1
|
Douchant K, He SM, Noordhof C, Greenlaw J, Vancuren S, Schroeter K, Allen-Vercoe E, Sjaarda C, Vanner SJ, Petrof EO, Sheth PM, Guzman M. Defined microbial communities and their soluble products protect mice from Clostridioides difficile infection. Commun Biol 2024; 7:135. [PMID: 38280981 PMCID: PMC10821944 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05778-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated infectious diarrhea. The development of C.difficile infection is tied to perturbations of the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract, called the gastrointestinal microbiota. Repairing the gastrointestinal microbiota by introducing lab-designed bacterial communities, or defined microbial communities, has recently shown promise as therapeutics against C.difficile infection, however, the mechanisms of action of defined microbial communities remain unclear. Using an antibiotic- C.difficile mouse model, we report the ability of an 18-member community and a refined 4-member community to protect mice from two ribotypes of C.difficile (CD027, CD078; p < 0.05). Furthermore, bacteria-free supernatant delivered orally to mice from the 4-member community proteolyzed C.difficile toxins in vitro and protected mice from C.difficile infection in vivo (p < 0.05). This study demonstrates that bacteria-free supernatant is sufficient to protect mice from C.difficile; and could be further explored as a therapeutic strategy against C.difficile infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Douchant
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada
| | - Shu-Mei He
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| | - Curtis Noordhof
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| | - Jill Greenlaw
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Vancuren
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G2W1, ON, Canada
| | - Kathleen Schroeter
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G2W1, ON, Canada
| | - Emma Allen-Vercoe
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G2W1, ON, Canada
| | - Calvin Sjaarda
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada
- Division of Microbiology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen J Vanner
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada
| | - Elaine O Petrof
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| | - Prameet M Sheth
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada.
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada.
- Division of Microbiology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada.
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada.
| | - Mabel Guzman
- The Gastrointestinal Disease Research Unit (GIDRU), Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, K7L2V7, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dicks LMT. Biofilm Formation of Clostridioides difficile, Toxin Production and Alternatives to Conventional Antibiotics in the Treatment of CDI. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2161. [PMID: 37764005 PMCID: PMC10534356 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile is considered a nosocomial pathogen that flares up in patients exposed to antibiotic treatment. However, four out of ten patients diagnosed with C. difficile infection (CDI) acquired the infection from non-hospitalized individuals, many of whom have not been treated with antibiotics. Treatment of recurrent CDI (rCDI) with antibiotics, especially vancomycin (VAN) and metronidazole (MNZ), increases the risk of experiencing a relapse by as much as 70%. Fidaxomicin, on the other hand, proved more effective than VAN and MNZ by preventing the initial transcription of RNA toxin genes. Alternative forms of treatment include quorum quenching (QQ) that blocks toxin synthesis, binding of small anion molecules such as tolevamer to toxins, monoclonal antibodies, such as bezlotoxumab and actoxumab, bacteriophage therapy, probiotics, and fecal microbial transplants (FMTs). This review summarizes factors that affect the colonization of C. difficile and the pathogenicity of toxins TcdA and TcdB. The different approaches experimented with in the destruction of C. difficile and treatment of CDI are evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon M T Dicks
- Department of Microbiology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beckers M, Bloem BR, Verbeek MM. Mechanisms of peripheral levodopa resistance in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2022; 8:56. [PMID: 35546556 PMCID: PMC9095610 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00321-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an increasingly common neurodegenerative condition. The disease has a significant negative impact on quality of life, but a personalized management approach can help reduce disability. Pharmacotherapy with levodopa remains the cornerstone of treatment, and a gratifying and sustained response to this treatment is a supportive criterion that argues in favor of an underlying diagnosis of PD. Yet, in daily practice, it is not uncommon to encounter patients who appear to have true PD, but who nevertheless seem to lose the responsiveness to levodopa (secondary non-responders). Some patients may even fail to respond altogether (primary non-responders). Here, we address how two mechanisms of “peripheral resistance” may underlie this failing response to levodopa in persons with PD. The first explanation relates to impaired bowel motility leading to secondary bacterial overgrowth, and more specifically, to the excessive bacterial production of the enzyme tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC). This enzyme may convert levodopa to dopamine in the gut, thereby hampering entry into the circulation and, subsequently, into the brain. The second explanation relates to the systemic induction of the enzyme aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), leading to premature conversion of levodopa into dopamine, again limiting the bioavailability within the brain. We discuss these two mechanisms and focus on the clinical implications, potential treatments and directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Beckers
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Bastiaan R Bloem
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel M Verbeek
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dureja C, Olaitan AO, Hurdle JG. Mechanisms and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile. Curr Opin Microbiol 2022; 66:63-72. [PMID: 35077947 PMCID: PMC9064893 DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The evolution of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile has markedly shaped its epidemiology and detrimentally impacted patient care. C. difficile exhibits resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials, due to accumulation of horizontally acquired resistance genes and de novo mutations to drug targets. Particularly worrying is that declines in clinical success of firstline CDI antimicrobials coincide with the spread of strains that are more resistant to these drugs. Yet, there is still much to learn regarding the prevalence of genetic elements in clinical isolates, their molecular mechanisms, and the extent to which this information can be translated to develop molecular diagnostics that improve antimicrobial prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship approaches for CDI. Thus, this perspective discusses current understanding and knowledge gaps of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in C. difficile, emphasizing on CDI therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Dureja
- Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Abiola O Olaitan
- Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Julian G Hurdle
- Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
![]()
The paradigm of antivirulence
therapy dictates that bacterial pathogens
are specifically disarmed but not killed by neutralizing their virulence
factors. Clearance of the invading pathogen by the immune system is
promoted. As compared to antibiotics, the pathogen-selective antivirulence
drugs hold promise to minimize collateral damage to the beneficial
microbiome. Also, selective pressure for resistance is expected to
be lower because bacterial viability is not directly affected. Antivirulence
drugs are being developed for stand-alone prophylactic and therapeutic
treatments but also for combinatorial use with antibiotics. This Review
focuses on drug modalities that target bacterial exotoxins after the
secretion or release-upon-lysis. Exotoxins have a significant and
sometimes the primary role as the disease-causing virulence factor,
and thereby they are attractive targets for drug development. We describe
the key pre-clinical and clinical trial data that have led to the
approval of currently used exotoxin-targeted drugs, namely the monoclonal
antibodies bezlotoxumab (toxin B/TcdB, Clostridioides difficile), raxibacumab (anthrax toxin, Bacillus anthracis), and obiltoxaximab (anthrax toxin, Bacillus anthracis), but also to challenges with some of the promising leads. We also
highlight the recent developments in pre-clinical research sector
to develop exotoxin-targeted drug modalities, i.e., monoclonal antibodies,
antibody fragments, antibody mimetics, receptor analogs, neutralizing
scaffolds, dominant-negative mutants, and small molecules. We describe
how these exotoxin-targeted drug modalities work with high-resolution
structural knowledge and highlight their advantages and disadvantages
as antibiotic alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moona Sakari
- Institute of Biomedicine, Research Unit for Infection and Immunity, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Arttu Laisi
- Institute of Biomedicine, Research Unit for Infection and Immunity, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Arto T. Pulliainen
- Institute of Biomedicine, Research Unit for Infection and Immunity, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genetic Mechanisms of Vancomycin Resistance in Clostridioides difficile: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11020258. [PMID: 35203860 PMCID: PMC8868222 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance to treatments for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) poses a significant threat to global health. C. difficile is widely thought to be susceptible to oral vancomycin, which is increasingly the mainstay of CDI treatment. However, clinical labs do not conduct C. difficile susceptibility testing, presenting a challenge to detecting the emergence and impact of resistance. In this systematic review, we describe gene determinants and associated clinical and laboratory mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in C. difficile, including drug-binding site alterations, efflux pumps, RNA polymerase mutations, and biofilm formation. Additional research is needed to further characterize these mechanisms and understand their clinical impact.
Collapse
|
7
|
van Prehn J, Reigadas E, Vogelzang EH, Bouza E, Hristea A, Guery B, Krutova M, Norén T, Allerberger F, Coia JE, Goorhuis A, van Rossen TM, Ooijevaar RE, Burns K, Scharvik Olesen BR, Tschudin-Sutter S, Wilcox MH, Vehreschild MJGT, Fitzpatrick F, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. [PMID: 34678515 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
SCOPE In 2009, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This document was updated in 2014. The growing literature on CDI antimicrobial treatment and novel treatment approaches, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and toxin-binding monoclonal antibodies, prompted the ESCMID study group on C. difficile (ESGCD) to update the 2014 treatment guidance document for CDI in adults. METHODS AND QUESTIONS Key questions on CDI treatment were formulated by the guideline committee and included: What is the best treatment for initial, severe, severe-complicated, refractory, recurrent and multiple recurrent CDI? What is the best treatment when no oral therapy is possible? Can prognostic factors identify patients at risk for severe and recurrent CDI and is there a place for CDI prophylaxis? Outcome measures for treatment strategy were: clinical cure, recurrence and sustained cure. For studies on surgical interventions and severe-complicated CDI the outcome was mortality. Appraisal of available literature and drafting of recommendations was performed by the guideline drafting group. The total body of evidence for the recommendations on CDI treatment consists of the literature described in the previous guidelines, supplemented with a systematic literature search on randomized clinical trials and observational studies from 2012 and onwards. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The guideline committee was invited to comment on the recommendations. The guideline draft was sent to external experts and a patients' representative for review. Full ESCMID endorsement was obtained after a public consultation procedure. RECOMMENDATIONS Important changes compared with previous guideline include but are not limited to: metronidazole is no longer recommended for treatment of CDI when fidaxomicin or vancomycin are available, fidaxomicin is the preferred agent for treatment of initial CDI and the first recurrence of CDI when available and feasible, FMT or bezlotoxumab in addition to standard of care antibiotics (SoC) are preferred for treatment of a second or further recurrence of CDI, bezlotoxumab in addition to SoC is recommended for the first recurrence of CDI when fidaxomicin was used to manage the initial CDI episode, and bezlotoxumab is considered as an ancillary treatment to vancomycin for a CDI episode with high risk of recurrence when fidaxomicin is not available. Contrary to the previous guideline, in the current guideline emphasis is placed on risk for recurrence as a factor that determines treatment strategy for the individual patient, rather than the disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joffrey van Prehn
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Elena Reigadas
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Erik H Vogelzang
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilio Bouza
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adriana Hristea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Prof Dr Matei Bals, Romania
| | - Benoit Guery
- Infectious Diseases Specialist, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcela Krutova
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
| | - Torbjorn Norén
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Reference Laboratory for Clostridioides difficile, Clinical Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | - John E Coia
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital South West Jutland and Department of Regional Health Research IRS, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Abraham Goorhuis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tessel M van Rossen
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier E Ooijevaar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Burns
- Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital & Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Universitatsspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mark H Wilcox
- Department of Microbiology, Old Medical, School Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals & University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fidelma Fitzpatrick
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ed J Kuijper
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bermejo Boixareu C, Tutor-Ureta P, Ramos Martínez A. [Updated review of Clostridium difficile infection in elderly]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2020; 55:225-235. [PMID: 32423602 DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection is the most common cause of health care-associated diarrhoea, and its incidence increases with age. Clinical challenges, risk of resistance to treatment, risk of recurrence, and treatment responses are different in elderly. The aim of this review is to discuss the updated epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of C. difficile infection in elderly with the available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pablo Tutor-Ureta
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - Antonio Ramos Martínez
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antibiotic Treatment Pipeline for Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI): A Wide Array of Narrow-Spectrum Agents. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11908-020-00730-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
10
|
Bouza E, Aguado JM, Alcalá L, Almirante B, Alonso-Fernández P, Borges M, Cobo J, Guardiola J, Horcajada JP, Maseda E, Mensa J, Merchante N, Muñoz P, Pérez Sáenz JL, Pujol M, Reigadas E, Salavert M, Barberán J. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR). REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA : PUBLICACION OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA 2020; 33:151-175. [PMID: 32080996 PMCID: PMC7111242 DOI: 10.37201/req/2065.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This document gathers the opinion of a multidisciplinary forum of experts on different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Spain. It has been structured around a series of questions that the attendees considered relevant and in which a consensus opinion was reached. The main messages were as follows: CDI should be suspected in patients older than 2 years of age in the presence of diarrhea, paralytic ileus and unexplained leukocytosis, even in the absence of classical risk factors. With a few exceptions, a single stool sample is sufficient for diagnosis, which can be sent to the laboratory with or without transportation media for enteropathogenic bacteria. In the absence of diarrhoea, rectal swabs may be valid. The microbiology laboratory should include C. difficile among the pathogens routinely searched in patients with diarrhoea. Laboratory tests in different order and sequence schemes include GDH detection, presence of toxins, molecular tests and toxigenic culture. Immediate determination of sensitivity to drugs such as vancomycin, metronidazole or fidaxomycin is not required. The evolution of toxin persistence is not a suitable test for follow up. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI should be rapid and results reported and interpreted to clinicians immediately. In addition to the basic support of all diarrheic episodes, CDI treatment requires the suppression of antiperistaltic agents, proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics, where possible. Oral vancomycin and fidaxomycin are the antibacterials of choice in treatment, intravenous metronidazole being restricted for patients in whom the presence of the above drugs in the intestinal lumen cannot be assured. Fecal material transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple recurrences but uncertainties persist regarding its standardization and safety. Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody to C. difficile toxin B that should be administered to patients at high risk of recurrence. Surgery is becoming less and less necessary and prevention with vaccines is under research. Probiotics have so far not been shown to be therapeutically or preventively effective. The therapeutic strategy should be based, rather than on the number of episodes, on the severity of the episodes and on their potential to recur. Some data point to the efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis in patients who reccur CDI when systemic antibiotics are required again.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bouza
- Emilio Bouza MD, PhD, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y E. Infecciosas C/ Dr. Esquerdo, 46 - 28007 Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Plasmid-mediated metronidazole resistance in Clostridioides difficile. Nat Commun 2020; 11:598. [PMID: 32001686 PMCID: PMC6992631 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14382-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Metronidazole was until recently used as a first-line treatment for potentially life-threatening Clostridioides difficile (CD) infection. Although cases of metronidazole resistance have been documented, no clear mechanism for metronidazole resistance or a role for plasmids in antimicrobial resistance has been described for CD. Here, we report genome sequences of seven susceptible and sixteen resistant CD isolates from human and animal sources, including isolates from a patient with recurrent CD infection by a PCR ribotype (RT) 020 strain, which developed resistance to metronidazole over the course of treatment (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 8 mg L−1). Metronidazole resistance correlates with the presence of a 7-kb plasmid, pCD-METRO. pCD-METRO is present in toxigenic and non-toxigenic resistant (n = 23), but not susceptible (n = 563), isolates from multiple countries. Introduction of a pCD-METRO-derived vector into a susceptible strain increases the MIC 25-fold. Our finding of plasmid-mediated resistance can impact diagnostics and treatment of CD infections. Cases of C. difficile (CD) resistant to metronidazole have been reported but the mechanism remains enigmatic. Here the authors identify a plasmid, which correlates with metronidazole resistance status in a large international collection of CD isolates, and demonstrate that the plasmid can confer metronidazole resistance.
Collapse
|
12
|
Madoff SE, Urquiaga M, Alonso CD, Kelly CP. Prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anaerobe 2019; 61:102098. [PMID: 31493500 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Recurrent Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (rCDI) is common, and patients who have had one recurrence are more likely to have multiple recurrences. Frequent recurrences have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, high healthcare costs, and lower quality of life. In this review, we compare the efficacy of interventions designed to prevent rCDI. We performed a systematic review of the English literature, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated rCDI as an outcome. Studies were included irrespective of patient demographics, disease severity, type of intervention, comparator used, or time-point of outcome evaluation. We performed a comprehensive literature search with the assistance of a research librarian. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Our search yielded 38 RCTs (8,102 participants). Nineteen RCTs (3,743 subjects) evaluated antibiotics, eight fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) (582 subjects), three monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (2,805 subjects), and eight probiotics, prebiotics, or non-antibiotic polymers (972 subjects). The antibiotic and FMT therapies that demonstrated efficacy in rCDI prevention included: fidaxomicin (when compared to a ten-day vancomycin course) and FMT administered by nasogastric tube (when compared to a fourteen-day vancomycin course and a fourteen-day vancomycin course plus bowel lavage). Actoxumab (MAb against C. difficile toxin A; CDA1) plus bezlotoxumab (MAb against C. difficile toxin B; CDB1) in combination or bezlotoxumab alone appeared to be more effective in preventing rCDI compared to actoxumab alone. Of the prebiotics, probiotics, and nonantibiotic polymers, oligofructose, Saccharomyces boulardii, and the nontoxigenic C. difficile strain M3 were the most efficacious for rCDI prevention. Thirty-eight RCTs (>8,000 participants) evaluating treatment modalities for CDI were examined for efficacy in prevention of rCDI. Several CDI-specific antibiotics, FMT modalities, monoclonal antibodies, and various prebiotics and probiotics demonstrated a reduction in risk of rCDI with the greatest risk reduction observed with FMT and monoclonal antibody therapy. It is notable that the comparators in these studies were very different from one another and the relative risk reduction of rCDI may not be directly comparable from one study to the next.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Madoff
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Mariana Urquiaga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carolyn D Alonso
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ciarán P Kelly
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dieterle MG, Rao K, Young VB. Novel therapies and preventative strategies for primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019; 1435:110-138. [PMID: 30238983 PMCID: PMC6312459 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is the leading infectious cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis. C. difficile infection (CDI) places a heavy burden on the healthcare system, with nearly half a million infections yearly and an approximate 20% recurrence risk after successful initial therapy. The high incidence has driven new research on improved prevention such as the emerging use of probiotics, intestinal microbiome manipulation during antibiotic therapies, vaccinations, and newer antibiotics that reduce the disruption of the intestinal microbiome. While the treatment of acute C. difficile is effective in most patients, it can be further optimized by adjuvant therapies that improve the initial treatment success and decrease the risk of subsequent recurrence. Finally, the high risk of recurrence has led to multiple emerging therapies that target toxin activity, recovery of the intestinal microbial community, and elimination of latent C. difficile in the intestine. In summary, CDIs illustrate the complex interaction among host physiology, microbial community, and pathogen that requires specific therapies to address each of the factors leading to primary infection and recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G. Dieterle
- University of Michigan Medical School, Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP), Ann Arbor, Michigan
- University of Michigan Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Krishna Rao
- University of Michigan Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Vincent B. Young
- University of Michigan Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- University of Michigan Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Englert C, Brendel JC, Majdanski TC, Yildirim T, Schubert S, Gottschaldt M, Windhab N, Schubert US. Pharmapolymers in the 21st century: Synthetic polymers in drug delivery applications. Prog Polym Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
15
|
Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 38:209-231. [PMID: 30498879 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3419-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) dramatically increased during the last decade and cause a major public health problem. Current treatments are limited by the high disease recurrence rate, severity of clinical forms, disruption of the gut microbiota, and colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). In this review, we resumed current treatment options from official recommendation to promising alternatives available in the management of adult CDI, with regard to severity and recurring or non-recurring character of the infection. Vancomycin remains the first-line antibiotic in the management of mild to severe CDI. The use of metronidazole is discussed following the latest US recommendations that replaced it by fidaxomicin as first-line treatment of an initial episode of non-severe CDI. Fidaxomicin, the most recent antibiotic approved for CDI in adults, has several advantages compared to vancomycin and metronidazole, but its efficacy seems limited in cases of multiple recurrences. Innovative therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and antitoxin antibodies were developed to limit the occurrence of recurrence of CDI. Research is therefore very active, and new antibiotics are being studied as surotomycin, cadazolid, and rinidazole.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abughanimeh O, Qasrawi A, Kaddourah O, Al Momani L, Abu Ghanimeh M. Clostridium difficile infection in oncology patients: epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Hosp Pract (1995) 2018; 46:266-277. [PMID: 30296190 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1533673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections in the United States. Its incidence has been increasing in the recent years despite preventative measures. CDI increases annual expenses by 1.5 billion dollars. Cancer patients are at higher risk to acquire CDI, as explained by their frequent exposure to risk factors. CDI in cancer patients is associated with higher mortality rates and prolonged hospitalization. Furthermore, CDI affects the course of the disease by delaying treatments such as chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutics drugs are considered independent risk factors for CDI. This review discusses Clostridium difficile infection in cancer patients, including those who are receiving chemotherapy. Herein, we summarize recent data regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, including chemotherapy regimens, pathogenesis, diagnostic techniques and treatment options, including newer agents. Method: A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The MeSH terms utilized in different combinations were 'clostridium difficile', 'neoplasia/cancer/oncology', 'chemotherapy', 'diagnosis', and 'treatment', in addition to looking up each treatment option individually to generate a comprehensive search. The articles were initially screened by title alone, followed by screening through abstracts. Full texts of pertinent articles (including letters to editors, case reports, case series, cohort studies, and clinical trials) were included in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abughanimeh
- a School of Medicine Internal Medicine , University of Missouri , Kansas City , USA
| | - Ayman Qasrawi
- a School of Medicine Internal Medicine , University of Missouri , Kansas City , USA
| | - Osama Kaddourah
- a School of Medicine Internal Medicine , University of Missouri , Kansas City , USA
| | - Laith Al Momani
- b East Tennessee State University James H Quillen College of Medicine - Internal Medicine , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beinortas T, Burr NE, Wilcox MH, Subramanian V. Comparative efficacy of treatments for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2018; 18:1035-1044. [DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30285-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
18
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents one of the most serious nosocomial infections that have grown dramatically over the past decade. Vancomycin and metronidazole are currently used as a standard therapy for CDI. Metronidazole is recommended as a first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate infections and vancomycin is mainly used for severe and/or refractory cases. However, studies have demonstrated that there are quite high CDI relapse rates with both of these medications, which represents a challenge for clinicians. Over the last decade, a number of newer and novel therapeutic options have emerged as promising alternatives to these standard CDI therapies. The following review provides the updated summaries of these newer therapeutic agents and their status in the treatment of CDI.
Collapse
|
19
|
Therapie akuter und rekurrenter Clostridium-difficile-Infektionen. Internist (Berl) 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00108-018-0401-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
20
|
Roshan N, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Non-conventional antimicrobial and alternative therapies for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 2018; 49:103-111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
21
|
Hopkins RJ, Wilson RB. Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis: a narrative review. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2018; 6:21-28. [PMID: 29479439 PMCID: PMC5806400 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gox041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming, obligate anaerobic bacillus that was originally isolated from the stool of a healthy neonate in 1935. In high-income countries, C. difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitalized patients. The incidence of C. difficile infection in the USA has increased markedly since 2000, with hospitalizations for C. difficile infections in non-pregnant adults doubling between 2000 and 2010. Between 20% and 35% of patients with C. difficile infection will fail initial antibiotic treatment and, of these, 40-60% will have a second recurrence. Recurrence of C. difficile infection after initial treatment causes substantial morbidity and is a major burden on health care systems. In this article, current treatments for recurrent C. difficile infection are reviewed and future directions explored. These include the use of antibiotics, probiotics, donor faecal transplants, anion resins, secondary bile acids or anti-toxin antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy J Hopkins
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert B Wilson
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Maxwell-Scott HG, Goldenberg SD. Existing and investigational therapies for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: A focus on narrow spectrum, microbiota-sparing agents. Med Mal Infect 2017; 48:1-9. [PMID: 29169816 DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite intense international attention and efforts to reduce its incidence, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant concern for patients, clinicians, and healthcare organizations. It is costly for payers and disabling for patients. Furthermore, recurrent CDI is particularly difficult to manage, resulting in excess mortality, hospital length of stay, and other healthcare resource use. A greater understanding of the role of the gut microbiome has emphasized the importance of this diverse community in providing colonization resistance against CDI. The introduction of fidaxomicin, which has limited effect on the microflora has improved clinical outcomes in relation to disease recurrence. There are a number of other new agents in development, which appear to have a narrow spectrum of activity whilst exerting minimal effect on the microflora. Whilst the role of these emerging agents in the treatment of CDI is presently unclear, they appear to be promising candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H G Maxwell-Scott
- London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| | - S D Goldenberg
- London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Darkoh C, Deaton M, DuPont HL. Nonantimicrobial drug targets for Clostridium difficile infections. Future Microbiol 2017; 12:975-985. [PMID: 28759258 DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health problem worldwide. Treatment has become complicated due to the emergence of strains with increased toxigenicity and sporulation rate, together with rampant antibiotics use that disrupts colonization resistance of the colonic microbiota. As a result, there is a critical need for nonantibiotic treatments. Therapies based on inhibiting the toxins, bacterial structures responsible for colonization, virulence and restoration of the gut microbiota are the most important nonantibiotic targets to combat CDI. This report outlines these targets and how they could become the focus of future therapeutic agents. Inhibiting colonization and virulence factors during CDI will disrupt pathogen persistence and decrease exposure to the inflammatory toxins, allowing the immune system to clear the infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Darkoh
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, & Environmental Sciences, Center For Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Program, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Magdalena Deaton
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, & Environmental Sciences, Center For Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Herbert L DuPont
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, & Environmental Sciences, Center For Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Baylor College of Medicine, Departments of Molecular Virology & Microbiology & Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming, toxin-secreting bacillus that has long been recognized to be the most common etiologic pathogen of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. C. difficile infection (CDI) is now the most common cause of health care-associated infections in the United States and accounts for 12% of these infections (Magill SS et al., N Engl J Med370:1198-1208, 2014). Among emerging pathogens of public health importance in the United States, CDI has the highest population-based incidence, estimated at 147 per 100,000 (Lessa FC et al., N Engl J Med372:825-834, 2015). In a report on antimicrobial resistance, C. difficile has been categorized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as one of three "urgent" threats (http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/). Although C. difficile was first described in the late 1970s, the past decade has seen the emergence of hypertoxigenic strains that have caused increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pathogenic strains, host susceptibility, and other regional factors vary and may influence the clinical manifestation and approach to intervention. In this article, we describe the global epidemiology of CDI featuring the different strains in circulation outside of North America and Europe where strain NAP1/027/BI/III had originally gained prominence. The elderly population in health care settings has been disproportionately affected, but emergence of CDI in children and healthy young adults in community settings has, likewise, been reported. New approaches in management, including fecal microbiota transplantation, are discussed.
Collapse
|
25
|
Nelson RL, Suda KJ, Evans CT. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD004610. [PMID: 28257555 PMCID: PMC6464548 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004610.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is recognized as a frequent cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and colitis. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic therapy for C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD), or C. difficile infection (CDI), being synonymous terms. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register from inception to 26 January 2017. We also searched clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrialsregister.eu for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Only randomised controlled trials assessing antibiotic treatment for CDI were included in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three authors independently assessed abstracts and full text articles for inclusion and extracted data. The risk of bias was independently rated by two authors. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We pooled data using a fixed-effect model, except where significant heterogeneity was detected, at which time a random-effects model was used. The following outcomes were sought: sustained symptomatic cure (defined as initial symptomatic response and no recurrence of CDI), sustained bacteriologic cure, adverse reactions to the intervention, death and cost. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-two studies (3215 participants) were included. The majority of studies enrolled patients with mild to moderate CDI who could tolerate oral antibiotics. Sixteen of the included studies excluded patients with severe CDI and few patients with severe CDI were included in the other six studies. Twelve different antibiotics were investigated: vancomycin, metronidazole, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifaximin, bacitracin, cadazolid, LFF517, surotomycin and fidaxomicin. Most of the studies were active comparator studies comparing vancomycin with other antibiotics. One small study compared vancomycin to placebo. There were no other studies that compared antibiotic treatment to a placebo or a 'no treatment' control group. The risk of bias was rated as high for 17 of 22 included studies. Vancomycin was found to be more effective than metronidazole for achieving symptomatic cure. Seventy-two per cent (318/444) of metronidazole patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 79% (339/428) of vancomycin patients (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97; moderate quality evidence). Fidaxomicin was found to be more effective than vancomycin for achieving symptomatic cure. Seventy-one per cent (407/572) of fidaxomicin patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 61% (361/592) of vancomycin patients (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.31; moderate quality evidence). Teicoplanin may be more effective than vancomycin for achieving a symptomatic cure. Eightly-seven per cent (48/55) of teicoplanin patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 73% (40/55) of vancomycin patients (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; very low quality evidence). For other comparisons including the one placebo-controlled study the quality of evidence was low or very low due to imprecision and in many cases high risk of bias because of attrition and lack of blinding. One hundred and forty deaths were reported in the studies, all of which were attributed by study authors to the co-morbidities of the participants that lead to acquiring CDI. Although many other adverse events were reported during therapy, these were attributed to the participants' co-morbidities. The only adverse events directly attributed to study medication were rare nausea and transient elevation of liver enzymes. Recent cost data (July 2016) for a 10 day course of treatment shows that metronidazole 500 mg is the least expensive antibiotic with a cost of USD 13 (Health Warehouse). Vancomycin 125 mg costs USD 1779 (Walgreens for 56 tablets) compared to fidaxomicin 200 mg at USD 3453.83 or more (Optimer Pharmaceuticals) and teicoplanin at approximately USD 83.67 (GBP 71.40, British National Formulary). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS No firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in severe CDI as most studies excluded patients with severe disease. The lack of any 'no treatment' control studies does not allow for any conclusions regarding the need for antibiotic treatment in patients with mild CDI beyond withdrawal of the initiating antibiotic. Nonetheless, moderate quality evidence suggests that vancomycin is superior to metronidazole and fidaxomicin is superior to vancomycin. The differences in effectiveness between these antibiotics were not too large and the advantage of metronidazole is its far lower cost compared to the other two antibiotics. The quality of evidence for teicoplanin is very low. Adequately powered studies are needed to determine if teicoplanin performs as well as the other antibiotics. A trial comparing the two cheapest antibiotics, metronidazole and teicoplanin, would be of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Nelson
- University of Illinois School of Public HealthEpidemiology/Biometry Division1603 West TaylorRoom 956ChicagoIllinoisUSA60612
| | | | - Charlesnika T Evans
- Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Center for Healthcare Studies633 N. St. ClairChicagoILUSA60611
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fehér C, Soriano A, Mensa J. A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection. Infect Dis Ther 2017; 6:1-35. [PMID: 27910000 PMCID: PMC5336415 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-016-0140-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In spite of increased awareness and the efforts taken to optimize Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) management, with the limited number of currently available antibiotics for C. difficile the halt of this increasing epidemic remains out of reach. There are, however, close to 80 alternative treatment methods with controversial anti-clostridial efficacy or in experimental phase today. Indeed, some of these therapies are expected to become acknowledged members of the recommended anti-CDI arsenal within the next few years. None of these alternative treatment methods can respond in itself to all the major challenges of CDI management, which are primary prophylaxis in the susceptible population, clinical cure of severe cases, prevention of recurrences, and forestallment of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage and in-hospital spread. Yet, the greater the variety of treatment choices on hand, the better combination strategies can be developed to reach these goals in the future. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of these experimental and currently off-label therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Csaba Fehér
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alex Soriano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Mensa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Garland
- Cancer
Biology Program, ‡Department of Pathology, §Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and ∥Department of
Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Sebastian Loscher
- Cancer
Biology Program, ‡Department of Pathology, §Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and ∥Department of
Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Matthew Bogyo
- Cancer
Biology Program, ‡Department of Pathology, §Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and ∥Department of
Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Trubiano JA, Cheng AC, Korman TM, Roder C, Campbell A, May MLA, Blyth CC, Ferguson JK, Blackmore TK, Riley TV, Athan E. Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases updated guidelines for the management of Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children in Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J 2017; 46:479-93. [PMID: 27062204 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2015] [Revised: 01/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to rise, whilst treatment remains problematic due to recurrent, refractory and potentially severe nature of disease. The treatment of C. difficile is a challenge for community and hospital-based clinicians. With the advent of an expanding therapeutic arsenal against C. difficile since the last published Australasian guidelines, an update on CDI treatment recommendations for Australasian clinicians was required. On behalf of the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases, we present the updated guidelines for the management of CDI in adults and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Trubiano
- Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Western Australia.,Infectious Diseases Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Western Australia
| | - A C Cheng
- Infectious Diseases Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Western Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Western Australia.,Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Western Australia
| | - T M Korman
- Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Western Australia
| | - C Roder
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Western Australia.,Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Western Australia
| | - A Campbell
- Infectious Diseases Department, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia
| | - M L A May
- Infection Management and Prevention Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital and Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland
| | - C C Blyth
- Infectious Diseases Department, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia.,School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia.,Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia
| | - J K Ferguson
- Pathology North, NSW Pathology, Wellington South, New Zealand.,Immunology and Infectious Diseases Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Wellington South, New Zealand.,Universities of New England and Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - T K Blackmore
- Laboratory Services, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington South, New Zealand
| | - T V Riley
- Microbiology and Immunology, School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia.,Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia
| | - E Athan
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Western Australia.,Department of Infectious Disease, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jodlowski TZ, Oehler R, Kam LW, Melnychuk I. Emerging Therapies in the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease. Ann Pharmacother 2016; 40:2164-9. [PMID: 17119105 DOI: 10.1345/aph.1h340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To describe emergent therapies, such as rifaximin, nitazoxanide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), tinidazole, tolevamer, and the possible use of a vaccine, in Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD), one of the most common causes of diarrhea in hospitalized adults in North America. Data Sources: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1996-October 2006), PubMed (1996–October 2006), abstracts from Infectious Diseases Society of America (September 2006) and International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (September 2006), Internet (October 2006), Genzyme product Web site (October 2006), and Romark Laboratories Web site (October 2006) using the terms Clostridium difficile, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, intravenous immunoglobulin, tolevamer, vaccine, and tinidazole. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Data presented in this article were selected based on clinical relevance and power of the studies. In vivo and in vitro studies supporting the use of drugs available for treatment of refractory CDAD were reviewed. Some of the information on new and emerging modalities was also included, although there were limited published data available. Data Synthesis: Clinical trials evaluating the use of nitazoxanide and tolevamer for the treatment of CDAD have been published. Tinidazole use is based on structural similarities to metronidazole; however, clinical trials have not been conducted and the cost of this agent may be a limiting factor. The use of rifaximin and IVIG will require randomized clinical trials to establish their place in therapy. Limited information in the literature suggests that a vaccine may be effective for CDAD prevention. Conclusions: CDAD is a debilitating disease with increasing treatment failure rates and recurrences using standard therapies. Clinicians need to look at other options to expand the available treatment arsenal in addition to placing a greater emphasis on prevention.
Collapse
|
30
|
Isaac S, Scher JU, Djukovic A, Jiménez N, Littman DR, Abramson SB, Pamer EG, Ubeda C. Short- and long-term effects of oral vancomycin on the human intestinal microbiota. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 72:128-136. [PMID: 27707993 PMCID: PMC5161046 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral vancomycin remains the mainstay of therapy for severe infections produced by Clostridium difficile, the most prevalent cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhoea in developed countries. However, its short- and long-term effects on the human intestinal microbiota remain largely unknown. METHODS We utilized high-throughput sequencing to analyse the effects of vancomycin on the faecal human microbiota up to 22 weeks post-antibiotic cessation. The clinical relevance of the observed microbiota perturbations was studied in mice. RESULTS During vancomycin therapy, most intestinal microbiota genera and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were depleted in all analysed subjects, including all baseline OTUs from the phylum Bacteroidetes. This was accompanied by a vast expansion of genera associated with infections, including Klebsiella and Escherichia/Shigella. Following antibiotic cessation, marked differences in microbiota resilience were observed among subjects. While some individuals recovered a microbiota close to baseline composition, in others, up to 89% of abundant OTUs could no longer be detected. The clinical relevance of the observed microbiota changes was further demonstrated in mice, which developed analogous microbiota alterations. During vancomycin treatment, mice were highly susceptible to intestinal colonization by an antibiotic-resistant pathogen and, upon antibiotic cessation, a less-resilient microbiota allowed higher levels of pathogen colonization. CONCLUSIONS Oral vancomycin induces drastic and consistent changes in the human intestinal microbiota. Upon vancomycin cessation, the microbiota recovery rate varied considerably among subjects, which could influence, as validated in mice, the level of susceptibility to pathogen intestinal colonization. Our results demonstrate the negative long-term effects of vancomycin, which should be considered as a fundamental aspect of the cost-benefit equation for antibiotic prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine Isaac
- Departamento de Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública - FISABIO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose U Scher
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine and Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ana Djukovic
- Departamento de Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública - FISABIO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nuria Jiménez
- Departamento de Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública - FISABIO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dan R Littman
- Molecular Pathogenesis Program, The Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven B Abramson
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine and Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric G Pamer
- Immunology Program and Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Lucille Castori Center for Microbes, Inflammation and Cancer, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carles Ubeda
- Departamento de Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública - FISABIO, Valencia, Spain .,Centers of Biomedical Research Network (CIBER) in Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI) is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals. The epidemic strain NAP1/BI/ribotype 027 accounts for outbreaks worldwide, with increasing mortality and severity. CDI is acquired from an endogenous source or from spores in the environment, most easily acquired during the hospital stay. The use of antimicrobials disrupts the intestinal microflora enabling C. difficile to proliferate in the colon and produce toxins. Clinical diagnosis in symptomatic patients requires toxin detection from stool specimens and rarely in combination with stool culture to increase sensitivity. However, stool culture is essential for epidemiological studies. Oral metronidazole is the recommended therapy for milder cases of CDI and oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin for more severe cases. Treatment of first recurrence involves the use of the same therapy used in the initial CDI. In the event of a second recurrence oral vancomycin often given in a tapered dose or intermittently, or fidaxomicin may be used. Fecal transplantation is playing an immense role in therapy of recurrent CDI with remarkable results. Fulminant colitis and toxic megacolon warrant surgical intervention. Novel approaches including new antibiotics and immunotherapy against CDI or its toxins appear to be of potential value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Ofosu
- Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Louie TJ, Byrne B, Emery J, Ward L, Krulicki W, Nguyen D, Wu K, Cannon K. Differences of the Fecal Microflora With Clostridium difficile Therapies. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 60 Suppl 2:S91-7. [PMID: 25922407 DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), patterns of pathogen reduction in relationship to changes in components of the normal microbiota are hypothesized to be predictive of response to treatment and subsequent sustained cure. METHODS At a single center, subjects enrolled into phase 2 and 3 C. difficile treatment clinical trials (2003-2008) provided fecal samples to assess killing of C. difficile and changes to components of the microbiome. Quantitative bacterial cultures, measurement of C. difficile toxin titers, quantitative polymerase chain reaction of fecal samples for Bacteroidetes, Clostridium clusters XIVa and IV, and C. difficile were performed. RESULTS Quantitative bacterial cultures showed a mean log10 C. difficile count (colony-forming units [CFU]) of 6.7 ± 2.0 at study entry; vancomycin treatment consistently reduced C. difficile counts to the limit of detection (2.0 log10 CFU/g), whereas metronidazole was associated with mean C. difficile counts 1.5-2 log10 higher at 10 days of treatment. In patients receiving tolevamer, C. difficile persisted in high counts during treatment; response to treatment was correlated with neutralization of toxin along with persistence of normal microbiota components. However, this was achieved in approximately half of subjects. Both vancomycin and metronidazole further suppressed microbiome components during treatment of CDI. Lactobacilli were observed to be a microbiome component that persisted during treatment of CDI. CONCLUSIONS Differences of pathogen clearance and microbiome perturbation during treatment of CDI appear to explain treatment outcomes. The hypothesis that probiotic microbes could help prevent onset of CDI is supported by the observation of persistence of lactobacilli during and after treatment of CDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Louie
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary Infection Prevention and Control, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Canada
| | - Brendan Byrne
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary
| | - Judith Emery
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary
| | - Linda Ward
- Infection Prevention and Control, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Canada
| | - Wally Krulicki
- Infection Prevention and Control, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Canada
| | - David Nguyen
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary
| | - Kaiyu Wu
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary
| | - Kristine Cannon
- Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary Infection Prevention and Control, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is being recognized as a growing threat to many health-care systems. Epidemiology data shows that infection rates are soaring and the disease burden is increasing. Despite the efficacy of standard treatments, it is becoming evident that novel therapeutics will be required to tackle this disease. These new treatments aim to enhance the intestinal microbial barrier, activate the immune system and neutralize the toxins that mediate this disease. Many of these therapies are still in the beginning stages of investigation, however, in the next few years, more clinical data will become available to help implement many of these exciting new therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Padua
- a Department of Medicine , University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| | - Charalabos Pothoulakis
- a Department of Medicine , University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clostridium difficile infections are a leading cause of healthcare facility outbreaks of gastrointestinal illness that may have serious complications and a high rate of recurrent disease. Despite the availability of standard antibiotic treatments, data from national surveillance programs indicate that the incidence of this disease continues to increase, placing a heavy burden on healthcare systems. New emerging strategies are being tested to replace or augment these standard antibiotics. AREAS COVERED Thirty-two current investigational agents focusing on different strategies for both prevention and treatment of C. difficile infections are reviewed. Data was gathered from a literature search of public databases for published trials from 1999-November 13, 2015 and from the author's compendium of knowledge. Agents reviewed included 13 antibiotics, two antibiotic inactivators, seven bacteria or yeasts acting to enhance the normal microbiome, seven immunizing agents and three toxin binders. Of the 32 investigational treatments reviewed, 8 (25%) showed significant efficacy in phase II or III clinical trials and are actively being developed as new therapies for C. difficile infections. EXPERT OPINION A number of potential treatments have floundered during their development process, while others have shown promising results. The strongest efficacy has been in the areas of newer antibiotics, probiotics, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. By targeting the pathogenic pathway of C. difficile infections, multiple strategies for prevention and treatment have been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne V McFarland
- a Dept of Medicinal Chemistry , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carmo J, Marques S, Chapim I, Túlio MA, Rodrigues JP, Bispo M, Chagas C. Leaping Forward in the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection: Update in 2015. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2015; 22:259-267. [PMID: 28868417 PMCID: PMC5579984 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, significant advances in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have risen. We review the most relevant updated recommendations in the current standard of care of CDI and discuss emerging therapies, including antibiotic, alternative therapies (probiotics, toxin-binding resins, immunotherapy) and new data on fecal transplantation. Upcoming surgical options and other rescue therapies for severe refractory disease are also addressed. Although oral metronidazole is a first-line therapy for non-severe CDI, emerging data have demonstrated its inferiority relatively to vancomycin, particularly in the setting of recurrent and/or severe infection. After a CDI recurrence for the first time, fidaxomicin has been shown to be associated with lower likelihood of CDI recurrence compared to vancomycin. Fecal transplantation is now strongly recommended for multiple recurrent CDI and may have a role in refractory disease. Oral, frozen stool capsules may simplify fecal transplantation in the future, with preliminary promising results. Diverting loop ileostomy combined with colonic lavage is a potential alternative to colectomy in severe complicated CDI. Potential alternative therapies requiring further investigation include toxin-binding resins and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Carmo
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Susana Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Iolanda Chapim
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria Ana Túlio
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - José Pedro Rodrigues
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Miguel Bispo
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.,Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cristina Chagas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated and nosocomial infectious diarrhea. Presenting as clostridium difficile colitis, it is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Metronidazole is regarded as the agent of choice for CDl therapy and also for the first recurrence in most patients with mild to moderate CDI. Vancomycin is recommended as an initial therapy for patients with severe CDI. With recent Food and Drug Administration-approval fidaxomicin is available for clinical use and is as effective as vancomycin with lower relapse rates. Rifaximin and fecal bacteriotherapy are alternative approaches in patients with severe or refractory CDI, before surgical intervention. Antibiotic research is ongoing to add potential new drugs such as teicoplanin, ramoplanin, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, rifampin, bacitracin to our armamentarium. Role of toxin-binding agents is still questionable. Monoclonal antibody and intravenous immunoglobulin are still investigational therapies that could be promising options. The ongoing challenges in the treatment of CDI include management of recurrence and presence of resistance strains such as NAP1/BI/027, but early recognition of surgical candidates can potentially decrease mortality in CDI.
Collapse
|
37
|
Effective Sequestration of Clostridium difficile Protein Toxins by Calcium Aluminosilicate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:7178-83. [PMID: 26149988 DOI: 10.1128/aac.05050-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and the etiologic agent responsible for C. difficile infection. Toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) are nearly indispensable virulence factors for Clostridium difficile pathogenesis. Given the toxin-centric mechanism by which C. difficile pathogenesis occurs, the selective sequestration with neutralization of TcdA and TcdB by nonantibiotic agents represents a novel mode of action to prevent or treat C. difficile-associated disease. In this preclinical study, we used quantitative enzyme immunoassays to determine the extent by which a novel drug, calcium aluminosilicate uniform particle size nonswelling M-1 (CAS UPSN M-1), is capable of sequestering TcdA and TcdB in vitro. The following major findings were derived from the present study. First, we show that CAS UPSN M-1 efficiently sequestered both TcdA and TcdB to undetectable levels. Second, we show that CAS UPSN M-1's affinity for TcdA is greater than its affinity for TcdB. Last, we show that CAS UPSN M-1 exhibited limited binding affinity for nontarget proteins. Taken together, these results suggest that ingestion of calcium aluminosilicate might protect gastrointestinal tissues from antibiotic- or chemotherapy-induced C. difficile infection by neutralizing the cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects of luminal TcdA and TcdB.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaiser AM, Hogen R, Bordeianou L, Alavi K, Wise PE, Sudan R. Clostridium Difficile Infection from a Surgical Perspective. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1363-77. [PMID: 25917533 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2785-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence and the severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have increased significantly over the last decade, especially in high-risk populations such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Surgeons must be able to both identify and minimize the risk of CDI in their own surgical patients and determine which CDI patients will benefit from surgery. PURPOSE We sought to define the risk factors, compare the treatment options, define the surgical indications, and identify factors that affect surgical outcomes for CDI based on the currently available literature. RESULTS Antibiotic use, exposure to the C. difficile bacteria, IBD, and higher levels of co-morbidity are all risk factors for CDI. The majority of CDI can be treated with antibiotics. Severe or fulminant colitis, however, has a high potential for poor outcome, but experience and some data suggest a lower mortality rate with colectomy rather than with continued medical treatment. Open total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy is typically the preferred surgical strategy. It is often difficult to determine which patients will fail medical management as some may not manifest clinical signs of severe infection. Surrogate parameters of failure of medical therapy include respiratory and/or renal insufficiency, age greater than 60 years, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and coagulopathy, all of which have been associated with worse surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that in appropriately selected patients, colectomy performed before the development of shock requiring vasopressors, respiratory failure, renal failure, multi-organ dysfunction, and mental status changes may reduce mortality of the most severe forms of colitis. For less severe or recurrent presentations, creation of a loop ileostomy with intra-operative colonic lavage, fecal microbiota transfer, and C. difficile vaccinations are being discussed but have only been studied in small case-controlled series. CONCLUSIONS Prevention, containment, and non-surgical treatment are the cornerstone of management for CDI. However, the most severe forms with toxic colitis benefit from involvement of a surgical team. Swift open total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy in patients with severe or fulminant C. difficile colitis has the best chance to reduce mortality if it is not delayed until shock, end organ damage, vasopressor requirement, mental status changes develop. Less aggressive approaches may be appropriate for milder and refractory forms but require further study before their applicability can be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas M Kaiser
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7418, Los Angeles, 90033, CA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kachrimanidou M, Sarmourli T, Skoura L, Metallidis S, Malisiovas N. Clostridium difficile infection: New insights into therapeutic options. Crit Rev Microbiol 2015; 42:773-9. [PMID: 25955884 DOI: 10.3109/1040841x.2015.1027171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in healthcare settings and represents a major social and economic burden. The major virulence determinants are large clostridial toxins, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB), encoded within the pathogenicity locus. Traditional therapies, such as metronidazole and vancomycin, frequently lead to a vicious circle of recurrences due to their action against normal human microbiome. New disease management strategies together with the development of novel therapeutic and containment approaches are needed in order to better control outbreaks and treat patients. This article provides an overview of currently available CDI treatment options and discusses the most promising therapies under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Kachrimanidou
- a Department of Microbiology , Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece , Thessaloniki , Greece and
| | - Theopisti Sarmourli
- a Department of Microbiology , Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece , Thessaloniki , Greece and
| | - Lemonia Skoura
- a Department of Microbiology , Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece , Thessaloniki , Greece and
| | - Symeon Metallidis
- b Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Internal Medicine , Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - Nikolaos Malisiovas
- a Department of Microbiology , Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece , Thessaloniki , Greece and
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
McCoy RM, Klick A, Hill S, Dull RB. Luminal Toxin-Binding Agents for Clostridium difficile Infection. J Pharm Pract 2015; 29:361-7. [PMID: 25613056 DOI: 10.1177/0897190014566315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically search the literature for trials evaluating luminal toxin-binding agents (LTBAs) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). METHODS A systematic search was conducted utilizing PubMed and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts with the following terms: anion-exchange resins, C difficile, cholestyramine, tolevamer, and colestipol. Articles were included if published in the English language and reported clinical outcomes of more than 5 adult humans with CDI treated with LTBAs. RESULTS Nearly all clinical trials evaluated LTBA as monotherapy for CDI and LTBAs are inferior to standard therapy. In contemporary practice, LTBAs are employed as adjunctive or sequential therapy for which there is a paucity of data. Some data suggest potential efficacy for recurrent CDI. Current guidelines for CDI assert LTBAs are contraindicated due to drug-drug interactions with vancomycin. However, the impact of this interaction on clinical outcomes has not been evaluated, and it is unknown whether higher doses of vancomycin or separating the administration of LTBAs from vancomycin would mitigate this interaction. CONCLUSION LTBA monotherapy is inferior to vancomycin and metronidazole for CDI. Some data indicate possible benefit in reducing recurrent CDI, but outcomes with adjunctive and/or sequential LTBAs are unavailable. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of LTBAs for CDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M McCoy
- Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Andrew Klick
- Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Steven Hill
- Ross University School of Medicine and School of Veterinary Medicine, Roseau, Commonwealth of Dominica, West Indies
| | - Ryan B Dull
- Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chilton CH, Freeman J. Predictive values of models of Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2015; 29:163-77. [PMID: 25582644 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
In vivo and in vitro models are widely used to simulate Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). They have made considerable contributions in the study of C difficile pathogenesis, antibiotic predisposition to CDI, and population dynamics as well as the evaluation of new antimicrobial and immunologic therapeutics. Although CDI models have greatly increased understanding of this complicated pathogen, all have limitations in reproducing human disease, notably their inability to generate a truly reflective immune response. This review summarizes the most commonly used models of CDI and discusses their pros and cons and their predictive values in terms of clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline H Chilton
- Section of Molecular Gastroenterology, Leeds Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Old Medical School, Thoresby Place, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
| | - Jane Freeman
- Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, The General Infirmary, Old Medical School, Thoresby Place, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults: 2010 Update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 31:431-55. [PMID: 20307191 DOI: 10.1086/651706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2180] [Impact Index Per Article: 242.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Since publication of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America position paper onClostridium difficileinfection in 1995, significant changes have occurred in the epidemiology and treatment of this infection.C. difficileremains the most important cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and is increasingly important as a community pathogen. A more virulent strain ofC. difficilehas been identified and has been responsible for more-severe cases of disease worldwide. Data reporting the decreased effectiveness of metronidazole in the treatment of severe disease have been published. Despite the increasing quantity of data available, areas of controversy still exist. This guideline updates recommendations regarding epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and infection control and environmental management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart H Cohen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious and Immunologic Diseases, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
DuPont HL. Chemoprophylaxis of Clostridium difficile infections in high-risk hospitalized patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:1862-4. [PMID: 24768812 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert L DuPont
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Kelsey Research Foundation, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20 Suppl 2:1-26. [PMID: 24118601 DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 767] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2013] [Revised: 09/22/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In 2009 the first European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection (ESCMID) treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was published. The guideline has been applied widely in clinical practice. In this document an update and review on the comparative effectiveness of the currently available treatment modalities of CDI is given, thereby providing evidence-based recommendations on this issue. A computerized literature search was carried out to investigate randomized and non-randomized trials investigating the effect of an intervention on the clinical outcome of CDI. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The ESCMID and an international team of experts from 11 European countries supported the process. To improve clinical guidance in the treatment of CDI, recommendations are specified for various patient groups, e.g. initial non-severe disease, severe CDI, first recurrence or risk for recurrent disease, multiple recurrences and treatment of CDI when oral administration is not possible. Treatment options that are reviewed include: antibiotics, toxin-binding resins and polymers, immunotherapy, probiotics, and faecal or bacterial intestinal transplantation. Except for very mild CDI that is clearly induced by antibiotic usage antibiotic treatment is advised. The main antibiotics that are recommended are metronidazole, vancomycin and fidaxomicin. Faecal transplantation is strongly recommended for multiple recurrent CDI. In case of perforation of the colon and/or systemic inflammation and deteriorating clinical condition despite antibiotic therapy, total abdominal colectomy or diverting loop ileostomy combined with colonic lavage is recommended.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common infectious cause of healthcare-acquired diarrhoea. Outcomes of C. difficile colonization are varied, from asymptomatic carriage to fulminant colitis and death, due in part to the interplay between the pathogenic virulence factors of the bacterium and the counteractive immune responses of the host. Secreted toxins A and B are the major virulence factors of C. difficile and induce a profound inflammatory response by intoxicating intestinal epithelial cells causing proinflammatory cytokine release. Host cell necrosis, vascular permeability and neutrophil infiltration lead to an elevated white cell count, profuse diarrhoea and in severe cases, dehydration, hypoalbuminaemia and toxic megacolon. Other bacterial virulence factors, including surface layer proteins and flagella proteins, are detected by host cell surface signal molecules that trigger downstream cell-mediated immune pathways. Human studies have identified a role for serum and faecal immunoglobulin levels in protection from disease, but the recent development of a mouse model of CDI has enabled studies into the precise molecular interactions that trigger the immune response during infection. Key effector molecules have been identified that can drive towards a protective anti-inflammatory response or a damaging proinflammatory response. The limitations of current antimicrobial therapies for CDI have led to the development of both active and passive immunotherapies, none of which have, as yet been formally approved for CDI. However, recent advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of host immune protection against CDI may provide an exciting opportunity for novel therapeutic developments in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Solomon
- School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pareja-Sierra T. [Diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile in the elderly: new perspectives]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2014; 49:188-193. [PMID: 24685366 DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2014.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 02/15/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Infection due to Clostridium difficile is currently the main cause of hospital acquired gastrointestinal disease. Its prevalence in the elderly population is higher due to there being many associated risk factors in this age group, such as comorbidity, frequent exposure to the healthcare or residential home setting, immunosenescence, greater consumption of antibiotics, and antiacids. The diagnostic techniques have notably improved in the last few years, which could also account for an increase in its diagnosis. The new expert consensus recommendations propose stratifying the clinical situation of the patient in order to choose the treatment option. Therapeutic options have recently been included in the new Clinical Guidelines, such as flidaxomicin or fecal transplants, with encouraging results, particularly for the control of frequent recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Pareja-Sierra
- Sección de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Sescam, Guadalajara, España.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wilcox MH. Editorial Commentary: The Trials and Tribulations of Treating Clostridium difficile Infection--One Step Backward, One Step Forward, but Still Progress. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:355-7. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
48
|
Johnson S, Louie TJ, Gerding DN, Cornely OA, Chasan-Taber S, Fitts D, Gelone SP, Broom C, Davidson DM. Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:345-54. [PMID: 24799326 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 366] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common complication of antibiotic therapy that is treated with antibiotics, contributing to ongoing disruption of the colonic microbiota and CDI recurrence. Two multinational trials were conducted to compare the efficacy of tolevamer, a nonantibiotic, toxin-binding polymer, with vancomycin and metronidazole. METHODS Patients with CDI were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio to oral tolevamer 9 g (loading dose) followed by 3 g every 8 hours for 14 days, vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours for 10 days, or metronidazole 375 mg every 6 hours for 10 days. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as resolution of diarrhea and absence of severe abdominal discomfort for more than 2 consecutive days including day 10. RESULTS In a pooled analysis, 563 patients received tolevamer, 289 received metronidazole, and 266 received vancomycin. Clinical success of tolevamer was inferior to both metronidazole and vancomycin (P < .001), and metronidazole was inferior to vancomycin (P = .02; 44.2% [n = 534], 72.7% [n = 278], and 81.1% [n = 259], respectively). Clinical success in patients with severe CDI who received metronidazole was 66.3% compared with vancomycin, which was 78.5%. (P = .059). A post-hoc multivariate analysis that excluded tolevamer found 3 factors that were strongly associated with clinical success: vancomycin treatment, treatment-naive status, and mild or moderate CDI severity. Adverse events were similar among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Tolevamer was inferior to antibiotic treatment of CDI, and metronidazole was inferior to vancomycin. Trial Registration. clinicaltrials.gov NCT00106509 and NCT00196794.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Johnson
- Loyola University Medical Center and Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Dale N Gerding
- Loyola University Medical Center and Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Oliver A Cornely
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - David Fitts
- ViroPharma Incorporated, Exton, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Colin Broom
- ViroPharma Incorporated, Exton, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
IV ECO, III ECO, Johnson DA. Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2014; 5:1-26. [PMID: 24729930 PMCID: PMC3951810 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2013] [Revised: 10/06/2013] [Accepted: 12/09/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) presents a rapidly evolving challenge in the battle against hospital-acquired infections. Recent advances in CDI diagnosis and management include rapid changes in diagnostic approach with the introduction of newer tests, such as detection of glutamate dehydrogenase in stool and polymerase chain reaction to detect the gene for toxin production, which will soon revolutionize the diagnostic approach to CDI. New medications and multiple medical society guidelines have introduced changing concepts in the definitions of severity of CDI and the choice of therapeutic agents, while rapid expansion of data on the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation heralds a revolutionary change in the management of patients suffering multiple relapses of CDI. Through a comprehensive review of current medical literature, this article aims to offer an intensive review of the current state of CDI diagnosis, discuss the strengths and limitations of available laboratory tests, compare both current and future treatments options and offer recommendations for best practice strategies.
Collapse
|
50
|
Shivashankar R, Khanna S, Kammer PP, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Baddour LM, Pardi DS. Clinical factors associated with development of severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11:1466-71. [PMID: 23702192 PMCID: PMC3846768 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2012] [Revised: 04/11/2013] [Accepted: 04/12/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) can cause life-threatening complications. Severe-complicated CDI is characterized by hypotension, shock, sepsis, ileus, megacolon, and colon perforation. We created a model to identify clinical factors associated with severe-complicated CDI. METHODS We analyzed data from 1446 inpatient cases of CDI (48.6% female; median age, 62.5 years; range, 0.1-103.7 years) at the Mayo Clinic from June 28, 2007, to June 25, 2010. Patients with severe-complicated CDI (n = 487) were identified as those who required admission to the intensive care unit or colectomy, or died, within 30 days of CDI diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to identify variables that were independently associated with the occurrence of severe-complicated CDI in 2 cohorts. One cohort comprised all hospitalized patients; the other comprised a subset of these inpatients who were residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota to assess the association of comorbid conditions with the development of severe-complicated infection in a population-based cohort. The linear combinations of variables identified by using logistic regression models provided scores to predict the risk of developing severe-complicated CDI. RESULTS In a multivariable model that included all inpatients, increasing age, leukocyte count >15 × 10(9)/L, increase in serum level of creatinine >1.5-fold from baseline, and use of proton pump inhibitors or narcotic medications were independently associated with severe-complicated CDI. In the secondary analysis, which included only patients from Olmsted County, comorbid conditions were not significantly associated with severe-complicated CDI. CONCLUSIONS Older age, high numbers of leukocytes in blood samples, an increased serum level of creatinine, gastric acid suppression, and use of narcotic medications were independently associated with development of severe-complicated CDI in hospitalized patients. Early aggressive monitoring and intervention could improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raina Shivashankar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sahil Khanna
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patricia P. Kammer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - W. Scott Harmsen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alan R. Zinsmeister
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Larry M. Baddour
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darrell S. Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|