1
|
Warren M, Barrett A, Bhalla N, Brada M, Chuter R, Cobben D, Eccles CL, Hart C, Ibrahim E, McClelland J, Rea M, Turtle L, Fenwick JD. Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D-MRI data using an automatic tumor-based signal reduces stitching artifacts. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14262. [PMID: 38234116 PMCID: PMC11005973 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D-magnetic resonance (4D-MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes. METHODS (4D-MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor-motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison. For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test. RESULTS The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior-inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior-inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05). Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02-0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one. CONCLUSION Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Warren
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | | - Neeraj Bhalla
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Michael Brada
- Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Robert Chuter
- Christie Medical Physics and EngineeringThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - David Cobben
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Cynthia L. Eccles
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- RadiotherapyThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Clare Hart
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Ehab Ibrahim
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Jamie McClelland
- Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Marc Rea
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Louise Turtle
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - John D. Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eiben B, Bertholet J, Tran EH, Wetscherek A, Shiarli AM, Nill S, Oelfke U, McClelland JR. Respiratory motion modelling for MR-guided lung cancer radiotherapy: model development and geometric accuracy evaluation. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055009. [PMID: 38266298 PMCID: PMC10875968 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad222f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Respiratory motion of lung tumours and adjacent structures is challenging for radiotherapy. Online MR-imaging cannot currently provide real-time volumetric information of the moving patient anatomy, therefore limiting precise dose delivery, delivered dose reconstruction, and downstream adaptation methods.Approach.We tailor a respiratory motion modelling framework towards an MR-Linac workflow to estimate the time-resolved 4D motion from real-time data. We develop a multi-slice acquisition scheme which acquires thick, overlapping 2D motion-slices in different locations and orientations, interleaved with 2D surrogate-slices from a fixed location. The framework fits a motion model directly to the input data without the need for sorting or binning to account for inter- and intra-cycle variation of the breathing motion. The framework alternates between model fitting and motion-compensated super-resolution image reconstruction to recover a high-quality motion-free image and a motion model. The fitted model can then estimate the 4D motion from 2D surrogate-slices. The framework is applied to four simulated anthropomorphic datasets and evaluated against known ground truth anatomy and motion. Clinical applicability is demonstrated by applying our framework to eight datasets acquired on an MR-Linac from four lung cancer patients.Main results.The framework accurately reconstructs high-quality motion-compensated 3D images with 2 mm3isotropic voxels. For the simulated case with the largest target motion, the motion model achieved a mean deformation field error of 1.13 mm. For the patient cases residual error registrations estimate the model error to be 1.07 mm (1.64 mm), 0.91 mm (1.32 mm), and 0.88 mm (1.33 mm) in superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and left-right directions respectively for the building (application) data.Significance.The motion modelling framework estimates the patient motion with high accuracy and accurately reconstructs the anatomy. The image acquisition scheme can be flexibly integrated into an MR-Linac workflow whilst maintaining the capability of online motion-management strategies based on cine imaging such as target tracking and/or gating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Eiben
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena H Tran
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna-Maria Shiarli
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang Y, Thielemans K, Price G, McClelland JR. Surrogate-driven respiratory motion model for projection-resolved motion estimation and motion compensated cone-beam CT reconstruction from unsorted projection data. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:025020. [PMID: 38091611 PMCID: PMC10791594 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Objective.As the most common solution to motion artefact for cone-beam CT (CBCT) in radiotherapy, 4DCBCT suffers from long acquisition time and phase sorting error. This issue could be addressed if the motion at each projection could be known, which is a severely ill-posed problem. This study aims to obtain the motion at each time point and motion-free image simultaneously from unsorted projection data of a standard 3DCBCT scan.Approach.Respiration surrogate signals were extracted by the Intensity Analysis method. A general framework was then deployed to fit a surrogate-driven motion model that characterized the relation between the motion and surrogate signals at each time point. Motion model fitting and motion compensated reconstruction were alternatively and iteratively performed. Stochastic subset gradient based method was used to significantly reduce the computation time. The performance of our method was comprehensively evaluated through digital phantom simulation and also validated on clinical scans from six patients.Results.For digital phantom experiments, motion models fitted with ground-truth or extracted surrogate signals both achieved a much lower motion estimation error and higher image quality, compared with non motion-compensated results.For the public SPARE Challenge datasets, more clear lung tissues and less blurry diaphragm could be seen in the motion compensated reconstruction, comparable to the benchmark 4DCBCT images but with a higher temporal resolution. Similar results were observed for two real clinical 3DCBCT scans.Significance.The motion compensated reconstructions and motion models produced by our method will have direct clinical benefit by providing more accurate estimates of the delivered dose and ultimately facilitating more accurate radiotherapy treatments for lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliang Huang
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kris Thielemans
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Price
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng L. Live-view 4D GRASP MRI: A framework for robust real-time respiratory motion tracking with a sub-second imaging latency. Magn Reson Med 2023; 90:1053-1068. [PMID: 37203314 PMCID: PMC10330383 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a framework called live-view golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI for low-latency and high-fidelity real-time volumetric MRI. METHODS Live-view GRASP MRI has two stages. The first one is called an off-view stage and the second one is called a live-view stage. In the off-view stage, 3D k-space data and 2D navigators are acquired alternatively using a new navi-stack-of-stars sampling scheme. A 4D motion database is then generated that contains time-resolved MR images at a sub-second temporal resolution, and each image is linked to a 2D navigator. In the live-view stage, only 2D navigators are acquired. At each time point, a live-view 2D navigator is matched to all the off-view 2D navigators. A 3D image that is linked to the best-matched off-view 2D navigator is then selected for this time point. This framework places the typical acquisition and reconstruction burden of MRI in the off-view stage, enabling low-latency real-time 3D imaging in the live-view stage. The accuracy of live-view GRASP MRI and the robustness of 2D navigators for characterizing respiratory variations and/or body movements were assessed. RESULTS Live-view GRASP MRI can efficiently generate real-time volumetric images that match well with the ground-truth references, with an imaging latency below 500 ms. Compared to 1D navigators, 2D navigators enable more reliable characterization of respiratory variations and/or body movements that may occur throughout the two imaging stages. CONCLUSION Live-view GRASP MRI represents a novel, accurate, and robust framework for real-time volumetric imaging, which can potentially be applied for motion adaptive radiotherapy on MRI-Linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Feng
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huttinga NRF, Bruijnen T, van den Berg CAT, Sbrizzi A. Gaussian Processes for real-time 3D motion and uncertainty estimation during MR-guided radiotherapy. Med Image Anal 2023; 88:102843. [PMID: 37245435 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Respiratory motion during radiotherapy causes uncertainty in the tumor's location, which is typically addressed by an increased radiation area and a decreased dose. As a result, the treatments' efficacy is reduced. The recently proposed hybrid MR-linac scanner holds the promise to efficiently deal with such respiratory motion through real-time adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). For MRgRT, motion-fields should be estimated from MR-data and the radiotherapy plan should be adapted in real-time according to the estimated motion-fields. All of this should be performed with a total latency of maximally 200 ms, including data acquisition and reconstruction. A measure of confidence in such estimated motion-fields is highly desirable, for instance to ensure the patient's safety in case of unexpected and undesirable motion. In this work, we propose a framework based on Gaussian Processes to infer 3D motion-fields and uncertainty maps in real-time from only three readouts of MR-data. We demonstrated an inference frame rate up to 69 Hz including data acquisition and reconstruction, thereby exploiting the limited amount of required MR-data. Additionally, we designed a rejection criterion based on the motion-field uncertainty maps to demonstrate the framework's potential for quality assurance. The framework was validated in silico and in vivo on healthy volunteer data (n=5) acquired using an MR-linac, thereby taking into account different breathing patterns and controlled bulk motion. Results indicate end-point-errors with a 75th percentile below 1 mm in silico, and a correct detection of erroneous motion estimates with the rejection criterion. Altogether, the results show the potential of the framework for application in real-time MR-guided radiotherapy with an MR-linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek R F Huttinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Bruijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Sbrizzi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goodburn RJ, Philippens MEP, Lefebvre TL, Khalifa A, Bruijnen T, Freedman JN, Waddington DEJ, Younus E, Aliotta E, Meliadò G, Stanescu T, Bano W, Fatemi‐Ardekani A, Wetscherek A, Oelfke U, van den Berg N, Mason RP, van Houdt PJ, Balter JM, Gurney‐Champion OJ. The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:2592-2608. [PMID: 36128894 PMCID: PMC9529952 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a major component of cancer treatment pathways worldwide. The main aim of this treatment is to achieve tumor control through the delivery of ionizing radiation while preserving healthy tissues for minimal radiation toxicity. Because radiation therapy relies on accurate localization of the target and surrounding tissues, imaging plays a crucial role throughout the treatment chain. In the treatment planning phase, radiological images are essential for defining target volumes and organs-at-risk, as well as providing elemental composition (e.g., electron density) information for radiation dose calculations. At treatment, onboard imaging informs patient setup and could be used to guide radiation dose placement for sites affected by motion. Imaging is also an important tool for treatment response assessment and treatment plan adaptation. MRI, with its excellent soft tissue contrast and capacity to probe functional tissue properties, holds great untapped potential for transforming treatment paradigms in radiation therapy. The MR in Radiation Therapy ISMRM Study Group was established to provide a forum within the MR community to discuss the unmet needs and fuel opportunities for further advancement of MRI for radiation therapy applications. During the summer of 2021, the study group organized its first virtual workshop, attended by a diverse international group of clinicians, scientists, and clinical physicists, to explore our predictions for the future of MRI in radiation therapy for the next 25 years. This article reviews the main findings from the event and considers the opportunities and challenges of reaching our vision for the future in this expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie J. Goodburn
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Thierry L. Lefebvre
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Aly Khalifa
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Tom Bruijnen
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | | | - David E. J. Waddington
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, ACRF Image X InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyesha Younus
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Eric Aliotta
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Gabriele Meliadò
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Fisica SanitariaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Teo Stanescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Wajiha Bano
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Ali Fatemi‐Ardekani
- Department of PhysicsJackson State University (JSU)JacksonMississippiUSA
- SpinTecxJacksonMississippiUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyCommunity Health Systems (CHS) Cancer NetworkJacksonMississippiUSA
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Nico van den Berg
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Ralph P. Mason
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Petra J. van Houdt
- Department of Radiation OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - James M. Balter
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Oliver J. Gurney‐Champion
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kavaluus H, Koivula L, Salli E, Seppälä T, Saarilahti K, Tenhunen M. Motion modeling from 4D MR images of liver simulating phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13611. [PMID: 35413145 PMCID: PMC9278689 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose A novel method of retrospective liver modeling was developed based on four‐dimensional magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) images. The 4D‐MR images will be utilized in generation of the subject‐specific deformable liver model to be used in radiotherapy planning (RTP). The purpose of this study was to test and validate the developed 4D‐magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method with extensive phantom tests. We also aimed to build a motion model with image registration methods from liver simulating phantom images. Materials and methods A deformable phantom was constructed by combining deformable tissue‐equivalent material and a programmable 4D CIRS‐platform. The phantom was imaged in 1.5 T MRI scanner with T2‐weighted 4D SSFSE and T1‐weighted Ax dual‐echo Dixon SPGR sequences, and in computed tomography (CT). In addition, geometric distortion of the 4D sequence was measured with a GRADE phantom. The motion model was developed; the phases of the 4D‐MRI were used as surrogate data, and displacement vector fields (DVF's) were used as a motion measurement. The motion model and the developed 4D‐MRI method were evaluated and validated with extensive tests. Result The 4D‐MRI method enabled an accuracy of 2 mm using our deformable phantom compared to the 4D‐CT. Results showed a mean accuracy of <2 mm between coordinates and DVF's measured from the 4D images. Three‐dimensional geometric accuracy results with the GRADE phantom were: 0.9‐mm mean and 2.5 mm maximum distortion within a 100 mm distance, and 2.2 mm mean, 5.2 mm maximum distortion within a 150 mm distance from the isocenter. Conclusions The 4D‐MRI method was validated with phantom tests as a necessary step before patient studies. The subject‐specific motion model was generated and will be utilized in the generation of the deformable liver model of patients to be used in RTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henna Kavaluus
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Physics, MATRENA, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lauri Koivula
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Physics, MATRENA, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Salli
- Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Seppälä
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kauko Saarilahti
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mikko Tenhunen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huttinga NRF, Bruijnen T, Van Den Berg CAT, Sbrizzi A. Real-Time Non-Rigid 3D Respiratory Motion Estimation for MR-Guided Radiotherapy Using MR-MOTUS. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2022; 41:332-346. [PMID: 34520351 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3112818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The MR-Linac is a combination of an MR-scanner and radiotherapy linear accelerator (Linac) which holds the promise to increase the precision of radiotherapy treatments with MR-guided radiotherapy by monitoring motion during radiotherapy with MRI, and adjusting the radiotherapy plan accordingly. Optimal MR-guidance for respiratory motion during radiotherapy requires MR-based 3D motion estimation with a latency of 200-500 ms. Currently this is still challenging since typical methods rely on MR-images, and are therefore limited by the 3D MR-imaging latency. In this work, we present a method to perform non-rigid 3D respiratory motion estimation with 170 ms latency, including both acquisition and reconstruction. The proposed method called real-time low-rank MR-MOTUS reconstructs motion-fields directly from k -space data, and leverages an explicit low-rank decomposition of motion-fields to split the large scale 3D+t motion-field reconstruction problem posed in our previous work into two parts: (I) a medium-scale offline preparation phase and (II) a small-scale online inference phase which exploits the results of the offline phase for real-time computations. The method was validated on free-breathing data of five volunteers, acquired with a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Results show that the reconstructed 3D motion-field are anatomically plausible, highly correlated with a self-navigation motion surrogate ( R=0.975 ±0.0110 ), and can be reconstructed with a total latency of 170 ms that is sufficient for real-time MR-guided abdominal radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Probabilistic 4D predictive model from in-room surrogates using conditional generative networks for image-guided radiotherapy. Med Image Anal 2021; 74:102250. [PMID: 34601453 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Shape and location organ variability induced by respiration constitutes one of the main challenges during dose delivery in radiotherapy. Providing up-to-date volumetric information during treatment can improve tumor tracking, thereby increasing treatment efficiency and reducing damage to healthy tissue. We propose a novel probabilistic model to address the problem of volumetric estimation with scalable predictive horizon from image-based surrogates during radiotherapy treatments, thus enabling out-of-plane tracking of targets. This problem is formulated as a conditional learning task, where the predictive variables are the 2D surrogate images and a pre-operative static 3D volume. The model learns a distribution of realistic motion fields over a population dataset. Simultaneously, a seq-2-seq inspired temporal mechanism acts over the surrogate images yielding extrapolated-in-time representations. The phase-specific motion distributions are associated with the predicted temporal representations, allowing the recovery of dense organ deformation in multiple times. Due to its generative nature, this model enables uncertainty estimations by sampling the latent space multiple times. Furthermore, it can be readily personalized to a new subject via fine-tuning, and does not require inter-subject correspondences. The proposed model was evaluated on free-breathing 4D MRI and ultrasound datasets from 25 healthy volunteers, as well as on 11 cancer patients. A navigator-based data augmentation strategy was used during the slice reordering process to increase model robustness against inter-cycle variability. The patient data was used as a hold-out test set. Our approach yields volumetric prediction from image surrogates with a mean error of 1.67 ± 1.68 mm and 2.17 ± 0.82 mm in unseen cases of the patient MRI and US datasets, respectively. Moreover, model personalization yields a mean landmark error of 1.4 ± 1.1 mm compared to ground truth annotations in the volunteer MRI dataset, with statistically significant improvements over state-of-the-art.
Collapse
|
10
|
Polycarpou I, Soultanidis G, Tsoumpas C. Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2021; 379:20200207. [PMID: 34218675 PMCID: PMC8255946 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Subject motion in positron emission tomography (PET) is a key factor that degrades image resolution and quality, limiting its potential capabilities. Correcting for it is complicated due to the lack of sufficient measured PET data from each position. This poses a significant barrier in calculating the amount of motion occurring during a scan. Motion correction can be implemented at different stages of data processing either during or after image reconstruction, and once applied accurately can substantially improve image quality and information accuracy. With the development of integrated PET-MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scanners, internal organ motion can be measured concurrently with both PET and MRI. In this review paper, we explore the synergistic use of PET and MRI data to correct for any motion that affects the PET images. Different types of motion that can occur during PET-MRI acquisitions are presented and the associated motion detection, estimation and correction methods are reviewed. Finally, some highlights from recent literature in selected human and animal imaging applications are presented and the importance of motion correction for accurate kinetic modelling in dynamic PET-MRI is emphasized. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synergistic tomographic image reconstruction: part 2'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Polycarpou
- Department of Health Sciences, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Georgios Soultanidis
- Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charalampos Tsoumpas
- Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Biomedical Imaging Science Department, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Invicro, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Dhont J, Fiorino C, Green O, Güngör G, Jornet N, Klüter S, Landry G, Mattiucci GC, Placidi L, Reynaert N, Ruggieri R, Tanadini-Lang S, Thorwarth D, Yadav P, Yang Y, Valentini V, Verellen D, Indovina L. Artificial Intelligence in magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy: Medical and physical considerations on state of art and future perspectives. Phys Med 2021; 85:175-191. [PMID: 34022660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last years, technological innovation in Radiotherapy (RT) led to the introduction of Magnetic Resonance-guided RT (MRgRT) systems. Due to the higher soft tissue contrast compared to on-board CT-based systems, MRgRT is expected to significantly improve the treatment in many situations. MRgRT systems may extend the management of inter- and intra-fraction anatomical changes, offering the possibility of online adaptation of the dose distribution according to daily patient anatomy and to directly monitor tumor motion during treatment delivery by means of a continuous cine MR acquisition. Online adaptive treatments require a multidisciplinary and well-trained team, able to perform a series of operations in a safe, precise and fast manner while the patient is waiting on the treatment couch. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is expected to rapidly contribute to MRgRT, primarily by safely and efficiently automatising the various manual operations characterizing online adaptive treatments. Furthermore, AI is finding relevant applications in MRgRT in the fields of image segmentation, synthetic CT reconstruction, automatic (on-line) planning and the development of predictive models based on daily MRI. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current AI integration in MRgRT from a medical physicist's perspective. Medical physicists are expected to be major actors in solving new tasks and in taking new responsibilities: their traditional role of guardians of the new technology implementation will change with increasing emphasis on the managing of AI tools, processes and advanced systems for imaging and data analysis, gradually replacing many repetitive manual tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Cusumano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Görkem Güngör
- Acıbadem MAA University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Maslak Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Núria Jornet
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Spain
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Nick Reynaert
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica Avanzata, IRCCS "Sacro cuore - don Calabria", Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tüebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Human Oncology School of Medicine and Public Heath University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, USA
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Medical Physics, Iridium Cancer Network, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Luca Indovina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|