1
|
Kord M, Kluge A, Kufeld M, Kalinauskaite G, Loebel F, Stromberger C, Budach V, Gebauer B, Acker G, Senger C. Risks and Benefits of Fiducial Marker Placement in Tumor Lesions for Robotic Radiosurgery: Technical Outcomes of 357 Implantations. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194838. [PMID: 34638321 PMCID: PMC8508340 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Robotic radiosurgery (RRS) allows for the accurate treatment of primary tumors or metastases with high single doses. However, organ motion during or between fractions can lead to imprecise irradiation. We sought to evaluate the risks and advantages of fiducial marker (FM) implantation regarding clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude. Complications were most common in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly lung lesions. Pneumothoraces and pulmonary bleeding were the most common complications. An increased complication rate was associated with concomitant biopsy sampling and FM implantation. Most FM migration observed in this study occurred after CT-guided placements and clinical FM insertions. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions. This study highlights the benefits of marker implantation, especially in lesions with a large motion amplitude, including hepatic lesions and lesions of the lower lobe of the lung located >100.0 mm from the spine. Abstract Fiducial markers (FM) inserted into tumors increase the precision of irradiation during robotic radiosurgery (RRS). This retrospective study evaluated the clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude of FM implantations by analyzing 288 cancer patients (58% men; 63.1 ± 13.0 years) who underwent 357 FM implantations prior to RRS with CyberKnife, between 2011 and 2019. Complications were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. The radial motion amplitude was calculated for tumors that moved with respiration. A total of 725 gold FM was inserted. SIR-rated complications occurred in 17.9% of all procedures. Most complications (32.0%, 62/194 implantations) were observed in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly in pulmonary lesions (46.9% 52/111 implantations). Concurrent biopsy sampling was associated with a higher complication rate (p = 0.001). FM migration occurred in 3.6% after CT-guided and clinical FM implantations. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic (20.5 ± 11.0 mm) and lower lung lobe (15.4 ± 10.5 mm) lesions. This study increases the awareness of the risks of FM placement, especially in thoracic lesions affected by respiratory motion. Considering the maximum motion amplitude, FM placement remains essential in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions located >100.0 mm from the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Kord
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Gueliz Acker
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Acadamy, Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-557221
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freijo C, Herraiz JL, Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Udias JM. Dictionary-based protoacoustic dose map imaging for proton range verification. PHOTOACOUSTICS 2021; 21:100240. [PMID: 33520652 PMCID: PMC7820918 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has the potential to provide state-of-the-art dose conformality in the tumor area, reducing possible adverse effects on surrounding organs at risk. However, uncertainties in the exact location of the proton Bragg peak inside the patient prevent this technique from achieving full clinical potential. In this context, in vivo verification of the range of protons in patients is key to reduce uncertainty margins. Protoacoustic range verification employs acoustic pressure waves generated by protons due to the radio-induced thermoacoustic effect to reconstruct the dose deposited in a patient during proton therapy. In this paper, we propose to use the a priori knowledge of the shape of the proton dose distribution to create a dictionary with the expected ultrasonic signals at predetermined detector locations. Using this dictionary, the reconstruction of deposited dose is performed by matching pre-calculated dictionary acoustic signals with data acquired online during treatment. The dictionary method was evaluated on a single-field proton plan for a prostate cancer patient. Dose calculation was performed with the open-source treatment planning system matRad, while acoustic wave propagation was carried out with k-Wave. We studied the ability of the proposed dictionary method to detect range variations caused by anatomical changes in tissue density, and alterations of lateral and longitudinal beam position. Our results show that the dictionary-based protoacoustic method was able to identify the changes in range originated by all the alterations introduced, with an average accuracy of 1.4 mm. This procedure could be used for in vivo verification, comparing the measured signals with the precalculated dictionary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Freijo
- Nuclear Physics Group, EMFTEL and IPARCOS, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University Complutense of Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Corresponding author.
| | - Joaquin L. Herraiz
- Nuclear Physics Group, EMFTEL and IPARCOS, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University Complutense of Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa
- Nuclear Physics Group, EMFTEL and IPARCOS, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University Complutense of Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Sedecal, Molecular Imaging, 28119, Algete, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel Udias
- Nuclear Physics Group, EMFTEL and IPARCOS, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University Complutense of Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|