Immunoprecipitation and virus neutralization assays demonstrate qualitative differences between protective antibody responses to inactivated hepatitis A vaccine and passive immunization with immune globulin

Acute Hepatitis A Viral Infection in People With HIV With Previously Documented Hepatitis A Immunity or Appropriate Vaccination: A Case Series

We describe 4 people with HIV (PWH) who acquired acute hepatitis A (HAV) infection during recent King County, Washington, outbreaks despite documented immunity and/or vaccination. HAV revaccination may be needed in PWH with risk factors for HAV infection regardless of preexisting immunity.

Prevention of Hepatitis A Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2020

HEPATITIS A IS A VACCINE-PREVENTABLE, COMMUNICABLE DISEASE OF THE LIVER CAUSED BY THE HEPATITIS A VIRUS (HAV). THE INFECTION IS TRANSMITTED VIA THE FECAL-ORAL ROUTE, USUALLY FROM DIRECT PERSON-TO-PERSON CONTACT OR CONSUMPTION OF CONTAMINATED FOOD OR WATER. HEPATITIS A IS AN ACUTE, SELF-LIMITED DISEASE THAT DOES NOT RESULT IN CHRONIC INFECTION. HAV ANTIBODIES (IMMUNOGLOBULIN G [IGG] ANTI-HAV) PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO HAV INFECTION PERSIST FOR LIFE AND PROTECT AGAINST REINFECTION; IGG ANTI-HAV PRODUCED AFTER VACCINATION CONFER LONG-TERM IMMUNITY. THIS REPORT SUPPLANTS AND SUMMARIZES PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP) REGARDING THE PREVENTION OF HAV INFECTION IN THE UNITED STATES. ACIP RECOMMENDS ROUTINE VACCINATION OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS AND CATCH-UP VACCINATION FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS AGED 2-18 YEARS WHO HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED HEPATITIS A (HEPA) VACCINE AT ANY AGE. ACIP RECOMMENDS HEPA VACCINATION FOR ADULTS AT RISK FOR HAV INFECTION OR SEVERE DISEASE FROM HAV INFECTION AND FOR ADULTS REQUESTING PROTECTION AGAINST HAV WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF A RISK FACTOR. THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ALSO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR VACCINATION BEFORE TRAVEL, FOR POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS, IN SETTINGS PROVIDING SERVICES TO ADULTS, AND DURING OUTBREAKS.

Pharmacokinetic modeling to determine the minimum effective dose of disease-specific antibodies for preventing hepatitis A post-exposure

BACKGROUND

The minimum effective dose of intramuscular polyvalent immune globulin for prevention of hepatitis A post-exposure is unknown. In Australia current dosing is according to weight category.

METHODS

The peak concentration and decay of hepatitis A antibodies after intramuscular dosing of immune globulin in adults was modeled utilizing published parameters. Models simulated dosing according to current Australian guidelines, then adjusted the dose in clinically relevant increments to estimate the optimal dose of hepatitis A antibodies for post-exposure prophylaxis of nonimmune individuals. Optimal dosing assumed a target serum concentration of hepatitis A antibodies of the correlate of protection plus a 10% margin of error at an incubation period. The effect of weight on hepatitis A antibody concentration at an incubation period under current guidelines was examined by fixing weight in 5 kg increments.

RESULTS

Current dosing guidelines in Australia may underdose people who weigh in excess of 85 kg. The optimal dose of hepatitis A-specific antibodies according to the model was 3.6, 2.5, and 1.9 IU/kg assuming 50%, 75% and 100% bioavailability respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For individuals in Australia recommended passive immunization as post-exposure prophylaxis and weighing in excess of 85 kg, conservative management would include dosing between 2.5 and 3.6 IU hepatitis A antibodies/kg.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

This review is withdrawn because it is outdated. A new review is to be published by the end of 2019.

Adaptive Immune Responses in Hepatitis A Virus and Hepatitis E Virus Infections

Both hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis E virus (HEV) cause self-limited infections in humans that are preventable by vaccination. Progress in characterizing adaptive immune responses against these enteric hepatitis viruses, and how they contribute to resolution of infection or liver injury, has therefore remained largely frozen for the past two decades. How HAV and HEV infections are so effectively controlled by B- and T-cell immunity, and why they do not have the same propensity to persist as HBV and HCV infections, cannot yet be adequately explained. The objective of this review is to summarize our understanding of the relationship between patterns of virus replication, adaptive immune responses, and acute liver injury in HAV and HEV infections. Gaps in knowledge, and recent studies that challenge long-held concepts of how antibodies and T cells contribute to control and pathogenesis of HAV and HEV infections, are highlighted.

Immunization against Hepatitis A

Worldwide, there are multiple formaldehyde-inactivated and at least two live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines now in clinical use. The impressive immunogenicity of inactivated vaccines is reflected in rapid seroconversion rates, enabling both preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis. Universal childhood vaccination programs targeting young children have led to significant drops in the incidence of hepatitis A both in toddlers and in susceptible nonimmune adults in regions with intermediate endemicity for hepatitis A. Although the safety of inactivated vaccines is well established, further studies are needed concerning the implications of fecal virus shedding by recipients of attenuated vaccines, as well as the long-term persistence of immune memory in children receiving novel immunization schedules consisting of single doses of inactivated vaccines.

Hepatitis A Virus Genome Organization and Replication Strategy

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a positive-strand RNA virus classified in the genus Hepatovirus of the family Picornaviridae It is an ancient virus with a long evolutionary history and multiple features of its capsid structure, genome organization, and replication cycle that distinguish it from other mammalian picornaviruses. HAV proteins are produced by cap-independent translation of a single, long open reading frame under direction of an inefficient, upstream internal ribosome entry site (IRES). Genome replication occurs slowly and is noncytopathic, with transcription likely primed by a uridylated protein primer as in other picornaviruses. Newly produced quasi-enveloped virions (eHAV) are released from cells in a nonlytic fashion in a unique process mediated by interactions of capsid proteins with components of the host cell endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) system.

Immunomodulatory effects of exosomes produced by virus-infected cells

Viruses have developed a spectrum of ways to modify cellular pathways to hijack the cell machinery for the synthesis of their nucleic acid and proteins. Similarly, they use intracellular vesicular mechanisms of trafficking for their assembly and eventual release, with a number of viruses acquiring their envelope from internal or plasma cell membranes. There is an increasing number of reports on viral exploitation of cell secretome pathways to avoid recognition and stimulation of the immune response. Extracellular vesicles (EV) containing viral particles have been shown to shield viruses after exiting the host cell, in some cases challenging the boundaries between viral groups traditionally characterised as enveloped and non-enveloped. Apart from viral particles, EV can spread the virus also carrying viral genome and can modify the target cells through their cargo of virus-coded miRNAs and proteins as well as selectively packaged cellular mRNAs, miRNAs, proteins and lipids, differing in composition and quantities from the cell of origin.

Viral excretion and antibody titers in children infected with hepatitis A virus from an orphanage in western India

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A is endemic in India and mainly causes sporadic infections. However, children in childcare centers, schools and orphanages are vulnerable to common-source outbreaks as they have naive hosts.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate hepatitis A outbreak in an orphanage from Pune, India.

STUDY DESIGN

Monitoring of virus excretion and anti-HAV antibody levels in hepatitis A virus (HAV) infected children.

RESULTS

The orphanage housed 93 children of the age 1 month-6.5 years. Analysis of the collected serum (n=78) and stool samples (n=63) revealed 20 children to be either positive for anti-HAV IgM antibodies or excreting HAV, 14 being symptomatic and 6 asymptomatic, while 32 were already anti-HAV IgG positive either due to past HAV exposure (n=7, mean log antibody titers: 2.96) or maternal antibodies (n=25, mean log antibody titers: 1.13). Serum samples, taken 4 weeks apart, did not show any significant difference in the IgM and IgG antibody levels either. However, virus excretion decreased significantly after 15 days in symptomatic children (mean log HAV RNA copies/ml 1.03+0.30), while asymptomatic children continued to excrete higher viral loads, at constant levels (mean log HAV RNA copies/ml 2.33+0.33), for up to 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Though virus excretion continued up to 90 days in all HAV infected children, asymptomatic children excreted higher viral loads for longer period and hence can contribute significantly in person-to-person virus transmission. All children should be vaccinated in such set ups.

Reassessing immune control of hepatitis A virus

There is renewed interest in hepatitis A virus (HAV) pathogenesis and immunity after 2-3 decades of limited progress. From a public health perspective, the average age at infection has increased in developing countries, resulting in more severe hepatitis that is poorly understood mechanistically. More fundamentally, there is interest in comparing immunity to HAV and hepatitis C virus (HCV): small, positive-strand RNA viruses with very different infection outcomes. Here, we review evidence that circulating HAV virions are cloaked in membranes, with consequences for induction of innate immunity and antibody-mediated neutralization. We also consider the contribution of CD4+ helper versus CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to antiviral immunity and liver injury, and present a model of non-cytotoxic immune control of HAV infection.

Naked Viruses That Aren't Always Naked: Quasi-Enveloped Agents of Acute Hepatitis

Historically, viruses were considered to be either enveloped or nonenveloped. However, recent work on hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus challenges this long-held tenet. Whereas these human pathogens are shed in feces as naked nonenveloped virions, recent studies indicate that both circulate in the blood completely masked in membranes during acute infection. These membrane-wrapped virions are as infectious as their naked counterparts, although they do not express a virally encoded protein on their surface, thus distinguishing them from conventional enveloped viruses. The absence of a viral fusion protein implies that these quasi-enveloped virions have unique mechanisms for entry into cells. Like true enveloped viruses, however, these phylogenetically distinct viruses usurp components of the host ESCRT system to hijack host cell membranes and noncytolytically exit infected cells. The membrane protects these viruses from neutralizing antibodies, facilitating dissemination within the host, whereas nonenveloped virions shed in feces are stable in the environment, allowing for epidemic transmission.

Peek-a-boo: membrane hijacking and the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis

Historically, animal viruses have been classified on the basis of the presence or absence of an envelope - an external lipid bilayer membrane typically carrying one or more viral glycoproteins. However, growing evidence indicates that some 'non-enveloped' viruses circulate in the blood of infected individuals enveloped in host-derived membranes that provide protection from neutralizing antibodies. In this opinion article, we discuss this novel strategy for virus survival and consider how it contributes to the pathogenesis of acute viral hepatitis. The acquisition of an envelope by non-enveloped viruses profoundly influences their interaction with the host at both the cellular and system level and challenges how we think about vaccine protection against these infections.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical protective efficacy, sero-protective efficacy, and safety and harms of hepatitis A vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to November 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing HAV vaccine with placebo, no intervention, or appropriate control vaccines in participants of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two authors and verified by a third author. Where required, authors contacted investigators to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically apparent hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis). The secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protective anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG), and number and types of adverse events. Results were presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis. We conducted assessment of risk of bias to evaluate the risk of systematic errors (bias) and trial sequential analyses to estimate the risk of random errors (the play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 11 clinical studies, of which only three were considered to have low risk of bias; two were quasi-randomised studies in which we only addressed harms. Nine randomised trials with 732,380 participants addressed the primary outcome of clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Of these, four trials assessed the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (41,690 participants) and five trials assessed the live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (690,690 participants). In the three randomised trials with low risk of bias (all assessing inactivated vaccine), clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 9/20,684 (0.04%) versus 92/20,746 (0.44%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30). In all nine randomised trials, clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 31/375,726 (0.01%) versus 505/356,654 (0.18%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17). These results were supported by trial sequential analyses. Subgroup analyses confirmed the clinical effectiveness of both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30) and live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) on clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines had a significant effect on reducing the lack of sero-protection (less than 20 mIU/L) (RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03). No trial reported on a sero-protective threshold less than 10 mIU/L. The risk of both non-serious local and systemic adverse events was comparable to placebo for the inactivated HAV vaccines. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on adverse events for the live attenuated HAV vaccine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccines are effective for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis A in susceptible individuals. This review demonstrated significant protection for at least two years with the inactivated HAV vaccine and at least five years with the live attenuated HAV vaccine. There was evidence to support the safety of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. More high quality evidence is required to determine the safety of live attenuated vaccines.

Dominance of the CD4(+) T helper cell response during acute resolving hepatitis A virus infection

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection typically resolves within 4-7 wk but symptomatic relapse occurs in up to 20% of cases. Immune mechanisms that terminate acute HAV infection, and prevent a relapse of virus replication and liver disease, are unknown. Here, patterns of T cell immunity, virus replication, and hepatocellular injury were studied in two HAV-infected chimpanzees. HAV-specific CD8(+) T cells were either not detected in the blood or failed to display effector function until after viremia and hepatitis began to subside. The function of CD8(+) T cells improved slowly as the cells acquired a memory phenotype but was largely restricted to production of IFN-γ. In contrast, CD4(+) T cells produced multiple cytokines when viremia first declined. Moreover, only CD4(+) T cells responded during a transient resurgence of fecal HAV shedding. This helper response then contracted slowly over several months as HAV genomes were eliminated from liver. The findings indicate a dominant role for CD4(+) T cells in the termination of HAV infection and, possibly, surveillance of an intrahepatic reservoir of HAV genomes that decays slowly. Rapid contraction or failure to sustain such a CD4(+) T cell response after resolution of symptoms could increase the risk of relapsing hepatitis A.

Acute hepatitis A virus infection is associated with a limited type I interferon response and persistence of intrahepatic viral RNA

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is an hepatotropic human picornavirus that is associated only with acute infection. Its pathogenesis is not well understood because there are few studies in animal models using modern methodologies. We characterized HAV infections in three chimpanzees, quantifying viral RNA by quantitative RT-PCR and examining critical aspects of the innate immune response including intrahepatic IFN-stimulated gene expression. We compared these infection profiles with similar studies of chimpanzees infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), an hepatotropic flavivirus that frequently causes persistent infection. Surprisingly, HAV-infected animals exhibited very limited induction of type I IFN-stimulated genes in the liver compared with chimpanzees with acute resolving HCV infection, despite similar levels of viremia and 100-fold greater quantities of viral RNA in the liver. Minimal IFN-stimulated gene 15 and IFIT1 responses peaked 1-2 wk after HAV challenge and then subsided despite continuing high hepatic viral RNA. An acute inflammatory response at 3-4 wk correlated with the appearance of virus-specific antibodies and apoptosis and proliferation of hepatocytes. Despite this, HAV RNA persisted in the liver for months, remaining present long after clearance from serum and feces and revealing dramatic differences in the kinetics of clearance in the three compartments. Viral RNA was detected in the liver for significantly longer (35 to >48 wk) than HCV RNA in animals with acute resolving HCV infection (10-20 wk). Collectively, these findings indicate that HAV is far stealthier than HCV early in the course of acute resolving infection. HAV infections represent a distinctly different paradigm in virus-host interactions within the liver.

The use of dried blood spots for assessing antibody response to hepatitis A virus after natural infection and vaccination

During recent years, vaccination against hepatitis A has been implemented in several countries. It is expected that the increase in mass vaccination against hepatitis A will eventually result in a decreased prevalence of anti-HAV antibodies in the general population. For this reason, a suitable clinical sample for diagnosis of hepatitis A must be sufficiently sensitive to enable detection of lower antibodies titers. In this study, the feasibility of using dried blood spots (DBS) was assessed for the detection of anti-HAV antibodies after a natural infection and vaccination. Seventy-four DBS and paired plasma samples were obtained from a group of college students for a cross-sectional hepatitis A seroepidemiological study. Forty-six students seronegative for anti-HAV were selected randomly and immunized with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine using an 0-6 month schedule. Seroconversion was monitored in paired plasma and DBS samples 6 months after the first dose followed by a period of 8 and 24 months after the second dose. A strong correlation between OD/CO rates of paired plasma and DBS samples for the detection of anti-HAV was observed. The sensitivity and specificity of the DBS compared with plasma for the detection of anti-HAV antibodies after natural infection was 100%. The sensitivity of DBS in samples collected 24 months after the second dose of hepatitis A vaccine was 95.4%. The results showed that DBS samples can be used for the detection of anti-HAV antibodies both after natural infection or vaccination.

Long-term immunity after two doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, in Argentinean children

We examined long-term anti-hepatitis A virus antibody persistence in Argentinean children 10 years after the initial study in which they received 2 doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Avaxim 80U). Of the 111 children, 48 from the initial trial were enrolled. Of 48, 47 (97.9%) participants had serum anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titers > or =20 mIU/mL, with the geometric mean concentration of 390.91 (+/-370.14) mIU/mL; (95% confidence interval, 282.2-499.5 mIU/mL), range, 36 to 1860.

Interchangeability of a hepatitis A vaccine second dose: Avaxim 80 following a first dose of Vaqta 25 or Havrix 720 in children in Turkey

INTRODUCTION

This randomised, observer-blind clinical trial conducted in Turkey evaluated the immunogenicity, safety and interchangeability of three paediatric inactivated hepatitis A vaccines in 424 seronegative children between 1 and 15 years of age.

METHODS

Potential subjects were screened for anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies prior to receiving a first dose of Avaxim 80, Havrix 720 or Vaqta 25, followed by a second dose of either the same vaccine or Avaxim 6 months later. Anti-HAV antibody concentrations were measured 2 weeks after the first injection, at 24 weeks (before the second dose) and at 28 weeks for the evaluation of the immune response.

RESULTS

Nearly 80% of the children between 1 and 5 years of age and half of those between the ages of 6 and 10 in the population from which the subjects were recruited were seronegative for HAV antibodies. Two weeks after the first dose, 98.2% of all subjects had anti-HAV antibody concentrations equal to or higher than 20 mIU/mL, believed to be seroprotective, and all subjects were seroprotected before and after the second dose. Anti-HAV geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) 2 weeks after the first dose and before the second were similar in children who received Avaxim and Vaqta (P = 0.2), but both were higher than Havrix (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the anti-HAV GMCs between the study groups that received two doses of the same vaccine compared with two doses of different vaccines. There were no significant differences in the frequency of any local or systemic adverse events among the study groups following either of the two doses.

CONCLUSION

All three vaccines are safe and highly immunogenic in healthy children aged 1 to 15 years. Avaxim 80 may also be given as the second dose when Havrix 720 or Vaqta 25 are given as the first dose. The pattern of seroprevalence seen here is similar to that reported in a number of recent evaluations in Turkey, and are supportive of the routine hepatitis A vaccination of young children.

Identification of hepatitis A virus mimotopes by phage display, antigenicity and immunogenicity

A phage-displayed peptide approach was used to identify ligands mimicking antigenic determinants of hepatitis A virus (HAV) for the first time. Bacteriophages displaying HAV mimotopes were isolated from a phage-display peptide library by affinity selection on serum antibodies from hepatitis A patients. Selected phage-peptides were screened for reactivity with sera from HAV infected patients and healthy controls. Four cloned peptides with different sequences were identified as mimotopes of HAV; three of them showed similarity in their amino acid sequences with at least one of the VP3 and VP1 antigenic proteins of HAV. One clone was recognised by 92% of the positive sera. The phagotopes competed effectively with HAV for absorption of anti-HAV-specific antibodies in human sera, as determined by ELISA. The four phage clones induced neutralising anti-HAV antibodies in immunised mice. These results demonstrate the potential of this method to elucidate the disease related epitopes of HAV and to use these mimotopes in diagnostic applications or in the development of a mimotope-based hepatitis A vaccine without the necessity of manipulation of the virus.

Hepatitis A virus: from discovery to vaccines

Hepatitis A virus (HAV), the causative agent of type A viral hepatitis, is an ancient human virus that was first identified almost 35 years ago. It has several characteristics that make it unique among the Picornaviridae, particularly in terms of its mechanisms of polyprotein processing and virion morphogenesis, and which likely contribute to its pathobiology. Although efficacious vaccines containing formalin-inactivated virus produced in cell culture have been licensed in multiple countries, their use has been limited by cost considerations. Changes in public health sanitation and generally increasing standards of living are leading to a decreasing incidence of acute hepatitis A worldwide, with the result that the prevalence of preexisting immunity among adults is declining in many regions. These changes in the epidemiology of HAV may paradoxically enhance the disease burden, as greater numbers of individuals become infected at older ages when disease is more likely to be clinically evident, thus providing greater incentives for vaccine utilization.

Immunochemiluminescent focus assays for the quantitation of hepatitis A virus and rotavirus in cell cultures

Two new immunological methods, the luminescent immunofocus assay (LIFA) and the luminescent immunofocus inhibition assay (LIF-IA), are described for the quantitation of cytopathic and non-cytopathic viruses propagated on cell culture monolayers. These methods use enhanced chemiluminescent detection to identify foci (luminescent immunofoci, LIF) of virus-infected cells. Viruses are propagated in susceptible cells under an agarose overlay, inactivated with ultraviolet irradiation, lifted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with virus-specific monoclonal or polyclonal antibody followed by a second antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Membranes are then treated with a luminol-based detection reagent and exposed to light sensitive film for up to 10 min. The film is developed and foci appear as dark, discrete spots which are proportional to the dose of each virus. The LIFA detected both cytopathic and non-cytopathic hepatitis A viruses (HAV) and simian rotavirus. For the cytopathic HAV, the LIFA and plaque counts were comparable. The LIF-IA was developed for HAV using virus-specific antiserum which effectively attenuated LIF formation. The LIFA and LIF-IA may be completed 5 days faster than conventional radioimmunofocus assays for HAV and rotavirus and do not require the use of radiolabeled antibodies, offering safety advantages and making these techniques more adaptable for general use. Luminescent immunofocus assays should be useful for the detection and quantitation of virtually any cytopathic or non-cytopathic virus that can be propagated in monolayer cultures when virus-specific antiserum is available.

Travel-related vaccines

Travelers are at increased risk for several infections, including familiar infections such as measles that are widely distributed but more common in developing countries. Vaccines can markedly decrease the risk for many of these infections and are an important part of pretravel preparation. Travel provides an opportunity to review and update routine vaccines in adults and assess risk from unusual infections. Global travel is growing. Persons who are elderly, HIV-infected, and immunocompromised account for many of the travelers. Studies that assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and adverse effects of some of the special vaccines used primarily in travelers generally have been done in young, healthy populations. Findings in young adults do not apply to other populations in whom immune response can be slower, less effective, and less durable. Recent reports of severe adverse events in elderly persons who have received yellow fever vaccine are a reminder that widely used, old vaccines can have unexpected side effects when used in a new population. It is biologically plausible that adverse effects might be more common in the elderly, and epidemiologically plausible that occasional instances of similar adverse events in the past could have been missed. Studies on special and travel vaccines in the elderly are needed urgently to define how these vaccines should be used in older populations and whether alternative means for protection are needed.

Safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in Argentinean children

BACKGROUND

Children are a reservoir of hepatitis A virus and must be considered as primary targets of any immunization strategy. The safety and immunogenicity were evaluated for a new formulation of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim 80 units, containing one-half the antigen dose of the adult formulation.

METHODS

The safety of two doses of this vaccine given 6 months apart was evaluated in an open study in 537 Argentinean children 12 months to 15 years old. Immunogenicity was evaluated at Weeks 0, 2, 24 and 27 in a subgroup of 120 subjects.

RESULTS

Two weeks after the first vaccine dose, >99% of initially seronegative children had seroconverted (titers > or =20 mIU/ml), with a geometric mean titer of 98.5 mIU/ml. Before booster at 24 weeks all subjects had seroconverted. A strong anamnestic response was observed after the second dose at which time the geometric mean titer had increased >35-fold, and antibody titers were consistent with long term protection. Immediate adverse reactions were observed in 3 of 537 (0.6%) subjects after the first dose. Local reactions were mild and transient and did not increase with subsequent doses. Among the systemic events reported during the 7-day follow-up period, 37 cases of fever after the first dose and 22 cases after the second dose were reported. Only 3 cases of fever were clearly related to vaccination (< or =38.2 degrees C) after the first injection, all of which subsided in less than 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of hepatitis A vaccine in children ages 12 months to 15 years in healthy children ages 12 to 47 months.

Identification of immunodominant and conformational epitopes in the capsid protein of hepatitis E virus by using monoclonal antibodies

Antibody to the capsid (PORF2) protein of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is sufficient to confer immunity, but knowledge of B-cell epitopes in the intact capsid is limited. A panel of murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was generated following immunization with recombinant ORF2.1 protein, representing the C-terminal 267 amino acids (aa) of the 660-aa capsid protein. Two MAbs reacted exclusively with the conformational ORF2.1 epitope (F. Li, J. Torresi, S. A. Locarnini, H. Zhuang, W. Zhu, X. Guo, and D. A. Anderson, J. Med. Virol. 52:289-300, 1997), while the remaining five demonstrated reactivity with epitopes in the regions aa 394 to 414, 414 to 434, and 434 to 457. The antigenic structures of both the ORF2.1 protein expressed in Escherichia coli and the virus-like particles (VLPs) expressed using the baculovirus system were examined by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using five of these MAbs and HEV patient sera. Despite the wide separation of epitopes within the primary sequence, all the MAbs demonstrated some degree of cross-inhibition with each other in ORF2. 1 and/or VLP ELISAs, suggesting a complex antigenic structure. MAbs specific for the conformational ORF2.1 epitope and a linear epitope within aa 434 to 457 blocked convalescent patient antibody reactivity against VLPs by approximately 60 and 35%, respectively, while MAbs against epitopes within aa 394 to 414 and 414 to 434 were unable to block patient serum reactivity. These results suggest that sequences spanning aa 394 to 457 of the capsid protein participate in the formation of strongly immunodominant epitopes on the surface of HEV particles which may be important in immunity to HEV infection.

Comparison of immunogenicity of two hepatitis A vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--in young adults

Two new hepatitis A vaccines have been developed, and their immunogenicity tested using different immunoassays. The present study was designed to compare the immunogenicity of these two hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--as determined by seroconversion rates and anti-HAV titers, and using the same immunoassay. Healthy volunteers (15-30 y), seronegative for anti-HAV, were randomized in an open single center study to four groups of 20-21 vaccinees each, to receive either a 25 U or a 50 U dose of VAQTA, or HAVRIX at 720 EU or 1440 EU/dose, administered at 0, 1 and 6 m or at 0 and 6 m, respectively. Four weeks after primary immunization, seroconversion rates were 100% for VAQTA and 95% for HAVRIX, following injection of 50 U or 1440 EU, respectively (p = NS) and anti-HAV GMTs were 40 and 37 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively. At 6 months, prior to the booster dose, seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, with anti-HAV GMTs of 111 and 70 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < 0.05). At month 7, four weeks after the only booster injection, using the two dose regimen, anti-HAV titers were 2212 and 1511 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < NS). Using three doses of 25 U/dose of VAQTA or 720 EU/dose of HAVRIX at 0, 1 and 6 m did not produce any clinically evaluable advantage over the two dose regimen for either vaccine. No significant adverse events were observed using either vaccine. In summary, both vaccines have similar immunogenicity demonstrated using identical immunoassays for evaluation. These results also confirm the outstanding immunogenicity of a single dose of either of the HAV vaccines and support their use in pre- and possibly postexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A virus infection.