Evaluation of four breath-enhanced nebulizers for home use

Effect of Disinfection Method and Testing Methodology on the Performance of a Breath-Enhanced Jet Nebulizer

National guidelines for cystic fibrosis recommend cleaning and disinfecting nebulizers after each use. We tested two groups of five reusable breath-enhanced nebulizers after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 sterilization (baby bottle sterilizer) or cleaning cycles. The nebulizers were operated for 7 min (6 L/min) after loading albuterol (2.5 mg/3 mL), and they were evaluated with and without breathing simulation after cleaning/sterilization (0-180 and 0-60 cycles, respectively). Over the course of 180 cleaning/sterilization cycles, the mean (SD) solution output was 1.33 mL (0.12 mL)/1.29 mL (0.08 mL); the nebulizer mass remaining in the nebulizer was 61.5% (5.2%)/63% (4%); sputtering time was 4.7 min (0.8 min)/4.8 s (0.6 min); inspiratory filter was 19% (3%)/18.5% (2.4%); expiratory filter was 6.7% (1.1%)/6.7% (0.8%); and difference in drug output calculated using the solution output and nebulizer mass was 6.8% (4%)/5.2% (2.9%). Thermal disinfection with a baby-bottle sterilizer did not alter the performance of a reusable breath-enhanced nebulizer. The nebulizer test performed without breathing simulation underestimated its performance. The calculation of the drug output based on the solution output resulted in its overestimation.

Enhanced Optimal Parameter-Based Nebulizer Design for Flow Analysis of Fluticasone Propionate

A jet nebulizer sprays a fine mist or aerosol directly into the lungs to reduce inflammation, expand airways, and make breathing easier for respiratory patients. Asthma, COPD, emphysema, and cystic fibrosis are treated with jet nebulizers. They are chosen over other nebulizers for their shorter treatment time and wider medication compatibility. For mechanically ventilated patients, jet nebulizers humidify oxygen to provide bronchodilators, antibiotics, and other respiratory medications. Additionally, they treat pneumonia, bronchitis, and other lung infections. Aerosol therapy requires medical jet nebulizers. However, experiment setup is time-consuming and challenging to enhance smaller droplet output. The study is aimed at enhancing the nebulizer and process parameters using numerical simulation and comparing the results to experimental data from the Malvern Spraytec™ laser diffraction system. This numerical model improves nebulization knowledge and predicts process parameters that affect output. Ansys Fluent was used to analyze a Creo-designed jet nebulizer solid model. The Spraytec™ experimental method was utilized to characterize fluticasone propionate's aerosol output and build the best nebulizer. Laser diffraction and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis measured the nebulizer aerosol output. Comparing particle size data between 2 and 5 μm. The results are similar, with a difference of 4.20%. Taguchi optimization found the optimal process parameter, and a conformation test enhanced the process parameter. The nebulizer generates 8.57% more fluticasone propionate at optimal particle size. The optimized nebulizer generates aerosols reliably and speeds up patient recovery.

In vitro delivery efficiencies of nebulizers for different breathing patterns

BACKGROUND

Nebulizers are medical devices that deliver aerosolized medication directly to lungs to treat a variety of respiratory diseases. However, breathing patterns, respiration rates, airway diameters, and amounts of drugs delivered by nebulizers may be respiratory disease dependent.

METHOD

In this study, we developed a respiratory simulator consisting of an airway model, an artificial lung, a flow sensor, and an aerosol collecting filter. Various breathing patterns were generated using a linear actuator and an air cylinder. We tested six home nebulizers (jet (2), static (2), and vibrating mesh nebulizers (2)). Nebulizers were evaluated under two conditions, that is, for the duration of nebulization and at a constant output 1.3 mL using four breathing patterns, namely, the breathing pattern specified in ISO 27427:2013, normal adult, asthmatic, and COPD.

RESULTS

One of the vibrating mesh nebulizers had the highest dose delivery efficiency. The drug delivery efficiencies of nebulizers were found to depend on breathing patterns.

CONCLUSION

We suggest a quantitative drug delivery efficiency evaluation method and calculation parameters that include considerations of constant outputs and residual volumes. The study shows output rates and breathing patterns should be considered when the drug delivery efficiencies of nebulizers are evaluated.

Effect of nebulizer type, delivery interface, and flow rate on aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously breathing pediatric and infant lung models

BACKGROUND

Different types of nebulizers, interfaces, and flow rates are used to deliver aerosolized medications to children. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of nebulizer type, delivery interface, and flow rate on aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously breathing pediatric and infant lung models.

METHODOLOGY

A teaching mannequin was attached to a sinusoidal pump via a collecting filter at the bronchi to simulate a spontaneously breathing child (Vt: 250 mL, RR: 20 bpm and Ti: 1 second) and infant (Vt = 100 mL, RR = 30 bpm, Ti: 0.7 seconds). Albuterol sulfate was nebulized with jet (Misty Max 10; Cardinal Health) and mesh (Aerogen Solo; Aerogen) nebulizers using a low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC; Hudson), a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC; Fisher & Paykel), face mask (FM; Hudson), and mouthpiece (MP; Cardinal Health). While all interfaces were used in the pediatric study, only LFNC, HFNC, and FM were tested in the infant study. The mesh nebulizer was tested at 2, 4, and 6 L/min with LFNC, 4 and 6 L/min with HFNC, and 6 L/min with FM and MP. The jet nebulizer was operated at 6 and 8 L/min with FM and 6 L/min with LFNC, HFNC, and MP (n = 5). The drug was eluted from the filter and analyzed by spectrophotometry. Factorial analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons were used for data analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Delivery efficiency of mesh nebulizers is two to fourfold more than jet nebulizers used with HFNC, FM, and MP. No statistical difference was found between jet and mesh nebulizers used with LFNC in infants (P = .643) and pediatrics (P = .255). Aerosol delivery with MP was the best compared to other interfaces used in pediatrics (P < .05). As the second-best interface in aerosol drug delivery, the delivery efficiency of FM was greater than HFNC (P = .0001) and LFNC (P = .0001). Increasing flow rate with LFNC and HFNC decreased aerosol delivery with the mesh nebulizer in both infants and pediatrics.

CONCLUSION

The type of nebulizer, delivery interface, and flow rate used in the treatment of children affect aerosol drug delivery.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Breath-Enhanced to Conventional Nebulizers in the Treatment of Children with Acute Asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a breath-enhanced and a conventional jet nebulizer in the treatment of children with moderate to severe acute asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled subjects between 6 and 18 years of age presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma and an initial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) <70% of predicted. We excluded patients with chronic disease, who required immediate resuscitation, or failed spirometry. Subjects were randomized to breath-enhanced or conventional jet delivery of a 5-mg albuterol treatment. Our primary outcome was change in FEV₁, and secondary outcomes included change in clinical asthma scores, ED length of stay, disposition, and side effects. Student t test and multivariable linear regression were used to evaluate the primary outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 497 patients were assessed for eligibility with 118 enrolled and 107 subjects available for analysis of the primary outcome. Improvement in FEV₁ was significantly greater with conventional jet nebulizer (mean ΔFEV₁ +13.8% vs +9.1%, P = .04). This difference remained significant after adjustment for baseline differences. Subgroup analysis of 57 subjects with spirometry meeting American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines yielded similar results (mean ΔFEV₁ +14.5% vs +8.5%, P=.03). There were no significant differences in clinical asthma scores, ED length of stay, disposition, or side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Albuterol delivered via conventional jet nebulizer resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV₁ than albuterol delivered by breath-enhanced nebulizer, without significant differences in clinical measures. Conventional jet nebulizers may deliver albuterol to children with acute asthma more effectively than breath-enhanced nebulizers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02566902.

Comparison of a rapid albuterol pathway with a standard pathway for the treatment of children with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if a rapid albuterol delivery pathway with a breath-enhanced nebulizer can reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), while maintaining admission rates and side effects, when compared to a traditional asthma pathway with a standard jet nebulizer.

METHODS

Children aged 3-18 presenting to a large urban pediatric ED for asthma were enrolled if they were determined by pediatric asthma score to have a moderate to severe exacerbation. Subjects were randomized to either a standard treatment arm where they received up to 2 continuous albuterol nebulizations, or a rapid albuterol arm where they received up to 4 rapid albuterol treatments with a breath-enhanced nebulizer, depending on severity scoring. The primary endpoint was ED LOS from enrollment until disposition decision. Asthma scores, albuterol dose, side effects, and return visits were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 50 subjects were enrolled (25 in each arm). The study LOS was shorter in the rapid albuterol group (118 vs. 163 minutes, p = 0.0002). When total ED LOS was analyzed, the difference was no longer statistically significant (192 vs. 203 minutes, p = 0.65). There were no statistically significant differences with respect to admission rates, asthma score changes, side effects, or return visits.

CONCLUSION

A rapid albuterol treatment pathway that utilizes a breath-enhanced nebulizer is an effective alternative to traditional pathways that utilize continuous nebulizations for children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations in the ED.

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests

This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Operating in Inspiratory Synchronized and Continuous Nebulization Modes During Noninvasive Ventilation

Backround: Coupling nebulization with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in patients with respiratory diseases. However, a breath-synchronized nebulization option that could potentially improve drug delivery by limiting drug loss during exhalation is currently not available on bilevel ventilators. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare aerosol delivery of amikacin with a vibrating mesh nebulizer coupled to a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, using conventional continuous (Conti-Neb) and experimental inspiratory synchronized (Inspi-Neb) nebulization modes.

METHODS

Using an adult lung bench model of NIV, we tested a vibrating mesh device coupled with a bilevel ventilator in both nebulization modes. Inspi-Neb delivered aerosol only during the whole inspiratory phase, whereas Conti-Neb delivered aerosol continuously. The nebulizer was charged with amikacin solution (250 mg/3 mL) and placed at two different positions: between the lung and exhalation port and between the ventilator and exhalation port. Inhaled, expiratory wasted and circuit lost doses were assessed by residual gravimetric method. Particle size distribution of aerosol delivered at the outlet of the ventilator circuit during both nebulization modes was measured by laser diffraction method.

RESULTS

Regardless of the nebulizer position, Inspi-Neb produced higher inhaled dose (p < 0.01; +6.3% to +16.8% of the nominal dose), lower expiratory wasted dose (p < 0.05; -2.7% to -42.6% of the nominal dose), and greater respirable dose (p < 0.01; +8.4% to +15.2% of the nominal dose) than Conti-Neb. The highest respirable dose was found with the nebulizer placed between the lung and exhalation port (48.7% ± 0.3% of the nominal dose).

CONCLUSIONS

During simulated NIV with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, the use of inspiratory synchronized vibrating mesh nebulization improves respirable dose and reduces drug loss of amikacin compared with continuous vibrating mesh nebulization.

Aerosol Delivery of siRNA to the Lungs. Part 1: Rationale for Gene Delivery Systems

This article reviews the pulmonary route of administration, aerosol delivery devices, characterization of pulmonary drug delivery systems, and discusses the rationale for inhaled delivery of siRNA. Diseases with known protein malfunctions may be mitigated through the use of siRNA therapeutics. The inhalation route of administration provides local delivery of siRNA therapeutics for the treatment of various pulmonary diseases, however barriers to pulmonary delivery and intracellular delivery of siRNA exists. siRNA loaded nanocarriers can be used to overcome the barriers associated with the pulmonary route, such as anatomical barriers, mucociliary clearance, and alveolar macrophage clearance. Apart from naked siRNA aerosol delivery, previously studied siRNA carrier systems comprise of lipidic, polymeric, peptide, or inorganic origin. Such siRNA delivery systems formulated as aerosols can be successfully delivered via an inhaler or nebulizer to the pulmonary region. Preclinical animal investigations of inhaled siRNA therapeutics rely on intratracheal and intranasal siRNA and siRNA nanocarrier delivery. Aerosolized siRNA delivery systems may be characterized using in vitro techniques, such as dissolution test, inertial cascade impaction, delivered dose uniformity assay, laser diffraction, and laser Doppler velocimetry. The ex vivo techniques used to characterize pulmonary administered formulations include the isolated perfused lung model. In vivo techniques like gamma scintigraphy, 3D SPECT, PET, MRI, fluorescence imaging and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics analysis may be used for evaluation of aerosolized siRNA delivery systems. The use of inhalable siRNA delivery systems encounters barriers to their delivery, however overcoming the barriers while formulating a safe and effective delivery system will offer unique advances to the field of inhaled medicine.

Safety and Tolerability of Nebulized Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid in Patients with COPD (STONAC 1 and STONAC 2)

The safety and tolerability of nebulized amoxicillin clavulanic acid were determined in patients with stable COPD and during severe exacerbations of COPD. Nine stable COPD patients received doses ranging from 50:10 mg up to 300:60 mg amoxicillin clavulanic acid and eight patients hospitalised for a COPD exacerbation received fixed doses 200/40 mg twice daily. Safety was evaluated by spirometry before and after inhalation. Tolerability was evaluated by questionnaire. Plasma and expectorated sputum samples were assayed for amoxicillin content. Seventeen patients underwent in total 100 nebulizations with amoxicillin clavulanic acid. In this safety and tolerability study no clinically relevant deteriorations in FEV1 were observed. Nebulized amoxicillin clavulanic acid produces sputum concentrations well above the Minimal Inhibiting Concentration of 90% for potential pathogenic micro-organisms, with low concentrations in the central compartment (low systemic exposure). Based on spirometry and reported side effects, inhalation of nebulized amoxicillin clavulanic acid seems to be safe and well tolerated, both in stable patients with COPD as in those experiencing a severe exacerbation. Levels of amoxicillin were adequate.

Modeling breath-enhanced jet nebulizers to estimate pulmonary drug deposition

BACKGROUND

Predictable delivery of aerosol medication for a given patient and drug-device combination is crucial, both for therapeutic effect and to avoid toxicity. The gold standard for measuring pulmonary drug deposition (PDD) is gamma scintigraphy. However, these techniques expose patients to radiation, are complicated, and are relevant for only one patient and drug-device combination, making them less available. Alternatively, in vitro experiments have been used as a surrogate to estimate in vivo performance, but this is time-consuming and has few "in vitro to in vivo" correlations for therapeutics delivered by inhalation. An alternative method for determining inhaled mass and PDD is proposed by deriving and validating a mathematical model, for the individual breathing patterns of normal subjects and drug-device operating parameters. This model was evaluated for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

METHODS

This study is comprised of three stages: mathematical model derivation, in vitro testing, and in vivo validation. The model was derived from an idealized patient's respiration cycle and the steady-state operating characteristics of a drug-device combination. The model was tested under in vitro dynamic conditions that varied tidal volume, inspiration-to-expiration time, and breaths per minute. This approach was then extended to incorporate additional physiological parameters (dead space, aerodynamic particle size distribution) and validated against in vivo nuclear medicine data in predicting PDD in both normal subjects and those with CF.

RESULTS

The model shows strong agreement with in vitro testing. In vivo testing with normal subjects yielded good agreement, but less agreement for patients with chronic obstructive lung disease and bronchiectasis from CF.

CONCLUSIONS

The mathematical model was successful in accommodating a wide range of breathing patterns and drug-device combinations. Furthermore, the model has demonstrated its effectiveness in predicting the amount of aerosol delivered to "normal" subjects. However, challenges remain in predicting deposition in obstructive lung disease.

A comparison of amount and speed of deposition between the PARI LC STAR® jet nebulizer and an investigational eFlow® nebulizer

BACKGROUND

The potency and physical properties of many of the drugs used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis necessitates the use of nebulization, a relatively time-consuming pulmonary delivery method. Newer, faster, and more efficient delivery systems are being proposed. The purposes of this study was to compare the length of time it took to deliver the equivalent of normal saline nebulized for 10 min in a PARI LC STAR(®) nebulizer to that of an investigational PARI eFlow(®).

METHODS

Six normal adults inhaled a 4-mL (36-mg) charge volume of saline from the LC STAR(®) or a 2.5-mL (22.5-mg) charge volume from the investigational eFlow(®). The saline was mixed with (99m)Tc-DTPA to allow two-dimensional imaging. The inhalation was preceded by a xenon equilibration scan to allow more accurate separation of deposition into central and peripheral lung regions.

RESULTS

The investigational eFlow(®) delivered 8.6 ± 1.0 mg, approximately 90% of the lung dose compared to the LC STAR(®), 9.6 ± 1.0 mg, but did in less than half the time (p < 0.02 for both). There were no differences in central versus peripheral distribution for either device.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion the investigational eFlow(®) was both faster and more efficient than the LC STAR(®).

In vitro deposition properties of nebulized formoterol fumarate: effect of nebulization time, airflow, volume of fill and nebulizer type

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the delivery of a new long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) drug formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (20 microg/2 mL) nebulized with and without ipratropium bromide (0.5 mg/2.5 mL) at different administration times (2.5-22.5 min), airflows (5-28.3 L/min), nebulizer fill volumes (2-6 mL),and nebulizer brands (Pari LC+, Ventstream and DeVilbiss).

METHOD

Formoterol fumarate with and without ipratropium bromide was aerosolized at different administration times, airflows, nebulizer fill volumes, and nebulizer brands. The drug deposited on the throat, filter and stage plates was collected and analyzed by HPLC to determine the aerodynamic profiles of the nebulized drugs under each variable.

RESULTS

In addition to altering the aerosol characteristics,increasing the nebulizer fill volume including the addition of ipratropium bromide produced a significant(p50.05) increase in the drug output. As expected, sputtering time was significantly longer at low airflows, and vice versa at higher airflows but with a significant loss of drug delivered presumably due to greater solvent evaporation at higher airflows. Airflows between 10 and 28.3 L/min and a nebulization time of approximately 10 min appear sufficient for producing aerosols within the respirable range (1-5 mm MMAD) with the nebulizer/compressor combination used.While the drug output varied significantly (p50.05) among the three brands of nebulizers tested, the LC+ nebulizer appears to produce aerosols (2.7 0.1 microm MMAD) capable of penetrating more deeply into the lung than the other nebulizers evaluated under the current test conditions. This study did not attempt to evaluate different nebulizer/compressor combinations. Also, the cascade impaction data may not necessarily reflect aerosol deposition in the airways in vivo, which may be different depending on the health status of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that administration of nebulized formoterol fumarate require proper selection of a delivery system/method for safe and effective therapy of the medication with and without ipratropium bromide.

Current therapies and technological advances in aqueous aerosol drug delivery

Recent advances in aerosolization technology have led to renewed interest in pulmonary delivery of a variety of drugs. Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have experienced success in recent years; however, many limitations are presented by formulation difficulties, inefficient delivery, and complex device designs. Simplification of the formulation process as well as adaptability of new devices has led many in the pharmaceutical industry to reconsider aerosolization in an aqueous carrier. In the acute care setting, breath-enhanced air-jet nebulizers are controlling and minimizing the amount of wasted medication, while producing a high percentage of respirable droplets. Vibrating mesh nebulizers offer advantages in higher respirable fractions (RFs) and slower velocity aerosols when compared with air-jet nebulizers. Vibrating mesh nebulizers incorporating formulation and patient adaptive components provide improvements to continuous nebulization technology by generating aerosol only when it is most likely to reach the deep lung. Novel innovations in generation of liquid aerosols are now being adapted for propellant-free pulmonary drug delivery to achieve unprecedented control over dose delivered and are leading the way for the adaptation of systemic drugs for delivery via the pulmonary route. Devices designed for the metered dose delivery of insulin, morphine, sildenafil, triptans, and various peptides are all currently under investigation for pulmonary delivery to treat nonrespiratory diseases. Although these devices are currently still in clinical testing (with the exception of the Respimat), metered dose liquid inhalers (MDLIs) have already shown superior outcomes to current pulmonary and systemic delivery methods.

Compatibility and aerosol characteristics of formoterol fumarate mixed with other nebulizing solutions

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often given admixtures of nebulizable drugs to minimize the time of administration in treatment regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the physicochemical compatibility and aerodynamic characteristics of formoterol fumarate 20 microg/2 mL when mixed or sequentially nebulized with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg/2 mL, ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg/2.5 mL, cromolyn sodium 20 mg/2 mL, or acetylcysteine 10% (100 mg/mL).

METHODS

The admixtures were prepared in triplicate and analyzed for physicochemical compatibility at 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after mixing at room temperature. Physical compatibility was determined by visual examination and measurements of pH, osmolality, and turbidity. Chemical stability was evaluated using compendial or in-house-validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay methods. The aerodynamic characteristics of the admixtures or sequentially nebulized drugs were determined from aerosols generated from a Pari LC Plus nebulizer, using an 8-stage cascade impactor followed by HPLC analysis of the deposited drug.

RESULTS

The admixtures remained clear, colorless solutions with no precipitation, except for cloudiness observed in the formoterol/budesonide combination due to budesonide suspension. The pH, osmolality, and turbidity for all admixtures were within the initial values (< or = 3%), and there were no significant changes (< or = 2%) in potency of the active components throughout the 1-hour study period. Due to increased drug volume or reconcentration in the nebulizer cup, the respirable fraction/delivered dose increased significantly (p < 0.05) for the mixed or sequentially nebulized drug. However, the fine particle fraction (FPF), mass median aerodynamic diameter, and geometric standard deviation generally remained unchanged for all admixtures, with the exception of FPF for the formoterol/budesonide combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that admixtures of formoterol with budesonide, ipratropium, cromolyn, or acetylcysteine are physically and chemically compatible. However, admixing or sequential nebulization significantly increased the amount of drug delivered compared with single drug nebulization. The clinical implications of the in vitro data in patients with COPD have not been determined.

Influence of Impactor Operating Flow Rate on Particle Size Distribution of Four Jet Nebulizers

When a nebulizer is evaluated by the Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI), the flow rate is generally maintained at 28.3 L/min, as recommended by the manufacturer. However, the nebulizer flow rate that a patient inhales is only around 18 L/min. Because the drive flow of a nebulizer is approximately 6-8 L/min, the nebulized drug is mixed with outside air when delivered. Evaluating impactor performance at the 28.3 L/min flow rate is less than ideal because an additional 10 L/min of outside air is mixed with the drug, thereby affecting the drug size distribution and dose before inhalation and deposition in the human lung. In this study we operated the ACI at an 18.0 L/min flow rate to test whether the effect of the changing ambient humidity was being exaggerated by the 28.3 L/min flow rate. The study was carried out at three different relative humidity levels and two different impactor flow rates with four commercially available nebulizers. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and the geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the droplets were found to increase when the impactor was operated at a flow rate of 18 L/min compared to that of 28.3 L/min. The higher MMAD and GSD could cause the patient to inhale less of the drug than expected if the nebulizer was evaluated by the ACI at the operating flow rate of 28.3 L/min.

Calculating expected lung deposition of aerosolized administration of AAV vector in human clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive disease affecting approximately 1 in 2500 live births. Introducing the cDNA that codes for normal cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to the small airways of the lung could result in restoring the CFTR function. A number of vectors for lung gene therapy have been tried and adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors offer promise. The vector is delivered to the lung using a breath-actuated jet nebulizer. The purpose of this project was to determine the aerosolized AAV (tgAAVCF) particle size distribution (PSD) in order to calculate target doses for lung delivery.

METHODS

A tgAAVCF solution was nebulized using the Pari LC Plus (n = 3), and the PSD was determined by coupling laser diffraction and inertial impaction (NGI) techniques. The NGI allowed for quantification of the tgAAVCF at each stage of impaction, ensuring that rAAV-CFTR vector is present and not empty particles. Applying the results to mathematical algorithms allowed for the calculation of expected pulmonary deposition.

RESULTS

The mass median diameter (MMD) for the tgAAVCF was 2.78 +/- 0.43 microm. If the system works ideally and the patient only receives aerosol on inspiration, the patient would receive 47 +/- 0% of the initial dose placed in the nebulizer, with 72 +/- 0.73% of this being deposited beyond the vocal cords.

CONCLUSIONS

This technology for categorizing the pulmonary delivery system for lung gene therapy vectors can be adapted for advanced aerosol delivery systems or other vectors.

Dry powder inhalation of colistin in cystic fibrosis patients: a single dose pilot study

BACKGROUND

Dry powder inhalation (DPI) may be an alternative to nebulisation of drugs in the treatment of chest infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In a pilot study the feasibility of a colistin dry powder inhaler (prototype Twincer) by a single dose in CF-patients was assessed and compared to nebulised colistin.

METHODS

Ten CF-patients, chronically infected with P. aeruginosa, participated in a randomised cross over study. On two visits to the outpatient clinic, patients inhaled colistin sulphomethate as 25 mg dry powder (Twincer) or as 158 mg nebulised solution (Ventstream nebuliser, PortaNeb compressor). Pulmonary function tests were performed before, 5 and 30 min after inhalation. Serum samples were drawn prior to each dose and at 15, 45 min, 1.5; 2.5; 3.5 and 5.5 h after inhalation.

RESULTS

The DPI was well tolerated by the patients: no significant reduction in FEV1 was observed. Relative bioavailability of DPI to nebulisation was approx. 140% based on actual dose and approx. 270% based on drug dose label claim.

CONCLUSIONS

The colistin DPI (Twincer inhaler) is well tolerated and appreciated by CF-patients. Optimisation with respect to particle size and internal resistance of the inhaler is necessary to attain equivalent pulmonary deposition to liquid nebulisation.

High-dose inhaled fluticasone does not replace oral prednisolone in children with mild to moderate acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are not as effective as oral corticosteroids in school-aged children with severe acute asthma. It is uncertain how inhaled corticosteroids compare with oral corticosteroids in mild to moderate exacerbations.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to determine whether there is a significant difference in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children with mild to moderate acute asthma treated with either inhaled fluticasone or oral prednisolone.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind controlled trial conducted between 2001 and 2004 in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. We studied a convenience sample of 69 previously healthy children 5 to 17 years of age with acute asthma and forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 50% to 79% predicted value; 41 families refused participation. Albuterol was given in the emergency department and salmeterol was given after discharge to all patients, as well as either 2 mg of fluticasone via metered dose inhaler and valved holding chamber in the emergency department plus 500 microg twice daily via Diskus for 10 doses after discharge (fluticasone group, N = 35) or 2 mg/kg of oral prednisolone in the emergency department plus 5 daily doses of 1 mg/kg of prednisolone after discharge (prednisolone group, N = 34). We measured a priori defined absolute change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline to 4 and 48 hours in the 2 groups. RESULTS. At 240 minutes, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased by 19.1% +/- 12.7% in the fluticasone group and 29.8% +/- 15.5% in the prednisolone group. At 48 hours, this difference was no longer significant (estimated difference: 4.0 +/- 3.4; P = .14). The relapse rates by 48 hours were 12.5% and 0% in the fluticasone group and prednisolone group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Airway obstruction in children with mild to moderate acute asthma in the emergency department improves faster on oral than inhaled corticosteroids.

Nebulized therapies for childhood pulmonary hypertension: an in vitro model

OBJECTIVES

Sildenafil, tezosentan, and prostacyclin reduce pulmonary vascular pressures in pulmonary hypertension, but have potential to vasodilate the systemic circulation. Nebulized vasodilators allow targeted drug delivery, high local drug concentrations, less systemic hypotension, and better matching of the lung's ventilation and perfusion. We aimed to estimate pulmonary deposition of these drugs from commonly employed nebulizers using in vitro techniques and to create a mathematical model to predict inspired mass of aerosol.

DESIGN

Lung deposition was estimated by characterization of drug output and particle size distribution (PSD) of nebulizers using helium-neon laser diffraction techniques. A mathematical model for each device was created to estimate pulmonary deposition using patients' breathing patterns and was verified with a mechanical-breathing model.

RESULTS

Total output and PSD were similar for the Hudson Updraft II and Whisperjet nebulizers, consisting of half the nebulizer's charge, with (1/4) of particles < or = 5 microm, in the respirable fraction (RF). Drug output increased with inspiratory flow for the Pari LC Star. Differences were noted in device performance, depending on the drug tested. Estimated pulmonary deposition (mean, 95% CI) was 8.1 (7.2, 9.0)% of the initial drug charge for the Hudson Updraft II, 6.4 (5.8, 7.0)% for the Whisperjet, and 33.0 (28.3, 37.9)% for the Pari LC Star. A mechanical model was consistent with our mathematical model.

CONCLUSIONS

All drugs could be nebulized, but expected pulmonary deposition varied depending on the nebulizer and drug.

Variation in pediatric aerosol delivery: importance of facemask

We have quantified in vitro the influence of the facemask on the amount of drug delivered (e.g., inhaled mass) by jet nebulizer and pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) valved holding chamber (VHC) combinations (non-detergent-coated and detergent-coated). Pediatric breathing patterns were used with a breathing simulator, which was connected to a face onto which each device was positioned. An inhaled mass filter interposed between the simulator and the face captured the aerosolized drug. Budesonide inhalation suspension (0.25 mg) was used with the jet nebulizers and fluticasone propionate (220 microg) pMDI with the VHCs. Maximal drug delivery was measured using constant flow through each device. Breathing pattern effects were assessed for sealed devices (no leaks) and with facemasks (possible leaks at the facemask). Inhaled mass from both nebulizers and pMDI VHCs was affected by breathing pattern, but compared to nebulizers the pMDI VHCs were significantly more variable and sensitive to several factors. The influence of VHC conditioning combined with effects of breathing pattern resulted in the inhaled mass ranging from 0.7 +/- 0.5 to 53.3 +/- 6.2%. Nebulizers were less variable (9.6 +/- 0.7 to 24.3 +/- 3.1%). Detergent coating of VHC markedly increased the inhaled mass and reproducibility of drug delivery (27.2 +/- 1.4 to 53.3 +/- 6.2%) for pMDI VHC combinations, but these effects were lost in the presence of facemasks. Using pediatric patterns of breathing, nebulizer/facemask combinations delivered 4.1 +/- 0.8 to 19.3 +/- 2.3% of the label dose while pMDI and detergent-coated VHC delivered 4.0 +/- 1.6 to 28.6 +/- 2.5%. Facemask seal is a key factor in drug delivery. Leaks around the facemask reduce drug delivery and for pMDI VHCs can negate effects of detergent coating.

Evaluation of Nebulizer Performance under Various Humidity Conditions

Jet nebulizers are a drug delivery tool commonly used for treating respiratory diseases. When a nebulizer generates aerosols, the rate at which droplets evaporate depends on humidity conditions around the nebulizer outlet. Because the relative humidity (RH) of the air affects the evaporation rate, the aerosol distribution and drug delivery dose is also affected by RH. Four nebulizers were chosen for comparison in this study: PARI LC Plus (PARI Respiratory Equipment, Inc., Midlothian, VA), SideStream (Medic-Aid Ltd., UK), VixOne (Westmed, Inc., Tucson, AZ), and Micromist (Hudson Respiratory Care Inc., Temecula, CA). Two different formulations were used: albuterol (liquid solution) and budesonide (suspension). Particle distribution (mass median aerodynamic diameter [MMAD] and geometric standard deviation [GSD]), nebulizer efficiency (total efficiency and respirable fraction [RF] efficiency for particles less than 4.7 microm), and dead volume (the amount of solution remaining after nebulization) were compared at the RH of 5%, 50%, and 80%. Our results showed that the MMAD increased (p value varied from <0.001 to 0.016) with the increase in RH, except for with the VixOne unit with albuterol (p = 0.24). The MMAD from the budesonide always appeared higher than from the albuterol. The RF (and thus, the inhalation dose) was lower with a higher RH. Except for the PARI LC Plus with budesonide, the RF decreased approximately 15-27% when the RH rose from 5% to 50%. For the PARI LC Plus nebulizer, the lower dead volume (0.22 mL) with higher residual drugs (62.3% of total drug) was obtained at an RH of 5% comparing the RH of 50% and 80% because of the unit's unique design.

Bronchial constriction and inhaled colistin in cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Inhaled colistin is used for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients despite reports of chest tightness and bronchospasm. The main objective of the study was to assess whether bronchospasm occurred in pediatric CF patients with or without clinical evidence of airway hyperreactivity.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective placebo-controlled clinical trial with crossover design was devised using challenge tests with 75 mg colistin in 4 mL saline solution and a placebo solution of the same osmolarity using a breath-enhanced nebulizer for administration. Subjects were recruited as follows: high risk (HR) for bronchospasm due to a personal history of recurrent wheezing, a family history of asthma and/or atopy, or bronchial lability, as demonstrated in pulmonary function tests; or low risk (LR) without these characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean FEV(1) (expressed as the mean [+/- SD] fall from baseline) of the HR group (n = 12) fell 12 +/- 9% after placebo was administered, and fell 17 +/- 10% after colistin was administered. For the LR group (n = 8), the mean FEV(1) fell 9 +/- 4% following placebo administration and 13 +/- 8% following colistin administration. There was a greater number of subjects in the HR group compared to the LR group, which had a mean fall in FEV(1) of >/= 15% (p < 0.01) after inhaling colistin. The differences between placebo and colistin therapy in the LR group were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that colistin can cause bronchospasm, particularly in those patients with coexisting CF and asthma.

Comparison of Breath-Enhanced to Breath-Actuated Nebulizers for Rate, Consistency, and Efficiency

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate differences between three new-generation nebulizers-Pari LC Star (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Mississauga, ON, Canada), AeroEclipse (Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada), and Halolite (Medic-Aid Limited, West Sussex, UK)-in terms of rate and amount of expected deposition as well as the consistency of the doses delivered.

METHODS

The in vitro performance characteristics were determined and then coupled to the respiratory pattern of seven patients with cystic fibrosis (age range, 4 to 18 years) in order to calculate expected deposition. The Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse were characterized while being driven by the Pari ProNeb Ultra compressor (Pari Respiratory Equipment) for home use, and by a 50-psi medical air hospital source. The Halolite has its own self-contained compressor. Algorithms for the rate of output for the inspiratory flow were developed for each device. Patient flow patterns were divided into 5-ms epochs, and the expected deposition for each epoch was calculated from the algorithms. Summed over a breath, this allowed the calculation of the estimated deposition for each patient's particular pattern of breathing.

RESULTS

The rate of deposition was highest for the Pari LC Star and lowest for the Halolite. Rate of deposition was independent of respiratory pattern for the Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse, but proportional to respiratory rate for the Halolite. The differences between the Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse were less when driven by the 50-psi source. The AeroEclipse had the least amount of drug wastage. As designed, the Halolite delivered a predetermined amount of drug very accurately, whereas expected deposition when run to dryness of the other two devices had significant variations.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize treatment time, the Pari LC Star would be best. To minimize drug wastage, the AeroEclipse would be best. To accurately deliver a specific drug dose, the Halolite would be best.

Residual Gravimetric Method to Measure Nebulizer Output

The aim of this study was to assess a residual gravimetric method based on weighing dry filters to measure the aerosol output of nebulizers. This residual gravimetric method was compared to assay methods based on spectrophotometric measurement of terbutaline (Bricanyl, Astra Zeneca, France), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurement of tobramycin (Tobi, Chiron, U.S.A.), and electrochemical measurements of NaF (as defined by the European standard). Two breath-enhanced jet nebulizers, one standard jet nebulizer, and one ultrasonic nebulizer were tested. Output produced by the residual gravimetric method was calculated by weighing the filters both before and after aerosol collection and by filter drying corrected by the proportion of drug contained in total solute mass. Output produced by the electrochemical, spectrophotometric, and HPLC methods was determined after assaying the drug extraction filter. The results demonstrated a strong correlation between the residual gravimetric method (x axis) and assay methods (y axis) in terms of drug mass output (y = 1.00 x -0.02, r(2) = 0.99, n = 27). We conclude that a residual gravimetric method based on dry filters, when validated for a particular agent, is an accurate way of measuring aerosol output.

The choice of a compressor for the aerosolisation of tobramycin (TOBI®) with the PARI LC PLUS® reusable nebuliser

The performance of five different compressors (CR60), Porta-Neb, Pulmo-Aide, TurboBoy and Freeway Freedom) was studied in combination with the widely recommended PARI LC PLUS nebuliser for the aerosolisation of a marketed tobramycin solution (TOBI). The droplet size distribution of the generated aerosol was measured with laser diffraction technique at stationary inspiratory flow rates through the nebuliser cup of 20, 30 and 40l N/min. The different compressors showed a distinct difference in droplet size distribution of the aerosol and nebulisation time till dry running. The finest droplets with a volume (equals mass) median diameter (mmd) of 1.84 microm (which was the same at all flow rates), as well as the narrowest size distribution were obtained with a CR60. The Freeway Freedom generated the largest droplets: mmd ranged between 2.63 and 3.72 microm depending on the inspiratory flow rate. The aerosol produced with this compressor also had the widest size distribution. The differences between the compressors could be explained with differences in the jet flow. A higher jet flow resulted in finer droplets, less dependence on the inspiratory flow rate and a shorter time till dry running. Thus, to obtain the required fineness of the aerosol for peripheral airway deposition of the tobramycin, independent of the inspiratory flow rate, the use of the CR60 compressor is preferred over the use of Porta-Neb, Pulmo-Aide, TurboBoy and Freeway Freedom (in order of decreasing preference). Finally, it was found that careful cleaning with warm water and liquid soap of the nebuliser cup is essential to obtain adequate performance of the LC PLUS.

Evaluation of bronchial constriction in children with cystic fibrosis after inhaling two different preparations of tobramycin

OBJECTIVES

This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study evaluated the risk of bronchoconstriction with two preparations of inhaled tobramycin in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without airway hyperreactivity.

DESIGN

Of 19 children with CF (age range, 7 to 16 years) with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease, 10 children were at high risk (HR) for bronchospasm (family history of asthma and previous response to bronchodilators) and 9 children were at low risk (LR) for bronchospasm (no family history of asthma or previous response to bronchodilators). Two solutions of tobramycin were administered: (1) 80 mg in a 2-mL vial diluted with 2 mL of saline solution containing the preservatives phenol and bisulfites (IV preparation); and (2) 300 mg in a preservative-free preparation in a 5-mL solution. Following a bronchodilator-free period of 12 h, the patients inhaled either one or the other preparation in random order on two different occasions, 2 weeks apart.

RESULTS

Prechallenge and postchallenge results for the LR group showed a percentage of fall in FEV(1) (DeltaFEV(1)) of 12 +/- 9% (mean +/- SD) for the IV preparation, compared to 4 +/- 5% for the preservative-free preparation (p = 0.046). An DeltaFEV(1) of > 10% was seen in six of nine patients for the IV preparation and in one of nine patients for preservative-free preparation. For the HR group, the DeltaFEV(1) was 17 +/- 13% for the IV-preparation group, compared to 16 +/- 12% for the preservative-free group (p = 0.4). In this group, equal numbers of patients (8 of 10 patients) had an DeltaFEV(1) > 10% after inhaling each preparation. The largest DeltaFEV(1) was 44% (HR group with the preservative-free preparation that forced the early termination of inhalation).

CONCLUSIONS

Both preparations caused significant bronchoconstriction in the HR group, and the preservative-containing IV preparation caused more bronchospasm in LR group than the preservative-free solution. Heightened airway reactivity in children with CF places them at risk of bronchospasm from inhalation therapy.