The importance of nosocomial transmission of measles in the propagation of a community outbreak

Barriers encountered during the implementation of a policy guideline on the vaccination of health care workers during the 2013-2014 measles outbreak in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

Background

In 2013 the Netherlands faced a measles epidemic, during which more than 2600 individuals were infected, including 19 health care workers (HCW). Vaccinating health care workers can lead to benefits on both the individual and public health level, underscoring the need for HCW vaccination. In June of 2013 the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) developed a measles guideline (MG) that advised Dutch hospitals to strengthen their policies concerning measles vaccination of HCWs. A key problem with guidelines, however, is adherence, which can be due to several barriers. The objective of this research was to identify the barriers that Dutch hospital professionals encountered during the implementation of this policy guideline, in order to improve the implementation of similar policies in the future.

Methods

In-depth interviews (n = 9) were conducted with 12 hospital health care professionals involved with prevention and control of communicable diseases. These participants represented ten different Dutch hospitals located in eight of the twelve different provinces. Participants were asked about their experiences during the 2013–2014 measles epidemic regarding infection prevention measures, including vaccination of HCWs, with a specific focus on barriers to the implementation of the RIVM guideline.

Results

The implementation of the MG was impeded by several (types of) barriers. First, barriers were found related to knowledge and attitude, and included lack of agreement, barriers associated with leadership and issues related to evidence-based decision making. Second, barriers related to characteristics of the guideline, mostly related to unclear or missing guideline content. Finally, contextual and social factors such as human and financial resources, belief systems, physical facilities and technical support, and national views on vaccination policies also play an important role in policy implementation.

Conclusions

This study has provided valuable insights into the barriers infection prevention specialists encounter during the implementation of new policies concerning vaccination of HCWs in times of a major outbreak. Moreover, this study exposed the complexity and breadth of barriers that are of importance when implementing vaccination policies in the hospital setting. In order to improve the implementation of similar policies in the future, guideline developers and health care providers and administrators alike should aim to eliminate or minimise these identified barriers by taking into account the suggestions made by the authors.

A global perspective of vaccination of healthcare personnel against measles: systematic review

Measles transmission has been well documented in healthcare facilities. Healthcare personnel who are unvaccinated and who lack other evidence of measles immunity put themselves and their patients at risk for measles. We conducted a systematic literature review of measles vaccination policies and their implementation in healthcare personnel, measles seroprevalence among healthcare personnel, measles transmission and disease burden in healthcare settings, and impact/costs incurred by healthcare facilities for healthcare-associated measles transmission. Five database searches yielded 135 relevant articles; 47 additional articles were found through cross-referencing. The risk of acquiring measles is estimated to be 2 to 19 times higher for susceptible healthcare personnel than for the general population. Fifty-three articles published worldwide during 1989-2013 reported measles transmission from patients to healthcare personnel; many of the healthcare personnel were unvaccinated or had unknown vaccination status. Eighteen articles published worldwide during 1982-2013 described examples of transmission from healthcare personnel to patients or to other healthcare personnel. Half of European countries have no measles vaccine policies for healthcare personnel. There is no global policy recommendation for the vaccination of healthcare personnel against measles. Even in countries such as the United States or Finland that have national policies, the recommendations are not uniformly implemented in healthcare facilities. Measles serosusceptibility in healthcare personnel varied widely across studies (median 6.5%, range 0-46%) but was consistently higher among younger healthcare personnel. Deficiencies in documentation of two doses of measles vaccination or other evidence of immunity among healthcare personnel presents challenges in responding to measles exposures in healthcare settings. Evaluating and containing exposures and outbreaks in healthcare settings can be disruptive and costly. Establishing policies for measles vaccination for healthcare personnel is an important strategy towards achieving measles elimination and should be a high priority for global policy setting groups, governments, and hospitals.

Measles susceptibility and immunization: experiences in a forensic psychiatric hospital

BACKGROUND

In response to a measles outbreak in the community, a measles immunization program was developed at our hospital for forensic psychiatric patients.

METHODS

Measles antibody screening of all employees and patients by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was followed by vaccination of susceptible persons.

RESULTS

Serum samples from 813 employees and 868 patients during a 6-month period were analyzed. The susceptibility rate was 16.15% for employees and 13.60% for patients born in or after 1957. It was 4.67% for employees and 5.40% for patients born before 1957. The overall rate was 7.38% for employees and 8.53% for patients. A rate of 5% is known to be sufficient for transmission in institutions. Vaccine was given to 84.51% of susceptible patients. Vaccine failure occurred in 8.33%. Residual susceptibility rate was 1.84%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost analysis showed that screening of all individuals and immunization of susceptible persons was the most cost-effective method for measles control in our institutional setting.

Nosocomial measles infection in a pediatric hospital during a community-wide epidemic

From Jan. 1, 1988, through Dec. 31, 1988, a total of 89 cases of measles were observed at Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, and 37 patients were admitted to the hospital. Of the 37 patients, six were not initially thought to have measles, which resulted in exposure of 107 patients and 24 personnel. Of the exposed patients, measles developed in four. One nosocomially infected infant died of pneumonia. Another exposed patient was subsequently admitted to another hospital with unrecognized measles, which led to exposure of an additional eight patients. Of seven employees in whom measles developed, two required hospitalization because of pneumonia. Two hundred eleven employee days were lost because of measles exposure or infection. Infection control interventions included prophylaxis of exposed patients, employee education, and measles immunization for susceptible personnel. Of 1103 hospital personnel considered susceptible to measles, 800 received monovalent measles vaccine. No secondary cases of measles occurred in hospital personnel who received appropriate prophylaxis. We conclude that infection control programs aimed at mandating measles immunity in hospital employees at risk should be instituted.