1
|
Arseneau-Robar TJM, Anderson KA, Vasey EN, Sicotte P, Teichroeb JA. Think Fast!: Vervet Monkeys Assess the Risk of Being Displaced by a Dominant Competitor When Making Foraging Decisions. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.775288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Foraging animals need to quickly assess the costs and benefits of different foraging decisions, including resource quantity, quality, preference, ease of access, dispersion, distance, and predation risk. Social animals also need to take social context into account and adapt foraging strategies that maximize net resource intake and minimize contest competition with conspecifics. We used an experimental approach to investigate how social context impacts wild vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) foraging decisions in a multi-destination pentagon array. We baited four platforms with less-preferred corn and one platform with a larger, preferred resource (half banana) that required handling time. We ran over 1,000 trials and found that when monkeys foraged alone, they usually took the path that minimized travel distance but prioritized the preferred-food platform when in competition. However, the foraging strategy chosen by low-ranking individuals depended on the handling skill of the decision maker (i.e., time it would take them to retrieve the banana), the relative rank of their audience members (i.e., who has priority-of-access to resources), and the distance audience members were from the experiment site (i.e., their travel time). When the risk of being displaced by a dominant competitor was low (because they were far away and/or because the decision-maker was skilled in retrieving the banana), low-ranking individuals chose a route that minimized travel costs. Conversely, when the risk of losing food to a dominant competitor was high, decision-makers rushed for the preferred-food platform at the onset of the trial. When the risk of displacement was moderate because a dominant audience member was at least 50 m away, low-ranking individuals partly prioritized the preferred-food platform but took the time to stop for one platform of corn on the way. This strategy increased the total amount of food obtained during the trial. These findings suggest that lower-ranking individuals, who experienced high contest competition at the foraging experiment, calculated the risk of being displaced by a dominant competitor when making foraging decisions. This experiment demonstrates that vervets go through a complex decision-making process that simultaneously considers the profitability of different foraging decisions and their social context.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sheppard CE, Heaphy R, Cant MA, Marshall HH. Individual foraging specialization in group-living species. Anim Behav 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
3
|
Martina C, Cowlishaw G, Carter AJ. Individual differences in task participation in wild chacma baboons. Anim Behav 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
4
|
Thompson NA, Cords M. Stronger social bonds do not always predict greater longevity in a gregarious primate. Ecol Evol 2018; 8:1604-1614. [PMID: 29435236 PMCID: PMC5792528 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 12/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In group-living species, individuals often have preferred affiliative social partners, with whom ties or bonds can confer advantages that correspond with greater fitness. For example, in adult female baboons and juvenile horses, individuals with stronger or more social ties experience greater survival. We used detailed behavioral and life history records to explore the relationship between tie quality and survival in a gregarious monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni), while controlling for dominance rank, group size, and life history strategy. We used Cox proportional hazards regressions to model the cumulative (multi-year) and current (single-year) relationships of social ties and the hazard of mortality in 83 wild adult females of known age, observed 2-8 years each (437 subject-years) in eight social groups. The strength of bonds with close partners was associated with increased mortality risk under certain conditions: Females that had strong bonds with close partners that were inconsistent over multiple years had a higher risk of mortality than females adopting any other social strategy. Within a given year, females had a higher risk of death if they were strongly bonded with partners that changed from the previous year versus with partners that remained consistent. Dominance rank, number of adult female groupmates, and age at first reproduction did not predict the risk of death. This study demonstrates that costs and benefits of strong social bonds can be context-dependent, relating to the consistency of social partners over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A. Thompson
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental BiologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
- New York Consortium in Evolutionary PrimatologyNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Marina Cords
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental BiologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
- New York Consortium in Evolutionary PrimatologyNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marshall HH, Griffiths DJ, Mwanguhya F, Businge R, Griffiths AGF, Kyabulima S, Mwesige K, Sanderson JL, Thompson FJ, Vitikainen EIK, Cant MA. Data collection and storage in long-term ecological and evolutionary studies: The Mongoose 2000 system. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190740. [PMID: 29315317 PMCID: PMC5760034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Studying ecological and evolutionary processes in the natural world often requires research projects to follow multiple individuals in the wild over many years. These projects have provided significant advances but may also be hampered by needing to accurately and efficiently collect and store multiple streams of the data from multiple individuals concurrently. The increase in the availability and sophistication of portable computers (smartphones and tablets) and the applications that run on them has the potential to address many of these data collection and storage issues. In this paper we describe the challenges faced by one such long-term, individual-based research project: the Banded Mongoose Research Project in Uganda. We describe a system we have developed called Mongoose 2000 that utilises the potential of apps and portable computers to meet these challenges. We discuss the benefits and limitations of employing such a system in a long-term research project. The app and source code for the Mongoose 2000 system are freely available and we detail how it might be used to aid data collection and storage in other long-term individual-based projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry H. Marshall
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
- Centre for Research in Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Francis Mwanguhya
- Banded Mongoose Research Project, Queen Elizabeth National Park, Kasese District, Rubirizi, Uganda
| | - Robert Businge
- Banded Mongoose Research Project, Queen Elizabeth National Park, Kasese District, Rubirizi, Uganda
| | | | - Solomon Kyabulima
- Banded Mongoose Research Project, Queen Elizabeth National Park, Kasese District, Rubirizi, Uganda
| | - Kenneth Mwesige
- Banded Mongoose Research Project, Queen Elizabeth National Park, Kasese District, Rubirizi, Uganda
| | - Jennifer L. Sanderson
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| | - Faye J. Thompson
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| | - Emma I. K. Vitikainen
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
- Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helinski, Finland
| | - Michael A. Cant
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Multinomial analysis of behavior: statistical methods. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2017; 71:138. [PMID: 28959087 PMCID: PMC5594044 DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2363-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Revised: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Behavioral ecologists frequently use observational methods, such as instantaneous scan sampling, to record the behavior of animals at discrete moments in time. We develop and apply multilevel, multinomial logistic regression models for analyzing such data. These statistical methods correspond to the multinomial character of the response variable while also accounting for the repeated observations of individuals that characterize behavioral datasets. Correlated random effects potentially reveal individual-level trade-offs across behaviors, allowing for models that reveal the extent to which individuals who regularly engage in one behavior also exhibit relatively more or less of another behavior. Using an example dataset, we demonstrate the estimation of these models using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, as implemented in the RStan package in the R statistical environment. The supplemental files include a coding script and data that demonstrate auxiliary functions to prepare the data, estimate the models, summarize the posterior samples, and generate figures that display model predictions. We discuss possible extensions to our approach, including models with random slopes to allow individual-level behavioral strategies to vary over time and the need for models that account for temporal autocorrelation. These models can potentially be applied to a broad class of statistical analyses by behavioral ecologists, focusing on other polytomous response variables, such as behavior, habitat choice, or emotional states.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee AEG, Cowlishaw G. Switching spatial scale reveals dominance-dependent social foraging tactics in a wild primate. PeerJ 2017; 5:e3462. [PMID: 28674647 PMCID: PMC5494171 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
When foraging in a social group, individuals are faced with the choice of sampling their environment directly or exploiting the discoveries of others. The evolutionary dynamics of this trade-off have been explored mathematically through the producer-scrounger game, which has highlighted socially exploitative behaviours as a major potential cost of group living. However, our understanding of the tight interplay that can exist between social dominance and scrounging behaviour is limited. To date, only two theoretical studies have explored this relationship systematically, demonstrating that because scrounging requires joining a competitor at a resource, it should become exclusive to high-ranking individuals when resources are monopolisable. In this study, we explore the predictions of this model through observations of the natural social foraging behaviour of a wild population of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). We collected data through over 800 h of focal follows of 101 adults and juveniles across two troops over two 3-month periods. By recording over 7,900 social foraging decisions at two spatial scales we show that, when resources are large and economically indefensible, the joining behaviour required for scrounging can occur across all social ranks. When, in contrast, dominant individuals can aggressively appropriate a resource, such joining behaviour becomes increasingly difficult to employ with decreasing social rank because adult individuals can only join others lower ranking than themselves. Our study supports theoretical predictions and highlights potentially important individual constraints on the ability of individuals of low social rank to use social information, driven by competition with dominant conspecifics over monopolisable resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E G Lee
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.,Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee AEG, Ounsley JP, Coulson T, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G. Information use and resource competition: an integrative framework. Proc Biol Sci 2016; 283:20152550. [PMID: 26888031 PMCID: PMC4810826 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Organisms may reduce uncertainty regarding how best to exploit their environment by collecting information about resource distribution. We develop a model to demonstrate how competition can facilitate or constrain an individual's ability to use information when acquiring resources. As resource distribution underpins both selection on information use and the strength and nature of competition between individuals, we demonstrate interdependencies between the two that should be common in nature. Individuals in our model can search for resources either personally or by using social information. We explore selection on social information use across a comprehensive range of ecological conditions, generalizing the producer–scrounger framework to a wide diversity of taxa and resources. We show that resource ecology—defined by scarcity, depletion rate and monopolizability—determines patterns of individual differences in social information use. These differences suggest coevolutionary processes linking dominance systems and social information use, with implications for the evolutionary demography of populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E G Lee
- The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tim Coulson
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Marcus Rowcliffe
- The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carter AJ, Torrents Ticó M, Cowlishaw G. Sequential phenotypic constraints on social information use in wild baboons. eLife 2016; 5:e13125. [PMID: 27067236 PMCID: PMC4829417 DOI: 10.7554/elife.13125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Social information allows the rapid dissemination of novel information among individuals. However, an individual's ability to use information is likely to be dependent on phenotypic constraints operating at three successive steps: acquisition, application, and exploitation. We tested this novel framework by quantifying the sequential process of social information use with experimental food patches in wild baboons (Papio ursinus). We identified phenotypic constraints at each step of the information use sequence: peripheral individuals in the proximity network were less likely to acquire and apply social information, while subordinate females were less likely to exploit it successfully. Social bonds and personality also played a limiting role along the sequence. As a result of these constraints, the average individual only acquired and exploited social information on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alecia J Carter
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Miquel Torrents Ticó
- Zoological Society of London, Tsaobis Baboon Project, Institute of Zoology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- Zoological Society of London, Institute of Zoology, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roles of NMDA and dopamine in food-foraging decision-making strategies of rats in the social setting. BMC Neurosci 2016; 17:3. [PMID: 26754043 PMCID: PMC4710019 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-015-0233-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
In highly complex social settings, an animal’s motivational drive to pursue an object depends not only on the intrinsic properties of the object, but also on whether the decision-making animal perceives an object as being the most desirable among others. Mimetic desire refers to a subject’s preference for objects already possessed by another subject. To date, there are no appropriate animal models for studying whether mimetic desire is at play in guiding the decision-making process. Furthermore, the neuropharmacological bases of decision-making processes are not well understood. In this study, we used an animal model (rat) to investigate a novel food-foraging paradigm for decision-making, with or without a mimetic desire paradigm. Results Faced with the choice of foraging in a competitive environment, rats preferred foraging for the desirable object, indicating the rats’ ability for decision-making. Notably, treatment with the non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801, but not with the dopamine D1 or D2 receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and haloperidol, respectively, suppressed the food foraging preference when there was a competing resident rat in the cage. None of these three antagonists affected the food-foraging preference for palatable food. Moreover, MK-801 and SCH23390, but not haloperidol, were able to abolish the desirable environment effect on standard food-foraging activities in complex social settings. Conclusions These results highlight the concept that mimetic desire exerts a powerful influence on food-foraging decision-making in rats and, further, illustrate the various roles of the glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems in mediating these processes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Potts KB, Baken E, Levang A, Watts DP. Ecological factors influencing habitat use by chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am J Primatol 2015; 78:432-440. [PMID: 26670217 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Although numerous ecological and social factors influence range use in vertebrates, the general assumption is that ranging patterns typically accord with principles of optimal foraging theory. However, given temporal variability in resource abundance, animals can more easily meet nutritional needs at some times than at others. For species in which sociality is particularly important for fitness, such as chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other group-living primates, the influences of social factors can be particularly strong, and likely interact closely with ecological factors. We investigated home range use by a community of chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda, to determine whether range use corresponded to energy-based optimality principles. Chimpanzees were particularly attracted to areas of the home range where individuals of Ficus mucuso (a large but low-density resource) were found, but only if those areas also offered other preferred or important resource classes. The aggregation of large foraging parties at F. mucuso crowns (frequently seen year-round) facilitates a number of socially beneficial activities for both males and females. Because chimpanzees apparently seek out F. mucuso in areas where other high-quality feeding opportunities exist, these social benefits likely do not come at the expense of fitness benefits accrued from feeding on high-quality resources. Am. J. Primatol. 78:432-440, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B Potts
- Department of Biology, Augsburg College, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erica Baken
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Lowa
| | - Ashley Levang
- Department of Biology, Augsburg College, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David P Watts
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sick C, Carter AJ, Marshall HH, Knapp LA, Dabelsteen T, Cowlishaw G. Evidence for varying social strategies across the day in chacma baboons. Biol Lett 2015; 10:rsbl.2014.0249. [PMID: 25009240 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Strong social bonds can make an important contribution to individual fitness, but we still have only a limited understanding of the temporal period relevant to the adjustment of social relationships. While there is growing recognition of the importance of strong bonds that persist for years, social relationships can also vary over weeks and months, suggesting that social strategies may be optimized over shorter timescales. Using biological market theory as a framework, we explore whether temporal variation in the benefits of social relationships might be sufficient to generate daily adjustments of social strategies in wild baboons. Data on grooming, one measure of social relationships, were collected from 60 chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) across two troops over a six month period. Our analyses suggest that social strategies can show diurnal variation, with subordinates preferentially grooming more dominant individuals earlier in the day compared with later in the day. These findings indicate that group-living animals may optimize certain elements of their social strategies over relatively short time periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Sick
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK
| | - Alecia J Carter
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Harry H Marshall
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, UK
| | - Leslie A Knapp
- Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0060, USA
| | - Torben Dabelsteen
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lewis DL, Baruch-Mordo S, Wilson KR, Breck SW, Mao JS, Broderick J. Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human-bear conflict mitigation. Ecosphere 2015. [DOI: 10.1890/es15-00137.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
14
|
Marshall HH, Carter AJ, Ashford A, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G. Social effects on foraging behavior and success depend on local environmental conditions. Ecol Evol 2015; 5:475-92. [PMID: 25691973 PMCID: PMC4314278 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Revised: 11/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In social groups, individuals' dominance rank, social bonds, and kinship with other group members have been shown to influence their foraging behavior. However, there is growing evidence that the particular effects of these social traits may also depend on local environmental conditions. We investigated this by comparing the foraging behavior of wild chacma baboons, Papio ursinus, under natural conditions and in a field experiment where food was spatially clumped. Data were collected from 55 animals across two troops over a 5-month period, including over 900 agonistic foraging interactions and over 600 food patch visits in each condition. In both conditions, low-ranked individuals received more agonism, but this only translated into reduced foraging performances for low-ranked individuals in the high-competition experimental conditions. Our results suggest one possible reason for this pattern may be low-ranked individuals strategically investing social effort to negotiate foraging tolerance, but the rank-offsetting effect of this investment being overwhelmed in the higher-competition experimental environment. Our results also suggest that individuals may use imbalances in their social bonds to negotiate tolerance from others under a wider range of environmental conditions, but utilize the overall strength of their social bonds in more extreme environments where feeding competition is more intense. These findings highlight that behavioral tactics such as the strategic investment of social effort may allow foragers to mitigate the costs of low rank, but that the effectiveness of these tactics is likely to be limited in certain environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry H Marshall
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonRegent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College LondonSilwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, U.K
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of ExeterPenryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EF, U.K
| | - Alecia J Carter
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonRegent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K
- The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National UniversityActon, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia
| | - Alexandra Ashford
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonRegent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College LondonSilwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, U.K
| | - J Marcus Rowcliffe
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonRegent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonRegent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Marshall HH, Carter AJ, Ashford A, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G. How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions. J Anim Ecol 2013; 82:894-902. [PMID: 23650999 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2012] [Accepted: 03/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A forager's optimal patch-departure time can be predicted by the prescient marginal value theorem (pMVT), which assumes they have perfect knowledge of the environment, or by approaches such as Bayesian updating and learning rules, which avoid this assumption by allowing foragers to use recent experiences to inform their decisions. In understanding and predicting broader scale ecological patterns, individual-level mechanisms, such as patch-departure decisions, need to be fully elucidated. Unfortunately, there are few empirical studies that compare the performance of patch-departure models that assume perfect knowledge with those that do not, resulting in a limited understanding of how foragers decide when to leave a patch. We tested the patch-departure rules predicted by fixed rule, pMVT, Bayesian updating and learning models against one another, using patch residency times (PRTs) recorded from 54 chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) across two groups in natural (n = 6175 patch visits) and field experimental (n = 8569) conditions. We found greater support in the experiment for the model based on Bayesian updating rules, but greater support for the model based on the pMVT in natural foraging conditions. This suggests that foragers may place more importance on recent experiences in predictable environments, like our experiment, where these experiences provide more reliable information about future opportunities. Furthermore, the effect of a single recent foraging experience on PRTs was uniformly weak across both conditions. This suggests that foragers' perception of their environment may incorporate many previous experiences, thus approximating the perfect knowledge assumed by the pMVT. Foragers may, therefore, optimize their patch-departure decisions in line with the pMVT through the adoption of rules similar to those predicted by Bayesian updating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry H Marshall
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK; Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Marshall HH, Carter AJ, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G. Linking social foraging behaviour with individual time budgets and emergent group-level phenomena. Anim Behav 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|