Increasing pneumococcal vaccination rates among residents of long-term--care facilities: provider-based improvement strategies implemented by peer-review organizations in four western states

Effectiveness of educational interventions for healthcare workers on vaccination dialogue with older adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers (HCW) significantly influence older adults' vaccine acceptance. This systematic review aimed to identify effective educational interventions for HCWs that could enhance their ability to engage in a dialogue with older adults on vaccination.

METHODS

Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library and grey literature were searched for comparative studies investigating educational interventions concerning older adult vaccinations. The search encompassed all languages and publication years. Analysis was performed on the outcomes 'vaccines offered or ordered' and 'vaccination rates'. Whenever feasible, a sub-analysis on publication year was conducted. Methodological limitations were assessed using the RoB 2 for RCTs and the GRADE checklist for non-randomized studies. Study outcomes were categorized according to the four-level Kirkpatrick model (1996) for effectiveness: reaction, learning, behaviour, and results.

RESULTS

In total, 48 studies met all inclusion criteria. Most studies included reminder systems signalling HCWs on patients due for vaccination. Other interventions included seminars, academic detailing and peer-comparison feedback. Four articles reporting on the reaction-level indicated that most HCWs had a favourable view of the intervention. Two of the six articles reporting on the learning-level observed positive changes in attitude or knowledge due to the intervention. Seventeen studies reported on the behaviour-level. An analysis on eleven out of seventeen studies focusing on vaccines 'ordered' or 'offered' outcomes suggested that tailored reminders, particularly those implemented before 2000, were the most effective. Out of 34 studies reporting on the result-level, 24 were eligible for analysis on the outcome 'vaccination rate', which showed that compared to usual care, multicomponent interventions were the most effective, followed by tailored reminders, especially those predating 2000. Nonetheless, tailored reminders often fell short compared to other interventions like standing orders or patient reminders. In both the behaviour-level and result-level 'education only' interventions frequently underperformed relative to other interventions. Seventeen out of the 27 RCTs, and seven of the 21 non-randomized studies presented a low-to-medium risk for bias in the studies' findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailored reminders and multicomponent interventions effectively assist HCWs in addressing vaccines with older adults. However, education-only interventions appear to be less effective compared to other interventions rates, attitude, knowledge.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations Among Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review

This systematic review analyzes research examining racial/ethnic disparities in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage between White and racial/ethnic minority (Black and Hispanic) nursing home residents. A review of the literature for years 1966-2014 using Medline, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted. The Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument was used to appraise the quality of the 13 included studies. Overall, articles were strong in reporting and data analysis, but weak in sample selection and measurement quality. Disparities between vaccination coverage among racial/ethnic minorities versus Whites ranged from 2% to 20% for influenza and 6% to 15% for pneumococcal vaccination. Researchers reported racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to refuse vaccinations and less likely to have vaccinations offered and their vaccination status tracked compared to Whites. Policies/strategies that focus on ensuring racial/ethnic minorities are offered influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations and their vaccination status are tracked in nursing homes are warranted. Updated evaluation on vaccination disparities is also needed.

Trends in Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Among US Nursing Home Residents, 2006-2014

BACKGROUND

Institutionalized adults are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza and pneumococcal infection. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination have been shown to be effective in reducing hospitalization and deaths due to pneumonia and influenza in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends in influenza vaccination coverage among US nursing home residents from the 2005-2006 through 2014-2015 influenza seasons and trends in pneumococcal vaccination coverage from 2006 to 2014 among US nursing home residents, by state and demographic characteristics.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS's) Minimum Data Set (MDS). Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status were assessed for all residents of CMS-certified nursing homes using data reported to the MDS by all certified facilities.

RESULTS

Influenza vaccination coverage increased from 71.4% in the 2005-2006 influenza season to 75.7% in the 2014-2015 influenza season and pneumococcal vaccination coverage increased from 67.4% in 2006 to 78.4% in 2014. Vaccination coverage varied by state, with influenza vaccination coverage ranging from 50.0% to 89.7% in the 2014-2015 influenza season and pneumococcal vaccination coverage ranging from 55.0% to 89.7% in 2014. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic residents had lower coverage compared with non-Hispanic white residents for both vaccines, and these differences persisted over time.

CONCLUSION

Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among US nursing home residents remains suboptimal. Nursing home staff can employ strategies such as provider reminders and standing orders to facilitate offering vaccination to all residents along with culturally appropriate vaccine promotion to increase vaccination coverage among this vulnerable population.

Validity of ICD-9-CM Administrative Data for Determining Eligibility for Pneumococcal Vaccination Triggers

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of medical record administrative data as coded by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, for triggering pneumococcal vaccination reminders of patients following discharge from a tertiary care adult teaching hospital. A retrospective computerized search was conducted using administrative discharge data to detect patients admitted to the medical teaching unit who met clinical criteria for pneumococcal vaccination according to Canadian immunization guidelines. For identification of persons eligible for vaccination, administrative discharge data showed a sensitivity of 83% (confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.92) and a specificity of 78% (CI, 0.64-0.91), with a positive predictive value of 87% (CI, 0.83-0.90) and a negative predictive value of 72% (CI, 0.58-0.86). The reasonably high specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic codes in administrative data could be used to trigger appropriate pneumococcal vaccination among eligible patients after hospital discharge.

Influenza Immunization in Nursing Homes: Who Does Not Get Immunized and Whose Status Is Unknown?

Objective.

To identify nursing home resident and facility characteristics associated with patients not receiving influenza immunization and having unknown immunization status.

Design.

Secondary data analysis using multinomial logistic regression of data from the National Nursing Home Survey, a nationally representative establishment-based survey.

Setting.

A total of 1,423 nursing facilities of all ownerships and certifications systematically sampled with probability proportional to number of beds.

Patients.

A total of 7,350 randomly sampled people aged 65 years or older residing in nursing homes between July and December 1999 (approximately 6 per facility).

Main Outcome Measure.

Immunization status of residents.

Results.

Fifteen percent of residents were not immunized and 19% had unknown immunization status. In multivariate analysis, lack of immunization and unknown immunization status were each separately associated with being newly admitted, with no or unknown pneumococcal immunization, and with facility failures to screen for immunization and to record inoculation in the medical record. High-risk status and staff immunization requirements had no effect. Separate analyses showed that residents with unknown immunization status are statistically significantly different from both those vaccinated and those not vaccinated.

Conclusion.

This study indicates that both resident and facility characteristics are associated with failure to be immunized for influenza. Facilities should consider targeting younger, newly admitted, and residential care residents for influenza immunization, since they are more likely to be missed. Further research into the barriers to immunization specific to nursing home resident choice or opportunity may be warranted.

Are standing order programs associated with influenza vaccination? - NNHS, 2004

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccination coverage among nursing home residents has consistently been reported well below the Healthy People goals. We sought to determine if standing order programs (SOPs) in long-term care facilities are associated with greater influenza vaccination coverage among residents.

METHODS

The National Nursing Home Survey (2004) is cross-sectional. A total of 1152 US long-term care facilities were systematically sampled with probability proportional to number of beds. A total of 11,939 people aged 65 years or older residing in sampled long-term care facilities between August and December 2004 were randomly sampled. Influenza vaccination coverage of residents was obtained from facility records. Facility's immunization program included standing orders versus other (preprinted admission order, advance physician order, personal physician order, and no program). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between type of influenza immunization program and receipt of vaccination, adjusted for resident and facility confounders.

RESULTS

The proportion of residents aged 65 years or older who received influenza vaccination was 64%; 41% of residents lived in a facility with an SOP. Influenza vaccination coverage among residents residing in facilities with standing orders was 68% compared with 59% to 63% of residents in facilities with other program types. Logistic regression showed that standing order programs were independently associated with greater influenza vaccination coverage (66.7% versus 62.0%, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that residents in long-term care facilities having standing order programs for influenza were more likely to be immunized. More research needs to be done to understand how to facilitate adoption of these programs.

Prophylactic vaccinations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current status

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most acute exacerbations are triggered by community-acquired respiratory infections. Medications to treat COPD exacerbations are limited; therefore, identifying effective ways to prevent exacerbations are needed. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are currently recommended for all persons with COPD. However, current immunization rates are far lower than the Healthy People 2010 Goals. The reasons for nonadherence are multifactorial and strategies for overcoming these barriers are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Influenza vaccine clearly reduces the number of acute exacerbations that occur in persons with COPD. Influenza vaccine may reduce hospitalizations and mortality from COPD, but the evidence is not conclusive. Pneumococcal vaccine reduces the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease. However, there is not enough evidence to conclude that pneumococcal vaccination in persons with COPD has a significant impact on reducing morbidity or mortality. Vaccination with both influenza and pneumococcal vaccine may produce an additive effect that reduces exacerbations more effectively than either vaccine alone. Whole genome sequencing of bacteria and genome mining may represent a powerful way to identify novel potential vaccine antigens for future vaccine development.

SUMMARY

Although clinical trial data are limited, vaccinations can prevent some of the infections that cause COPD exacerbations and should be administered to all patients with COPD. Vaccines do not cause exacerbations of COPD. Patient and physician barriers to vaccination can be overcome with targeted education and system-wide interventions. Further research efforts should focus on improving current vaccines and identifying novel targets for future vaccine development.

Association of standing-order policies with vaccination rates in dialysis clinics: a US-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality because of infection. Quality improvement efforts for this patient population include assessment of institutional policies and practices that may increase vaccination rates for influenza, hepatitis B, and pneumococcal disease.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey of vaccination practices, beliefs, and attitudes was sent to all dialysis centers in End-Stage Renal Disease Networks 6, 11, and 15.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Of 1,052 dialysis facilities considered, 683 returned the survey, reported vaccination rates for 2005 to 2006, and had 20 or more patients.

PREDICTOR OR FACTOR

Standing-order policy of the dialysis facility, categorized as facility-wide orders, preprinted admission orders for each patient (chart orders), physician-specific orders, and individual orders.

OUTCOMES

Vaccination rates for influenza, hepatitis B (full or partial series), hepatitis B, and pneumococcal vaccine.

MEASUREMENTS

Patient vaccination, given at or outside the center.

RESULTS

Overall vaccination rates were 76% +/- 18% (SD) for influenza, 73% +/- 22% for hepatitis B full or partial series, 62% +/- 25% for hepatitis B full series, and 44% +/- 34% for pneumococcal vaccine. Compared with individual orders, facility-wide standing orders and chart orders were not associated with greater vaccination rates for influenza (0.4%; confidence interval, -4 to 5; and 1.27%; confidence interval, -3 to 5, respectively), but were associated with greater vaccination rates for hepatitis B full or partial series (9%; confidence interval, 3 to 15; and 11%; confidence interval, 5 to 17, respectively), hepatitis B full series (11%; confidence interval, 4 to 17; and 13%; confidence interval, 7 to 19, respectively), and pneumococcal disease (21%; confidence interval, 14 to 29; and 20%; confidence interval, 13 to 27, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Data are cross-sectional, and vaccinations outside the center were self-reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing facility-wide or chart-based order programs may be effective in promoting vaccination against hepatitis B and pneumococcal disease.

Practice-proven interventions to increase vaccination rates and broaden the immunization season

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that most (73%) persons residing in the United States be vaccinated against influenza each year. The actual rate of influenza vaccination is substantially below target levels: about 60% of persons >or=65 years (target is 90%) and only 10% to 40% of other groups (target is 60% for younger persons who have risk factors and 60% for healthcare personnel). Vaccinating patients throughout the influenza vaccination season (from October into January and beyond)--providing access beyond the traditional "fall immunization season"--is an important step toward meeting the substantial need for influenza vaccination. Vaccination rates may also be increased by interventions that increase patient demand and access to vaccine and overcome practice-related barriers. Such interventions include vaccination-only clinics, standing orders, strong recommendations from healthcare providers, as well as reminder and recall efforts. For maximum impact on immunization rates, interventions should be combined into a multifaceted immunization program rather than used alone. Interventions that address site-specific needs, taking resources into account, should be implemented on a practice-by-practice basis. With supply of influenza vaccine now plentiful, efforts need to be focused on reducing missed vaccination opportunities and promoting vaccination beyond the traditional fall time frame to protect as many Americans as possible from serious and potentially deadly influenza infection.

Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine uptake among nursing home residents in Nottingham, England: a postal questionnaire survey

Background

Previous studies have shown influenza vaccine uptake in UK nursing home residents to be low. Very little information exists regarding the uptake of pneumococcal vaccine in this population. The formulation of policies relating to the vaccination of residents has been proposed as a simple step that may help improve vaccine uptake in care homes.

Methods

A postal questionnaire was sent to matrons of all care homes with nursing within the Greater Nottingham area in January 2006. Non respondents were followed up with up to 3 phone calls.

Results

30% (16/53) of respondents reported having a policy addressing influenza vaccination and 15% (8/53) had a policy addressing pneumococcal vaccination. Seasonal influenza vaccine coverage in care homes with a vaccination policy was 87% compared with 84% in care homes without a policy (p = 0.47). The uptake of pneumococcal vaccination was found to be low, particularly in care homes with no vaccination policy. Coverage was 60% and 32% in care homes with and without a vaccination policy respectively (p = 0.06). This result was found to be statistically significant on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03, R = 0.46)

Conclusion

The uptake of influenza vaccine among care home residents in the Nottingham region is relatively high, although pneumococcal vaccine uptake is low. This study shows that there is an association between pneumococcal vaccine uptake and the existence of a vaccination policy in care homes, and highlights that few care homes have vaccination policies in place.

Hospital-based influenza vaccination of children: an opportunity to prevent subsequent hospitalization

OBJECTIVE

We performed this study to determine the frequency of previous hospitalization among children hospitalized with influenza.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System database (discharges that occurred between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2006) was used to determine the proportion of children hospitalized with influenza or respiratory illness who had a previous hospitalization during the most recent influenza-vaccination season. Subjects included pediatric patients (through 18 years of age). The index hospitalization was defined as the first influenza or respiratory illness hospitalization for a child that occurred during the study period and between November 1 and April 30. A previous hospitalization during the most recent influenza-vaccination season was defined as a hospitalization for any reason in the 0.5 to 6 months before the index hospitalization but not before September 1 or on or after March 1.

RESULTS

Overall, 16% of children hospitalized with influenza and 12% of children hospitalized with influenza or a respiratory illness had a previous hospitalization during the most recent influenza-vaccination season. Approximately 23% of the children hospitalized with influenza and a comorbidity had a previous hospitalization during the most recent influenza-vaccination season.

CONCLUSION

Hospital-based programs for influenza vaccination have the potential to reach children at highest risk of influenza complications and to reduce the rates of pediatric hospitalization for treatment of influenza-related illness.

Factors Predictive of Increased Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Coverage in Long-term Care Facilities: The CMS-CDC Standing Orders Program Project

BACKGROUND

Between 1999 and 2002, a multistate demonstration project was conducted in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to encourage implementation of standing orders programs (SOP) as evidence-based vaccine delivery strategies to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage in LTCFs.

OBJECTIVE

Examine predictors of increase in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage in LTCFs.

DESIGN

Intervention study. Self-administered surveys of LTCFs merged with data from OSCAR (On-line Survey Certification and Reporting System) and immunization coverage was abstracted from residents' medical charts in LTCFs.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty LTCFs were sampled from 9 intervention and 5 control states in the 2000 to 2001 influenza season for baseline and during the 2001 to 2002 influenza season for postintervention.

INTERVENTION

Each state's quality improvement organization (QIO) promoted the use of standing orders for immunizations as well as other strategies to increase immunization coverage among LTCF residents.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariate analysis included Poisson regression to determine independent predictors of at least a 10 percentage-point increase in facility influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage.

RESULTS

Forty-two (20%) and 59 (28%) of the facilities had at least a 10 percentage-point increase in influenza and pneumococcal immunizations, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, predictors associated with increase in influenza vaccination coverage included adoption of requirement in written immunization protocol to document refusals, less-demanding consent requirements, lower baseline influenza coverage, and small facility size. Factors associated with increase in pneumococcal vaccination coverage included adoption of recording pneumococcal immunizations in a consistent place, affiliation with a multifacility chain, and provision of resource materials.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the health of LTCF residents, strategies should be considered that increase immunization coverage, including written protocol for immunizations and documentation of refusals, documenting vaccination status in a consistent place in medical records, and minimal consent requirements for vaccinations.

Characteristics of long-term care facilities associated with standing order programs to deliver influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to residents in 13 states

BACKGROUND

Standing order programs (SOPs) are effective evidence-based interventions in which nurses or pharmacists are authorized to vaccinate according to an approved protocol without a physician order or examination. National rates for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in long-term care facilities (LTCF) are far below HP2010 goals of 90%.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of SOPs and other types of immunization programs in LTCFs and determine characteristics of LTCFs implementing SOPs.

DESIGN

Mailed survey.

SETTING

All Medicare- or Medicaid-licensed LTCFs in 13 states.

PARTICIPANTS

Directors of Nursing (DONs).

MEASUREMENTS

Survey collecting information on SOPs and barriers to their use in respondents' LTCF. Data from this survey were linked to the On-line Survey and Certification Administrative Record (OSCAR), a federal administrative database containing structural, staffing and other information on LTCFs.

RESULTS

A total of 3,451 of 4,366 (79%) LTCFs completed surveys. Few facilities used SOPs for influenza (9%) or pneumococcal vaccination (7%). The greatest use of influenza SOPs compared with other immunization program types were seen in facilities that were government owned or owned by nonprofit entities compared with for-profit entities (15% and 10% vs. 7%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5 to 3.4 and OR = 1.4, CI = 1.1 to 1.8, respectively); dually-certified (both Medicare- and Medicaid-certified) nursing facilities compared with distinct part skilled nursing facilities in which beds are set aside for residents with a specific payment source (11% vs. 7%; OR = 1.6, CI = 1.3 to 2.1); independent facility compared with one that is part of a multi-facility chain (10% vs. 7%; OR = 1.3, CI = 1.1 to 1.7); and lower acuity index (resident resource needs) compared with higher (10% vs. 7%; OR = 1.4, CI = 1.1 to 1.7). Findings were similar for pneumococcal vaccination SOPs. SOP use varied substantially by state (range = 0% to 23% influenza; range = 3% to 15% pneumococcal). The most frequently reported barriers to SOP use were legal concerns: liability for the facility (53%) and staff lacking legal authority (39%) to vaccinate by standing orders.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LTCFs with certain characteristics used SOPs more often, overall few facilities (<10%) used SOPs to improve vaccination rates. SOP use varied by state indicating that state policies or other factors may promote or inhibit SOP use. More studies are needed to examine the causes of state-level variations in vaccination interventions and their relationships to health outcomes of residents in LTCFs. The federal government's resources to promote SOPs should focus on all LTCFs, but with a particular focus on those that are less likely to be using SOPs and that represent a large proportion of homes nationally (i.e., for-profit and chain facilities).

Pneumococcal immunization in older adults: implications for the long-term-care setting

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in older adults between clinical trial and observational studies and to discuss the implications for long-term-care facilities (LTCFs).

DATA SOURCE

A Medline search (to April 2003).

STUDY SELECTION

All meta-analyses of randomized and quasi-randomized trials of pneumococcal vaccines with placebo or no treatment were sought. All cohort or case-control studies were sought.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 16 individual randomized clinical trials included in the reviews, 8 compared pneumococcal vaccine in individuals 55 years and older individuals. Only one study specifically addressed LTCF residents. Although no significant protective effect of the vaccine in elderly subpopulations was found, on the basis of wide confidence intervals and small subpopulation sample sizes, beneficial effects, particularly for pneumococcal bacteremia, could not be ruled out. Of the individual observational studies, 11 specifically evaluated vaccine efficacy in older adults. Vaccine efficacy was demonstrated in 9 of the 11 studies with no protective effect was shown in 2 studies.

CONCLUSION

Although the pooling of clinical trial data does not demonstrate significant efficacy of the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in subgroups of older adults, these subgroup studies lacked power to show significant differences. Observational studies repeatedly demonstrate efficacy in older adults, and the vaccine has been demonstrated to be cost-effective and safe. It is strongly promoted by U.S. and Canadian advisory committees. On the basis of this available evidence, the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine should currently be recommended for older adults, especially those who are residents of LTCFs.

The development of a group B streptococcus prevention policy at a community hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In 1996, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issued guidelines for antepartum antibiotic prophylaxis of group B streptococcal (GBS)-positive women. The objective of this study is to document results of a GBS prophylaxis policy at one nonacademically affiliated, community hospital and discern its effectiveness with regard to compliance as well as in decreasing the incidence of early onset GBS (EOGBS) disease.

METHODS

The development of a GBS-prevention policy at the Women's Hospital of Greensboro (WHG) was documented by means of interviews and examination of minutes of meetings. Effectiveness of the policy was assessed by calculating the percentage of all GBS+ or unknown mothers who received antepartum antibiotics during a 1-year period. Additionally, all newborns with any positive GBS culture during the past 13 years at WHG were identified.

RESULTS

The policy was formulated and distributed during a 6-month period by strong leadership, community "buy-in," and an educational seminar. A preprinted physician order was written so that all GBS-positive/unknown mothers would receive antepartum antibiotics. Additionally, a clinical pathway was used to track and monitor maternal GBS status. During October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000, 1124 (23.1%) mothers were found to be GBS positive/unknown. Of those who delivered an infant >37 weeks' gestation and who could be linked to the pharmacy database, 777 (91.1%) received antepartum antibiotics. The incidence of EOGBS disease at WHG before 1996 was 1.93 +/- 0.7/1000 births compared to 0.4 +/- 0.05/1000 after the issuance of the guidelines (p = 0.002, t-test).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 90% of GBS-positive mothers were treated with antibiotics at WHG. Associated with this high adherence rate to the CDC guidelines has been a five-fold decrease in the incidence of EOGBS disease. We attribute these results to the implementation of a preprinted physician order sheet to direct intrapartum antibiotics for women with GBS positive or unknown colonization and the use of a clinical pathway to track GBS colonization status.

Pneumonia in the long-term-care facility

Pneumonia is a common infection among residents of long-term-care facilities (LTCFs), with an incidence of 1.2 episodes per 1,000 patient-days. This rate is believed to be six- to tenfold higher than the rate of pneumonia among elderly individuals living in the community. The risk factors for pneumonia among residents of LTCFs are profound disability, bedridden state, urinary incontinence, difficulty swallowing, malnutrition, tube feedings, contractures, and use of benzodiazepines and anticholinergic medications. An elevated respiratory rate is often an early clue to pneumonia in this group of patients. Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus) and aerobic gram-negative bacilli (including multidrug-resistant isolates) are more frequent causes of pneumonia in this setting than in the community. Criteria have been developed that help identify patients for treatment in their LTCFs.