Song Y, Hoori A, Wu H, Vembar M, Al-Kindi S, Ciancibello L, Terry JG, Jacobs DR, Carr JJ, Wilson DL. Improved bias and reproducibility of coronary artery calcification features using deconvolution.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2023;
10:014002. [PMID:
36647366 PMCID:
PMC9836910 DOI:
10.1117/1.jmi.10.1.014002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose
Our long-range goal is to improve whole-heart CT calcium scores by extracting quantitative features from individual calcifications. Here, we perform deconvolution to improve bias/reproducibility of small calcification assessments, which can be degraded at the normal CT calcium score image resolution.
Approach
We analyzed features of individual calcifications on repeated standard (2.5 mm) and thin (1.25 mm) slice scans from QRM-Cardio phantom, cadaver hearts, and CARDIA study participants. Preprocessing to improve the resolution involved of Lucy-Richardson deconvolution with a measured point spread function (PSF) or three-dimensional blind deconvolution in which the PSF was iteratively optimized on high detail structures such as calcifications in images.
Results
Using QRM with inserts having known mg-calcium, we determined that both blind and conventional deconvolution improved mass measurements nearly equally well on standard images. Further, deconvolved thin images gave an excellent recovery of actual mass scores, suggesting that such processing could be our gold standard. For CARDIA images, blind deconvolution greatly improved results on standard slices. Bias across 33 calcifications (without, with deconvolution) was (23%, 9%), (18%, 1%), and ( - 19 % , - 1 % ) for Agatston, volume, and mass scores, respectively. Reproducibility was (0.13, 0.10), (0.12, 0.08), and (0.11, 0.06), respectively. Mass scores were more reproducible than Agatston scores or volume scores. For many other calcification features, blind deconvolution improved reproducibility in 21 out of 24 features. Cadaver images showed similar improvements in bias/reproducibility and slightly better results with a measured PSF.
Conclusions
Deconvolution improves bias and reproducibility of multiple features extracted from individual calcifications in CT calcium score exams. Blind deconvolution is useful for improving feature assessments of coronary calcification in archived datasets.
Collapse