Pneumococcal Resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamides, Ketolides, and Streptogramin B Agents: Molecular Mechanisms and Resistance Phenotypes

Cethromycin: A New Ketolide Antibiotic

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, chemistry, microbiology, in vitro susceptibility, mechanism of resistance, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, drug interactions, dosage, and administration of cethromycin, a new ketolide antibiotic.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was obtained through searching PubMed (1950-October 2012), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-October 2012), and a bibliographic review of published articles. Search terms included cethromycin, ABT-773, ketolide antibiotic, and community-acquired pneumonia.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All available in vitro and preclinical studies, as well as Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical studies published in English were evaluated to summarize the pharmacology, chemistry, microbiology, efficacy, and safety of cethromycin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cethromycin, a new ketolide, has a similar mechanism of action to telithromycin with an apparently better safety profile. Cethromycin displays in vitro activity against selected gram-positive, gram-negative, and atypical bacteria. The proposed indication of cethromycin is treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in patients aged 18 years or older. Based on clinical studies, the recommended dose is 300 mg orally once a day without regard to meals. Cethromycin has an orphan drug designation for tularemia, plague, and anthrax prophylaxis. The Food and Drug Administration denied approval for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in 2009; a recent noninferiority trial showed comparable efficacy between cethromycin and clarithromycin. Preliminary data on adverse effects suggest that cethromycin is safe and gastrointestinal adverse effects appear to be dose-related.

CONCLUSIONS

Cethromycin appears to be a promising ketolide for the treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia. It was denied approval by the FDA in 2009 pending more evidence to show its efficacy, with more recent studies showing its noninferiority to antibiotics for the same indication.

Advances in pneumococcal antibiotic resistance

Antimicrobial resistance and serotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae have been evolving with the widespread use of antibiotics and the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV). Particularly, among various types of antimicrobial resistance, macrolide resistance has most remarkably increased in many parts of the world, which has been reported to be >70% among clinical isolates from Asian countries. Penicillin resistance has dramatically decreased among nonmeningeal isolates due to the changes in resistance breakpoints, although resistance to other β-lactams such as cefuroxime has increased. Multidrug resistance became a serious concern in the treatment of invasive pneumococcal diseases, especially in Asian countries. After PCV7 vaccination, serotype 19A has emerged as an important cause of invasive pneumococcal diseases which was also associated with increasing prevalence of multidrug resistance in pneumococci. Widespread use of PCV13, which covers additional serotypes 3, 6A and 19A, may contribute to reduce the clonal spread of drug-resistant 19A pneumococci.

Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century

Dangerous, antibiotic resistant bacteria have been observed with increasing frequency over the past several decades. In this review the factors that have been linked to this phenomenon are addressed. Profiles of bacterial species that are deemed to be particularly concerning at the present time are illustrated. Factors including economic impact, intrinsic and acquired drug resistance, morbidity and mortality rates, and means of infection are taken into account. Synchronously with the waxing of bacterial resistance there has been waning antibiotic development. The approaches that scientists are employing in the pursuit of new antibacterial agents are briefly described. The standings of established antibiotic classes as well as potentially emerging classes are assessed with an emphasis on molecules that have been clinically approved or are in advanced stages of development. Historical perspectives, mechanisms of action and resistance, spectrum of activity, and preeminent members of each class are discussed.

Macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs: use and development of antimicrobial resistance

Macrolides and lincosamides are important antibacterials for the treatment of many common infections in cattle and pigs. Products for in-feed medication with these compounds in combination with other antimicrobials are commonly used in Europe. Most recently approved injectable macrolides have very long elimination half-lives in both pigs and cattle, which allows once-only dosing regimens. Both in-feed medication and use of long-acting injections result in low concentrations of the active substance for prolonged periods, which causes concerns related to development of antimicrobial resistance. Acquired resistance to macrolides and lincosamides among food animal pathogens, including some zoonotic bacteria, has now emerged. A comparison of studies on the prevalence of resistance is difficult, since for many micro-organisms no agreed standards for susceptibility testing are available. With animal pathogens, the most dramatic increase in resistance has been seen in the genus Brachyspira. Resistance towards macrolides and lincosamides has also been detected in staphylococci isolated from pigs and streptococci from cattle. This article reviews the use of macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs, as well as the development of resistance in target and some zoonotic pathogens. The focus of the review is on European conditions.

In VitroInduction of Resistance by Tissue Concentrations of Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Cefixime and Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in Clinical Isolates ofStreptococcus pyogenes

This study evaluated the effects of exposure to serum, tonsils and breakpoint drug concentrations of clarithromycin, azithromycin, cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate on Streptococcus pyogenes susceptibility. Frequency of mutation and development of resistance after ten passages on antibiotic gradient plates, followed by ten passages without antibiotic, were determined. Phenotypes of macrolide-resistant strains grown at the end of multi-step selection were also determined. Azithromycin induced a surge of resistant strains more rapidly and frequently than clarithromycin, particularly at tonsils concentrations. With amoxicillin/clavulanate no strains showed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) higher than the susceptibility breakpoint. Mutational frequencies were higher for azithromycin, at serum and breakpoint drug concentrations, than for the other drugs. Most of the macrolide resistant strains showed an MLS(B) phenotype. In conclusion, the ability to prevent the occurrence of resistance in clinical isolates of S. pyogenes was similar for amoxicillin/clavulanate and clarithromycin followed by cefixime > azithromycin when tonsil drug concentrations were considered, and greater for amoxicillin/clavulanate followed by clarithromycin > cefixime> azithromycin, at breakpoint and serum concentrations.

Pharmacotherapy for pneumococcal infections: an update

INTRODUCTION

The management of pneumococcal diseases still places a significant burden on medical and economic resources. The subjects at greatest risk of pneumococcal infections are children.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyse the best current therapeutic approach to pneumococcal resistance, taking into account the level of susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of different antibiotics in the various pneumococcal diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

Antibiotic treatment of a number of pneumococcal diseases remains difficult or impossible due to the presence of strains resistant to commonly used antibiotics. In children the problem is significantly more important than in adults due to the reduced number of licenced drugs for subjects in the first years of life. The new conjugate pneumococcal vaccines containing 10 (PCV10) and 13 serotypes (PCV13), which include most of the recently emerging strains, might reduce the incidence of pneumococcal infections and the circulation of resistant pathogens. However, it is likely that optimal results will only be reached after the development of effective vaccines based on conserved proteins that are capable of preventing all pneumococcal infections, regardless of the serotype of the causative organism.

Serotype emergence and genotype distribution among macrolide-resistant invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in the postconjugate vaccine (PCV-7) era

We conducted population-based surveillance for pneumococcal bacteremia within a 5-county region surrounding Philadelphia from October 2001 through September 2008, the period following introduction of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Erythromycin resistance increased from 14.7% in 2001-2002 to 20.3% in 2007-2008, while the resistance rate to penicillin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml) decreased from 7.2% to 4.2% during the same period. The most predominant serotypes associated with erythromycin resistance in 2007-2008 included 19A (29.7%), 15A (29.2%), 6C (10.1%), 3 (5.6%), and 6A (4.5%). The molecular mechanisms for the increasing erythromycin resistance were mainly due to the growing presence of mef(A) negative erm(B)(+) and mef(A)(+) erm(B)(+) genotypes, which increased from 20.0% to 46.1% and from 1.8% to 19.1%, respectively, from 2001-2002 to 2007-2008. However, mef(A)-mediated erythromycin resistance decreased from 72.7% in 2001-2002 to 34.8% in 2007-2008. Serotypes related to the erm(B) gene were 15A (45.6%), 19A (20.9%), 3 (10.1%), and 6B (6.3%); serotypes related to the mef(A) gene were 6A (18.6%), 19A (15.0%), 6C (9.3%), and 14(8.4%); serotypes associated with the presence of both erm(B) and mef(A) were 19A (81.5%), 15A (7.7%), and 19F (6.2%). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis demonstrated that erythromycin-resistant isolates within the 19A serotype were genetically diverse and related to several circulating international clones. In contrast, erythromycin-resistant isolates within the 15A serotype consisted of clonally identical or closely related isolates.

Correlation between usage of macrolide antibiotic and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae clinic isolates from Chongqing children's hospital

To investigate the reasons of growing resistance problem of Streptococcus pneumoniae against macrolide in Chongqing, a retrospective method was employed to measure the minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC) of macrolide antibiotic against 1,210 S. pneumoniae clinic isolates. The defined daily doses (DDDs) of macrolide antibiotic were calculated. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to determine the presence of the erythromycin-resistant genes in 100 macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates. A decrease in macrolide consumption, from 371,100 DDDs in 2002 to 182,500 DDDs in 2005 (51% reduction); however, the rate of erythromycin resistance in S. pneumoniae showed continued increase from 88.0% in 2002 to 96.0% in 2005. No linear correlation was observed between the decline in macrolide consumption and continued increase in resistant rate in S. pneumoniae. In 100 macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates, 68 had both erm(B) and mef(A) genotypes, 10 only had the erm(B), 20 only had the mef(A). Co-existences of ribosomal modification coded by erm(B) gene and efflux effects coded by mef(A) gene were the main resistance mechanism against macrolides and might be attributed to the high drug resistance of S. pneumoniae in Chongqing.

Distribution and antibacterial susceptibility of macrolide resistance genotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae: PROTEKT Year 5 (2003-2004)

The distribution and antibacterial susceptibility of macrolide resistance genotypes among 7083 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected worldwide during 2003-2004 from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including patients within 48h of admission to hospital, were analysed. The overall rate of erythromycin resistance was 37.2% (intercountry range <10% to >50%). The most common resistance mechanism globally was erm(B) (55.0% of erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae (ERSP)), followed by mef(A) (30.6%) and erm(B)+mef(A) (12.0%). Genotype distribution varied by age group (P<0.0001); erm(B)+mef(A) was more prevalent (21.8% of isolates) among patients 0-2 years of age than among other age groups (P<0.001). The prevalence of tetracycline resistance among mef(A) isolates varied between different countries. Of the erm(B)+mef(A) strains, 43.5% were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Most ERSP isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin (98.3%) and telithromycin (99.4%).

Antimicrobial resistance: current status and future direction

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is initiated through mutations in bacterial genes, culminating in end products that help circumvent the action of specific antimicrobial agents. Resistant mutants can proliferate under a number of circumstances but primarily through the action of selective pressure from the overuse of antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

The results of surveillance studies over approximately the last ten years were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Resistance rates in the group of microorganisms associated with respiratory tract infections had been increasing rapidly over the past 10 years, but, recently, many seem to have reached a plateau. However, newer, more invasive clones of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), differing from health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), and typically associated with community-acquisition (CA-MRSA), recently have begun to proliferate. Burgeoning use of fluoroquinolones has impacted the Gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella), causing their resistance rates to approach the critical point. A better understanding of the epidemiology of resistance and responsible use of antimicrobial agents are mandatory if the continuing rates of increasing resistance are to be abrogated.

Comparative in vitro and bactericidal activities of telithromycin against penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae by time-kill methodology

Broth microdilution MICs were determined for 14 antimicrobial agents against 296 clinical, non-duplicate isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected at Methodist Hospital (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) from January 2001 to December 2003. Isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Time-kill studies were performed to evaluate the bactericidal activity of telithromycin at 1, 2, 4, and 8x MIC against 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant (7 M-phenotype, 3 MLS(B)-phenotype) strains. Bactericidal activity was defined as a >/=3-log(10) reduction in CFU/mL. The prevalence of resistance was highest for the macrolides (32%), followed by penicillin (16.2%), clindamycin (10.8%), amoxicillin+/-clavulanate (4.4%), levofloxacin (3.0%), gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (2.4%), ceftriaxone and cefotaxime (2.0%), and gemifloxacin (1.4%). None of the isolates tested were resistant to telithromycin. At 24h, telithromycin was bactericidal for 0/10, 2/10, 7/10, and 7/10 isolates at 1x MIC, 2x MIC, 4x MIC, and 8x MIC, respectively. At 4-8x MIC, telithromycin was bactericidal for 7/7 M-phenotype isolates and 0/3 MLS(B)-phenotype isolates. For the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates, colony counts were decreased by 1.3-2.1log(10) colony-forming units/mL after 24h at 8x MIC. Overall, telithromycin was highly active against 296 isolates of S. pneumoniae from our institution and demonstrated bactericidal activity at clinically achievable concentrations for 7 of 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, telithromycin was bacteriostatic for the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates.

In vitro efficacy, resistance selection, and structural modeling studies implicate the malarial parasite apicoplast as the target of azithromycin

Azithromycin (AZ), a broad-spectrum antibacterial macrolide that inhibits protein synthesis, also manifests reasonable efficacy as an antimalarial. Its mode of action against malarial parasites, however, has remained undefined. Our in vitro investigations with the human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum document a remarkable increase in AZ potency when exposure is prolonged from one to two generations of intraerythrocytic growth, with AZ producing 50% inhibition of parasite growth at concentrations in the mid to low nanomolar range. In our culture-adapted lines, AZ displayed no synergy with chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine, or artesunate. AZ activity was also unaffected by mutations in the pfcrt (P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter) or pfmdr1 (P. falciparum multidrug resistance-1) drug resistance loci, as determined using transgenic lines. We have selected mutant, AZ-resistant 7G8 and Dd2 parasite lines. In the AZ-resistant 7G8 line, the bacterial-like apicoplast large subunit ribosomal RNA harbored a U438C mutation in domain I. Both AZ-resistant lines revealed a G76V mutation in a conserved region of the apicoplast-encoded P. falciparum ribosomal protein L4 (PfRpl4). This protein is predicted to associate with the nuclear genome-encoded P. falciparum ribosomal protein L22 (PfRpl22) and the large subunit rRNA to form the 50 S ribosome polypeptide exit tunnel that can be occupied by AZ. The PfRpl22 sequence remained unchanged. Molecular modeling of mutant PfRpl4 with AZ suggests an altered orientation of the L75 side chain that could preclude AZ binding. These data imply that AZ acts on the apicoplast bacterial-like translation machinery and identify Pfrpl4 as a potential marker of resistance.

Macrolide resistance in adults with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia

We conducted a case-control study of adults with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia to identify factors associated with macrolide resistance. Study participants were identified through population-based surveillance in a 5-county region surrounding Philadelphia. Forty-three hospitals contributed 444 patients, who were interviewed by telephone regarding potential risk factors. In multivariable analyses, prior exposure to a macrolide antimicrobial agent (odds ratio [OR] 2.8), prior flu vaccination (OR 2.0), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 4.1) were independently associated with an increased probability of macrolide resistance, and a history of stroke was independently associated with a decreased probability of macrolide resistance (OR 0.2). Fifty-five percent of patients with macrolide-resistant infections reported no antimicrobial drug exposure in the preceding 6 months. Among patients who reported taking antimicrobial agents in the 6 months preceding infection, failure to complete the course of prescribed drugs was associated with an increased probability of macrolide resistance (OR 3.4).

The search for new antimicrobials: why we need new options

The increasing identification of antibiotic-resistant pathogens that cause serious infections cannot be ignored. Although the future cannot be predicted with certainty, it is surely possible that an extensive epidemic of resistant bacterial infections could potentially harm millions of people. Given that it takes more than 10 years to establish the efficacy and safety of new compounds, there is an urgent need to restock the antibiotic pipeline. Only a few new antibacterial agents have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in the last 5 years, including linezolid in 2001, cefditoren, pivoxil and ertapenem in 2002, gemifloxacin and daptomycin in 2003, and telithromycin in 2004. Many of these agents are improved derivatives from established classes of antibiotics, and several are directed primarily at resistant Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., linezolid and daptomycin). One promising new addition is the recent approval of tigecycline (Tigacyl, Wyeth) in June 2005.

Serogroup 19 pneumococci containing both mef and erm macrolide resistance determinants in an American city

BACKGROUND

Asia has experienced a striking incidence of infection by highly resistant pneumococi containing both principal macrolide resistance determinants, namely, the mef efflux pump and the erm ribosomal methylase. mef/erm-containing pneumococci have not been identified in significant numbers in North America.

METHODS

Pneumococci were isolated as part of a larger study in Cleveland, OH examining colonization patterns among children randomized to 1 of 4 outpatient antibiotics for acute otitis media. Azithromycin-resistant organisms were tested for the presence of mef and erm sequences by polymerase chain reaction. The clonal relationship of pneumococci containing both genes was determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence testing. Selected characteristics of children harboring mef/erm-containing organisms were compared with other participants of the larger study.

RESULTS

Of 221 children colonized by pneumococci, 17 (7.7%) were colonized with an organism containing both determinants. All mef/erm-positive organisms demonstrated azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentrations > or =256 microg/mL and were coresistant to all other agents tested. The mef/erm-containing organisms were serotype 19A and 19F, all but 1 of which manifested similar pulsed field gel electrophoresis patterns. Multilocus sequence testing analysis indicated a relationship to the Taiwan-14 macrolide-resistant strain that has spread throughout Eastern Asia. More than one-third of children colonized by a mef/erm-containing organism had received > or =1 dose of conjugate pneumococcal vaccine, a significantly higher proportion than children carrying less resistant organisms (P< 0.01). No other characteristics distinguished children harboring a mef/erm-containing pneumococcus from other children enrolled in the larger study.

CONCLUSION

Clonally related mef/erm-containing serogroup 19 pneumococci were prominent among otherwise healthy children in a North American metropolitan area. Our findings suggest that spread of these organisms may be poorly contained by immunization.

Comparison of amoxicillin with alternative agents for the treatment of acute otitis media in children

Expert panels have recommended high-dose amoxicillin (80-90 mg/kg/day) as the therapy of choice for uncomplicated acute otitis media in children. This recommendation is based primarily on pharmacokinetic data predicting bacteriologic cure of most middle ear infections by using amoxicillin at the recommended dosage. However, comparisons of aminopenicillin-containing regimens with alternative treatments, particularly azithromycin, have not consistently demonstrated superiority of the former, even in recent trials with stringent designs. Moreover, amoxicillin exposure may perturb nasopharyngeal colonization more profoundly than do alternative agents. These perturbations may theoretically promote the dissemination of beta-lactam-resistant pneumococci in the community more than other drugs approved for use in otitis media. Such findings suggest that several factors should be considered when choosing an agent to treat otitis media and that reexamination of high-dose amoxicillin as the superior first-line agent for this condition might be warranted.

Characterization of In Vivo Acquired Resistance of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to Macrolides and Lincosamides

Macrolides and related antibiotics are used to control mycoplasma infections in the pig industry worldwide. Some porcine mycoplasmas, however, survive these treatments by acquiring resistance. The mechanism of acquired resistance to macrolides and lincosamides was studied in more detail for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by comparing both the phenotype and genotype of a resistant field isolate to five susceptible isolates. The MICs were significantly higher for the resistant strain for all antibiotics tested. The MICs for the 16-membered macrolide tylosin ranged from 8 to 16 microg for the resistant strain and from 0.03 to 0.125 microg/ml for the five susceptible strains. The MICs for the 15-membered macrolides and lincosamides were higher than 64 microg/ml for the resistant strain while only 0.06 to 0.5 microg/ml for the susceptible strains. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains are intrinsically resistant to the 14-membered macrolides due to a G 2057 A transition (E. coli numbering) in their 23S rDNA. Therefore, high MICs were observed for all strains, although the MICs for the resistant strain were clearly increased. An additional, acquired A 2058 G point mutation was found in the 23S rRNA gene of the resistant strain. No differences linked to resistance were found in the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22. The present study showed that 23S rRNA mutations resulting in resistance to macrolides and lincosamides as described in other Mycoplasma spp. also occur under field conditions in M. hyopneumoniae.

Characterization of Erythromycin-ResistantStreptococcus pneumoniaein Korea, andIn VitroActivity of Telithromycin against Erythromycin-ResistantStreptococcus pneumoniae

To characterize the phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Korea and to evaluate the in vitro activity of telithromycin against these erythromycin-resistant isolates, we tested a total of 676 isolates of S. pneumoniae collected from 1997 to 2002 in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. MICs for erythromycin and telithromycin were determined by the agar dilution method. The macrolide resistance phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant isolates were determined by the erythromycin- clindamycin-rokitamycin triple disk (ECRTD) and MIC induction tests, whereas their macrolide resistance genotypes were determined by PCR for the erm(B), erm(A), subclass erm(TR), and mef genes. To discriminate between mef(A) and mef(E), PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses were performed. Of the 676 S. pneumoniae isolates, 459 (67.9%) were resistant to erythromycin. Of the 459 erythromycin-resistant isolates, 343 (74.7%) were assigned to the cMLS phenotype, 48 (10.4%) to the iMcLS phenotype, 4 (0.9%) to the iMLS phenotype, and 64 (14.0%) to the M phenotype. The erm(B) gene was detected in 251 (54.6%) isolates, the mef gene was detected in 64 (14.0%), and both the erm(B) and mef genes were detected in 144 (31.4%) isolates. All of the mef genes detected were identified as mef(E). Of the 459 erythromycin- resistant isolates, all but one were susceptible to telithromycin. The MIC(50)/MIC(90) to telithromycin of isolates carrying erm(B), mef(E), and both genes was 0.06/0.5 microg/ml, 0.03/0.125 microg/ml, and 0.5/1.0 microg/ml, respectively. Although the MICs of telithromycin for the erythromycin-resistant isolates varied according to genotype, telithromycin was very active against these erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Telithromycin: The first ketolide antimicrobial

BACKGROUND

Telithromycin is the first of the ketolide antibacterials to receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for clinical use. It is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) in adults.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the mechanism of action, in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and drug-interaction profile of telithromycin.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE (1990-March 2005) using the terms telithromycin and HMR 3647, a review of the reference lists of identified articles, and a review of the briefing document prepared by the manufacturer of telithromycin for presentation to the FDA Anti-infective Drugs Advisory Committee. A search of abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2001-2004) also was performed.

RESULTS

The results of in vitro susceptibility studies suggest that telithromycin provides coverage against the key respiratory pathogens, both typical and atypical. In addition, telithromycin may be useful against multidrug-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and against Haemophilus influenzae, irrespective of beta-lactamase production. In randomized, double-blind, comparative trials (against amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime axetil, clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, or trovafloxacin), telithromycin had comparable efficacy to its comparators in the empiric treatment of CAP (4 studies), AECB (3 studies), and AMS (3 studies). Telithromycin is dosed at 800 mg (two 400-mg tablets) QD in community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). No dose adjustment is required in the elderly, patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency, or patients with hepatic insufficiency. The majority of adverse events associated with telithromycin were mild to moderate, with gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) being the most commonly reported, followed by headache and dizziness. Telithromycin has been associated with elevations in hepatic transaminases and prolongation of the electrocardiographic QTc interval, although the significance of these findings is not known. Telithromycin is also a strong inhibitor of and substrate for the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme. Therefore, it is important to monitor for potential drug interactions with medications that prolong the QTc interval or are metabolized by the CYP system.

CONCLUSIONS

Telithromycin appears to be a useful option for the empiric treatment of community-acquired RTIs in adults. It may be particularly useful in the outpatient setting in areas with high rates of penicillin- and macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae; it may also be an alternative agent for patients who are allergic to beta-lactams and live in areas with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae or for those who have failed to respond to beta-lactam- or macrolide-based therapy.

Mechanisms of resistance to telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Reports of ketolide resistance remain scarce, however, a few laboratory-derived and clinical isolates of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae have been documented. Mutations in key telithromycin-binding sites such as domains II and V of the 23S rRNA and ribosomal proteins L4 and L22, as well as mutations of the resistance determinant erm(B) are associated with elevated telithromycin MICs. Mutations in the secondary binding site of domain II coupled with ribosomal methylation may have serious resistance consequences should the domain II binding site be lost. Although ketolides are purported to maintain excellent activity against efflux-positive isolates, laboratory-derived telithromycin-resistant strains have been generated. As telithromycin usage increases, ketolide-resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae may well increase.

Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance

Antibiotic resistance continues to plague antimicrobial chemotherapy of infectious disease. And while true biocide resistance is as yet unrealized, in vitro and in vivo episodes of reduced biocide susceptibility are common and the history of antibiotic resistance should not be ignored in the development and use of biocidal agents. Efflux mechanisms of resistance, both drug specific and multidrug, are important determinants of intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to these antimicrobials, with some accommodating both antibiotics and biocides. This latter raises the spectre (as yet generally unrealized) of biocide selection of multiple antibiotic-resistant organisms. Multidrug efflux mechanisms are broadly conserved in bacteria, are almost invariably chromosome-encoded and their expression in many instances results from mutations in regulatory genes. In contrast, drug-specific efflux mechanisms are generally encoded by plasmids and/or other mobile genetic elements (transposons, integrons) that carry additional resistance genes, and so their ready acquisition is compounded by their association with multidrug resistance. While there is some support for the latter efflux systems arising from efflux determinants of self-protection in antibiotic-producing Streptomyces spp. and, thus, intended as drug exporters, increasingly, chromosomal multidrug efflux determinants, at least in Gram-negative bacteria, appear not to be intended as drug exporters but as exporters with, perhaps, a variety of other roles in bacterial cells. Still, given the clinical significance of multidrug (and drug-specific) exporters, efflux must be considered in formulating strategies/approaches to treating drug-resistant infections, both in the development of new agents, for example, less impacted by efflux and in targeting efflux directly with efflux inhibitors.

Antibacterial drug resistance: implications for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

In contrast to the tremendous number of articles and meetings devoted to elucidating the mechanisms of antibacterial drug resistance and describing the emergence of drug resistance patterns, little research has been completed on the impact of bacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes. Moreover.among the studies that have been completed, the better-designed studies generally have failed to detect an effect of most current levels of antibacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes for patients who have CAP. Yet, practice patterns are shifting in response to the perception that current levels of drug resistance necessitate changes in treatment patterns. This is unfortunate because it severely limits one's ability to continue to monitor the effectiveness of available therapies in light of changing patterns of antibacterial drug resistance. If levels of drug resistance continue to rise, it is likely that outcomes from those drug treatments will be affected adversely. In this regard, the recent licensing of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for infants and young children may have an important effect on future trends in antibacterial drug resistance. The vaccine reduces childhood carriage of vaccine serotypes,which are among the most common serotypes found among drug-resistant isolates, and may reduce transmission of these serotypes to adults [65]. In conclusion, antibacterial drug resistance has not reduced substantially the effectiveness of first-line treatments for CAP. Whether levels of drug resistance will continue to increase or decline is unknown. Therefore,carefully designed outcomes studies likely will continue to be essential to help define optimal therapy for patients who have CAP.