Dose optimization for the MRI-accelerator: IMRT in the presence of a magnetic field

Quality and Safety Considerations for Adaptive Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO White Paper

PURPOSE

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.

SUMMARY

Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.

Impact of 1.5 T Magnetic Field on Treatment Plan Quality in MR-Guided Radiotherapy: Typical Phantom Test Cases

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the influence of the magnetic field on treatment plan quality using typical phantom test cases, which encompass a circle target test case, AAPM TG119 test cases (prostate, head-and-neck, C-shape, multi-target test cases), and a lung test case.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the typical phantom test cases, two plans were formulated. The first plan underwent optimization in the presence of a 1.5 Tesla magnetic field (1.5 T plan). The second plan was re-optimized without a magnetic field (0 T plan), utilizing the same optimization conditions as the first plan. The two plans were compared based on various parameters, including con-formity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), fit index (FI) and dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue (NT), monitor unit (MU). A plan-quality metric (PQM) scoring procedure was employed. For the 1.5 T plans, dose verifications were performed using an MR-compatible ArcCHECK phantom.

RESULTS

A smaller dose influence of the magnetic field was found for the circle target, prostate, head-and-neck, and C-shape test cases, compared with the multi-target and lung test cases. In the multi-target test case, the significant dose influence was on the inferior PTV, followed by the superior PTV. There was a relatively large dose influence on the PTV and OARs for lung test case. No statistically significant differences in PQM and MUs were observed. For the 1.5 T plans, gamma passing rates were all higher than 95% with criteria of 2 mm/3% and 2 mm/2%.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a 1.5 T magnetic field had a relatively large impact on dose parameters in the multi-target and lung test cases compared with other test cases. However, there were no significant influences on the plan-quality metric, MU and dose accuracy for all test cases.

Assessing the Impact of a 1.5 T Transverse Magnetic Field in Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients

Purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy enables visualization of static anatomy, capturing tumor motion, and extracting quantitative image features for treatment verification and outcome monitoring. However, magnetic fields in online MR imaging (MRI) require efforts to ensure accurate dose measurements. This study aimed to assess the dosimetric impact of a 1.5 T magnetic field in esophageal cancer radiotherapy using MR-linac, exploring treatment adaptation potential and personalized medicine benefits. Methods: A prospective cohort study enrolled 100 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing 4DCT and 3DCT scans before radiotherapy. The heart was contoured on 3DCT, 4DCT end expiration (EE), and 4DCT end inhalation (EI) images by the same radiation oncologist. Reference RT plans were designed on 3DCT, with adjustments for different phases generating 5 plan types per patient. Variations in dose-volume parameters for organs at risk and the target area among different plans were compared using Monaco 5.40.04. Results: Slight dose distortions at air-tissue interfaces were observed in the magnetic field's presence. Dose at air-tissue interfaces (chest wall and heart wall) was slightly higher in some patients (3.0% tissue increased by 4.3 Gy on average) compared to nonmagnetic conditions. Average clinical target volume coverage V100 dropped from 99% to 95% compared to reference plans (planEI and planEE). Dose-volume histogram variation between the original plan and reference plans was within 2.3%. Superior-inferior (SI) direction displacement was significantly larger than lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P < .05). Conclusion: Significant SI direction shift in lower esophageal cancerous regions during RT indicates the magnetic field's dosimetric impact, including the electron return effect at tissue-air boundaries. Changes in OAR dose could serve as valuable indicators of organ impairment and target dose alterations, especially for cardiac tissue when using the 1.5 T linac method. Reoptimizing the plan with the magnetic field enhances the feasibility of achieving a clinically acceptable treatment plan for esophageal cancer patients.

MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy Systems

MR-Guided Radiation Therapy (MRIgRT) has been made possible only due to the ingenuity and commitment of commercial radiation therapy system vendors. Unlike conventional linear accelerator systems, MRIgRT systems have had to overcome significant and previously untested techniques to integrate the MRI systems with the radiation therapy delivery systems. Each of these three commercial systems has developed different approaches to integrating their MR and Linac functions. Each has also decided on a different main magnetic field strength, from 0.35T to 1.5T, as well as different design philosophies for other systems, such as the patient support assembly and treatment planning workflow. This paper is intended to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of each system's configuration so that the reader can better interpret the scientific literature concerning these commercial MRIgRT systems.

Influence and optimization strategy of the magnetic field in 1.5 T MR-linac liver stereotactic radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare intensity reduction plans for liver cancer with or without a magnetic field and optimize field and subfield numbers in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans designed for liver masses in different regions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 62 patients who received radiotherapy for liver cancer at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Based on each patient's original individualized intensity-modulated plan (plan1.5 T), a magnetic field-free plan (plan0 T) and static intensity-modulated plan with four different optimization schemes were redesigned for each patient. The differences in dosimetric parameters among plans were compared.

RESULTS

In the absence of a magnetic field in the first quadrant, PTV Dmin increased (97.75 ± 17.55 vs. 100.96 ± 22.78)%, Dmax decreased (121.48 ± 29.68 vs. 119.06 ± 28.52)%, D98 increased (101.35 ± 7.42 vs. 109.35 ± 26.52)% and HI decreased (1.14 ± 0.14 vs. 1.05 ± 0.01). In the absence of a magnetic field in the second quadrant, PTV Dmin increased (84.33 ± 19.74 vs. 89.96 ± 21.23)%, Dmax decreased (105 ± 25.08 vs. 104.05 ± 24.86)%, and HI decreased (1.04 ± 0.25 vs. 0.99 ± 0.24). In the absence of a magnetic field in the third quadrant, PTV Dmax decreased (110.21 ± 2.22 vs. 102.31 ± 26)%, L-P V30 decreased (10.66 ± 9.19 vs. 5.81 ± 3.22)%, HI decreased (1.09 ± 0.02 vs. 0.98 ± 0.25), and PTV Dmin decreased (92.12 ± 4.92 vs. 89.1 ± 22.35)%. In the absence of a magnetic field in the fourth quadrant, PTV Dmin increased (89.78 ± 6.72 vs. 93.04 ± 4.86)%, HI decreased (1.09 ± 0.01 vs. 1.05 ± 0.01) and D98 increased (99.82 ± 0.82 vs. 100.54 ± 0.84)%. These were all significant differences. In designing plans for tumors in each liver region, a total number of subfields in the first area of 60, total subfields in the second zone of 80, and total subfields in the third and fourth zones of 60 or 80 can achieve the dose effect without a magnetic field.

CONCLUSION

In patients with liver cancer, the effect of a magnetic field on the target dose is more significant than that on doses to organs at risk. By controlling the max total number of subfields in different quadrants, the effect of the magnetic field can be greatly reduced or even eliminated.

High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin™, for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin™ entry surface doses, relative to D_max, were (9.9 ± 0.2)%, (10.1 ± 0.3)%, (11.3 ± 0.6)%, (12.9 ± 1.0)%, and (13.4 ± 1.0)% for 1 × 1 cm², 3 × 3 cm², 5 × 5 cm², 10 × 10 cm², and 22 × 22 cm² fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin™ measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 × 10 cm² field size using the MOSkin™ and 17.9% for the 22 × 22 cm² field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin™ detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.

MRI-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) for treatment of Oligometastases: Review of clinical applications and challenges

PURPOSE

Early clinical results on the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with a linear accelerator to deliver MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have demonstrated feasibility for safe delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treatment of oligometastatic disease. Here we set out to review the clinical evidence and challenges associated with MRgRT in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to clinical experiences and trials on the use of MRgRT primarily for the treatment of oligometastatic cancers. We reviewed the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of MRgRT.

RESULTS

Benefits of MRgRT pertaining to superior soft-tissue contrast, real-time imaging and gating, and online adaptive radiotherapy facilitate safe and effective dose escalation to oligometastatic tumors while simultaneously sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Challenges concerning further need for clinical evidence and technical considerations related to planning, delivery, quality assurance (QA) of hypofractionated doses, and safety in the MRI environment must be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising early indications of safety and effectiveness of MRgRT for SBRT-based treatment of oligometastatic disease in multiple treatment locations should lead to further clinical evidence to demonstrate the benefit of this technology.

Multi parametric magnetic resonance imaging for radiation treatment planning

In recent years, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) has played a major role in radiation therapy treatment planning. The superior soft tissue contrast, functional or physiological imaging capabilities and the flexibility of site-specific image sequence development has placed MpMRI at the forefront. In this article, the present status of MpMRI for external beam radiation therapy planning is reviewed. Common MpMRI sequences, preprocessing and QA strategies are briefly discussed, and various image registration techniques and strategies are addressed. Image segmentation methods including automatic segmentation and deep learning techniques for organs at risk and target delineation are reviewed. Due to the advancement in MRI guided online adaptive radiotherapy, treatment planning considerations addressing MRI only planning are also discussed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Prospectively Generated Glioma Treatment Plans Clinically Delivered on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) Versus Conventional Linac: Predicted and Measured Skin Dose

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator radiotherapy is an innovative technology that requires special consideration for secondary electron interactions within the magnetic field, which can alter dose deposition at air–tissue interfaces. As part of ongoing quality assurance and quality improvement of new radiotherapy technologies, the purpose of this study was to evaluate skin dose modelled from the treatment planning systems of a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator and a conventional linear accelerator, and then correlate with in vivo measurements of delivered skin dose from each linear accelerator. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 37 consecutive glioma patients had treatment planning completed and approved prior to radiotherapy initiation using commercial treatment planning systems: a Monte Carlo-based algorithm for magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator or a convolution-based algorithm for conventional linear accelerator. In vivo skin dose was measured using an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter. Results: Monte Carlo-based magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans and convolution-based conventional linear accelerator plans had similar dosimetric parameters for target volumes and organs-at-risk. However, magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans had 1.52 Gy higher mean dose to air cavities (P < .0001) and 1.10 Gy higher mean dose to skin (P < .0001). In vivo skin dose was 14.5% greater for magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator treatments (P = .0027), and was more accurately predicted by Monte Carlo-based calculation (ρ = 0.95, P < .0001) versus convolution-based (ρ = 0.80, P = .0096). Conclusion: This is the first prospective dosimetric comparison of glioma patients clinically treated on both magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator and conventional linear accelerator. Our findings suggest that skin doses were significantly greater with magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans but correlated better with in vivo measurements of actual skin dose from delivered treatments. Future magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator planning processes are being designed to account for skin dosimetry and treatment delivery.

An in-silico assessment of the dosimetric benefits of MR-guided radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To assess the dosimetric benefits of online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for esophageal cancer patients and to assess how these benefits could be translated into a local boosting strategy to improve future outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were in-silico treated with both a MRgRT regimen and a conventional image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) regimen using dose warping techniques. Here, the inter and intrafractional changes that occur over the course of treatment (as derived from 5 MRI scans that were acquired weekly during treatment) were incorporated to assess the total accumulated dose for each regimen.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in dose to the organs-at-risk (OARs) was observed for all dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for the MRgRT regimen without concessions to target coverage compared to the IGRT regimen. The mean lung dose was reduced by 28%, from 7.9 to 5.7 Gy respectively and V20Gy of the lungs was reduced by 55% (6.3-2.8%). A reduction of 24% was seen in mean heart dose (14.8-11.2 Gy), while the V25Gy of the heart was decreased by 53% (14.3-6.7%) and the V40Gy of the heart was decreased by 69% (3.9-1.2%). In addition, MRgRT dose escalation regimens with a boost up to 66% of the prescription dose to the primary tumor yielded approximately the same dose levels to the OARs as from the conventional IGRT regimen.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that MRgRT for esophageal cancer has the potential to significantly reduce the dose to heart and lungs. In addition, online high precision targeting of the primary tumor opens new perspectives for local boosting strategies to improve outcome of the local management of this disease.

ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology

Online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) represents one of the most innovative applications of current image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The revolutionary concept of oMRgRT systems is the ability to acquire MR images for adaptive treatment planning and also online imaging during treatment delivery. The daily adaptive planning strategies allow to improve targeting accuracy while avoiding critical structures. This ESTRO-ACROP recommendation aims to provide an overview of available systems and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase of hybrid MR-linac systems. Unlike the implementation of other radiotherapy techniques, oMRgRT adds the MR environment to the daily practice of radiotherapy, which might be a new experience for many centers. New issues and challenges that need to be thoroughly explored before starting clinical treatments will be highlighted.

DeepDose: a robust deep learning-based dose engine for abdominal tumours in a 1.5 T MRI radiotherapy system

We present a robust deep learning-based framework for dose calculations of abdominal tumours in a 1.5 T MRI radiotherapy system. For a set of patient plans, a convolutional neural network is trained on the dose of individual multi-leaf-collimator segments following the DeepDose framework. It can then be used to predict the dose distribution per segment for a set of patient anatomies. The network was trained using data from three anatomical sites of the abdomen: prostate, rectal and oligometastatic tumours. A total of 216 patient fractions were used, previously treated in our clinic with fixed-beam IMRT using the Elekta MR-linac. For the purpose of training, 176 fractions were used with random gantry angles assigned to each segment, while 20 fractions were used for the validation of the network. The ground truth data were calculated with a Monte Carlo dose engine at 1% statistical uncertainty per segment. For a total of 20 independent abdominal test fractions with the clinical angles, the network was able to accurately predict the dose distributions, achieving 99.4% ± 0.6% for the whole plan prediction at the 3%/3 mm gamma test. The average dose difference and standard deviation per segment was 0.3% ± 0.7%. Additional dose prediction on one cervical and one pancreatic case yielded high dose agreement of 99.9% and 99.8% respectively for the 3%/3 mm criterion. Overall, we show that our deep learning-based dose engine calculates highly accurate dose distributions for a variety of abdominal tumour sites treated on the MR-linac, in terms of performance and generality.

Impact of field number and beam angle on ERE for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with 1.5T MR-Linac

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of field number and beam angle on ERE during IMRT planning with 1.5T MR-Linac for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

IMRT plans for three representative lung cases who treated with 1.5T MR-Linac were generated using TPS Monaco 5.40.01. In each case, five types of plans were generated: (1) the "original plan" generated using 5-fields and beam angles manually optimized in ipsilateral tumor side, with no transverse magnetic field (TMF); (2) the plans generated by reoptimizing and recalculating the original plan, with a 1.5T TMF; (3) the plans generated with 5-fields, with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior (AP) direction; (4) the plans generated with equidistant 5-fields; and (5) the plans generated with equidistant 9-fields. These plans were compared using a variety of dose-volume-parameters (DVPs).

RESULTS

The DVPs under TMF showed the presence of 1.5T TMF can slightly change for all lung cases studied. When the plans generated with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior direction, results showed that the plans improved conformity and homogeneity for PTV and reduced the dose to tissue surface. Furthermore, the results showed that the equidistant/non-equidistant comparison of the previous target anatomy result in a more favourable dose distribution for the equidistant beam setting. At last, the results showed the dose distributions for PTV with 9 and 5 equidistant beams were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The plan quality can be significantly changed by the presence of a 1.5T TMF for lung SBRT with MR-Linac. The selection of optimal fields number and beam angle can substantially reduce or even eliminate these changes, without deteriorating overall plan quality.

Impact of Magnetic Field on Dose Distribution in MR-Guided Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer

Purpose

This study investigates the impact of the magnetic field on plan quality and dose at the tissue-air interface in MR-guided radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Materials and Methods

The charts of 10 patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with conventional fractionated radiotherapy were collected and reviewed. The skin and tissues containing air cavities were contoured. Three plans using 9 fields of intensity-modulated radiation therapy were generated for each patient in the Monaco treatment planning system of an Elekta Unity MR-linac. The first plan was optimized without the magnetic field (plan0T). The second plan was recalculated in the presence of a 1.5-T magnetic field (plan1.5T_reCal) using the same segment shape and monitor units as the first plan. The third plan was reoptimized in the presence of a 1.5-T magnetic field (plan1.5T_reOpt) using the same cost function as the first plan. The dose to the skin and tissues containing air cavities were compared across the three types of plans. A plan-quality metric method was used to evaluate the plan quality according to the clinical requirements.

Results

The skin dose was increased in the presence of the 1.5-T magnetic field, and the amplitude increase of plan1.5T_reOpt (ΔDmean 1.30 ± 0.42 Gy, ΔDmax 1.68 ± 1.36 Gy) was smaller than that of plan1.5T_reCal (ΔDmean 1.81 ± 0.79 Gy, ΔDmax 5.43 ± 2.26 Gy). There were no significant differences in terms of the metrics of interfaces of tissues containing air cavities except for an increased maximum dose to the larynx and trachea. The plan quality of plan1.5T_reCal (68.0 ± 9.2) was significantly worse than that of plan0T (82.2 ± 7.0), and the plan quality of plan1.5T_reOpt (80.0 ± 7.0) was similar to that of plan0T.

Conclusion

The presence of a 1.5-T magnetic field had an apparent impact on the dose distribution, in particular, a significant increase in the skin dose. The plan quality of plan1.5T_reOpt was similar to that of the original plan0T when the same cost function was used.

Experimental verification the electron return effect around spherical air cavities for the MR-Linac using Monte Carlo calculation

PURPOSE

Dose deposition around unplanned air cavities during magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is influenced by the electron return effect (ERE). This is clinically relevant for gas forming close to or inside organs at risk (OARs) that lie in the path of a single beam, for example, intestinal track during pelvic treatment. This work aims to verify Monte Carlo calculations that predict the dosimetric effects of ERE around air cavities. For this, we use GafChromic EBT3 film inside poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) -air phantoms.

METHOD

Four PMMA phantoms were produced. Three of the phantoms contained centrally located spherical air cavities (0.5, 3.5, 7.5 cm diameter), and one phantom contained no air. The phantoms were split to sandwich GafChromic EBT3 film in the center. The phantoms were irradiated on an Elekta Unity system using a single 10 × 10 cm2 7-MV photon beam under the influence of a 1.5-T transverse magnetic field. The measurements were replicated using the Elekta Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis with pass criteria 3%/3 mm was used to compare the measured and calculated dose distributions. We also consider 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm pass criteria for interest.

RESULTS

The gamma analysis showed that >95% of the points agreed between the TPS-calculated and measured dose distributions, using 3%/3 mm criteria. The phantom containing the largest air cavity had the lowest agreement, with most of the disagreeing points lying inside the air cavity (dose to air region).

CONCLUSIONS

The dose effects due to ERE around spherical air cavities are being calculated in the TPS with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.

Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system

Purpose

To investigate the dosimetric impact of magnetic (B) field on varying air cavities in rectum patients treated on the hybrid 1.5 T MR‐linac.

Methods

Artificial air cavities of varying diameters (0.0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 cm) were created for four rectum patients (two prone and two supine). A total of 56 plans using a 7 MV flattening filter‐free beam were generated with and without B‐field. Reference intensity‐modulated radiation therapy treatment plans without air cavity in the presence and absence of B‐field were generated to a total dose of 45/50 Gy. The reference plans were copied and recalculated for the varying air cavities. D₉₅(PTV₄₅–PTV₅₀), D₉₅(PTV₅₀–aircavity), V₅₀(PTV₅₀–aircavity), D_max(PTV₅₀–aircavity), and V_110%(PTV₅₀–aircavity) were extracted for each patient. Annulus rings of 1‐mm‐diameter step size were generated for one of the air cavity plans (3.0 cm) for all four patients to determine D_max (%) and V_110% (cc) within each annulus.

Results

In the presence of B‐field, hot spots at the cavity interface start to become visible at ~1 cm air cavity in both supine and prone positioning due to electron return effect (ERE). In the presence of B‐field D_max and V_110% varied from 5523 ± 49 cGy and 0.09 ± 0.16 cc for 0 cm air cavity size to 6050 ± 109 cGy and 11.6 ± 6.7 cc for 5 cm air cavity size. The hot spots were located within 3 mm inside the rectal‐air interface, where D_max increased from 110.4 ± 0.5% without B‐field to 119.2 ± 0.8 % with B‐field.

Conclusions

Air cavities inside rectum affects rectum plan dosimetry due ERE. Location and magnitude of hot spots are dependent on the size of the air cavity.

Automated air region delineation on MRI for synthetic CT creation

Automatically and accurately separating air from other low signal regions (especially bone, liver, etc) in an MRI is difficult because these tissues produce similar MR intensities, resulting in errors in synthetic CT generation for MRI-based radiation therapy planning. This work aims to develop a technique to accurately and automatically determine air-regions for MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy. CT and MRI scans (T2-weighted) of phantoms with fabricated air-cavities and abdominal cancer patients were used to establish an MR intensity threshold for air delineation. From the phantom data, air/tissue boundaries in MRI were identified by CT-MRI registration. A formula relating the MRI intensities of air and surrounding materials was established to auto-threshold air-regions. The air-regions were further refined by using quantitative image texture features. A naive Bayesian classifier was trained using the extracted features with a leave-one-out cross validation technique to differentiate air from non-air voxels. The multi-step air auto-segmentation method was tested against the manually segmented air-regions. The dosimetry impacts of the air-segmentation methods were studied. Air-regions in the abdomen can be segmented on MRI within 1 mm accuracy using a multi-step auto-segmentation method as compared to manually delineated contours. The air delineation based on the MR threshold formula was improved using the MRI texture differences between air and tissues, as judged by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 81% when two texture features (autocorrelation and contrast) were used. The performance increased to 82% with using three features (autocorrelation, sum-variance, and contrast). Dosimetric analysis showed no significant difference between the auto-segmentation and manual MR air delineation on commonly used dose volume parameters. The proposed techniques consisting of intensity-based auto-thresholding and image texture-based voxel classification can automatically and accurately segment air-regions on MRI, allowing synthetic CT to be generated quickly and precisely for MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy.

Feasibility of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy in Elekta Unity® MR-Linac

The Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL) is expected to benefit spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to the improved soft tissue contrast available with onboard MR imaging. However, the irradiation geometry and beam configuration of the MRL deviates from the conventional linear accelerator (Linac). The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility of spine SBRT on the MRL. Treatment plans were generated for lumbar and thoracic spines. Target and spinal cord doses were measured with two cylindrical ion chambers inserted into an anthropomorphic spine phantom. Our study indicated that the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) could generate clinical treatment plans for the MRL that were of comparable quality to the RayStation TPS with a conventional Linac. For both Linacs the planned dose within the gross tumor volume agreed with measurements within ±3%. For the spinal cord, while the measured doses from the TrueBeam were 1.8% higher for the lumbar spine plan and 6.9% higher for thoracic spine plan, the measured doses from MRL were 0.6% lower for the lumbar spine plan and 3.9% higher for the thoracic spine plan. In conclusion, the feasibility of spine SBRT in Elekta Unity MRL has been demonstrated, however, more effort is needed for such as optimizing the online plan adaptation method.

Assessing localized dosimetric effects due to unplanned gas cavities during pelvic MR-guided radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulations

PURPOSE

It has been proposed that beam modulation and opposing beam configurations can cancel effects of the Electron Return Effect (ERE) during MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). However, this may not always be the case for unplanned gas cavities outside of the target in the pelvic region. We evaluate dosimetric effects, including effects in the rectal wall, due to unplanned spherical air cavities during MRgRT.

METHODS

Nine virtual cuboid water phantoms containing spherical air cavities (0.5-7.5 cm diameter) and a reference phantom without air were created. Monte Carlo dose calculations of 7 MV photons under the influence of a 1.5 T transverse magnetic field were produced using Monaco 5.19.02 Treatment Planning System (TPS) (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Cavities in the path of a single and multiple beam plans were considered. Dose distributions of phantoms with and without air cavities were compared (ΔD% ) using a spherical coordinate system originating in the center of the cavity. Effects in the rectal wall were quantified by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters for solid and gaseous filling from simulated rectal wall structures.

RESULTS

Max(ΔD% ) of ~70% and 20% were observed around large cavities in the path of a single and multiple beam plans, respectively. Approximately 45 cm3 of phantom surrounding the largest cavity in a single beam received dose changes of >10%. Dmean in the rectal wall was unchanged when comparing gaseous and solid filling in the path of a single beam; however, D1cc and Dmax increased by up to ~45% and ~63%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned gas cavities in the path of a single beam during pelvic MRgRT with a 1.5 T transverse magnetic field cause dose changes which may impact toxicity in the rectal wall, depending on local dose and fractionation. Effects are reduced but not eliminated with a five-beam plan.

Low-density gel dosimeter for measurement of the electron return effect in an MR-linac

Radiation therapy in the presence of a strong magnetic field is known to cause regions of enhanced and reduced dose at interfaces of materials with varying densities, in a phenomenon known as the electron return effect (ERE). In this study, a novel low-density gel dosimeter was developed to simulate lung tissue and was used to measure the ERE at the lung-soft tissue interface. Low-density gel dosimeters were developed with Fricke xylenol orange gelatin (FXG) and ferrous oxide xylenol orange (FOX) gels mixed with polystyrene foam beads of various sizes. The gels were characterized based on CT number, MR signal intensity, and uniformity. All low-density gels had CT numbers roughly equivalent to lung tissue. The optimal lung-equivalent gel formulation was determined to be FXG with  <1 mm polystyrene beads due to the higher signal intensity of FXG compared to FOX and the higher uniformity with the small beads. Dose response curves were generated for the optimal low-density gel and conventional FXG. The change in spin-lattice relaxation rate (R1) before and after irradiation was linear with dose for both gels. Next, phantoms consisting of concentric cylinders with low-density and conventional FXG were created to simulate the lung-soft tissue interface. The phantoms were irradiated in a conventional linear accelerator (linac) and in a linac combined with a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unit (MR-linac) to measure the effects of the magnetic field on the dose distribution. Hot and cold spots were observed in the dose distribution at the boundaries between the gels for the phantom irradiated in the MR-linac but not the conventional linac, consistent with the ERE.

Development and validation of a 1.5 T MR-Linac full accelerator head and cryostat model for Monte Carlo dose simulations

PURPOSE

To develop, implement, and validate a full 1.5 T/7 MV magnetic resonance (MR)-Linac accelerator head and cryostat model in EGSnrc for high precision dose calculations accounting for magnetic field effects that are independent from the vendor treatment planning system.

METHODS

Primary electron beam parameters for the implemented model were adapted to be in accordance with measured dose profiles of the Elekta Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Parameters to be investigated were the mean electron energy as well as the Gaussian radial intensity and energy distributions. Energy tuning was done comparing depth dose profiles simulated with monoenergetic beams of varying energies to measurements. The optimum radial intensity distribution was found by varying the radial full width at half maximum (FWHM) and comparing simulated and measured lateral profiles. The influence of the energy distribution was investigated by comparing simulated lateral and depth dose profiles with varying energy spreads to measured data. Comparison of simulations and measurements was performed by calculating average and maximum local dose deviations. The model was validated recalculating a clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan for the MR-Linac and comparing the resulting dose distribution with simulations from the commercial treatment planning system Monaco using the gamma criterion.

RESULTS

Comparison of simulated and measured data showed that the optimum initial electron beam for MR-Linac simulations was monoenergetic with an electron energy of (7.4 ± 0.2) MeV. The optimum Gaussian radial intensity distribution has a FWHM of (2.2 ± 0.3) mm. The average relative deviations were smaller than 1% for all simulated profiles with optimum electron parameters, whereas the largest maximum deviation of 2.07% was found for the 22 × 22 cm 2 cross-plane profile. Profiles were insensitive to energy spread variations. The IMRT plan recalculated with the final MR-Linac model with optimized initial electron beam parameters showed a gamma pass rate of 99.83 % using a gamma criterion of 3%/3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGSnrc MR-Linac model developed in this study showed good accordance with measurements and was successfully used to recalculate a first full clinical IMRT treatment plan. Thus, it shows the general possibility for future secondary dose calculations of full IMRT plans with EGSnrc, which needs further detailed investigations before clinical use.

Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac

Purpose

The magnetic field can cause a nonnegligible dosimetric effect in an MR‐Linac system. This effect should be accurately accounted for by the beam models in treatment planning systems (TPS). The purpose of the study was to verify the beam model and the entire treatment planning and delivery process for a 1.5 T MR‐Linac based on comprehensive dosimetric measurements and end‐to‐end tests.

Material and methods

Dosimetry measurements and end‐to‐end tests were performed on a preclinical MR‐Linac (Elekta AB) using a multitude of detectors and were compared to the corresponding beam model calculations from the TPS for the MR‐Linac. Measurement devices included ion chambers (IC), diamond detector, radiochromic film, and MR‐compatible ion chamber array and diode array. The dose in inhomogeneous phantom was also verified. The end‐to‐end tests include the generation, delivery, and comparison of 3D and IMRT plan with measurement.

Results

For the depth dose measurements with Farmer IC, micro IC and diamond detector, the absolute difference between most measurement points and beam model calculation beyond the buildup region were <1%, at most 2% for a few measurement points. For the beam profile measurements, the absolute differences were no more than 1% outside the penumbra region and no more than 2.5% inside the penumbra region. Results of end‐to‐end tests demonstrated that three 3D static plans with single 5 × 10 cm² fields (at gantry angle 0°, 90° and 270°) and two IMRT plans successfully passed gamma analysis with clinical criteria. The dose difference in the inhomogeneous phantom between the calculation and measurement was within 1.0%.

Conclusions

Both relative and absolute dosimetry measurements agreed well with the TPS calculation, indicating that the beam model for MR‐Linac properly accounts for the magnetic field effect. The end‐to‐end tests verified the entire treatment planning process.

In vitro biological response of cancer and normal tissue cells to proton irradiation not affected by an added magnetic field

To optimize beam delivery and conformality of proton therapy, MRI integration has been proposed. Therefore, we investigated if proton irradiation in a magnetic field would change biological responses. Our data in cancer cell lines and stem cell-derived organoid models suggest that a magnetic field does not modify the biological response.

The effect of density overrides on magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy planning for lung cancer

Background and Purpose

Inverse treatment planning for lung cancer can be challenging since density heterogeneities may appear inside the planning target volume (PTV). One method to improve the quality of intensity modulation is the override of low density tissues inside the PTV during plan optimization. For magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT), where the influence of the magnetic field on secondary electrons is sensitive to the tissue density, the reliability of density overrides has not yet been proven. This work, therefore, gains a first insight into density override strategies for MRgRT.

Material and methods

Monte Carlo-based treatment plans for five lung cancer patients were generated based on free-breathing CTs and two density override strategies. Different magnetic field configurations were considered with their effect being accounted for during optimization. Optimized plans were forward calculated to 4D-CTs and accumulated for the comparison of planned and expected delivered dose.

Results

For MRgRT, density overrides led to a discrepancy between the delivered and planned dose. The tumor volume coverage deteriorated for perpendicular magnetic fields of 1.5 T to 93.6% (D_98%). For inline fields a maximal increase of 2.2% was found for the mean dose. In terms of organs at risk, a maximal sparing of 0.6 Gy and 0.9 Gy was observed for lung and heart, respectively.

Conclusions

In this work, first results on the effect of density overrides on treatment planning for MRgRT are presented. It was observed that the underestimation of magnetic field effects in overridden densities during treatment planning resulted in an altered delivered dose, depending on the field strength and orientation.

MRI-guidance for motion management in external beam radiotherapy: current status and future challenges

High precision conformal radiotherapy requires sophisticated imaging techniques to aid in target localisation for planning and treatment, particularly when organ motion due to respiration is involved. X-ray based imaging is a well-established standard for radiotherapy treatments. Over the last few years, the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide radiation-free images with high-resolution and superb soft tissue contrast has highlighted the potential of this imaging modality for radiotherapy treatment planning and motion management. In addition, these advantageous properties motivated several recent developments towards combined MRI radiation therapy treatment units, enabling in-room MRI-guidance and treatment adaptation. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in MRI-based image guidance for organ motion management in external beam radiotherapy. Methodological aspects of MRI for organ motion management are reviewed and their application in treatment planning, in-room guidance and adaptive radiotherapy described. Finally, a roadmap for an optimal use of MRI-guidance is highlighted and future challenges are discussed.

Radiation-induced lung toxicity in mice irradiated in a strong magnetic field

Strong magnetic fields affect radiation dose deposition in MRI-guided radiation therapy systems, particularly at interfaces between tissues of differing densities such as those in the thorax. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a 1.5 T magnetic field on radiation-induced lung damage in C57L/J mice. We irradiated 140 mice to the whole thorax with parallel-opposed Co-60 beams to doses of 0, 9.0, 10.0, 10.5, 11.0, 12.0, or 13.0 Gy (20 mice per dose group). Ten mice per dose group were irradiated while a 1.5 T magnetic field was applied transverse to the radiation beam and ten mice were irradiated with the magnetic field set to 0 T. We compared survival and noninvasive assays of radiation-induced lung damage, namely respiratory rate and metrics derived from thoracic cone-beam CTs, between the two sets of mice. We report two main results. First, the presence of a transverse 1.5 T field during irradiation had no impact on survival of C57L/J mice. Second, there was a small but statistically significant effect on noninvasive assays of radiation-induced lung damage. These results provide critical safety data for the clinical introduction of MRI-guided radiation therapy systems.

Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy

The clinical introduction of MRI-guided radiotherapy has prompted consideration of the potential impact of the static magnetic field on biological responses to radiation. This review provides an introduction to the mechanisms of biological interaction of radiation and magnetic fields individually, in addition to a description of the magnetic field effects on megavoltage photon beams at the macroscale, microscale and nanoscale arising from the Lorentz force on secondary charged particles. A relatively small number of scientific studies have measured the impact of combined static magnetic fields and ionising radiation on biological endpoints of relevance to radiotherapy. Approximately, half of these investigations found that static magnetic fields in combination with ionising radiation produced a significantly different outcome compared with ionising radiation alone. strength static magnetic fields appear to modestly influence the radiation response via a mechanism distinct from modification to the dose distribution. This review intends to serve as a reference for future biological studies, such that understanding of static magnetic field plus ionising radiation synergism may be improved, and if necessary, accounted for in MRI-guided radiotherapy treatment planning.

Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare radiotherapy treatments plans in esophageal cancer calculated for a high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linac with plans for a conventional linac.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were re-planned retrospectively using the research version of Monaco (V 5.19.03, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with a nine-field step-and-shoot technique and two-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for the Elekta MRI-linac and a conventional linac, respectively. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy to the primary tumor (PTV₆₀) and 50 Gy to elective volumes (PTV₅₀). Plans were optimized for optimal coverage of the 60 Gy volume and compared using dose-volume histogram parameters.

RESULTS

All calculated treatment plans met predefined criteria for target volume coverage and organs at risk dose both for MRI-linac and conventional linac. Plans for the MRI-linac had a lower number of segments and monitor units. No significant differences between both plans were seen in terms of V_20Gy of the lungs and V_40Gy of the heart with slightly higher mean doses to the heart (14.0 Gy vs. 12.5 Gy) and lungs (12.8 Gy vs. 12.2 Gy).

CONCLUSION

Applying conventional target volume and margin concepts as well as dose-fractionation prescription reveals clinically acceptable dose distributions using hybrid MRI-linac in its current configuration compared to standard IMRT/VMAT. This represents an important prerequisite for future studies to investigate the clinical benefit of MRI-guided radiotherapy exploiting the conceptional advantages such as reduced margins, plan adaptation and biological individualization and hypofractionation.

Plan quality for high-risk prostate cancer treated with high field magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Daily radiotherapy plan adaptation facilitated by a high field magnetic resonance linac (MRL) may potentially reduce the treated volume due to a reduction of the setup uncertainty. However, the technology also imposes limitations to the treatment technique compared to a standard linac. This study investigated the clinical quality of MRL treatment plans against current standard plans using identical planning target volume margins for high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Twenty consecutive patients planned with our current clinical standard TPS and treated with single arc VMAT on standard linacs with 78 Gy in the prostate and 56 Gy for pelvic lymph nodes over 39 fractions were included. In addition, IMRT treatment plans for delivery by a 1.5 T MRL, using standard margins and dose objectives, were made in a dedicated TPS. Mean population dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose metrics were analyzed and clinical plan quality was evaluated by an oncologist.

Results

All MRL plans were considered clinically acceptable, and DVH analysis showed an overall high similarity to dose distributions of the clinically delivered plans. Mean target coverage was similar (78.0 Gy vs 77.8 Gy). Small but statistically significant differences were seen in doses to organs at risk; on average MRL plans reduced dose to the bladder (46.2 vs 48.3 Gy) compared to standard plans, while dose was higher to the bowel (29.2 vs 26.6 Gy) and penile bulb (16.5 vs 10.8 Gy).

Conclusion

MRL treatment plans were clinically acceptable and similar in quality to the current standard.

The future of image-guided radiotherapy-is image everything?

MR-based image-guided (IG) radiotherapy via all-in-one MR treatment units (MR-linacs) is one of the hottest topics in contemporary radiotherapy research. From ingenious engineering solutions to complex physical problems, researchers have developed machines with the promise of superior image quality, and all the advantages this may confer. Benefits include better tumour visualisation, online adaptation and the potential for image biomarker-based personalised RT. However, it is important to remember that the technical challenges are real. In many instances, they are skillfully managed rather than abolished, a point illustrated by the wide variety of MR-linac designs. The proposed benefits also deserve careful inspection. Better visibility of the primary tumour on an IG scan cannot be bad, but does not automatically equate to better IG, which often depends on a more generalised match to daily anatomy. MR-linac will undoubtedly be a rich milieu to search for IMBs, but these will need to be carefully validated, and similar work with CT-based biomarkers using existing, cheaper, and more widely available hardware is currently ongoing. Online adaptation is an attractive concept, but practicalities are complex, and more work is required to understand which patients will benefit from plan adaptation, and when. Finally, the issue of cost cannot be overlooked, nor can the research community's responsibilities to global healthcare inequalities. MR-linac is an exciting and ingenious technology, which merits both investment and research. It may not, however, have the future to itself.

Assessing MR-linac radiotherapy robustness for anatomical changes in head and neck cancer

The MR-Linac will provide excellent soft tissue contrast for on-treatment imaging. It is well known that the electron return effect (ERE) results in areas of increased and decreased dose at air/tissue boundaries, which can be compensated for in plan optimisation. However, anatomical changes may affect the quality of this compensation. In this paper we aim to quantify the interaction of anatomical changes with ERE in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Twenty patients treated with either 66 Gy or 60 Gy in 30 fractions were selected. Ten had significant weight-loss during treatment requiring repeat CT (rCT) and ten had PTVs close to the sinus cavity. Plans were optimised using Monaco to meet the departmental dose constraints and copied to the rCT and re-calculated. For the sinus patients, we optimised plans with full and empty sinus at both 0 T and 1.5 T. The effect of the opposite filling state was next evaluated. No clinically relevant difference between the doses in the PTV and OARs were observed related to weight-loss in 0 T or 1.5 T fields. Variable sinus filling caused greater dosimetric differences near the walls of the sinus for plans optimised with a full cavity in 1.5 T, indicating that optimising with an empty sinus makes the plan more robust to changes in filling. These findings indicate that current off-line strategies for adaptive planning for H&N patients are also valid on an MR-linac, if care is taken with sinus filling.

Remote Cherenkov imaging-based quality assurance of a magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy system

PURPOSE

Tools to perform regular quality assurance of magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) systems should ideally be independent of interference from the magnetic fields. Remotely acquired optical Cherenkov imaging-based dosimetry measurements in water were investigated for this purpose, comparing measures of dose accuracy, temporal dynamics, and overall integrated IMRT delivery.

METHODS

A 40 × 30.5 × 37.5 cm3 water tank doped with 1 g/L of quinine sulfate was imaged using an intensified charge-coupled device (ICCD) to capture the Cherenkov emission while being irradiated by a commercial MRIgRT system (ViewRay™). The ICCD was placed down-bore at the end of the couch, 4 m from treatment isocenter and behind the 5-Gauss line of the 0.35-T MRI. After establishing optimal camera acquisition settings, square beams of increasing size (4.2 × 4.2 cm2 , 10.5 × 10.5 cm2 , and 14.7 × 14.7 cm2 ) were imaged at 0.93 frames per second, from an individual cobalt-60 treatment head, to develop projection measures related to percent depth dose (PDD) curves and cross beam profiles (CPB). These Cherenkov-derived measurements were compared to ionization chamber (IC) and radiographic film dosimetry data, as well as simulation data from the treatment planning system (TPS). An intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) commissioning plan from AAPM TG-119 (C4:C-Shape) was also imaged at 2.1 frames per second, and the single linear sum image from 509 s of plan delivery was compared to the dose volume prediction generated by the TPS using gamma index analysis.

RESULTS

Analysis of standardized test target images (1024 × 1024 pixels) yielded a pixel resolution of 0.37 mm/pixel. The beam width measured from the Cherenkov image-generated projection CBPs was within 1 mm accuracy when compared to film measurements for all beams. The 502 point measurements (i.e., pixels) of the Cherenkov image-based projection percent depth dose curves (pPDDs) were compared to pPDDs simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS), with an overall average error of 0.60%, 0.56%, and 0.65% for the 4.2, 10.5, and 14.7 cm square beams, respectively. The relationships between pPDDs and central axis PDDs derived from the TPS were used to apply a weighting factor to the Cherenkov pPDD, so that the Cherenkov data could be directly compared to IC PDDs (average error of -0.07%, 0.10%, and -0.01% for the same sized beams, respectively). Finally, the composite image of the TG-119 C4 treatment plan achieved a 95.1% passing rate using 4%/4 mm gamma index agreement criteria between Cherenkov intensity and TPS dose volume data.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first examination of Cherenkov-generated pPDDs and pCBPs in an MR-IGRT system. Cherenkov imaging measurements were fast to acquire, and minimal error was observed overall. Cherenkov imaging also provided novel real-time data for IMRT QA. The strengths of this imaging are the rapid data capture ability providing real-time, high spatial resolution data, combined with the remote, noncontact nature of imaging. The biggest limitation of this method is the two-dimensional (2D) projection-based imaging of three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions through the transparent water tank.

Investigating the effect of a magnetic field on dose distributions at phantom-air interfaces using PRESAGE® 3D dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulations

Dosimetric quality assurance (QA) of the new Elekta Unity (MR-linac) will differ from the QA performed of a conventional linac due to the constant magnetic field, which creates an electron return effect (ERE). In this work we aim to validate PRESAGE® dosimetry in a transverse magnetic field, and assess its use to validate the research version of the Monaco TPS of the MR-linac. Cylindrical samples of PRESAGE® 3D dosimeter separated by an air gap were irradiated with a cobalt-60 unit, while placed between the poles of an electromagnet at 0.5 T and 1.5 T. This set-up was simulated in EGSnrc/Cavity Monte Carlo (MC) code and relative dose distributions were compared with measurements using 1D and 2D gamma criteria of 3% and 1.5 mm. The irradiation conditions were adapted for the MR-linac and compared with Monaco TPS simulations. Measured and EGSnrc/Cavity simulated profiles showed good agreement with a gamma passing rate of 99.9% for 0.5 T and 99.8% for 1.5 T. Measurements on the MR-linac also compared well with Monaco TPS simulations, with a gamma passing rate of 98.4% at 1.5 T. Results demonstrated that PRESAGE® can accurately measure dose and detect the ERE, encouraging its use as a QA tool to validate the Monaco TPS of the MR-linac for clinically relevant dose distributions at tissue-air boundaries.

Effects of magnetic field orientation and strength on the treatment planning of nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the potential to increase the accuracy of radiation treatment delivery. Several research groups have developed hybrid MRgRT devices differing by radiation source used and magnetic field orientation and strength. In this work, we investigate the impact of different magnetic field orientations and strengths on the treatment planning of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC).

METHODS

A framework using the in-house developed treatment planning system matRad and the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system was introduced to perform Monte Carlo-based treatment planning in the presence of a magnetic field. A specialized spectrum-based source model for the beam qualities of 6 MV and cobalt-60 was applied. Optimized plans for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were generated for four NSCLC patients in the presence of different magnetic field orientations and strengths which are applied in hybrid MRgRT devices currently under development or in clinical use.

RESULTS

SBRT and IMRT treatment planning could be performed with consistent plan quality for all magnetic field setups. Only minor effects on the treatment planning outcome were found in the case of magnetic fields orientated perpendicular to the beam direction. Compared to the perpendicular magnetic field orientation, the inline orientation showed the capability to reduce the dose to lung while maintaining equal target coverage. Particularly for tumors with a central position in lung, a distinct dose reduction was obtained which led to a maximum reduction of mean lung dose by 18.5% (0.5 Gy), when applying a 1 T inline magnetic field.

CONCLUSION

All plans generated in this work obtained dose metrics within clinical constraints according to RTOG guidelines. When considering conventional dose metrics, no detrimental effects due to the magnetic fields were observed on the dose to the tumor or to organs at risk. An evaluation of the effects on skin dose was not ascertainable due to the simplified specification of the source model used. By accounting for the magnetic field during treatment planning, a dose reduction in lung could be achieved for inline-oriented magnetic fields. An inline orientation of the magnetic field therefore showed a potential benefit when treating NSCLC with MRgRT.

Dosimetric feasibility of the hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-linac System (MRL) for brain metastases: The impact of the magnetic field

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the suitability of treating patients with single brain metastases using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with the MRL and to characterize the dosimetric impact at tissue-air interfaces resulting primarily from the electron return effect (ERE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

24 patients treated for intact single brain metastases were analyzed. Three radiotherapy plans with the same prescribed dose were generated for each case: (1) noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), (2) coplanar step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on the MRL in the absence (MRLB=0), and (3) in the presence of the transverse magnetic field (MRLB=1.5). The plans were evaluated using cumulative dose-volume histograms and by calculation of Paddick conformity index (CI), V100%, V12Gy minus gross tumor volume (V12Gy - GTV), and V2Gy. At tissue-air boundaries, the dosimetric impact of the magnetic field was quantified using a 5 mm rim of tissue.

RESULTS

All plans met the target coverage and organs-at-risk planning objectives. Differences between all investigated dosimetric parameters significantly favored the VMAT plans as compared to the MRLB=0 and MRLB=1.5 plans, except for V2Gy. The mean V12Gy - GTV and V2Gy marginally favored the MRLB=0 plans compared to the MRLB=1.5 plans (mean difference: 0.45 cm³, p = 0.0019 and 16.46 cm³, p < 0.0001, respectively). The presence of the magnetic field resulted in a statistically significant but small increase in mean dose and D_2cc in the skin (0.08 Gy, p < 0.0001 and 0.6 Gy, p < 0.0001, respectively) and around air cavities (0.07 Gy, p = 0.0092 and 0.3 Gy, p = 0.0004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to generate stereotactic radiation plans that satisfy clinical requirements using the MRL in the setting of single brain metastases. The dosimetric impact of the magnetic field including the ERE at tissue-air boundaries is minor and does not negatively impact target conformity or dose gradient.

MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system

This review article describes advancement of magnetic resonance imaging technologies in radiation therapy planning, guidance, and adaptation of brain tumors. The potential for MR-guided radiation therapy to improve outcomes and the challenges in its adoption are discussed.

New concept on an integrated interior magnetic resonance imaging and medical linear accelerator system for radiation therapy

Image guidance plays a critical role in radiotherapy. Currently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is routinely used in clinics for this purpose. While this modality can provide an attenuation image for therapeutic planning, low soft-tissue contrast affects the delineation of anatomical and pathological features. Efforts have recently been devoted to several MRI linear accelerator (LINAC) projects that lead to the successful combination of a full diagnostic MRI scanner with a radiotherapy machine. We present a new concept for the development of the MRI-LINAC system. Instead of combining a full MRI scanner with the LINAC platform, we propose using an interior MRI (iMRI) approach to image a specific region of interest (RoI) containing the radiation treatment target. While the conventional CBCT component still delivers a global image of the patient's anatomy, the iMRI offers local imaging of high soft-tissue contrast for tumor delineation. We describe a top-level system design for the integration of an iMRI component into an existing LINAC platform. We performed numerical analyses of the magnetic field for the iMRI to show potentially acceptable field properties in a spherical RoI with a diameter of 15 cm. This field could be shielded to a sufficiently low level around the LINAC region to avoid electromagnetic interference. Furthermore, we investigate the dosimetric impacts of this integration on the radiotherapy beam.

Technical Note: Enhancing the surface dose using a weak longitudinal magnetic field

PURPOSE

The surface dose in radiotherapy is subject to the physical properties of the radiation beam and collimator. The purpose of this work is to investigate the manipulation of surface dose using magnetic fields produced with a resistive magnet. Better understanding of the feasibility and mechanisms of altered surface dose could have important clinical applications where the surface dose must be increased for therapeutic goals, or reduced to enhance the therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

A resistive magnet capable of generating a peak magnetic field up to 0.24 T was integrated with a cobalt treatment unit. The magnetic fringe field of the magnet was small due to the self-shielding built within the magnet. The magnetic field at the beam collimation jaws of the cobalt irradiator was less than 10 G. The surface dose and depth dose were measured for varying magnetic field strengths.

RESULTS

The resistive magnet was able to alter the dose in the buildup region of the (60)Co depth dose significantly, and the magnitude of dose enhancement was directly related to the strength of the longitudinal magnetic field. Peak magnetic fields as low as 0.08 T were able to affect the surface dose. At a peak field of 0.24 T, the authors measured a surface dose enhancement of 2.8-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface dose enhancement using resistive magnets is feasible. Further experimental study is needed to understand the origin of the scattered electrons that contribute to the increase in surface dose.

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with an MR-linac - Quantifying the impact of the magnetic field and real-time tumor tracking

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are concerns that radiotherapy doses delivered in a magnetic field might be distorted due to the Lorentz force deflecting secondary electrons. This study investigates this effect on lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, conducted either with or without multileaf collimator (MLC) tumor tracking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Lung SBRT treatments with an MR-linac were simulated for nine patients. Two different treatment techniques were compared: conventional, non-tracked deliveries and deliveries with real-time MLC tumor tracking, each conducted either with or without a 1.5T magnetic field.

RESULTS

Slight dose distortions at air-tissue-interfaces were observed in the presence of the magnetic field. Most prominently, the dose to 2% of the skin increased by 1.4Gy on average. Regardless of the presence of the magnetic field, MLC tracking was able to spare healthy tissue, for example by decreasing the mean lung dose by 0.3Gy on average, while maintaining the target dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for the magnetic field during treatment plan optimization allowed for design and delivery of clinically acceptable lung SBRT treatments with an MR-linac. Furthermore, the ability of MLC tumor tracking to decrease dose exposure of healthy tissue, was not inhibited by the magnetic field.

Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has been integrated into daily clinical routine and can today be considered the standard especially with high-dose radiotherapy. Currently imaging is based on MV- or kV-CT, which has clear limitations especially in soft-tissue contrast. Thus, combination of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-end radiotherapy opens a new horizon. The intricate technical properties of MR imagers pose a challenge to technology when combined with radiation technology. Several solutions that are almost ready for routine clinical application have been developed. The clinical questions include dose-escalation strategies, monitoring of changes during treatment as well as imaging without additional radiation exposure during treatment.