Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV

BACKGROUND

An estimated 260,000 children under the age of 15 years acquired HIV infection in 2012. As much as 42% of mother-to-child transmission is related to breastfeeding. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for mothers or infants has the potential to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV through breast milk.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which antiretroviral prophylactic regimens are efficacious and safe for reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV through breastfeeding and thereby avert child morbidity and mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

Using Cochrane Collaboration search methods in conjunction with appropriate search terms, we identified relevant studies from January 1, 1994 to January 14, 2014 by searching databases including Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE and PubMed, LILACS, and Web of Science/Web of Social Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in which HIV-infected mothers breastfed their infants, and in which the mothers used antiretroviral prophylaxis while breastfeeding their children or their children received antiretroviral prophylaxis for at least four weeks while breastfeeding, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Abstracts of all trials identified were examined independently by two authors. We identified 15,922 references and examined 81 in detail. Data were abstracted independently using a standardized form.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the review.One trial compared triple antiretroviral prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding with short antiretroviral prophylaxis to given to the mother to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV. At 12 months, the risks of HIV transmission, and of HIV transmission or death, were lower, but there was no difference in infant mortality alone in the triple arm versus the short arm. Using the GRADE methodology, evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally low to moderate.One trial compared six months of breastfeeding using zidovudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir/ritonavir versus zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir from 26-34 weeks gestation. At six months, there was no difference in risk of infant HIV infection, infant death, or infant HIV infection or death between the two groups. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally very low to low.One trial of single dose nevirapine versus six weeks of infant zidovudine found the risk of HIV infection at 12 weeks to be greater in the zidovudine arm than in the single dose nevirapine arm. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally very low.One multi-country trial compared single dose nevirapine and six weeks of infant nevirapine. After 12 months, infants in the extended nevirapine group had a lower risk of infant mortality compared with the control. There was no difference in the risk of HIV infection or death or in HIV transmission alone in the extended nevirapine group compared with the control. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally low to moderate.One trial compared single dose nevirapine plus one week zidovudine; the control regimen plus nevirapine up to 14 weeks; or the control regimen with dual prophylaxis up to 14 weeks. At 24 months, the extended nevirapine regimen group had a lower risk of HIV transmission and of HIV transmission or death vs. the control. There was no difference in infant mortality alone. Compared with controls, the dual prophylaxis group had a lower risk of HIV transmission and of HIV transmission or death, but no difference in infant mortality alone. There was no difference in these outcomes between the two intervention arms. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally moderate to high.One trial compared six weeks of nevirapine with six months of nevirapine. Among infants of mothers not using highly active antiretroviral therapy, there was no difference in risk of HIV infection among the six month nevirapine group versus the six week nevirapine group. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally low to moderate.One trial compared a maternal triple-drug antiretroviral regimen, infant nevirapine, or neither intervention. Infants in the maternal prophylaxis arm were at lower risk for HIV, and HIV infection or death when compared with the control group. There was no difference in the risk of infant mortality alone. Infants with extended prophylaxis had a lower risk of HIV infection and of HIV infection or death versus the control group infants. There was no difference in the risk of infant mortality alone in the extended infant nevirapine group versus the control. There was no difference in HIV infection, infant mortality, and HIV infection or death between the maternal and extended infant prophylaxis groups. Evidence quality for outcomes in this trial was generally low to moderate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiretroviral prophylaxis, whether used by the HIV-infected mother or the HIV-exposed infant while breastfeeding, is efficacious in preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Further research is needed regarding maternal resistance and response to subsequent antiretroviral therapy after maternal prophylaxis. An ongoing trial (IMPAACT 1077BF) compares the efficacy and safety of maternal triple antiretroviral prophylaxis versus daily infant nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission through breastfeeding.

Use of neonatal post-exposure prophylaxis for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in the UK and Ireland, 2001-2008

OBJECTIVES

To investigate changing clinical practice with regard to antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and factors associated with the use of combination prophylaxis in infants born to HIV-infected women in the UK and Ireland.

METHODS

Surveillance of obstetric and paediatric HIV infection in the UK and Ireland is conducted through the National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood. Infants born to HIV-infected women between 2001 and 2008 were included in the study.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine per cent of infants (8155 of 8205) received antiretroviral prophylaxis; 86% of those with information on type of prophylaxis (n=8050) received single, 3% dual and 11% triple drug prophylaxis. Among those who received prophylaxis, use of triple prophylaxis increased significantly between 2001-2004 and 2005-2008, from 9% (297 of 3243) to 13% (624 of 4807) overall (P<0.001); from 43% (41 of 95) to 71% (45 of 63) in infants born to untreated women; and from 13% (114 of 883) to 32% (344 of 1088) where mothers were viraemic despite highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in pregnancy. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with receipt of triple prophylaxis included later time period, shorter duration or lack of antenatal antiretroviral therapy, receipt of antiretroviral drugs during labour, detectable maternal viral load, CD4 count<200 cells/μL in pregnancy, preterm delivery (<37 weeks) and unplanned (emergency caesarean or vaginal) delivery.

CONCLUSION

Between 2001 and 2008, almost all infants born to HIV-infected women in the UK and Ireland received antiretroviral PEP, mostly with one drug. Use of triple PEP increased over time, particularly for infants whose mothers were untreated or viraemic despite HAART, in line with current guidelines.