1
|
Sapozhnikov J, Albarillo FS, Pulia MS. Optimizing Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2024; 42:443-459. [PMID: 38641398 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Antibiotic stewardship is a core component of emergency department (ED) practice and impacts patient safety, clinical outcomes, and public health. The unique characteristics of ED practice, including crowding, time pressure, and diagnostic uncertainty, need to be considered when implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions in this setting. Rapid advances in pathogen detection and host response biomarkers promise to revolutionize the diagnosis of infectious diseases in the ED, but such tests are not yet considered standard of care. Presently, clinical decision support embedded in the electronic health record and pharmacist-led interventions are the most effective ways to improve antibiotic prescribing in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Sapozhnikov
- Medical Science Liaison, Karius Inc, 975 Island Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065, USA
| | - Fritzie S Albarillo
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Loyola University Medical Center, Loyola University Medical Center is 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Michael S Pulia
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 300, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ababneh MA, Nasser SA, Rababa'h AM. A systematic review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program implementation in Middle Eastern countries. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 105:746-752. [PMID: 33737132 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat to global health. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) are adopted by healthcare systems worldwide. This review aimed to evaluate the published practices of ASPs in Middle Eastern countries. METHODS Searches were carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar electronic databases for studies published from January 2005 to December 2020 that assessed ASP practices in Middle Eastern countries, following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Of the 422 titles identified, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, five in Qatar, two each in Lebanon and Jordan, and one each in Palestine and UAE; there was also one multinational study. Different ASP practices, including prospective auditing and feedback, pre-authorization, tracking, antibiotic restriction, education, de-escalation, and intravenous-to-oral switch, were reported. ASP practices correlated with improved susceptibility rates and decreases in antimicrobial use. CONCLUSION The outcomes of this review reveal the scarcity of data on ASP practices. The introduction of ASPs in hospitals in Middle Eastern countries has led to favorable clinical effects. Policymakers and stakeholders should promote and invest in implementing these programs as an essential component of their healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mera A Ababneh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
| | - Sara A Nasser
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Abeer M Rababa'h
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Decreased Overall and Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in a Veterans Affairs Hospital Emergency Department following a Peer Comparison-Based Stewardship Intervention. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 65:AAC.01660-20. [PMID: 33020159 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01660-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic prescribing is very common in emergency departments (EDs). Optimal stewardship intervention strategies in EDs are not well defined. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study in a Veterans Affairs ED in which clinician education and monthly e-mail-based peer comparisons were directed against all oral antibiotic prescribing for discharged patients. Oral antibiotic prescriptions were compared in baseline (June 2016 to December 2017) and intervention (January to June 2018) periods using an interrupted time series regression model. Prescribing appropriateness was compared during January to June 2017 and the intervention period. During the intervention period, antibiotic prescriptions decreased monthly by 10.4 prescriptions per 1,000 ED visits (P = 0.07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -21.7 to 1.0]). The relative decrease in the trend of antibiotic prescriptions during the intervention period compared to baseline was 9.9 prescriptions per 1,000 ED visits per month (P = 0.07 [95% CI, -20.9 to 1.0]). The intervention was associated with a significant decrease and increase in amoxicillin-clavulanate and cephalexin prescriptions, respectively (P < 0.001, P = 0.004). Decreasing trends in ciprofloxacin prescriptions during the baseline period were maintained during the intervention. Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing (i.e., antibiotic not indicated) decreased from 55.6% to 38.7% during the intervention (30.4% decrease, P = 0.003). Optimal antibiotic prescribing (i.e., antibiotics were indicated, and a guideline-concordant agent was prescribed for guideline-concordant duration) increased by 36% (21.6% to 29.3%, P = 0.12). A peer comparison-based stewardship intervention directed at ED clinicians was associated with reductions in overall and unnecessary oral antibiotic prescribing. There is potential to further improve antibiotic use as suboptimal prescribing remained common.
Collapse
|
4
|
BundlED Up: A Narrative Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives and Bundles in the Emergency Department. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7040145. [PMID: 31683859 PMCID: PMC6958310 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7040145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) is becoming an increasingly high priority worldwide, yet the emergency department (ED) is an area where stewardship is often neglected. Implementing care bundles, guidelines, and protocols appears to be a rational strategy for ED stewardship given the inherently dynamic and hectic environment of care. Multiple questions still exist such as whether to target certain disease states, optimal implementation of ASP interventions in the ED, and the benefit of unique ED-specific guidelines and protocols. A narrative review was performed on interventions, guidelines, and bundles implemented in the ED setting, in an effort to improve ASP or management of infectious diseases. This review is meant to serve as a framework for the reader to implement these practices at their own institution. We examined various studies related to ASP interventions or care bundles in the ED which included: CNS infections (one study), skin and soft-tissue infections (one study), respiratory infections (four studies), urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted infections (eight studies), sepsis (two studies), culture follow-up programs (four studies), and stewardship in general or multiple infection types (five studies). The interventions in this review were diverse, yet the majority showed a benefit in clinical outcomes or a decrease in antimicrobial use. Care bundles, guidelines, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions can streamline care and improve the management of common infectious diseases seen in the ED.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wai JM, Aloezos C, Mowrey WB, Baron SW, Cregin R, Forman HL. Using clinical decision support through the electronic medical record to increase prescribing of high-dose parenteral thiamine in hospitalized patients with alcohol use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat 2019; 99:117-123. [PMID: 30797383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) are at an increased risk of developing Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE), a devastating and difficult diagnosis caused by thiamine deficiency. Even as AUD is present in up to 25% of hospitalized patients on medical floors, appropriate thiamine supplementation in the hospital setting remains inadequate. These patients are particularly susceptible to thiamine deficiency and subsequent WE due to both their alcohol use and active medical illnesses. The electronic medical record (EMR) has become ubiquitous in health care systems and can be used as a tool to improve the care of hospitalized patients. METHODS As a quality improvement initiative, we implemented a medication order panel in the EMR with autopopulated orders for thiamine dosing to increase the appropriate use of high-dose parenteral thiamine (HPT) for hospitalized patients with AUD. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all inpatients with AUD who received an Addiction Psychiatry Consult Service consult three months before and after the EMR change. We compared the proportion of patients receiving HPT prior to consultation (primary outcome) and the length of stay (secondary outcome) between the historical control group and the EMR intervention group. RESULTS Patients in the EMR intervention group were significantly more likely to receive HPT than the historical control group (20.2% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.0001). This difference remained statistically significant when adjusted for potential confounders (OR: 9.89, 95% CI: [2.77, 35.34], p = 0.0004). There was a trend towards statistical significance that the intervention group had a higher likelihood of being prescribed any thiamine (76.6% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.06) and had a shorter length of stay (median (IQR): 3.8 (2.4, 7.0) vs. 4.6 (2.9, 7.8) days, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION These results indicate that providing autopopulated thiamine order panels for patients with AUD can be an effective method for specialty services to increase appropriate care practices without additional education or training for providers. Further research should consider the clinical outcomes of increasing HPT for patients with AUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Wai
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 66, Office 3705, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Unit 66, Office 3705, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
| | - Christopher Aloezos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA; Department of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Wenzhu B Mowrey
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Sarah W Baron
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Regina Cregin
- Department of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Howard L Forman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The emergency department (ED) is the hub of the US health care system. Acute infectious diseases are frequently encountered in the ED setting, making this a critical setting for antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Systems level and behavioral stewardship interventions have demonstrated success in the ED setting but successful implementation depends on institutional support and the presence of a physician champion. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts in the ED should target high-impact areas: antibiotic prescribing for nonindicated respiratory tract conditions, such as bronchitis and sinusitis; overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria; and using two antibiotics (double coverage) for uncomplicated cases of cellulitis or abscess.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pulia
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 300, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| | - Robert Redwood
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715
| | - Larissa May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, 4150 V Street, Suite 2100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nori P, Guo Y, Ostrowsky B. Creative Collaborations in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Core Elements as Your Guide. Med Clin North Am 2018; 102:845-854. [PMID: 30126575 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) success and growth rely on recurring collaborations with partners within the health care system, such as administration, clinical services, infection prevention, pharmacy, the medical school, and microbiology. These collaborations present valuable opportunities for development of hospital policies, institutional guidelines, and educational curriculum. External opportunities for collaboration may be less frequent but equally valuable. These collaborations are facilitated by health system partnerships with national quality organizations, neighboring ASPs, and the Department of Health. All collaborations present novel opportunities for policy development, research initiatives, and expanding the regional ASP footprint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Nori
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
| | - Yi Guo
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Belinda Ostrowsky
- Antimicrobial Stewardship & Hospital Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Psychosocial determinants of physician acceptance toward an antimicrobial stewardship program and its computerized decision support system in an acute care tertiary hospital. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
9
|
Foolad F, Nagel JL, Eschenauer G, Patel TS, Nguyen CT. Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship: a review of active and passive approaches to patient management. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 72:3232-3244. [PMID: 29177489 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Although new antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) often begin by targeting the reduction of antimicrobial use, an increasing focus of ASPs is to improve the management of specific infectious diseases. Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship emphasizes improving patient outcomes by optimizing antimicrobial use and increasing compliance with performance measures. Directing efforts towards the comprehensive management of specific infections allows ASPs to promote the shift in healthcare towards improving quality, safety and patient outcome metrics for specific diseases. This review evaluates published active and passive disease-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions and their impact on antimicrobial use and associated patient outcomes for patients with pneumonia, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, asymptomatic bacteriuria, Clostridium difficile infection and intra-abdominal infections. Current literature suggests that disease-based antimicrobial stewardship effects on medical management and patient outcomes vary based on infectious disease syndrome, resource availability and intervention type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farnaz Foolad
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jerod L Nagel
- Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Gregory Eschenauer
- Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.,College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, 428 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Twisha S Patel
- Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Cynthia T Nguyen
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC0010, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dassner AM, Girotto JE. Evaluation of a Second-Sign Process for Antimicrobial Prior Authorization. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2018; 7:113-118. [PMID: 28407067 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/pix015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A second-sign prospective restriction of select broad-spectrum antimicrobials was fully implemented in January 2015 as a pediatric antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) initiative to help ensure the most appropriate empiric use of ceftaroline, cefepime, fidaxomicin, linezolid, and vancomycin (intravenous). The objective of this evaluation is to assess the effectiveness of a forced second-sign process in the electronic medical record as a pediatric ASP strategy. We anticipated that the second-sign process for antibiotics would increase the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic use, as defined by preapproved criteria, clinical pathways, national guidelines, and pediatric-specific infectious diseases reference texts, while not causing significant delay in the initial administration of antibiotic therapy. METHODS This was a retrospective before and after intervention chart review conducted from July 2014 to June 2015. The study was conducted at a 187-bed, freestanding teaching children's hospital that included the following: level-1 pediatric trauma center, 18-bed pediatric intensive care unit, and 32-bed neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS A total of 1178 orders were identified, and 389 met inclusion criteria. The vast majority of second-sign orders were for vancomycin (92%), 61% were written for males, and the median age was 6 years old. Appropriateness of second-sign restricted antibiotic use significantly increased after second-sign implementation (84.5% to 92.9%, P = .01). The secondary outcome of time from initial order entry to medication administration was not different between the before and after groups (median time, 184.5 [interquartile range, 110.25-280.75] vs 174 [interquartile range, 104-228] minutes; P = .342). CONCLUSIONS The use of a second-sign approval process for antimicrobial restriction can lead to increased appropriateness of antibiotic use at a pediatric hospital, without causing a delay in administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee M Dassner
- Department of Pharmacy, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut, School of Pharmacy, Storrs
| | - Jennifer E Girotto
- Department of Pharmacy, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut, School of Pharmacy, Storrs
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manias E. Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:259-275. [PMID: 29303376 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1424830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication errors are commonly affected by breakdowns in communication. Interdisciplinary collaboration is an important means of facilitating communication between health professionals in clinical practice. To date, there has been little systematic examination of past research in this area. AREAS COVERED The aims of this integrative review are to examine how interdisciplinary collaboration influences medication errors in hospitals, the araes of interdisciplinary collaboration that have been researched in previous work, and recommendations for future research and practice. An integrative review was undertaken of research papers (N = 30) published from inception to August 2017 using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase. EXPERT OPINION Five different areas of interdisciplinary collaboration were identified in research involving medication errors. These areas were: communication through tools including guidelines, protocols, and communication logs; participation of pharmacists in interdisciplinary teams; collaborative medication review on admission and at discharge; collaborative workshops and conferences; and complexity of role differentiation and environment. Despite encouraging results demonstrated in past research, medication errors continued to occur. Increased focus is needed on developing tailored, individualized strategies that can be applied in particular contexts to create further reductions in medication errors. Greater understandings are also needed about the changing roles of various disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Manias
- a Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery , Deakin University , Burwood , Australia.,b The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Medicine , The University of Melbourne , Parkville , Australia.,c Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences , The University of Melbourne , Parkville , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thompson RZ, Gardner B, Carter T, Schadler A, Allen J, Bailey A. Decreasing the Time to Oral Antibiotics in a University Hospital Pediatric Emergency Department. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2017; 22:272-275. [PMID: 28943822 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.4.272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare time to administration of oral antibiotics in the pediatric emergency department (ED) when antibiotics are stored in the pediatric ED versus when they were dispensed by central pharmacy services within an academic medical center. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients who received a one-time dose of oral antibiotics within the pediatric ED and were subsequently discharged home. Two 3-month time periods were compared to determine the metrics of providing oral antibiotics before and after these medications were stocked in the pediatric ED automated dispensing cabinet (ADC). The primary outcome was to compare the time to administration. Secondary outcomes were to assess wastage of stocked medications and time to ED discharge. RESULTS In the ADC time period (n = 74), the median time to administration was 17.5 minutes versus 57 minutes in the central pharmacy time period (n = 34) (p < 0.001). The ED length of stay during the ADC time period was 188.5 minutes versus 228.5 minutes (p = 0.094). 35.4% of doses from the ADC expired resulting in a wholesale acquisition cost of $53.14 wasted. CONCLUSION Stocking commonly used oral antibiotics in the pediatric ED led to a significant decrease in the time to medication administration. This decreased time to administration has the potential to lead to improved patient and nursing satisfaction. Routine surveillance is needed after implementation to ensure compliance and to minimize wastage.
Collapse
|
13
|
Thrall SA, Fominaya CE, Chiasson JM, Castle S, Taber DJ. Improvement in immunosuppression therapy monitoring in organ transplant recipients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017; 74:S67-S74. [PMID: 28842520 DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The results of a study to determine whether a technology-enabled pharmacist intervention improved immunosuppression monitoring in organ transplant recipients are presented. METHODS This was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Eligible patients included veteran solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppression therapy from a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) between July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2015. A clinical pharmacist used an electronic surveillance system to determine need for laboratory monitoring and engaged the recipients to obtain regular laboratory monitoring at the VAMC or an outside facility. The primary aim was to determine whether the intervention improved immunosuppression monitoring using an interrupted time series inquiry with segmented regression analysis. The secondary aim was to assess care coordination using descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 110 veteran transplant recipients were included; 96% were male, 50% received kidney transplants, 36% received liver transplants, and 14% received thoracic transplants. During the 6-month initial intervention period, the rate of patients meeting minimum immunosuppression monitoring criteria increased by 4.7% per month (p < 0.001). The monthly rate of patients meeting immunosuppressant monitoring for tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and antimetabolites increased by 4.1% (p = 0.0013), 9.5% (p = 0.0442), and 1.5% (p = 0.0077), respectively. The clinical pharmacist performed 126 medication reconciliations, documented 259 outside laboratory values, and referred 9 patients to other providers. CONCLUSION Clinical pharmacist intervention resulted in an increased number of patients with solid organ transplant meeting minimum immunosuppressant monitoring recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Thrall
- Department of Pharmacy, Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, SC, and College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| | - Cory E Fominaya
- Department of Pharmacy, Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, SC
| | - Jordan M Chiasson
- College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Sharon Castle
- Department of Pharmacy, Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, SC
| | - David J Taber
- Department of Pharmacy, Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, Charleston, SC, and Division of Transplant Surgery and College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mecham ID, Vines C, Dean NC. Community-acquired pneumonia management and outcomes in the era of health information technology. Respirology 2017; 22:1529-1535. [PMID: 28758325 DOI: 10.1111/resp.13132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Implementation of health information technology (HIT) can lead to cost savings and improved care. In this review, we examine the literature on the use of HIT in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. We also discuss barriers to adoption of technology in managing pneumonia, the reliability and quality of electronic health data in pneumonia research, how technology has assisted pneumonia diagnosis and outcomes research. The goal of using HIT is to develop and deploy generalizable, real-time, computerized clinical decision support integrated into usual pneumonia care. A friendly user interface that does not disrupt efficiency and demonstrates improved clinical outcomes should result in widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D Mecham
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Caroline Vines
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.,Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nathan C Dean
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dinh A, Duran C, Davido B, Bouchand F, Deconinck L, Matt M, Sénard O, Guyot C, Levasseur AS, Attal J, Razazi D, Tritz T, Beauchet A, Salomon J, Beaune S, Grenet J. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship programme to optimize antimicrobial use for outpatients at an emergency department. J Hosp Infect 2017; 97:288-293. [PMID: 28698021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have been effective in optimizing antibiotic use for inpatients. However, an emergency department's fast-paced clinical setting can be challenging for a successful ASP. AIM In April 2015, an ASP was implemented in our emergency department and we aimed to determine its impact on antimicrobial use for outpatients. METHODS This was a single-centre study comparing the quality of antibiotic prescriptions between a one-year period before ASP implementation (November 2012 to October 2013) and a one-year period after its implementation (June 2015 to May 2016). For each period, antimicrobial prescriptions for all adult outpatients (hospitalized for <24h) were evaluated by an infectious disease specialist and an emergency department physician to assess compliance with local prescribing guidelines. Inappropriate prescriptions were then classified. FINDINGS Before and after ASP, 34,671 and 35,925 consultations were registered at our emergency department, of which 25,470 and 26,208 were outpatients. Antimicrobials were prescribed in 769 (3.0%) and 580 (2.2%) consultations, respectively (P < 0.0001). There were 484 (62.9%) and 271 (46.7%) (P < 0.0001) instances of non-compliance with guidelines before and after ASP implementation. Non-compliance included unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions, 197 (25.6%) vs 101 (17.4%) (P<0.0005); inappropriate spectrum, 108 (14.0%) vs 54 (9.3%) (P=0.008); excessive treatment duration, 87 (11.3%) vs 53 (9.1%) (P>0.05); and inappropriate choices, 11 (1.4%) vs 15 (2.6%) (P>0.05). CONCLUSION The implementation of an ASP markedly decreased the number of unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions, but had little impact on most other aspects of inappropriate prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dinh
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France.
| | - C Duran
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - B Davido
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - F Bouchand
- Pharmacy Department, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - L Deconinck
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - M Matt
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - O Sénard
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - C Guyot
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - A-So Levasseur
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - J Attal
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - D Razazi
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - T Tritz
- Pharmacy Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - A Beauchet
- Medical Informatic Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - J Salomon
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Garches, France
| | - S Beaune
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - J Grenet
- Emergency Department, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Losier M, Ramsey TD, Wilby KJ, Black EK. A Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the Emergency Department. Ann Pharmacother 2017; 51:774-790. [PMID: 28539060 DOI: 10.1177/1060028017709820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE To improve antimicrobial utilization, development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in the emergency department (ED) has been recommended. The primary objective of this review was to characterize antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the ED and to identify interventions that improve patient outcomes or process of care and/or reduce consequences of antimicrobial use. METHODS This study was completed as a systematic review. The following databases were searched from inception through November, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, interrupted time series studies, and repeated-measures studies evaluating AMS interventions in the ED were included in the review. Studies published in languages other than English were excluded. RESULTS A total of 43 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from our search. Patient or provider education and guideline or clinical pathway implementation were the most commonly reported interventions. Few studies reported on audit and feedback, and no study evaluated preauthorization. Impact of interventions showed variable results. Where identified, benefits of AMS interventions primarily included improvement in delivery of care or a decrease in antimicrobial utilization; however, most studies were rated as having unclear or high risk of bias. CONCLUSION AMS interventions in the ED may improve patient care. However, the optimal combination of interventions is unclear. Additional studies with more rigorous design evaluating core components of AMS programs, including prospective audit and feedback are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Losier
- 1 Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Tasha D Ramsey
- 1 Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,2 Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Impact of a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship program: A front-line ownership driven quality improvement project in a large urban emergency department. CAN J EMERG MED 2017; 19:441-449. [PMID: 28399946 DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic overuse has promoted growing rates of antimicrobial resistance and secondary antibiotic-associated infections such as Clostridium difficile (C. difficile). Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are effective in reducing antimicrobial use in the inpatient setting; however, the unique environment of the emergency department (ED) lends itself to challenges for successful implementation. Front-line ownership (FLO) methodology has been shown to be a potentially effective strategy for the implementation of inpatient ASPs through an iterative multi-pronged approach driven by front-line providers. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a FLO approach to antimicrobial stewardship in the ED can alter antimicrobial usage. METHODS Interventions were driven by ED physicians and facilitated by Infectious Diseases Division physicians from the hospital's ASP using FLO principles. Measured end points included antibiotic usage in the ED as measured by defined daily doses, and rates of urine culture sent from the ED. RESULTS There was a step-wise significant reduction in the use of azithromycin (p=0.006), ceftriaxone (p=0.045), ciprofloxacin (p=0.034), and moxifloxacin (p=0.008). There was also a significant reduction in rates of urine cultures (p<0.001) by 2.26 urine cultures per 100 ED patient visits. CONCLUSIONS FLO offers a promising approach to successful implementation of an ASP in the ED. Future studies would be important to evaluate the generalizability of the FLO approach to ASP development in other EDs and to determine strategies to improve the sustainability of reductions in antimicrobial use.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bohan JG, Hunt L, Madaras-Kelly K. Antimicrobial Stewardship Guidelines: Syndrome-Specific Strategies. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40506-017-0107-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Pulia MS, Redwood R, Sharp B. Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Management of Sepsis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2017; 35:199-217. [PMID: 27908334 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Sepsis represents a unique clinical dilemma with regard to antimicrobial stewardship. The standard approach to suspected sepsis in the emergency department centers on fluid resuscitation and timely broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The lack of gold standard diagnostics and evolving definitions for sepsis introduce a significant degree of diagnostic uncertainty that may raise the potential for inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Intervention bundles that combine traditional quality improvement strategies with emerging electronic health record-based clinical decision support tools and rapid molecular diagnostics represent the most promising approach to enhancing antimicrobial stewardship in the management of suspected sepsis in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Pulia
- Emergency Medicine Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 310, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| | - Robert Redwood
- Antibiotic Stewardship Committee, Divine Savior Healthcare, 2817 New Pinery Road, Portage, WI 53901, USA
| | - Brian Sharp
- The American Center, BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 310, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pollack LA, van Santen KL, Weiner LM, Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Srinivasan A. Antibiotic Stewardship Programs in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals: Findings From the 2014 National Healthcare Safety Network Annual Hospital Survey. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:443-9. [PMID: 27199462 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Action Plan to Combat Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria calls for all US hospitals to improve antibiotic prescribing as a key prevention strategy for resistance and Clostridium difficile Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) will be important in this effort but implementation is not well understood. METHODS We analyzed the 2014 National Healthcare Safety Network Annual Hospital Survey to describe ASPs in US acute care hospitals as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Core Elements for Hospital ASPs. Univariate analyses were used to assess stewardship infrastructure and practices by facility characteristics and a multivariate model determined factors associated with meeting all ASP core elements. RESULTS Among 4184 US hospitals, 39% reported having an ASP that met all 7 core elements. Although hospitals with greater than 200 beds (59%) were more likely to have ASPs, 1 in 4 (25%) of hospitals with less than 50 beds reported achieving all 7 CDC-defined core elements of a comprehensive ASP. The percent of hospitals in each state that reported all seven elements ranged from 7% to 58%. In the multivariate model, written support (adjusted relative risk [RR] 7.2 [95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-8.4]; P < .0001) or salary support (adjusted RR 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4-1.6]; P < .0001) were significantly associated with having a comprehensive ASP. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that ASP implementation varies across the United States and provide a baseline to monitor progress toward national goals. Comprehensive ASPs can be established in facilities of any size and hospital leadership support for antibiotic stewardship appears to drive the establishment of ASPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori A Pollack
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katharina L van Santen
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lindsey M Weiner
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Margaret A Dudeck
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jonathan R Edwards
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Arjun Srinivasan
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, Srinivasan A, Dellit TH, Falck-Ytter YT, Fishman NO, Hamilton CW, Jenkins TC, Lipsett PA, Malani PN, May LS, Moran GJ, Neuhauser MM, Newland JG, Ohl CA, Samore MH, Seo SK, Trivedi KK. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:e51-77. [PMID: 27080992 PMCID: PMC5006285 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1826] [Impact Index Per Article: 228.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based guidelines for implementation and measurement of antibiotic stewardship interventions in inpatient populations including long-term care were prepared by a multidisciplinary expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. The panel included clinicians and investigators representing internal medicine, emergency medicine, microbiology, critical care, surgery, epidemiology, pharmacy, and adult and pediatric infectious diseases specialties. These recommendations address the best approaches for antibiotic stewardship programs to influence the optimal use of antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar F Barlam
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lilian M Abbo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Conan MacDougall
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Audrey N Schuetz
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Edward J Septimus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Houston
| | - Arjun Srinivasan
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Timothy H Dellit
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Yngve T Falck-Ytter
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Neil O Fishman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
| | | | | | - Pamela A Lipsett
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Schools of Medicine and Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Preeti N Malani
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
| | - Larissa S May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis
| | - Gregory J Moran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar
| | | | - Jason G Newland
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christopher A Ohl
- Section on Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Matthew H Samore
- Department of Veterans Affairs and University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Susan K Seo
- Infectious Diseases, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herepath A, Kitchener M, Waring J. A realist analysis of hospital patient safety in Wales: applied learning for alternative contexts from a multisite case study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHospital patient safety is a major social problem. In the UK, policy responses focus on the introduction of improvement programmes that seek to implement evidence-based clinical practices using the Model for Improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. Empirical evidence that the outcomes of such programmes vary across hospitals demonstrates that the context of their implementation matters. However, the relationships between features of context and the implementation of safety programmes are both undertheorised and poorly understood in empirical terms.ObjectivesThis study is designed to address gaps in conceptual, methodological and empirical knowledge about the influence of context on the local implementation of patient safety programmes.DesignWe used concepts from critical realism and institutional analysis to conduct a qualitative comparative-intensive case study involving 21 hospitals across all seven Welsh health boards. We focused on the local implementation of three focal interventions from the 1000 Lives+patient safety programme: Improving Leadership for Quality Improvement, Reducing Surgical Complications and Reducing Health-care Associated Infection. Our main sources of data were 160 semistructured interviews, observation and 1700 health policy and organisational documents. These data were analysed using the realist approaches of abstraction, abduction and retroduction.SettingWelsh Government and NHS Wales.ParticipantsInterviews were conducted with 160 participants including government policy leads, health managers and professionals, partner agencies with strategic oversight of patient safety, advocacy groups and academics with expertise in patient safety.Main outcome measuresIdentification of the contextual factors pertinent to the local implementation of the 1000 Lives+patient safety programme in Welsh NHS hospitals.ResultsAn innovative conceptual framework harnessing realist social theory and institutional theory was produced to address challenges identified within previous applications of realist inquiry in patient safety research. This involved the development and use of an explanatory intervention–context–mechanism–agency–outcome (I-CMAO) configuration to illustrate the processes behind implementation of a change programme. Our findings, illustrated by multiple nested I-CMAO configurations, show how local implementation of patient safety interventions are impacted and modified by particular aspects of context: specifically, isomorphism, by which an intervention becomes adapted to the environment in which it is implemented; institutional logics, the beliefs and values underpinning the intervention and its source, and their perceived legitimacy among different groups of health-care professionals; and the relational structure and power dynamics of the functional group, that is, those tasked with implementing the initiative. This dynamic interplay shapes and guides actions leading to the normalisation or the rejection of the patient safety programme.ConclusionsHeightened awareness of the influence of context on the local implementation of patient safety programmes is required to inform the design of such interventions and to ensure their effective implementation and operationalisation in the day-to-day practice of health-care teams. Future work is required to elaborate our conceptual model and findings in similar settings where different interventions are introduced, and in different settings where similar innovations are implemented.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Herepath
- Sir Roland Smith Centre for Strategic Management, Department of Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Innovation, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Justin Waring
- Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the causative agents of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in young infants and the optimal approach to empiric antibiotic therapy for infants with SBI. METHODS From May 1, 2011, to December 1, 2013, pertinent clinical data were collected on previously well infants 60 days or younger with SBI as defined by a positive bacterial culture from a sterile site. Infants were identified by prospective surveillance of admissions and daily review of microbiology records. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-five infants with SBI were identified. Mean age was 32 days (SD ±16.6 days). Twenty-nine infants had meningitis, 66 had bacteremia (37 with concomitant urinary tract infection), and 170 had urinary tract infection alone. No methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus sp., or penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were identified. Four extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli were seen. Empiric therapy was ampicillin and gentamicin (n = 116, 44%) or third-generation cephalosporin based (n = 149, 56%). Ampicillin and gentamicin, with third-generation cephalosporins reserved for cases where meningitis is suspected, would have provided effective coverage for 98.5% of infants and unnecessarily broad therapy for 4.3%. Third-generation cephalosporins with ampicillin would have been effective for 98.5% of infants and unnecessarily broad for 83.8%. Third-generation cephalosporin monotherapy was less effective than either combination (P < 0.001). Fifty-seven percent of broad spectrum empiric therapy was continued despite culture results allowing de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS Ampicillin/gentamicin remains an effective empiric regimen for infants 60 days or younger with suspected SBI. Use of a third-generation cephalosporin for suspected meningitis is appropriate, but cerebrospinal fluid must be obtained promptly to guide appropriate therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Evans RS, Olson JA, Stenehjem E, Buckel WR, Thorell EA, Howe S, Wu X, Jones PS, Lloyd JF. Use of computer decision support in an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6:120-35. [PMID: 25848418 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2014-11-ra-0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Document information needs, gaps within the current electronic applications and reports, and workflow interruptions requiring manual information searches that decreased the ability of our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) at Intermountain Healthcare (IH) to prospectively audit and provide feedback to clinicians to improve antimicrobial use. METHODS A framework was used to provide access to patient information contained in the electronic medical record, the enterprise-wide data warehouse, the data-driven alert file and the enterprise-wide encounter file to generate alerts and reports via pagers, emails and through the Centers for Diseases and Control's National Healthcare Surveillance Network. RESULTS Four new applications were developed and used by ASPs at Intermountain Medical Center (IMC) and Primary Children's Hospital (PCH) based on the design and input from the pharmacists and infectious diseases physicians and the new Center for Diseases Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) antibiotic utilization specifications. Data from IMC and PCH now show a general decrease in the use of drugs initially targeted by the ASP at both facilities. CONCLUSIONS To be effective, ASPs need an enormous amount of "timely" information. Members of the ASP at IH report these new applications help them improve antibiotic use by allowing efficient, timely review and effective prioritization of patients receiving antimicrobials in order to optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Evans
- Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah ; Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - J A Olson
- Pharmacy, Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - E Stenehjem
- Clinical Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, Intermountain Medical Center, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - W R Buckel
- Pharmacy, Intermountain Medical Center, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - E A Thorell
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - S Howe
- Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - X Wu
- Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - P S Jones
- Clinical Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, Intermountain Medical Center, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - J F Lloyd
- Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Richey EA, Dudley L, Liu SK. Quality improvement in hospital management of community-acquired pneumonia: focus on new strategies and current challenges. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2014; 16:395. [PMID: 24474070 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-014-0395-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia is a common reason for hospitalization and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. There are published evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of community-acquired pneumonia. Many countries, including the US, have developed national, publically reported quality measures related to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. This review highlights recent published innovations aimed at improving the quality of care for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Interventions include standardized protocols and pathways, education and feedback from antimicrobial stewardship teams, and automated pharmacy technology. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and multidimensional interventions are discussed. Insight into local context and institutional support are essential to understanding the implementation of improvement efforts and these factors should be reported in future publications related to quality improvement.
Collapse
|