Does in vitro susceptibility to rifabutin and ethambutol predict the response to treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia with rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin? Canadian HIV Trials Network Protocol 010 Study Group

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical and Environmental Mycobacterium chimaera Isolates

Mycobacterium chimaera is a slow-growing nontuberculous Mycobacterium species belonging to the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). It has been identified globally as the cause of a large outbreak of cardiovascular infections following open heart surgery, but it can also cause respiratory infections in individuals with underlying structural pulmonary disease. Invasive M. chimaera infections are associated with poor clinical responses, and the optimal antibiotic treatment regimen for these infections is not known. In this study, the drug susceptibility profiles of clinical and environmental M. chimaera isolates for antimicrobial agents that are commonly considered for treatment of MAC infections were determined. All M. chimaera isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin, with a median MIC of 2 μg/ml, while 98% (85/87 isolates) were susceptible to amikacin. Twenty-five percent of isolates (22/87 isolates) had intermediate susceptibility and 52% (46/87 isolates) were resistant to moxifloxacin. Similarly, 39% of isolates (34/87 isolates) had intermediate susceptibility and 39% (34/87 isolates) were resistant to linezolid. MIC breakpoints derived from the literature were used to determine resistance to rifampin (16/87 isolates [18%]), ethambutol (10/87 isolates [11%]), rifabutin (2/87 isolates [2%]), and streptomycin (1/87 isolates [1%]). In conclusion, our results showed that clarithromycin, amikacin, rifabutin, and streptomycin had the best activity against M. chimaera isolates, while susceptibility rates were lower for rifampin and ethambutol. In contrast, there was a high prevalence of isolates that were not susceptible to moxifloxacin or linezolid. While factors in addition to antibiotic susceptibility may determine the outcomes of treatment of M. chimaera infections, our results should inform the selection of antimicrobials as part of the overall therapeutic strategy.

Rifabutin: where do we stand in 2016?

Rifabutin is a spiro-piperidyl-rifamycin structurally closely related to rifampicin that shares many of its properties. We attempted to address the reasons why this drug, which was recently recognized as a WHO Essential Medicine, still had a far narrower range of indications than rifampicin, 24 years after its launch. In this comprehensive review of the classic and more recent rifabutin experimental and clinical studies, the current state of knowledge about rifabutin is depicted, relying on specific pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial properties, resistance data and side effects compared with rifampicin. There are consistent in vitro data and clinical studies showing that rifabutin has at least equivalent activity/efficacy and acceptable tolerance compared with rifampicin in TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Clinical studies have emphasized the clinical benefits of low rifabutin liver induction in patients with AIDS under PIs, in solid organ transplant patients under immunosuppressive drugs or in patients presenting intolerable side effects related to rifampicin. The contribution of rifabutin for rifampicin-resistant, but rifabutin-susceptible, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates according to the present breakpoints has been challenged and is now controversial. Compared with rifampicin, rifabutin's lower AUC is balanced by higher intracellular penetration and lower MIC for most pathogens. Clinical studies are lacking in non-mycobacterial infections.

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) Immune Reconstitution Syndrome (IRIS) With Reduced Susceptibility to Ethambutol in an HIV-Infected Patient

Objective: To describe a case of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lymphadenitis complicated by immune reconstitution syndrome (IRIS) and reduced susceptibility to ethambutol. Case Summary: A 24-year-old man was diagnosed in October 2012 with advanced HIV infection upon hospitalization for multiple opportunistic infections (OIs). Within 5 months of starting antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed significant cervical lymphadenopathy concerning for MAC/IRIS. Acid-fast bacilli were detected in the primary lymph node biopsy smear, and culture results confirmed the presence of MAC. Susceptibility testing revealed an organism susceptible to azithromycin, with an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to ethambutol (8 µg/mL). Currently, there is no interpretation for an ethambutol MIC of 8 µg/mL for MAC. A review of the primary literature revealed the possibility of decreased ethambutol susceptibility when the MIC is above 1 µg/mL, and therefore, therapy was replaced by rifabutin in combination with azithromycin. Discussion: Current guidelines recommend a 2-drug regimen for the treatment of MAC, specifically a macrolide plus ethambutol. Guidelines also emphasize MAC susceptibility testing for macrolides only. Susceptibility results from this patient’s biopsy prompted an evaluation of the effectiveness of his antimycobacterial regimen. Conclusions: Reduced ethambutol susceptibility in this patient triggered a search of the primary literature that resulted in the decision to replace ethambutol with rifabutin. Additional clinical trials are needed to define susceptibility breakpoints for ethambutol and other antimycobacterial agents used for MAC infection treatment and to direct clinical decisions when elevated MICs to primary agents are identified.

Automated quantitative drug susceptibility testing of non-tuberculous mycobacteria using MGIT 960/EpiCenter TB eXiST

OBJECTIVES

To assess the predictive value of in vitro drug susceptibility testing (DST) in slow-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), knowledge on quantitative levels of drug susceptibility should be available. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of the MGIT 960/TB eXiST system for quantitative DST of NTM.

METHODS

We have assessed quantitative levels of drug susceptibility for clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium kansasii by comparing radiometric Bactec 460TB-based DST with non-radiometric DST using MGIT 960/TB eXiST.

RESULTS

MGIT 960/TB eXiST gives results comparable to those of Bactec 460TB.

CONCLUSIONS

The MGIT 960/TB eXiST appears suitable for quantitative DST of NTM.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections

CONTEXT

Nontuberculous mycobacteria include numerous acid-fast bacilli species, many of which have only recently been recognized as pathogenic. The diagnosis of mycobacterial disease is based on a combination of clinical features, microbiologic data, radiographic findings, and histopathologic studies.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the clinical and pathologic aspects of nontuberculous mycobacteria infection, including diagnostic laboratory methods, classification, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the pertinent literature and published methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Nontuberculous mycobacteria include numerous acid-fast bacilli species, many of which are potentially pathogenic, and are classified according to the Runyon system based on growth rates and pigment production. Their slow growth hinders cultures, which require special medium and prolonged incubation. Although such methods are still used, newer nucleic acid-based technologies (polymerase chain reaction and hybridization assays) can rapidly detect and speciate some mycobacteria--most notably, distinguishing Mycobacterium tuberculosis from other species. Infections caused by these organisms can present as a variety of clinical syndromes, not only in immunocompromised patients but also in immunocompetent hosts. Most common among these are chronic pulmonary infections, superficial lymphadenitis, soft tissue and osteoarticular infections, and disseminated disease. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is difficult, requiring extended courses of multidrug therapy with or without adjunctive surgical intervention.

Surgical Excision versus Antibiotic Treatment for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Cervicofacial Lymphadenitis in Children: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of nontuberculosis mycobacterial cervical lymphadenitis in children has not been established. Until recently, surgical excision was the standard treatment, but the number of reports of successful antibiotic treatment is increasing, which questions whether surgery is the preferred treatment. In this randomized, multicenter trial, we compared surgical excision with antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

One hundred children with microbiologically proven nontuberculous mycobacterial cervicofacial lymphadenitis were randomly assigned to undergo surgical excision of the involved lymph nodes or to receive antibiotic therapy with clarithromycin and rifabutin for at least 12 weeks. The primary end point was cure, defined as regression of the lymph node enlargement by at least 75%, with cure of the fistula and total skin closure without local recurrence or de novo lesions after 6 months, as assessed by clinical and ultrasound evaluation. Secondary end points included complications of surgery and adverse effects of antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that surgical excision was more effective than antibiotic therapy (cure rates, 96% and 66%, respectively; 95% confidence interval for the difference, 16%-44%). Treatment failures were explained neither by noncompliance nor by baseline or acquired in vitro resistance to clarithromycin or rifabutin. Surgical complications were seen in 14 (28%) of 50 patients; staphylococcal wound infection occurred in 6 patients, and a permanent grade 2 facial marginal branch dysfunction occurred in 1 patient. The vast majority of patients who were allocated to antibiotic therapy reported adverse effects (39 [78%] of 50 patients), including 4 patients who had to discontinue treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical excision is more effective than antibiotic treatment for children with nontuberculous mycobacterial cervicofacial lymphadenitis.

Antimycobacterial agents differ with respect to their bacteriostatic versus bactericidal activities in relation to time of exposure, mycobacterial growth phase, and their use in combination

A number of antimycobacterial agents were evaluated with respect to their bacteriostatic activity (growth inhibition) versus the bactericidal activity against a clinical isolate of Mycobacterium avium (Mycobacterium avium complex [MAC] strain 101) in relation to the time of exposure and the growth phase of the mycobacteria. In terms of growth inhibition the MAC in the active phase of growth was susceptible to clarithromycin, ethambutol, rifampin, amikacin, and the quinolones moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and sparfloxacin. In terms of bactericidal activity in relation to the time of exposure these agents differed substantially with respect to the killing rate. An initial high killing capacity at low concentration was observed for amikacin, which in this respect was superior to the other agents. The bactericidal activity of clarithromycin and ethambutol was only seen at relatively high concentrations and increased with time. Killing by rifampin was concentration dependent as well as time dependent. The bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin was marginally dependent on the concentration or the time of exposure. The activity of clarithromycin in combination with ethambutol was not significantly enhanced compared to single-agent exposure. Only an additive effect was observed. The addition of rifampin or moxifloxacin as a third agent only marginally effected increased killing of MAC. However, by addition of amikacin the activity of the clarithromycin-ethambutol combination was significantly improved. The combination of amikacin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid exhibited synergistic antimycobacterial activity. Towards MAC at low growth rates, only the quinolones exhibited a bactericidal effect.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of mycobacterial infections

The therapy of mycobacterial infections is challenging for a number of reasons. Because mycobacteria are not susceptible to many classes of antibacterial agents, treatment typically requires the use of antimicrobial drugs that are not commonly used and may have small therapeutic windows. For many species, procedures for drug susceptibility testing and optimal treatment regimens have yet to be defined. Finally, because mycobacteria are generally slow to succumb to antimicrobial agents, therapy must be given with multiple drugs for prolonged periods of time, making it necessary to monitor for drug toxicity, drug interactions, and patient nonadherence. Better understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimycobacterial agents should improve the therapy of mycobacterial infections. Using current treatment strategies for tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex infections as examples, this review highlights basic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles and the rationale for combination chemotherapy that should also be applicable to other mycobacterial infections.

Multisite reproducibility of results obtained by two broth dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex

A multicenter study was conducted to assess the interlaboratory reproducibility of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) by broth microdilution using two different media (cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase and 7H9 broth with casein) and by macrodilution using the BACTEC 460TB and 12B media at pH 6.8 and 7.3 to 7.4. Ten well-characterized strains of MAC (four macrolide susceptible, six macrolide resistant) were tested against clarithromycin and azithromycin (the latter only by BACTEC 460TB, pH 6.8). At each site, strains were tested against clarithromycin three times on each of three separate days (nine testing events per isolate) by using a common lot of microdilution trays and BACTEC 12B medium, pH 6.8; strains were tested once on three separate days against clarithromycin in 12B medium at pH 7.3 to 7.4 and against azithromycin. Agreement among MICs (i.e., mode +/- 1 twofold dilution) was 100% for all strains and both drugs when BACTEC 460TB was used, regardless of the pH of the medium, but varied when microdilution with either medium was used, particularly with susceptible strains. Agreement based on interpretive category, with NCCLS-recommended breakpoints, was 100% for all strains with the BACTEC 460TB method (both drugs and both pH values) and with microdilution using 7H9 broth. With microdilution and Mueller-Hinton broth, agreement by interpretive category was 100% for eight isolates and >90% for two; errors occurred only in laboratories where personnel had minimal experience with this technique. MAC susceptibility testing may be performed by broth macrodilution or microdilution at either pH, with NCCLS-recommended interpretive breakpoints. However, because visual interpretation of broth microdilution end points is subjective, it is more prone to reader error; therefore, this method requires greater expertise than the BACTEC 460TB. Both techniques require appropriate validation and continued documentation of proficiency.

Activities of eighteen antimicrobial regimens against Mycobacterium avium infection in beige mice

The therapeutic effect of 18 anti-Mycobacterium avium regimens was examined in beige mice after 91 days of infection. Treatments included monotherapy with clarithromycin (CLA), ethambutol (EMB), amikacin (AMI), rifabutin (RFB), ciprofloxacin (CIP), clofazimine (CLO), and combinations of CLA, CLA-EMB, or CLA-AMI with one of the other drugs. After monotherapy, only AMI and CLA displayed bacteriostatic and/or moderate bactericidal effects in spleens and lungs, while CIP and RFB were totally inactive and CLO and EMB showed intermediate effects against the isolate tested. Resistant mutants were isolated in spleens of mice treated with EMB, CIP, RFB, and CLO-Among two-drug combinations, CLA-RFB, CLA-CIP, and CLA-CLO were significantly more active than RFB, CIP, CLO, respectively, but not more active than CLA alone, in both organs; CLA-AMI and CLA-EMB were bactericidal in spleens and lungs, respectively. Although activity of CLA-EMB was significantly potentiated by RFB and CLO in spleens and lungs, that of CLA-AMI was significantly increased by RFB and CLO only in lungs. The most active regimen in spleens and lungs on day 91 was the combination of all three, namely CLA-AMI-EMB, which reduced the CFU numbers of 2.7 and 7.5 log10, in comparison with day 1 and day 91 counts in untreated control mice, respectively.

Gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host

Infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract continue to be an important source of morbidity and mortality. Viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa that infect normal hosts also infect the gastrointestinal tract in immunocompromised hosts. Disease caused by these pathogens may be more severe and more difficult to treat in immunocompromised hosts. In addition, pathogens that rarely cause disease in normal hosts cause significant disease in immunosuppressed hosts. Diagnostic decisions need to take into account expected pathogens and response to therapy. Treatment decisions must be based on the findings of diagnostic procedures; expected pathogens; and recent data suggesting that highly active antiretroviral therapy, with its ability to reconstitute immune function, is an essential component of treatment. This review summarizes the most important developments made in the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal infections in immunocompromised hosts in the past year.