1
|
Guérit F, Middlebrooks JC, Gransier R, Richardson ML, Wouters J, Carlyon RP. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2024; 25:201-213. [PMID: 38459245 PMCID: PMC11018570 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Attempts to use current-focussing strategies with cochlear implants (CI) to reduce neural spread-of-excitation have met with only mixed success in human studies, in contrast to promising results in animal studies. Although this discrepancy could stem from between-species anatomical and aetiological differences, the masking experiments used in human studies may be insufficiently sensitive to differences in excitation-pattern width. METHODS We used an interleaved-masking method to measure psychophysical excitation patterns in seven participants with four masker stimulation configurations: monopolar (MP), partial tripolar (pTP), a wider partial tripolar (pTP + 2), and, importantly, a condition (RP + 2) designed to produce a broader excitation pattern than MP. The probe was always in partial-tripolar configuration. RESULTS We found a significant effect of stimulation configuration on both the amount of on-site masking (mask and probe on same electrode; an indirect indicator of sharpness) and the difference between off-site and on-site masking. Differences were driven solely by RP + 2 producing a broader excitation pattern than the other configurations, whereas monopolar and the two current-focussing configurations did not statistically differ from each other. CONCLUSION A method that is sensitive enough to reveal a modest broadening in RP + 2 showed no evidence for sharpening with focussed stimulation. We also showed that although voltage recordings from the implant accurately predicted a broadening of the psychophysical excitation patterns with RP + 2, they wrongly predicted a strong sharpening with pTP + 2. We additionally argue, based on our recent research, that the interleaved-masking method can usefully be applied to non-human species and objective measures of CI excitation patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Guérit
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
| | - John C Middlebrooks
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Robin Gransier
- Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew L Richardson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Jan Wouters
- Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quass GL, Kral A. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain. Hear Res 2024; 443:108953. [PMID: 38277881 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
The present study investigates effects of current focusing and pulse shape on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction in the time domain using cochlear implant stimulation. The study was performed on 20 adult guinea pigs using a 6-channel animal cochlear implant, recording was performed in the auditory midbrain using a multielectrode array. After determining the best frequencies for individual recording contacts with acoustic stimulation, the ear was deafened and a cochlear implant was inserted into the cochlea. The position of the implant was controlled by x-ray. Stimulation with biphasic, pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimuli was performed with monopolar, monopolar with common ground, bipolar and tripolar configuration in two sets of experiments, allowing comparison of the effects of the different stimulation strategies on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction. Channel interaction was studied in the temporal domain, where two electrodes were activated with pulse trains and phase locking to these pulse trains in the midbrain was quantified. The results documented multifactorial influences on the response properties, with significant interaction between factors. Thresholds increased with increasing current focusing, but decreased with pseudomonophasic and monophasic pulse shapes. The results documented that current focusing, particularly tripolar configuration, effectively reduces channel interaction, but that also pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimulation and phase duration intensity coding reduce channel interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar L Quass
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA) & Department of Experimental Otology, Otolaryngology Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177), Germany.
| | - Andrej Kral
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA) & Department of Experimental Otology, Otolaryngology Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177), Germany; Australian Hearing Hub, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azees AA, Thompson AC, Thomas R, Zhou J, Ruther P, Wise AK, Ajay EA, Garrett DJ, Quigley A, Fallon JB, Richardson RT. Spread of activation and interaction between channels with multi-channel optogenetic stimulation in the mouse cochlea. Hear Res 2023; 440:108911. [PMID: 37977051 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
For individuals with severe to profound hearing loss resulting from irreversibly damaged hair cells, cochlear implants can be used to restore hearing by delivering electrical stimulation directly to the spiral ganglion neurons. However, current spread lowers the spatial resolution of neural activation. Since light can be easily confined, optogenetics is a technique that has the potential to improve the precision of neural activation, whereby visible light is used to stimulate neurons that are modified with light-sensitive opsins. This study compares the spread of neural activity across the inferior colliculus of the auditory midbrain during electrical and optical stimulation in the cochlea of acutely deafened mice with opsin-modified spiral ganglion neurons (H134R variant of the channelrhodopsin-2). Monopolar electrical stimulation was delivered via each of four 0.2 mm wide platinum electrode rings at 0.6 mm centre-to-centre spacing, whereas 453 nm wavelength light was delivered via each of five 0.22 × 0.27 mm micro-light emitting diodes (LEDs) at 0.52 mm centre-to-centre spacing. Channel interactions were also quantified by threshold changes during simultaneous stimulation by pairs of electrodes or micro-LEDs at different distances between the electrodes (0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm) or micro-LEDs (0.52, 1.04, 1.56 and 2.08 mm). The spread of activation resulting from single channel optical stimulation was approximately half that of monopolar electrical stimulation as measured at two levels of discrimination above threshold (p<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between optical stimulation in opsin-modified deafened mice and pure tone acoustic stimulation in normal-hearing mice. During simultaneous micro-LED stimulation, there were minimal channel interactions for all micro-LED spacings tested. For neighbouring micro-LEDs/electrodes, the relative influence on threshold was 13-fold less for optical stimulation compared electrical stimulation (p<0.05). The outcomes of this study show that the higher spatial precision of optogenetic stimulation results in reduced channel interaction compared to electrical stimulation, which could increase the number of independent channels in a cochlear implant. Increased spatial resolution and the ability to activate more than one channel simultaneously could lead to better speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajmal A Azees
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Department of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Alex C Thompson
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ross Thomas
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
| | - Jenny Zhou
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
| | - Patrick Ruther
- Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79110, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79110, Germany
| | - Andrew K Wise
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elise A Ajay
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David J Garrett
- Department of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Anita Quigley
- Department of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia; The Aikenhead Centre for Medical Discovery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - James B Fallon
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachael T Richardson
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khurana L, Harczos T, Moser T, Jablonski L. En route to sound coding strategies for optical cochlear implants. iScience 2023; 26:107725. [PMID: 37720089 PMCID: PMC10502376 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss is the most common human sensory deficit. Severe-to-complete sensorineural hearing loss is often treated by electrical cochlear implants (eCIs) bypassing dysfunctional or lost hair cells by direct stimulation of the auditory nerve. The wide current spread from each intracochlear electrode array contact activates large sets of tonotopically organized neurons limiting spectral selectivity of sound coding. Despite many efforts, an increase in the number of independent eCI stimulation channels seems impossible to achieve. Light, which can be better confined in space than electric current may help optical cochlear implants (oCIs) to overcome eCI shortcomings. In this review, we present the current state of the optogenetic sound encoding. We highlight optical sound coding strategy development capitalizing on the optical stimulation that requires fine-grained, fast, and power-efficient real-time sound processing controlling dozens of microscale optical emitters as an emerging research area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshay Khurana
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Synaptic Nanophysiology Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
- Junior Research Group “Computational Neuroscience and Neuroengineering”, Göttingen, Germany
- The Doctoral Program “Sensory and Motor Neuroscience”, Göttingen Graduate Center for Neurosciences, Biophysics, and Molecular Biosciences (GGNB), Göttingen, Germany
- InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tamas Harczos
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Moser
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Synaptic Nanophysiology Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
- InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence “Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells” (MBExC), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Lukasz Jablonski
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Junior Research Group “Computational Neuroscience and Neuroengineering”, Göttingen, Germany
- InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee JI, Seist R, McInturff S, Lee DJ, Brown MC, Stankovic KM, Fried S. Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea. eLife 2022; 11:76682. [PMID: 35608242 PMCID: PMC9177144 DOI: 10.7554/elife.76682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) provide sound and speech sensations for patients with severe to profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. While most CI users achieve some degree of open set word recognition under quiet conditions, hearing that utilizes complex neural coding (e.g., appreciating music) has proved elusive, probably because of the inability of CIs to create narrow regions of spectral activation. Several novel approaches have recently shown promise for improving spatial selectivity, but substantial design differences from conventional CIs will necessitate much additional safety and efficacy testing before clinical viability is established. Outside the cochlea, magnetic stimulation from small coils (micro-coils) has been shown to confine activation more narrowly than that from conventional microelectrodes, raising the possibility that coil-based stimulation of the cochlea could improve the spectral resolution of CIs. To explore this, we delivered magnetic stimulation from micro-coils to multiple locations of the cochlea and measured the spread of activation utilizing a multielectrode array inserted into the inferior colliculus; responses to magnetic stimulation were compared to analogous experiments with conventional microelectrodes as well as to responses when presenting auditory monotones. Encouragingly, the extent of activation with micro-coils was ~60% narrower compared to electric stimulation and largely similar to the spread arising from acoustic stimulation. The dynamic range of coils was more than three times larger than that of electrodes, further supporting a smaller spread of activation. While much additional testing is required, these results support the notion that magnetic micro-coil CIs can produce a larger number of independent spectral channels and may therefore improve auditory outcomes. Further, because coil-based devices are structurally similar to existing CIs, fewer impediments to clinical translational are likely to arise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Ik Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Richard Seist
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stephen McInturff
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Daniel J Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - M Christian Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Konstantina M Stankovic
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Shelley Fried
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.,Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:481-508. [PMID: 34432222 PMCID: PMC8476711 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spencer MJ, Kameneva T, Grayden DB, Burkitt AN, Meffin H. Neural activity shaping utilizing a partitioned target pattern. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 33684894 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abecc4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of neural tissue is used in both clinical and experimental devices to evoke a desired spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity. These devices induce a local field that drives neural activation, referred to as an activating function or generator signal. In visual prostheses, the spread of generator signal from each electrode within the neural tissue results in a spread of visual perception, referred to as a phosphene. In cases where neighboring phosphenes overlap, it is desirable to use current steering or neural activity shaping strategies to manipulate the generator signal between the electrodes to provide greater control over the total pattern of neural activity. Applying opposite generator signal polarities in neighboring regions of the retina forces the generator signal to pass through zero at an intermediate point, thus inducing low neural activity that may be perceived as a high-contrast line. This approach provides a form of high contrast visual perception, but it requires partitioning of the target pattern into those regions that use positive or negative generator signals. This discrete optimization is an NP-hard problem that is subject to being trapped in detrimental local minima. This investigation proposes a new partitioning method using image segmentation to determine the most beneficial positive and negative generator signal regions. Utilizing a database of 1000 natural images, the method is compared to alternative approaches based upon the mean squared error of the outcome. Under nominal conditions and with a set computation limit, partitioning provided improvement for 32% of these images. This percentage increased to 89% when utilizing image pre-processing to emphasize perceptual features of the images. The percentage of images that were dealt with most effectively with image segmentation increased as lower computation limits were imposed on the algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Spencer
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, AUSTRALIA
| | - Tatiana Kameneva
- Telecommunication, Electrical, Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, AUSTRALIA
| | - David B Grayden
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, AUSTRALIA
| | - Anthony N Burkitt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, AUSTRALIA
| | - Hamish Meffin
- Australian College of Optometry, Parkville, Carlton, Victoria, 3010, AUSTRALIA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jahn KN, Bergan MD, Arenberg JG. Auditory Detection Thresholds and Cochlear Resistivity Differ Between Pediatric Cochlear Implant Listeners With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Those With Connexin-26 Mutations. Am J Audiol 2020; 29:23-34. [PMID: 31934787 DOI: 10.1044/2019_aja-19-00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate differences in the electrode-neuron interface as a function of hearing loss etiology in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) listeners with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) syndrome and in those with autosomal recessive connexin-26 mutations (DFNB1). Method Fifteen implanted ears (9 participants, 5 ears with EVA, 10 ears with DFNB1) were assessed. Single-channel auditory detection thresholds were measured using broad and spatially focused electrode configurations (steered quadrupolar; focusing coefficients = 0 and 0.9). Cochlear resistivity estimates were obtained via electrode impedances and electrical field imaging. Between-group differences were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. Results Children with EVA had significantly higher auditory detection thresholds than children with DFNB1, irrespective of electrode configuration. Between-group differences in thresholds were more pronounced on apical electrodes than on basal electrodes. In the apex, electrode impedances and electrical field imaging values were higher for children with EVA than for those with DFNB1. Conclusions The electrode-neuron interface differs between pediatric CI listeners with DFNB1 and those with EVA. It is possible that optimal clinical interventions may depend, in part, on hearing loss etiology. Future investigations with large samples should investigate individualized CI programming strategies for listeners with EVA and DFNB1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N. Jahn
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston
| | - Molly D. Bergan
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Julie G. Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brunton E, Silveira C, Riddell J, Nazarpour K. Recovery of the Response of Sensory Fibers to the Second of a Pair of Peripheral Nerve Stimuli. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2018; 2018:1214-1217. [PMID: 30440608 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8512560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Neural interfaces that stimulate the peripheral nerves have the potential to provide sensory feedback from artificial hands. Many neural interfaces are now being developed that allow for multi-channel stimulation of nerves. It is widely accepted that the electric fields generated by two or more contacts on a neural interface can interact. However, this has previously not been examined in the context of sensory feedback prostheses. Here, we aimed to investigate these interactions and the recovery dynamics of the sensory fibers. A multi-channel cuff electrode was implanted on the sciatic nerve of a rat. It comprised four rings (1 mm apart), each containing four circumferentially arranged electrodes. Temporally-patterned pairs of electrical stimuli were delivered through all 120 combinations of electrode pairs. Compound action potentials, elicited by stimulation of the sciatic nerve, were measured with two pairs of hook electrodes placed on the L4 dorsal root. We find that regardless of the relative position of the two electrodes on the cuff, at an interval of 0 ms, the CAP response is facilitated. At all other intervals, an inter-stimulus interval of even 5 ms was not enough for the response to the second stimulus to fully recover. This observation suggests that overlapping regions of nerve were stimulated. Examining only the intervals where the CAP did not fully recover, we noticed that if the electrodes lay longitudinally, that is, along the nerve, the CAP recovery was significantly impaired, compared to when the electrodes were in any other relative position. The observed space- and time-dependent interactions advocate for further controlled neuroscience studies in parallel to translational work on closed-loop prosthesis control.
Collapse
|
10
|
Shepherd RK, Villalobos J, Burns O, Nayagam DAX. The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies. J Neural Eng 2018; 15:041004. [PMID: 29756600 PMCID: PMC6049833 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aac43c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the rapid expansion of the field of neural stimulation and the rigorous regulatory approval requirements required before these devices can be applied clinically, it is important that there is clarity around conducting preclinical safety and efficacy studies required for the development of this technology. APPROACH The present review examines basic design principles associated with the development of a safe neural stimulator and describes the suite of preclinical safety studies that need to be considered when taking a device to clinical trial. MAIN RESULTS Neural stimulators are active implantable devices that provide therapeutic intervention, sensory feedback or improved motor control via electrical stimulation of neural or neuro-muscular tissue in response to trauma or disease. Because of their complexity, regulatory bodies classify these devices in the highest risk category (Class III), and they are therefore required to go through a rigorous regulatory approval process before progressing to market. The successful development of these devices is achieved through close collaboration across disciplines including engineers, scientists and a surgical/clinical team, and the adherence to clear design principles. Preclinical studies form one of several key components in the development pathway from concept to product release of neural stimulators. Importantly, these studies provide iterative feedback in order to optimise the final design of the device. Key components of any preclinical evaluation include: in vitro studies that are focussed on device reliability and include accelerated testing under highly controlled environments; in vivo studies using animal models of the disease or injury in order to assess efficacy and, given an appropriate animal model, the safety of the technology under both passive and electrically active conditions; and human cadaver and ex vivo studies designed to ensure the device's form factor conforms to human anatomy, to optimise the surgical approach and to develop any specialist surgical tooling required. SIGNIFICANCE The pipeline from concept to commercialisation of these devices is long and expensive; careful attention to both device design and its preclinical evaluation will have significant impact on the duration and cost associated with taking a device through to commercialisation. Carefully controlled in vitro and in vivo studies together with ex vivo and human cadaver trials are key components of a thorough preclinical evaluation of any new neural stimulator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K Shepherd
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia. Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shepherd RK, Wise AK, Enke YL, Carter PM, Fallon JB. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study. J Neural Eng 2018; 14:046020. [PMID: 28607224 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implants (CIs) have a limited number of independent stimulation channels due to the highly conductive nature of the fluid-filled cochlea. Attempts to develop highly focused stimulation to improve speech perception in CI users includes the use of simultaneous stimulation via multiple current sources. Focused multipolar (FMP) stimulation is an example of this approach and has been shown to reduce interaction between stimulating channels. However, compared with conventional biphasic current pulses generated from a single current source, FMP is a complex stimulus that includes extended periods of stimulation before charge recovery is achieved, raising questions on whether chronic stimulation with this strategy is safe. The present study evaluated the long-term safety of intracochlear stimulation using FMP in a preclinical animal model of profound deafness. APPROACH Six cats were bilaterally implanted with scala tympani electrode arrays two months after deafening, and received continuous unilateral FMP stimulation at levels that evoked a behavioural response for periods of up to 182 d. Electrode impedance, electrically-evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were monitored periodically over the course of the stimulation program from both the stimulated and contralateral control cochleae. On completion of the stimulation program cochleae were examined histologically and the electrode arrays were evaluated for evidence of platinum (Pt) corrosion. MAIN RESULTS There was no significant difference in electrode impedance between control and chronically stimulated electrodes following long-term FMP stimulation. Moreover, there was no significant difference between ECAP and EABR thresholds evoked from control or stimulated cochleae at either the onset of stimulation or at completion of the stimulation program. Chronic FMP stimulation had no effect on spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) survival when compared with unstimulated control cochleae. Long-term implantation typically evoked a mild foreign body reaction proximal to the electrode array; however stimulated cochleae exhibited a small but statistically significant increase in the tissue response. Finally, there was no evidence of Pt corrosion following long-term FMP stimulation; stimulated electrodes exhibited the same surface features as the unstimulated control electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE Chronic intracochlear FMP stimulation at levels used in the present study did not adversely affect electrically-evoked neural thresholds or SGN survival but evoked a small, benign increase in inflammatory response compared to control ears. Moreover chronic FMP stimulation does not affect the surface of Pt electrodes at suprathreshold stimulus levels. These findings support the safe clinical application of an FMP stimulation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K Shepherd
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne 3002, Australia. Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spencer TC, Fallon JB, Shivdasani MN. Creating virtual electrodes with 2D current steering. J Neural Eng 2018; 15:035002. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab1b8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
13
|
Reducing interaction in simultaneous paired stimulation with CI. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0171071. [PMID: 28182685 PMCID: PMC5300223 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study simultaneous paired stimulation of electrodes in cochlear implants is investigated by psychophysical experiments in 8 post-lingually deaf subjects (and one extra subject who only participated in part of the experiments). Simultaneous and sequential monopolar stimulation modes are used as references and are compared to channel interaction compensation, partial tripolar stimulation and a novel sequential stimulation strategy named phased array compensation. Psychophysical experiments are performed to investigate both the loudness integration during paired stimulation at the main electrodes as well as the interaction with the electrode contact located halfway between the stimulating pair. The study shows that simultaneous monopolar stimulation has more loudness integration on the main electrodes and more interaction in between the electrodes than sequential stimulation. Channel interaction compensation works to reduce the loudness integration at the main electrodes, but does not reduce the interaction in between the electrodes caused by paired stimulation. Partial tripolar stimulation uses much more current to reach the needed loudness, but shows the same interaction in between the electrodes as sequential monopolar stimulation. In phased array compensation we have used the individual impedance matrix of each subject to calculate the current needed on each electrode to exactly match the stimulation voltage along the array to that of sequential stimulation. The results show that the interaction in between the electrodes is the same as monopolar stimulation. The strategy uses less current than partial tripolar stimulation, but more than monopolar stimulation. In conclusion, the paper shows that paired stimulation is possible if the interaction is compensated.
Collapse
|
14
|
George SS, Shivdasani MN, Fallon JB. Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2016; 116:1104-16. [PMID: 27306672 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00126.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In multichannel cochlear implants (CIs), current is delivered to specific electrodes along the cochlea in the form of amplitude-modulated pulse trains, to convey temporal and spectral cues. Our previous studies have shown that focused multipolar (FMP) and tripolar (TP) stimulation produce more restricted neural activation and reduced channel interactions in the inferior colliculus (IC) compared with traditional monopolar (MP) stimulation, suggesting that focusing of stimulation could produce better transmission of spectral information. The present study explored the capability of IC neurons to detect modulated CI stimulation with FMP and TP stimulation compared with MP stimulation. The study examined multiunit responses of IC neurons in acutely deafened guinea pigs by systematically varying the stimulation configuration, modulation depth, and stimulation level. Stimuli were sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulse trains (carrier rate of 120 pulses/s). Modulation sensitivity was quantified by measuring modulation detection thresholds (MDTs), defined as the lowest modulation depth required to differentiate the response of a modulated stimulus from an unmodulated one. Whereas MP stimulation showed significantly lower MDTs than FMP and TP stimulation (P values <0.05) at stimulation ≤2 dB above threshold, all stimulation configurations were found to have similar modulation sensitivities at 4 dB above threshold. There was no difference found in modulation sensitivity between FMP and TP stimulation. The present study demonstrates that current focusing techniques such as FMP and TP can adequately convey amplitude modulation and are comparable to MP stimulation, especially at higher stimulation levels, although there may be some trade-off between spectral and temporal fidelity with current focusing stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shefin S George
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mohit N Shivdasani
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James B Fallon
- The Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|