Data-driven, energy-based method for estimation of scattered events in positron emission tomography

Design and development of the DE-SPECT system: a clinical SPECT system for broadband multi-isotope imaging of peripheral vascular disease

Objective. Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) affects more than 230 million people worldwide and is one of the leading causes of disability among people over age 60. Nowadays, PVD remains largely underdiagnosed and undertreated, and requires the development of tailored diagnostic approaches. We present the full design of the Dynamic Extremity SPECT (DE-SPECT) system, the first organ-dedicated SPECT system for lower extremity imaging, based on 1 cm thick Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) spectrometers and a dynamic dual field-of-view (FOV) synthetic compound-eye (SCE) collimator.Approach. The proposed DE-SPECT detection system consists of 48 1 cm thick 3D-position-sensitive CZT spectrometers arranged in a partial ring of 59 cm in diameter in a checkerboard pattern. The detection system is coupled with a compact dynamic SCE collimator that allows the user to select between two different FOVs at any time during an imaging study: a wide-FOV (28 cm diameter) configuration for dual-leg or scout imaging or a high-resolution and high-sensitivity (HR-HS) FOV (16 cm diameter) for single-leg or focused imaging.Main results.The preliminary experimental data show that the CZT spectrometer achieves a 3D intrinsic spatial resolution of <0.75 mm FWHM and an excellent energy resolution over a broad energy range (2.6 keV FWHM at 218, 3.3 keV at 440 keV). From simulations, the wide-FOV configuration offers a 0.034% averaged sensitivity at 140 keV and <8 mm spatial resolution, whereas the HR-HS configuration presents a peak central sensitivity of 0.07% at 140 keV and a ∼5 mm spatial resolution. The dynamic SCE collimator enables the capability to perform joint reconstructions that would ensure an overall improvement in imaging performance.Significance. The DE-SPECT system is a stationary and high-performance SPECT system that offers an excellent spectroscopic performance with a unique computer-controlled dual-FOV imaging capability, and a relatively high sensitivity for multi-tracer and multi-functional SPECT imaging of the extremities.

Strategies for deep learning-based attenuation and scatter correction of brain 18 F-FDG PET images in the image domain

BACKGROUND

Attenuation and scatter correction is crucial for quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Direct attenuation correction (AC) in the image domain using deep learning approaches has been recently proposed for combined PET/MR and standalone PET modalities lacking transmission scanning devices or anatomical imaging.

PURPOSE

In this study, different input settings were considered in the model training to investigate deep learning-based AC in the image space.

METHODS

Three different deep learning methods were developed for direct AC in the image space: (i) use of non-attenuation-corrected PET images as input (NonAC-PET), (ii) use of attenuation-corrected PET images with a simple two-class AC map (composed of soft-tissue and background air) obtained from NonAC-PET images (PET segmentation-based AC [SegAC-PET]), and (iii) use of both NonAC-PET and SegAC-PET images in a Double-Channel fashion to predict ground truth attenuation corrected PET images with Computed Tomography images (CTAC-PET). Since a simple two-class AC map (generated from NonAC-PET images) can easily be generated, this work assessed the added value of incorporating SegAC-PET images into direct AC in the image space. A 4-fold cross-validation scheme was adopted to train and evaluate the different models based using 80 brain 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images. The voxel-wise and region-wise accuracy of the models were examined via measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification bias in different regions of the brain.

RESULTS

The overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the Double-Channel setting was 0.157 ± 0.08 SUV in the whole brain region, while RMSEs of 0.214 ± 0.07 and 0.189 ± 0.14 SUV were observed in NonAC-PET and SegAC-PET models, respectively. A mean SUV bias of 0.01 ± 0.26% was achieved by the Double-Channel model regarding the activity concentration in cerebellum region, as opposed to 0.08 ± 0.28% and 0.05 ± 0.28% SUV biases for the network that uniquely used NonAC-PET or SegAC-PET as input, respectively. SegAC-PET images with an SUV bias of -1.15 ± 0.54%, served as a benchmark for clinically accepted errors. In general, the Double-Channel network, relying on both SegAC-PET and NonAC-PET images, outperformed the other AC models.

CONCLUSION

Since the generation of two-class AC maps from non-AC PET images is straightforward, the current study investigated the potential added value of incorporating SegAC-PET images into a deep learning-based direct AC approach. Altogether, compared with models that use only NonAC-PET and SegAC-PET images, the Double-Channel deep learning network exhibited superior attenuation correction accuracy.

Energy-based scatter estimation in clinical PET

BACKGROUND

Scatter correction (SC) is essential in PET for accurate quantitative imaging. The state-of-the-art SC method is single-scatter simulation (SSS). Although this method is usually robust and accurate, it can fail in some situations, for example when there is motion between the CT and PET scans in PET/CT. Therefore, it is of interest to consider other SC methods.

PURPOSE

In this work, an energy-based scatter estimation (EBS) method is described in detail, tested in phantoms and patients, and compared to SSS.

METHODS

This version of EBS was developed for list-mode data from Biograph Vision-600 PET/CT scanner. EBS is based on digitized 2D energy histograms in each bin of a coarsely sampled PET sinogram, either with or without time of flight (TOF). The histograms are modeled as a noisy realization of a linear combination of nine basis functions whose parameters were derived from a measurement of the 511-keV photopeak spectrum as well as Monte-Carlo simulations of the scattering process. EBS uses an iterative expectation maximization approach to determine the coefficients in the linear combination, and from this estimates the scatter. The investigation was restricted to 18 F-based PET data in which the acquired number of counts was similar to the levels seen in oncological whole-body PET/CT scans. To evaluate the performance, phantom scans were used that involved the NEMA NU2-2018 protocol, a slab phantom, an NU 2-1994 phantom, a cardiac phantom in an anthropomorphic chest phantom, and a uniformly-filled torso phantom with a bladder phantom slightly outside the axial field of view. Contrast recovery (CR) and other parameters were evaluated in images reconstructed with SSS and EBS. Furthermore, FDG PET scans of seven lung cancer patients were used in the evaluation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) based on SSS and EBS were compared in 27 lesions.

RESULTS

EBS and SSS images were visually similar in all cases except the torso + bladder phantom, where the EBS was much closer to the expected uniform image. The NU2-2018 analysis indicated a 2% scatter residual in EBS images compared to 3% with SSS, and 10% higher background variability, which is a surrogate for image noise. The cardiac phantom scan showed that CR was 98.2% with EBS and 99.6% with SSS, and that the SSS sinogram had values greater than the net-true emission sinogram, indicating a slight overcorrection in the case of SSS. In the lesion SUV comparison in patient scans, EBS correlated strongly (R2  = 0.9973) with SSS, and SUV based on EBS were systematically 0.1 SUV lower. In the case of the torso + bladder phantom portion, the SSS image of the torso + bladder phantom was 299% times hotter than expected in one area, due to scatter estimation error, compared to 16% colder with EBS.

CONCLUSIONS

In evaluating clinically relevant parameters such as SUV in focal lesions, EBS and SSS give almost the same results. In phantoms, some scatter figures of merit were slightly improved by use of EBS, though an image variability figure of merit was slightly degraded. In typical oncological whole-body PET/CT, EBS may be a suitable replacement for SSS, especially when SSS fails due to technical problems during the scan.