Spontaneous hepatic decompensation in patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus during interferon-ribavirin combination treatment

Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Co-infected Patients With Cirrhosis Are No Longer at Higher Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma or End-Stage Liver Disease as Compared to HCV Mono-infected Patients

It is widely accepted that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a risk factor for increased severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver disease. However, owing to better efficacy and safety of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), and increased access to HCV therapy, whether this condition remains true is still unknown. Overall, 1,253 HCV mono-infected patients and 175 HIV/HCV co-infected patients with cirrhosis, included in two prospective French national cohorts (ANRS CO12 CirVir and CO13 HEPAVIH), were studied. Cirrhosis was compensated (Child-Pugh A), without past history of complication, and assessed on liver biopsy. Incidences of liver decompensation (LD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and death according to HIV status were calculated by a Fine-Gray model adjusted for age. Propensity score matching was also performed to minimize confounding by baseline characteristics. At baseline, HIV/HCV patients were younger (47.5 vs. 56.0 years; P < 0.001), more frequently males (77.1% vs. 62.3%; P < 0.001), and had at baseline and at end of follow-up similar rates of HCV eradication than HCV mono-infected patients. A total of 80.4% of HIV/HCV patients had an undetectable HIV viral load. After adjustment for age, 5-year cumulative incidences of HCC and decompensation were similar in HIV/HCV and HCV patients (8.5% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.12 and 12.8% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.40, respectively). Overall mortality adjusted for age was higher in HIV/HCV co-infected patients (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.06; P = 0.011). Factors associated with LD and HCC were age, absence of sustained virological response, and severity of cirrhosis, but not HIV status. Using a propensity score matching 95 patients of each group according to baseline features, similar results were observed. Conclusion: In HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis, HIV co-infection was no longer associated with higher risks of HCC and hepatic decompensation. Increased mortality, however, persisted, attributed to extrahepatic conditions.

Daily cannabis and reduced risk of steatosis in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus-co-infected patients (ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH)

Liver steatosis is common in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected patients. Some recent studies have found that cannabis use is negatively associated with insulin resistance in the general population and in HIV-HCV-co-infected patients. Given the causal link between insulin resistance and steatosis, we hypothesized that cannabis use has a positive impact on steatosis. Therefore, we aimed to study whether cannabis use in this population was associated with a reduced risk of steatosis, measured by ultrasound examination. ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH is a French nationwide multicentre cohort of HIV-HCV-co-infected patients. Medical and socio-behavioural data from clinical follow-up visits and annual self-administered questionnaires were prospectively collected. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the first visit where both ultrasound examination data for steatosis (positive or negative diagnosis) and data on cannabis use were available. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between cannabis use and steatosis. Among study sample patients (n = 838), 40.1% had steatosis. Fourteen per cent reported daily cannabis use, 11.7% regular use and 74.7% no use or occasional use ("never or sometimes"). Daily cannabis use was independently associated with a reduced prevalence of steatosis (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.64 [0.42;0.99]; P = .046), after adjusting for body mass index, hazardous alcohol consumption and current or lifetime use of lamivudine/zidovudine. Daily cannabis use may be a protective factor against steatosis in HIV-HCV-co-infected patients. These findings confirm the need for a clinical evaluation of cannabis-based pharmacotherapies in this population. Eudract.ema.europa.eu number, DGS050367.

Regimens for Patients Coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is prevalent in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and has an accelerated disease course. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies that do not require interferon increase response rates to levels identical to those seen in HCV monoinfection. However, drug-drug interaction between antiretrovirals and HCV medication is the major consideration in deciding on the appropriate HCV therapeutic approach in patients with HIV. This article summarizes the currently available data with HCV DAAs in patients with HIV, and focuses on predicting and managing drug interaction to facilitate successful DAA-based HCV therapy in those with HIV.

Treating HCV in HIV 2013: on the cusp of change

Treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV/HCV co-infected patients is a challenge. Even if the benefits of achieving a sustained virological response are clear, the rates achieved with the combination of pegylated-interferon and ribavirin are disappointing. The addition of direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to the treatment of hepatitis C is revolutionizing the treatment of HCV in mono-infected patients. Even if there have not been any agents approved for the treatment of co-infected patients, many studies specifically designed for this population are ongoing. This article reviews available data on the use of DAAs in co-infected patients and the challenges associated with these new drugs.

HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients and cirrhosis: how to diagnose it and what to do next?

Liver disease, specifically cirrhosis, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. The diagnosis of early cirrhosis in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients may be challenging. The development of noninvasive methods for fibrosis assessment empowers the infectious disease specialist to diagnose advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Early diagnosis is essential to enroll patients in screening programs for esophageal varices and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cirrhosis may also modify decisions about treatment of both HIV and HCV, including vaccination, medications chosen, and referral for liver transplant.

Severe transaminitis after interferon-ribavirin therapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients: influence of a sustained HCV response

Chronic hepatitis C is an independent risk factor for severe drug hepatotoxicity. Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C may modulate drug hepatotoxicity, as it is associated with a decline in hepatic enzyme release and halts fibrosis progression in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The aim of this study was to determine biological and/or clinical determinants of alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase elevation (>five-fold above the upper limit of normal in patients with normal baseline levels or >3.5-fold increase from baseline in those with increased baseline levels) in a large prospective cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on HAART who had previously been treated for HCV infection. Median follow-up exceeded five years. Cox proportional hazards models were used. At baseline, 248 patients had been receiving antiretroviral therapy for a mean of 6.3 (± 3.2) years. Seventy-one patients (29%) had a sustained HCV viral response (SVR). During follow-up, 66 patients (26.6%) received a second course of HCV therapy and 29 (44%) of them had an SVR. Severe transaminitis occurred in 64 patients (26%). In multivariate analysis, no SVR (HR 33.33, 95% CI 4.54-222, P = 0.001) and stavudine-based therapy (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.99, P = 0.018) remained significantly associated with severe transaminitis. A SVR to anti-HCV therapy is thus associated with a markedly reduced risk of severe transaminitis during antiretroviral therapy. Treatment of HCV infection should therefore be a priority in HIV-coinfected patients. Stavudine is associated with an increased risk of severe transaminitis.

Current treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus/HIV-infected individuals: the role of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients. This review highlights the role of pegylated interferon-alpha (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy and examines factors associated with response and strategies to maximize responses.

RECENT FINDINGS

HCV viral clearance is lower in HIV co-infected patients than in HCV mono-infected patients. However, in patients who attain sustained response there is clinical benefit in terms of liver disease associated morbidity and mortality and treatment is costeffective. Predictors of response appear similar, although there are a number of modifiable patient-associated and HIV-associated factors that could be addressed. Moreover, the use of weight-based RBV and treatment length guided by early viral responses improve response rate. Avoidance of drug-drug interactions and use of haematopoietic growth factors reduce adverse events and dose reductions and ultimately increase response rates. Very early prediction of treatment futility is promising. Induction dosing strategies have not yielded positive results, though twice weekly peg-IFN-alpha-2a induction therapy merits further investigation.

SUMMARY

Peg-IFN/RBV therapy plays an important role in the management of HCV in HIV-infected patients. Efforts to maximize response to current therapy need to continue while we await new therapies.

Impact of HAART exposure and associated lipodystrophy on advanced liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The impact of antiretroviral drug exposure and associated lipodystrophy and/or insulin resistance (IR) on advanced liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is not fully documented. We determined the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis (defined by hepatic stiffness ≥9.5 kPa) and associated factors, focusing on the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy and its major adverse effects (lipodystrophy and IR), in 671 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients included in the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort. One hundred ninety patients (28.3%) had advanced liver fibrosis. In univariate analysis, advanced liver fibrosis was significantly associated with male sex, higher body mass index, HCV infection through intravenous drug use, a lower absolute CD4 cell count, a longer history of antiretroviral treatment, longer durations of protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and NRTI exposure, lipodystrophy, diabetes, and a high homeostasis model assessment method (HOMA) value. The only antiretroviral drugs associated with advanced liver fibrosis were efavirenz, stavudine and didanosine. In multivariate analysis, male sex (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.5; P = 0.018), HCV infection through intravenous drug use (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6; P = 0.018), lipodystrophy (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; P = 0.01), median didanosine exposure longer than 5 months (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8; P = 0.04) and a high HOMA value (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P = 0.005) remained significantly associated with advanced liver fibrosis. Mitochondrial toxicity and IR thus appear to play a key role in liver damage associated with HIV/HCV-coinfection, and this should be taken into account when selecting and optimizing antiretroviral therapy. Antiretroviral drugs with strong mitochondrial toxicity (e.g. didanosine) or a major effect on glucose metabolism should be avoided.

Increasing burden of liver disease in patients with HIV infection

Introduction of effective combined antiretroviral therapy has made HIV infection a chronic illness. Substantial reductions in the number of AIDS-related deaths have been accompanied by an increase in liver-related morbidity and mortality due to co-infection with chronic hepatitis B and C viruses. Increases in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and drug-induced hepatotoxicity, together with development of hepatocellular carcinoma, also potentiate the burden of liver disease in individuals with HIV infection. We provide an overview of the key causes, disease mechanisms of pathogenesis, and recommendations for treatment options including the evolving role of liver transplantation.

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients]

Since the pivotal trials conducted over the last few years which have used the combination of pegylated interferon along with fixed low doses (800 mg/day) of ribavirin and have provided treatment for 12 months, regardless the kinetics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load during therapy, great progress has been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients. Results approaching those seen in HCV-monoinfected patients can be obtained with optimal dosages of ribavirin, extension of treatment beyond 48 weeks in the absence of rapid virologic response and/or in patients older than 40 years, with severe fibrosis (METAVIR score F3 or F4) and/or with high HCV viral load and with a better management of HIV treatment in order to avoid a negative interaction between HCV and HIV therapies (interaction between abacavir and ribavirin) and to improve the tolerance of HCV therapy (Didanosine should never be used with ribavirin, Zidovudine and Stavudine should be avoided when possible with ribavirin).

Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients with human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C may be less effective if patients are co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients with HIV.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through manual and electronic searches in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded. The last search was May 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing at least 12 weeks of any anti-HCV treatment versus another treatment regimen or no treatment. Included patients had chronic hepatitis C and stable HIV irrespective of previous antiviral therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were done in duplicate. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials were included. None of the included 2269 patients were previously treated for chronic hepatitis C. Peginterferon (either 2a, 180 microgram, or 2b, 1.5 microgram/kg, once weekly) plus ribavirin was more effective in achieving end of treatment and sustained virological response compared with interferon plus ribavirin (5 trials, 1340 patients) or peginterferon (2 trials, 714 patients). The benefit of peginterferon plus ribavirin was seen irrespective of HCV genotype although patients with genotype 1 or 4 had lower response rates (27%) than patients with genotype 2 or 3 (56%). The remaining trials compared different treatment regimens in patients who were treatment naive or had no virological response after three months of treatment, but overall they had not enough power to show any effect of increasing the dose of interferon or adding both amantadine or ribavirin. The overall mortality was 23/2111 patients with no significant differences between treatment regimens. Treatment increased the risk of adverse events including anaemia and flu-like symptoms, and several serious adverse events occurred including fatal lactic acidosis, liver failure, and suicide due to depression.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Peginterferon plus ribavirin may be considered a treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C and stable HIV who have not received treatment for hepatitis C as the intervention may clear the blood of HCV RNA. Supporting evidence comes mainly from the analysis of this non-validated surrogate outcome assessed in comparisons against other antiviral treatments. There is no evidence on treatment of patients who have relapsed or did not respond to previous therapy. Careful monitoring of adverse events is warranted.

[ANRS HC 02 RIBAVIC: histo-pathological impact]

Anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy allows complete recovery of HCV infection (sustained virologic response). Reduction of necro-inflammation results usually in a stabilization then in a reduction of fibrosis and even of cirrhosis at least in patients with sustained virologic response. The randomised controlled RIBAVIC ANRS HC02 trial comparing the combination ribavirin-pegylated interferon-alpha2b versus ribavirine-standard interferon-alpha2b as first treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients allowed an analysis of 205 paired (pre- and post-treatment) biopsies using the Metavir and Ishak scores. A significant reduction was associated with sustained virologic response and non response with stabilization. There was no positive impact on fibrosis despite sustained virologic response and a deterioration in non responders. In multivariate analysis, didanosine and non response were significantly associated with fibrosis deterioration. The absence of fibrosis reversal in co-infected patients is related to virologic non response and probably to co-factors of fibrosis worsening, like the mitochondrial toxicity of antiretrovirals and especially of didanosine. In the RIBAVIC cohort (prospective followup of 383 co-infected HIV-HCV treated patients) with a median of 60 months, 21 patients (5 %) had a liver event: all were non responders and 20 had fibrosis score > or = F3. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with survival were virologic response to antiviral therapy, fibrosis score < F3 and baseline CD 4 count > 350/mL. These results emphasize the need of early therapeutic interventions to increase the rate of sustained virologic response and to decrease the rate of liver complications in the most severe patients.

[Role of tenofovir in HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in HIV-infected individuals, especially if the route of infection is intravenous (e.g. intravenous drug use or blood transfusion). Prognosis is poorer in patients with HCV and HIV coinfection than in those with HCV monoinfection, mainly due to the immunodepression caused by HIV infection and probably also to a direct effect of HIV on the liver. Moreover, although antiretroviral therapy can cause liver damage, there is little doubt about the net benefits obtained with triple therapy in coinfected individuals, since suppression of HIV replication and immune recovery help to halt liver damage. However, not all antiretroviral agents are equal and those with the lowest hepatotoxicity and best metabolic profile should be used in coinfected patients, since hepatic steatosis accelerates progression of hepatic fibrosis and insulin resistance hampers the success of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. Tenofovir is currently one of the safest nucleos(t)ide analogues, due to its low hepatotoxicity and its lack of negative interference on treatment of HCV infection.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding may unmask didanosine-associated portal hepatopathy in HIV/HCV co-infected patients

Three HIV individuals with chronic hepatitis C presented with esophageal variceal bleeding. They had mild liver fibrosis and normal liver function tests. All had received didanosine for long periods. Noncirrhotic portal hypertension associated with didanosine may appear in HIV patients without any liver disease or added to chronic hepatitis C.

Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected individuals

Many individuals are infected with both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. More rapid progression of liver disease is seen, higher levels of HCV RNA encourage transmission and sustained virological responses are lower in coinfected patients. The management of these patients is further complicated by potential interactions between antiretroviral therapy and peginterferon and ribavirin.

Management complexities of HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection in the twenty-first century

Because of shared routes of transmission, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common among HIV-infected persons. Because of the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy, chronic HCV has now emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Because chronic HCV is highly prevalent among HIV-infected patients and has a rapid disease progression, antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is critical for the long-term survival of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. In this article, the authors review the (1) epidemiology of HCV among HIV-infected individuals, (2) effect of HIV on the natural history of chronic HCV, (3) impact of antiretroviral therapy on HCV coinfection, and (4) management of chronic HCV in the HIV-infected person.

Pegylated interferon 2a and 2b in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV infected patients

Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV is an increasingly recognized clinical dilemma, particularly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Several studies of this population have demonstrated both more rapid progression of liver disease and poorer overall prognosis compared to HCV monoinfected patients. Consensus guidelines, based primarily on the results of 4 major randomized trials, recommend treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks in coinfected patients. However, this current standard of care is associated with lower response rates to therapy than those seen in monoinfected patients. Important predictors of response include HCV genotype, pretreatment HCV RNA level, and presence of rapid virologic response (RVR) and early virologic response (EVR). Use of weight-based ribavirin dosing appears to be safe and enhances the likelihood of sustained virologic response (SVR). Adverse effects most commonly encountered are anemia and weight loss. Mitochondrial toxicity can occur in the setting of concomitant nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use, especially didanosine, abacavir, and zidovudine, and these should be discontinued before initiation of ribavirin therapy. Discontinuation of therapy should be considered in patients failing to demonstrate EVR, though ongoing trials are investigating a potential role for maintenance therapy in these patients. Peginterferon combined with weight-based ribavirin is appropriate and safe for treatment of HCV in HIV - HCV coinfected patients. This review summarizes the data supporting these recommendations.

Critical role of ribavirin for the achievement of early virological response to HCV therapy in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients

The response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy seems to be lower in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients than in HCV-monoinfected individuals. Given that most pivotal trials conducted in coinfected patients have used the combination of pegylated interferon (pegIFN) along with fixed low doses (800 mg/day) of ribavirin (RBV), it is unclear whether HIV itself and/or suboptimal RBV exposure could explain this poorer outcome. Two well-defined end points of early virological response were evaluated in Peginterferon Ribavirina España Coinfección (PRESCO), a multicentre trial in which the combination of pegIFN plus RBV (1000 mg if body weight <75 kg and 1200 mg if >75 kg) was prescribed to coinfected patients. For comparisons, we used unpublished data from early kinetics in two other large trials, one performed in HIV-negative patients [Pegasys International Study Group (PISG)] in which RBV 1000-1200 mg/day was used and another [AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin Coinfection Trial (APRICOT)] in which HIV-positive patients received fixed low RBV doses (800 mg/day). A total of 348 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients from the PRESCO trial were analysed as well as all patients treated with pegIFN plus RBV, who completed 12 weeks of therapy in the comparative studies (435 in PISG and 268 in APRICOT). Negative serum HCV-RNA at week 4 (which has the highest positive predictive value of sustained virological response, SVR) was attained in 33.3%, 31.2% and 13% of treated patients with HCV genotype 1, respectively, in PRESCO, PISG and APRICOT. For HCV genotypes 2/3, responses were 83.7%, 84.2% and 37%, respectively. A decline lower than 2 log(10) at week 12 (which has the highest negative predictive value of SVR) was seen in 25.5%, 19.5% and 37% of HCV genotype-1-infected patients, and in 2.1%, 2.9% and 12% of genotypes-2/3-infected patients, respectively. Prescription of high RBV doses enhances the early virological response to HCV therapy in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, with results approaching those seen in HCV-monoinfected patients.

Predictive Value of Early Virologic Response in HIV/Hepatitis C Virus-Coinfected Patients Treated With an Interferon-Based Regimen Plus Ribavirin

BACKGROUND

As a result of adverse events, a moderate rate of virologic response, and high costs associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy, finding early markers of sustained treatment response is a clinical priority. In the HCV-monoinfected population, a reduction >or=2 log in plasma HCV RNA at week 12 of therapy (early virologic response [EVR]) predicts a sustained virologic response (SVR). Few data are available in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, however.

METHODS

A subanalysis of data from HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon-alpha-2b (PEG, 100-150 mug/wk) or interferon-alpha-2b (IFN, 3 MIU 3 times per week) plus ribavirin (RBV, 800-1200 mg/d) was conducted in a randomized single-center clinical trial. The duration of treatment was 48 weeks (only 24 weeks for HCV genotype 2 or 3 with a baseline HCV RNA level <800,000 IU/mL).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were randomized (43 assigned to IFN + RBV and 52 assigned to PEG + RBV). Eighty patients completed at least 12 weeks on therapy and were included in the EVR analysis. Thirty-five (43%) of them attained an SVR (56% and 30% of patients treated with PEG and IFN, respectively; P = 0.026). An EVR occurred in 55 (69%; 80% of PEG + RBV group and 56% of IFN + RBV group). Overall, 35 of 55 patients with an EVR were sustained responders, yielding a positive predictive value of 64% (70% in PEG + RBV arm and 55% in IFN + RBV arm). None of the patients who demonstrated an HCV RNA decline of <2 logs at week 12 reached an SVR (negative predictive value of 100%).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the utility of an EVR to predict the chance of the lack of an SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, particularly those treated with PEG.