1
|
Koniar H, Miller C, Rahmim A, Schaffer P, Uribe C. A GATE simulation study for dosimetry in cancer cell and micrometastasis from the 225Ac decay chain. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:46. [PMID: 37525027 PMCID: PMC10390455 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00564-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) with alpha-emitting radionuclides has shown great promise in treating metastatic cancers. The successive emission of four alpha particles in the 225Ac decay chain leads to highly targeted and effective cancer cell death. Quantifying cellular dosimetry for 225Ac RPT is essential for predicting cell survival and therapeutic success. However, the leading assumption that all 225Ac progeny remain localized at their target sites likely overestimates the absorbed dose to cancer cells. To address limitations in existing semi-analytic approaches, this work evaluates S-values for 225Ac's progeny radionuclides with GATE Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS The cellular geometries considered were an individual cell (10 µm diameter with a nucleus of 8 µm diameter) and a cluster of cells (micrometastasis) with radionuclides localized in four subcellular regions: cell membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, or whole cell. The absorbed dose to the cell nucleus was scored, and self- and cross-dose S-values were derived. We also evaluated the total absorbed dose with various degrees of radiopharmaceutical internalization and retention of the progeny radionuclides 221Fr (t1/2 = 4.80 m) and 213Bi (t1/2 = 45.6 m). RESULTS For the cumulative 225Ac decay chain, our self- and cross-dose nuclear S-values were both in good agreement with S-values published by MIRDcell, with per cent differences ranging from - 2.7 to - 8.7% for the various radionuclide source locations. Source location had greater effects on self-dose S-values than the intercellular cross-dose S-values. Cumulative 225Ac decay chain self-dose S-values increased from 0.167 to 0.364 GyBq-1 s-1 with radionuclide internalization from the cell surface into the cell. When progeny migration from the target site was modelled, the cumulative self-dose S-values to the cell nucleus decreased by up to 71% and 21% for 221Fr and 213Bi retention, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our GATE Monte Carlo simulations resulted in cellular S-values in agreement with existing MIRD S-values for the alpha-emitting radionuclides in the 225Ac decay chain. To obtain accurate absorbed dose estimates in 225Ac studies, accurate understanding of daughter migration is critical for optimized injected activities. Future work will investigate other novel preclinical alpha-emitting radionuclides to evaluate therapeutic potency and explore realistic cellular geometries corresponding to targeted cancer cell lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Koniar
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Cassandra Miller
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul Schaffer
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li WB, Bouvier-Capely C, Saldarriaga Vargas C, Andersson M, Madas B. Heterogeneity of dose distribution in normal tissues in case of radiopharmaceutical therapy with alpha-emitting radionuclides. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:579-596. [PMID: 36239799 PMCID: PMC9630198 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01000-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Heterogeneity of dose distribution has been shown at different spatial scales in diagnostic nuclear medicine. In cancer treatment using new radiopharmaceuticals with alpha-particle emitters, it has shown an extensive degree of dose heterogeneity affecting both tumour control and toxicity of organs at risk. This review aims to provide an overview of generalized internal dosimetry in nuclear medicine and highlight the need of consideration of the dose heterogeneity within organs at risk. The current methods used for patient dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapy are summarized. Bio-distribution and dose heterogeneities of alpha-particle emitting pharmaceutical 223Ra (Xofigo) within bone tissues are presented as an example. In line with the strategical research agendas of the Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI) and the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), future research direction of pharmacokinetic modelling and dosimetry in patient radiopharmaceutical therapy are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Bo Li
- Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Céline Bouvier-Capely
- Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE/SESANE/LRSI, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Clarita Saldarriaga Vargas
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
- In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michelle Andersson
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
- Medical Physics Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Balázs Madas
- Environmental Physics Department, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sarrut D, Arbor N, Baudier T, Borys D, Etxebeste A, Fuchs H, Gajewski J, Grevillot L, Jan S, Kagadis GC, Kang HG, Kirov A, Kochebina O, Krzemien W, Lomax A, Papadimitroulas P, Pommranz C, Roncali E, Rucinski A, Winterhalter C, Maigne L. The OpenGATE ecosystem for Monte Carlo simulation in medical physics. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac8c83. [PMID: 36001985 PMCID: PMC11149651 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8c83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews the ecosystem of GATE, an open-source Monte Carlo toolkit for medical physics. Based on the shoulders of Geant4, the principal modules (geometry, physics, scorers) are described with brief descriptions of some key concepts (Volume, Actors, Digitizer). The main source code repositories are detailed together with the automated compilation and tests processes (Continuous Integration). We then described how the OpenGATE collaboration managed the collaborative development of about one hundred developers during almost 20 years. The impact of GATE on medical physics and cancer research is then summarized, and examples of a few key applications are given. Finally, future development perspectives are indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sarrut
- Université de Lyon; CREATIS; CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1294; INSA-Lyon; Université Lyon 1, Léon Bérard cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Arbor
- Université de Strasbourg, IPHC, CNRS, UMR7178, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Baudier
- Université de Lyon; CREATIS; CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1294; INSA-Lyon; Université Lyon 1, Léon Bérard cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Damian Borys
- Department of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Ane Etxebeste
- Université de Lyon; CREATIS; CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1294; INSA-Lyon; Université Lyon 1, Léon Bérard cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Austria
| | - Jan Gajewski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Sébastien Jan
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale (BioMaps), F-91401 Orsay, France
| | - George C Kagadis
- 3DMI Research Group, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Han Gyu Kang
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Assen Kirov
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY 10021, United States of America
| | - Olga Kochebina
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale (BioMaps), F-91401 Orsay, France
| | - Wojciech Krzemien
- High Energy Physics Division, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland
- Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, S. Lojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Krakow, Poland
- Centre for Theranostics, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 40 St, 31 501 Krakow, Poland
| | - Antony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Christian Pommranz
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Roentgenweg 13, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Emilie Roncali
- University of California Davis, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Carla Winterhalter
- Center for Proton Therapy, PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lydia Maigne
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire de Physique de Clermont, CNRS, UMR 6533, F-63178 Aubière, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lima LFC, Pinto GM, da Silva CC, Fuser DC, Gama MP, Griebler CF, Bonifacio DA, de Sá LV, Lopes RT. Optimal theranostic SPECT imaging protocol for 223radium dichloride therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:374-383. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
5
|
S-Values for Radium-223 and absorbed doses estimates for 223RACL2 using three computational phantoms. Appl Radiat Isot 2022; 189:110387. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
6
|
Rajon DA, Canter BS, Leung CN, Bäck TA, Fritton JC, Azzam EI, Howell RW. Modeling bystander effects that cause growth delay of breast cancer xenografts in bone marrow of mice treated with radium-223. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1217-1228. [PMID: 34232830 PMCID: PMC8560015 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1951392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The role of radiation-induced bystander effects in cancer therapy with alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals remains unclear. With renewed interest in using alpha-particle emitters to sterilize disseminated tumor cells, micrometastases, and tumors, a better understanding of the direct effects of alpha particles and the contribution of the bystander responses they induce is needed to refine dosimetric models that help predict clinical benefit. Accordingly, this work models and quantifies the relative importance of direct effects (DE) and bystander effects (BE) in the growth delay of human breast cancer xenografts observed previously in the tibiae of mice treated with 223RaCl2. METHODS A computational model of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer xenografts in the tibial bone marrow of mice administered 223RaCl2 was created. A Monte Carlo radiation transport simulation was performed to assess individual cell absorbed doses. The responses of the breast cancer cells to direct alpha particle irradiation and gamma irradiation were needed as input data for the model and were determined experimentally using a colony-forming assay and compared to the responses of preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 and osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 bone cells. Using these data, a scheme was devised to simulate the dynamic proliferation of the tumors in vivo, including DE and BE propagated from the irradiated cells. The parameters of the scheme were estimated semi-empirically to fit experimental tumor growth. RESULTS A robust BE component, in addition to a much smaller DE component, was required to simulate the in vivo tumor proliferation. We also found that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for cell killing by alpha particle radiation was greater for the bone cells than the tumor cells. CONCLUSION This modeling study demonstrates that DE of radiation alone cannot explain experimental observations of 223RaCl2-induced growth delay of human breast cancer xenografts. Furthermore, while the mechanisms underlying BE remain unclear, the addition of a BE component to the model is necessary to provide an accurate prediction of the growth delay. More complex models are needed to further comprehend the extent and complexity of 223RaCl2-induced BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier A. Rajon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Brian S. Canter
- Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ USA
| | - Calvin N. Leung
- Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ USA
| | - Tom A. Bäck
- Department of Radiation Physics, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Edouard I. Azzam
- Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ USA
- Radiobiology and Health Branch, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roger W. Howell
- Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tranel J, Feng FY, James SS, Hope TA. Effect of microdistribution of alpha and beta-emitters in targeted radionuclide therapies on delivered absorbed dose in a GATE model of bone marrow. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035016. [PMID: 33321484 PMCID: PMC7880907 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd3ef] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Acute hematologic toxicity is a frequent adverse effect of beta-emitter targeted radionuclide therapies (TRTs). Alpha emitters have the potential of delivering high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation to the tumor attributed to its shorter range. Antibody-based TRTs have increased blood-pool half-lives, and therefore increased marrow toxicity, which is a particular concern with alpha emitters. Accurate 3D absorbed dose calculations focusing on the interface region of blood vessels and bone can elucidate energy deposition patterns. Firstly, a cylindrical geometry model with a central blood vessel embedded in the trabecular tissue was modeled. Monte Carlo simulations in GATE were performed considering beta (177Lu, 90Y) and alpha emitters (211At, 225Ac) as sources restricted to the blood pool. Subsequently, the radioactive sources were added in the trabecular bone compartment in order to model bone marrow metastases infiltration (BMMI). Radial profiles, dose-volume histograms and voxel relative differences were used to evaluate the absorbed dose results. We demonstrated that alpha emitters have a higher localized energy deposition compared to beta emitters. In the cylindrical geometry model, when the sources are confined to the blood pool, the dose to the trabecular bone is greater for beta emitting radionuclides, as alpha emitters deposit the majority of their energy within 70 μm of the vessel wall. In the BMMI model, alpha emitters have a lower dose to untargeted trabecular bone. Our results suggest that when alpha emitters are restricted to the blood pool, as when labeled to antibodies, hematologic toxicities may be lower than expected due to differences in the microdistribution of delivered absorbed dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Tranel
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, United States of America
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, United States of America
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Sara St James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, United States of America
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, United States of America
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|