Ionization chamber dosimetry based on 60Co absorbed dose to water calibration for diagnostic kilovoltage x-ray beams

Practical dosimetry procedure of air kerma for kilovoltage X-ray imaging in radiation oncology using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber with a cobalt absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficient

In this study, we implemented a practical dosimetry procedure of air kerma for kilovoltage X-ray beams using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber, and validated the procedure with the accuracy of the measurements using the 0.6-cc chamber compared to the measurements using a 6-cc chamber and a semiconductor device. In addition, the kerma area products (KAPs) were compared with the dose reference levels of radiology. A modified air kerma formalism using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber air kerma formalism with a cobalt absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficient was implemented. Validation of the formalism showed good agreement between the 0.6-cc chamber and the 6-cc chamber (< 5%), and between the 0.6-cc chamber and the semiconductor device (< 2%) in the 60-120 kV range. The KAPs for four RO machines had difference factors of 0.04-15.4 and 0.01-4.1 from their median and maximum dose reference levels in radiology, respectively.

SURFACE DOSE ESTIMATION BY A KAP METER FOR KILOVOLTAGE X-RAY BEAMS

This study aims to estimate the entrance surface dose (ESD) of a water phantom for kilovoltage x-ray beams using an air kerma area product meter (KAP meter) equipped in an x-ray unit. The KAP meter was calibrated in terms of the ESD determined by a plane-parallel ionization chamber based on a 60Co absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficient, ${N}_{D,w}^{{}^{60}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}}$. The ESD measured using the KAP meter was verified by comparing it with that estimated by the air kerma calibration coefficient, NK, for x-ray beam qualities. The ratio of ESDs based on ${N}_{D,w}^{{}^{60}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}}$ and NK was 1.003 on average and independent of the beam quality. The ESD by the KAP meter was an agreement within ±1.5% with that measured using the plane-parallel chamber for 10 × 10-30 × 30 cm2 fields with a source-surface distance of 75-150 cm. It was possible to estimate the ESD directly in a water phantom for x-ray beams without correction factors compared to the existing air kerma calibration, using a KAP meter calibrated based on ${N}_{D,w}^{{}^{60}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}}$.

Monte Carlo determination of a nanoDot OSLD response using quality index for diagnostic kilovoltage X-ray beams

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the energy response of an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter known as nanoDot for diagnostic kilovoltage X-ray beams via Monte Carlo calculations.

METHODS

The nanoDot response is calculated as a function of X-ray beam quality in free air and on a water phantom surface using Monte Carlo simulations. The X-ray fluence spectra are classified using the quality index (QI), which is defined as the ratio of the effective energy to the maximum energy of the photons. The response is calculated for X-ray fluence spectra with QIs of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 with tube voltages of 50-137.6 kVp and monoenergetic photon beams. The surface dose estimated using the calculated response is verified by comparing it with that measured using an ionization chamber.

RESULTS

The nanoDot response in free air for monoenergetic photon beams (QI = 1.0) varies significantly at photon energies below 100 keV and reaches a factor of 3.6 at 25-30 keV. The response differs by up to approximately 6% between QIs of 0.4 and 0.6 for the same half-value layer (HVL). The response at the phantom surface decreases slightly owing to the backscatter effect, and it is almost independent of the field size. The agreement between the surface dose estimated using the nanoDot and that measured using the ionization chamber for assessing X-ray beam qualities is less than 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The nanoDot response is indicated as a function of HVL for the specified QIs, and it enables the direct surface dose measurement.

Energy response of radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter for diagnostic kilovoltage x-ray beams

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the energy response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RGD) for diagnostic kilovoltage x-ray beams by Monte Carlo (MC) calculations and measurements.

METHODS

The uniformity and reproducibility of GD-352M (with Sn filter) and GD-302M (no filter) were tested with 45 RGDs in free air. Subsequently, the RGD response was obtained as a function of an Al-HVL using the parameter, quality index (QI), which is defined as the ratio of the effective energy (keV) to the maximum energy (keV) of the photons. The x-ray fluence spectra with QI of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 were set for tube voltages of 50 ~ 137.6 kVp. The RGD response was calculated in free air using the MC method and verified by the air kerma, K_air, measured using an ionization chamber.

RESULTS

The uniformity and reproducibility of the 45 RGDs were ± 2.3% and ± 2.7% for GD-352M and ± 0.7% and ± 1.6% for GD-302M at the one standard deviation level, respectively. The calculated RGD response was 0.965 to 1.062 at Al-HVL 2.73 mm or more for GD-352M and varied from 3.9 to 2.8 for GD-302M. Both RGD responses exhibited a good correlation with the Al-HVL for the given QI. K_air measured by RGDs for each beam quality with a QI of 0.5 was in the range of -5%~0.8% for GD-352M and -1.8%~3% for GD-302M, relative to the chamber measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The RGD response was indicated as a function of the Al-HVL for the given QI, and it presented a good correlation with the Al-HVL.