, shortcomings of influenza vaccination efforts, and how those shortcomings exemplify weaknesses in pandemic influenza and bioterrorism preparedness efforts. We make the case for establishing an annual universal influenza vaccination program to assure access to influenza vaccination to anyone who can safely receive vaccination and desires it. Such a program could greatly reduce the annual burden of influenza while advancing and maintaining U.S. pandemic influenza and bioterrorism preparedness and response efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mair
- Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mair M, Grow RW, Mair JS, Radonovich LJ. Universal Influenza Vaccination: The Time to Act Is Now. Biosecur Bioterror 2006. [DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.ft-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
14
|
Abstract
In the near future, experts predict, an influenza pandemic will likely spread throughout the world. Many countries have been creating a contingency plan in order to mitigate the severe health and social consequences of such an event. Examination of the pandemic plans of Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, from an ethical perspective, raises several concerns. One: scarcity of human and material resources is assumed to be severe. Plans focus on prioritization but do not identify resources that would be optimally required to reduce deaths and other serious consequences. Hence, these plans do not facilitate a truly informed choice at the political level where decisions have to be made on how much to invest now in order to reduce scarcity when a pandemic occurs. Two: mass vaccination is considered to be the most important instrument for reducing the impact of infection, yet pandemic plans do not provide concrete estimates of the benefits and burdens of vaccination to assure everyone that the balance is highly favorable. Three: pandemic plans make extraordinary demands on health care workers, yet professional organizations and unions may not have been involved in the plans' formulation and they have not been assured that authorities will aim to protect and support health care workers in a way that corresponds to the demands made on them. Four: all sectors of society and all individuals will be affected by a pandemic and everyone's collaboration will be required. Yet, it appears that the various populations have been inadequately informed by occasional media reports. Hence, it is essential that plans are developed and communication programs implemented that will not only inform but also create an atmosphere of mutual trust and solidarity; qualities that at the time of a pandemic will be much needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaro Kotalik
- Centre for Health Care Ethics, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Taylor JL, Roup BJ, Blythe D, Reed GK, Tate TA, Moore KA. Pandemic influenza preparedness in Maryland: improving readiness through a tabletop exercise. Biosecur Bioterror 2005; 3:61-9. [PMID: 15853456 DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
In February 1999, the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene initiated pandemic influenza planning for the state of Maryland. This process involved several major steps, including the development of the Maryland Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plan, and culminated in a high-level tabletop exercise to test the plan in April 2004. During the tabletop exercise, participants were presented with nine different fictitious scripts encompassing a single scenario. They were asked to respond to the information presented in each script, discuss organization-specific questions posed by the exercise facilitator, and make decisions regarding action steps that their organization would take in response to the various issues raised. The exercise identified a number of important gaps that need to be addressed, including (1) additional surge capacity specific to a pandemic, (2) greater understanding of the realities and implications of pandemic influenza among elected officials and decision-makers, (3) coordination of pandemic influenza planning with the existing emergency response infrastructure coupled with additional training in incident command, (4) further steps to operationalize several aspects of the Maryland Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plan, and (5) additional federal guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Lin Taylor
- Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore 21201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wilson N, Mansoor O, Lush D, Kiedrzynski T. Modeling the impact of pandemic influenza on Pacific Islands. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:347-9. [PMID: 15759341 PMCID: PMC3320443 DOI: 10.3201/eid1102.040951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Wilson
- Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Osman Mansoor
- Public Health Consulting Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Douglas Lush
- New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boutis K, Stephens D, Lam K, Ungar WJ, Schuh S. The impact of SARS on a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. CMAJ 2004; 171:1353-8. [PMID: 15557588 PMCID: PMC527337 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Greater Toronto Area (GTA) was considered a "hot zone" for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003. In accordance with mandated city-wide infection control measures, the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) drastically reduced all services while maintaining a fully operational emergency department. Because of the GTA health service suspensions and the overlap of SARS-like symptoms with many common childhood illnesses, this introduced the potential for a change in the volumes of patients visiting the emergency department of the only regional tertiary care children's hospital. METHODS We compared HSC emergency department patient volumes, admission rates and length of stay in the emergency department in the baseline years of 2000-2002 (non-SARS years) with those in 2003 (SARS year). The data from the prior years were modeled as a time series. Using an interrupted time series analysis, we compared the 2003 data for the periods before, during and after the SARS periods with the modeled data for significant differences in the 3 aforementioned outcomes of interest. RESULTS Compared with the 2000-2002 data, we found no differences in visits, admission rates or length of stay in the pre-SARS period in 2003. There were significant decreases in visits and length of stay (p < 0.001) and increases in admission rates (p < 0.001) during the periods in 2003 when there were new and active cases of SARS in the GTA. All 3 outcomes returned to expected estimates coincident with the absence of SARS cases from September to December 2003. INTERPRETATION During the SARS outbreak in the GTA, the HSC emergency department experienced significantly reduced volumes of patients with low-acuity complaints. This gives insight into utilization rates of a pediatric emergency department during a time when there was additional perceived risk in using emergency department services and provides a foundation for emergency department preparedness policies for SARS-like public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Boutis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although all jurisdictions in Canada offer annual influenza immunization to people at high risk of complications, only Ontario has provided universal annual immunization of healthy adults and children. Use of chemotherapy (amantidine, neuraminidase inhibitors) to prevent influenza varies among provinces. We sought to systematically review the evidence for the prevention of influenza infection in the general population. METHODS The interventions reviewed were influenza vaccination and prophylactic use of neuraminidase inhibitors. The health outcomes of interest were rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection, clinical definitions of influenza-like illness and work absenteeism. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1966 and March 2003. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. Evidence was appraised using the methodology of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. RESULTS Eighteen trials involving more than 33,000 healthy adults were identified that met the inclusion criteria; of these, 15 showed that influenza vaccination with either live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines was efficacious. Eleven trials were considered to be of "good" quality, and 7 were considered to be of "fair" quality. The relative risk reduction (RRR) associated with influenza immunization in adults ranged from 0% to 91%. Fifteen RCTs involving more than 45,000 healthy children aged 6 months to 19 years were identified, of which 9 were considered to contain "good" evidence and 6 "fair" evidence. Results from 12 of these trials showed protection against influenza. The RRR ranged from 0% to 93%. There were 6 RCTs of "good" quality showing that neuraminidase inhibitors are effective in preventing influenza infection. Side effects from both influenza vaccination and neuraminidase inhibitor administration were mild. INTERPRETATION There are numerous RCTs of good quality in large populations that have consistently shown that influenza vaccination, using inactivated or live-attenuated vaccines, is moderately effective in preventing influenza in the general population (healthy adults and children over 6 months of age). There is good evidence that neuraminidase inhibitor prophylaxis in contacts given within 36 to 48 hours of symptom onset of the household index case is effective; appropriate use of this prevention method requires access to rapid diagnostic methods. Decisions about introduction of routine immunization programs must take into account the cost and cost-effectiveness of a universal program and the burden of illness associated with influenza in each jurisdiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne M Langley
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and IWK Health Center, Halifax, NS.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Medema JK, Zoellner YF, Ryan J, Palache AM. Modeling pandemic preparedness scenarios: health economic implications of enhanced pandemic vaccine supply. Virus Res 2004; 103:9-15. [PMID: 15163482 DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Influenza pandemic planning is a complex, multifactorial process, which involves public health authorities, regulatory authorities, academia and industry. It is further complicated by the unpredictability of the time of emergence and severity of the next pandemic and the effectiveness of influenza epidemic interventions. The complexity and uncertainties surrounding pandemic preparedness have so far kept the various stakeholders from joining forces and tackling the problem from its roots. We developed a mathematical model, which shows the tangible consequences of conceptual plans by linking possible pandemic scenarios to health economic outcomes of possible intervention strategies. This model helps to structure the discussion on pandemic preparedness and facilitates the translation of pandemic planning concepts to concrete plans. The case study for which the model has been used shows the current level of global pandemic preparedness in an assumed pandemic scenario, the health economic implications of enhanced pandemic vaccine supply and the importance of cell culture-based influenza vaccine manufacturing technologies as a tool for pandemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen K Medema
- Business Group Influenza, Solvay Pharmaceuticals BV, PO Box 900, Weesp 1380 DA, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
|