Differential activity of the -2.7 kb chicken lysozyme enhancer in macrophages of different ontogenic origins is regulated by C/EBP and PU.1 transcription factors

Pivotal Advance: Avian colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), interleukin-34 (IL-34), and CSF-1 receptor genes and gene products

Macrophages are involved in many aspects of development, host defense, pathology, and homeostasis. Their normal differentiation, proliferation, and survival are controlled by CSF-1 via the activation of the CSF1R. A recently discovered cytokine, IL-34, was shown to bind the same receptor in humans. Chicken is a widely used model organism in developmental biology, but the factors that control avian myelopoiesis have not been identified previously. The CSF-1, IL-34, and CSF1R genes in chicken and zebra finch were identified from respective genomic/cDNA sequence resources. Comparative analysis of the avian CSF1R loci revealed likely orthologs of mammalian macrophage-specific promoters and enhancers, and the CSF1R gene is expressed in the developing chick embryo in a pattern consistent with macrophage-specific expression. Chicken CSF-1 and IL-34 were expressed in HEK293 cells and shown to elicit macrophage growth from chicken BM cells in culture. Comparative sequence and co-evolution analysis across all vertebrates suggests that the two ligands interact with distinct regions of the CSF1R. These studies demonstrate that there are two separate ligands for a functional CSF1R across all vertebrates.

Transcriptional regulation of a myeloid-lineage specific gene lysozyme C during zebrafish myelopoiesis

lysozyme C (lyz), a glycoside hydrolase expressed exclusively in myeloid cells, is involved in the host defense against bacterial infection. We isolated a 2.4kb zebrafish lyz promoter region and established transgenic lines that drive enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) to examine how lyz expression is regulated during myelopoiesis. We found that the 2.4kb lyz promoter is sufficient to drive myeloid-specific expression of EGFP in zebrafish. We identified potential transcriptional regulatory elements including a Runx element (TGTGGT at -1.70kb) and a C/ebp element (TTTGGCAAT at -1.46kb) in the lyz promoter, and showed that they are required for myeloid-specific expression of EGFP. We found that the myeloid-lineage transcription factors C/ebp1, Runx1 and Pu.1 can bind to the 2.4kb lyz promoter. Forced expression of runx1, c/ebp1 and pu.1 together induced ectopic lyz expression in the intermediated cell mass (ICM). Thus, we propose that c/ebp1 and runx1 presumably cooperated with pu.1 in the transcriptional regulation of lyz during zebrafish myelopoiesis.

Oncogenic point mutations in the Myb DNA-binding domain alter the DNA-binding properties of Myb at a physiological target gene

The oncoprotein v-Myb of avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) transforms myelomonocytic cells by deregulating specific target genes. Previous work has shown that the oncogenic potential of v-Myb was activated by truncation of N- and C-terminal sequences of c-Myb and was further increased by amino acid substitutions in the DNA-binding domain and other parts of the protein. We have analyzed the activation of the chicken lysozyme gene which is strongly activated by c-Myb but not by its oncogenic counterpart v-Myb. We report that Myb acts on two different cis-regulatory elements, the promoter and an enhancer located upstream of the gene. Interestingly, the activation of the enhancer was abolished by the oncogenic amino acid substitutions. We demonstrated that a single Myb-binding site is responsible for the activation of the lysozyme enhancer by Myb and showed that the v-Myb protein of AMV was unable to bind to this site. Our data demonstrate for the first time that oncogenic activation of Myb alters its DNA-binding specificity at a physiological Myb target gene.

A dual activation mechanism for Myb-responsive genes in myelomonocytic cells

The retroviral oncogene v-myb encodes a transcription factor (v-Myb) which is responsible for the transformation of myelomonocytic cells by avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV). v-Myb is thought to exert its biological effects by deregulating the expression of specific target genes. Here we have used DNaseI hypersensitive site mapping and reporter gene assays to study the activation of three Myb target genes--mim-1, the lysozyme gene and the C/EBPbeta gene--all of which are activated by Myb in myelomonocytic cells but not in other hematopoietic lineages. We have found that these genes are activated by Myb via more than one cis-regulatory region. Our data suggest that all three genes are activated by Myb by dual mechanisms involving the promoters as well as enhancers. Using a cell line that expresses an estrogen-inducible v-Myb/estrogen receptor fusion protein we have also determined the effect of Myb on the expression of the C/EBPalpha gene. Our results show that C/EBPalpha expression is down-regulated by v-Myb. Thus, v-Myb affects the expression of two C/EBP family members in opposite directions.

Identification of interventricular septum precursor cells in the mouse embryo

Little is known about the formation of the interventricular septum (IVS), a central event during cardiogenesis. Here, we describe a novel population of myocardial progenitor cells in the primitive ventricle of the mouse embryo, which is characterized by expression of lysozyme M (lysM). Using LysM-Cre mice we show that lysozyme expressing cells give rise to the IVS and to a part of the left ventricular free wall, demonstrating that these heart regions are developmentally related. LysM+ precursors are not of hematopoietic origin and develop in the absence of transcription factors that regulate lysozyme expression in macrophages. LysM-deficient mice lack an overt cardiac phenotype, perhaps due to compensation by the related lysozyme P, which we also found to be expressed in the developing heart. Direct visualization of lysM expression, using LysM-EGFP knock-in mice, showed that ventricular septation is initiated at embryonic day 9 by the movement of myocardial trabeculae from the primitive ventricle towards the bulbo-ventricular groove and revealed the dynamics of IVS formation at later stages. Our studies predict that LysM-Cre mice will be useful to inactivate genes in the developing IVS.

Lineage promiscuity and plasticity in hematopoietic development

Hematopoiesis has provided a valuable model for understanding how genetic programs are established to decide cell fates in multipotent stem or progenitor cells. The identification of common myeloid and lymphoid progenitors has allowed us to directly assess the regulatory mechanisms of lineage commitment. Multiple genes of hematopoietic lineages, including transcription factors, are coexpressed in hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors, a phenomenon referred to as "lineage priming." The accessibility for multiple transcription factors promiscuously allows flexibility in cell fate commitments at the multipotent stages. The changes in the expression levels and timing of transcription factors can induce lineage conversion of committed cells, indicating that the regulation of transcription factors might be primarily critical for maintaining hierarchical hematopoietic development.

Distinctive and indispensable roles of PU.1 in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiation

The PU.1 transcription factor is a key regulator of hematopoietic development, but its role at each hematopoietic stage remains unclear. In particular, the expression of PU.1 in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) could simply represent "priming" of genes related to downstream myelolymphoid lineages. By using a conditional PU.1 knock-out model, we here show that HSCs express PU.1, and its constitutive expression is necessary for maintenance of the HSC pool in the bone marrow. Bone marrow HSCs disrupted with PU.1 in situ could not maintain hematopoiesis and were outcompeted by normal HSCs. PU.1-deficient HSCs also failed to generate the earliest myeloid and lymphoid progenitors. PU.1 disruption in granulocyte/monocyte-committed progenitors blocked their maturation but not proliferation, resulting in myeloblast colony formation. PU.1 disruption in common lymphoid progenitors, however, did not prevent their B-cell maturation. In vivo disruption of PU.1 in mature B cells by the CD19-Cre locus did not affect B-cell maturation, and PU.1-deficient mature B cells displayed normal proliferation in response to mitogenic signals including the cross-linking of surface immunoglobulin M (IgM). Thus, PU.1 plays indispensable and distinct roles in hematopoietic development through supporting HSC self-renewal as well as commitment and maturation of myeloid and lymphoid lineages.

Transcriptional regulation in myelopoiesis: Hematopoietic fate choice, myeloid differentiation, and leukemogenesis

Myeloid cells (granulocytes and monocytes) are derived from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells. Gene transcription plays a critical role in hematopoietic differentiation. However, there is no single transcription factor that is expressed exclusively by myeloid cells and that, alone, acts as a "master" regulator of myeloid fate choice. Rather, myeloid gene expression is controlled by the combinatorial effects of several key transcription factors. Hematopoiesis has traditionally been viewed as linear and hierarchical, but there is increasing evidence of plasticity during blood cell development. Transcription factors strongly influence cellular lineage during hematopoiesis and expression of some transcription factors can alter the fate of developing hematopoietic progenitor cells. PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) regulate expression of numerous myeloid genes, and gene disruption studies have shown that they play essential, nonredundant roles in myeloid cell development. They function in cooperation with other transcription factors, co-activators, and co-repressors to regulate genes in the context of chromatin. Because of their essential roles in regulating myeloid genes and in myeloid cell development, it has been hypothesized that abnormal expression of PU.1 and C/EBPalpha would contribute to aberrant myeloid differentiation, i.e. acute leukemia. Such a direct link has been elusive until recently. However, there is now persuasive evidence that mutations in both PU.1 and C/EBPalpha contribute directly to development of acute myelogenous leukemia. Thus, normal myeloid development and acute leukemia are now understood to represent opposite sides of the same hematopoietic coin.

Analysis of an approach to oviduct-specific expression of modified chicken lysozyme genes

The -2.7 kb enhancer (E) element of the chicken lysozyme gene domain appears to govern expression of the gene in macrophages but not in oviduct tubular gland cells, the only other site of lysozyme expression. The ultimate goal of our research was to determine whether lysozyme domain variants could be developed that would mainly be expressed in the oviduct so that transgenic birds could be produced that would deposit exogenous protein in the egg white. Accordingly, precise mutations were made by poxvirus-mediated gene targeting in FEF/PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) transcription factor binding sites in the -2.7 kb E of cloned copies of a specific lysozyme gene variant that includes a hydrophobic pentapeptide tail encoding sequence inserted immediately prior to the stop codon. This variant contains the entire lysozyme domain and is cloned in a lambda bacteriophage vector (lambdaDIILys-HT); the novel tail sequence enables distinction in cell-based expression systems between transcripts of the variant and those of the endogenous gene. These various lysozyme domain mutants, in bacteriophage vector form, were tested for expression in cultured chicken blastodermal cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding the transcription factors C/EBP and v-Myb. In the absence of these plasmids, barely detectable levels of endogenous lysozyme gene transcription resulted in the blastodermal cells. In the presence of the plasmids, however, transcripts of the endogenous gene could be detected as well as varying levels (as evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR) of transcripts of all of the lysozyme domain mutants. These results are discussed in the context of the known role and occurrence of various transcription factors involved in gene expression in differentiating macrophage cells. The ultimate test of expression of the variants in macrophages vs. oviduct cells will be to use them to produce transgenic birds.

Secretion of foreign proteins mediated by chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences

Exploitation of the insulating properties of the complete chicken lysozyme gene domain may facilitate the production of transgenic chicken bioreactors with the capacity to deposit valuable proteins in the egg white. Chimeric genes consisting of the chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences and sequences encoding foreign proteins could be inserted randomly into the chicken genome and retain appropriate expression levels. The research reported here established that chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences can be used to direct the production and secretion of green fluorescent protein (used as a reporter protein) in transiently transfected chicken blastodermal cells. Attempts to verify these findings in transgenic hens are currently in progress. To provide a rapid means of generating constructs encoding other foreign proteins under the control of lysozyme gene regulatory sequences that can facilitate the secretion of heterologous proteins in vivo, a generic lysozyme gene regulatory scaffold was created using a poxvirus-mediated gene targeting system.

Developmentally regulated recruitment of transcription factors and chromatin modification activities to chicken lysozyme cis-regulatory elements in vivo

Expression of the chicken lysozyme gene is upregulated during macrophage differentiation and reaches its highest level in bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophages. This is accompanied by complex alterations in chromatin structure. We have previously shown that chromatin fine-structure alterations precede the onset of gene expression in macrophage precursor cells and mark the lysozyme chromatin domain for expression later in development. To further examine this phenomenon and to investigate the basis for the differentiation-dependent alterations of lysozyme chromatin, we studied the recruitment of transcription factors to the lysozyme locus in vivo at different stages of myeloid differentiation. Factor recruitment occurred in several steps. First, early-acting transcription factors such as NF1 and Fli-1 bound to a subset of enhancer elements and recruited CREB-binding protein. LPS stimulation led to an additional recruitment of C/EBPbeta and a significant change in enhancer and promoter structure. Transcription factor recruitment was accompanied by specific changes in histone modification within the lysozyme chromatin domain. Interestingly, we present evidence for a transient interaction of transcription factors with lysozyme chromatin in lysozyme-nonexpressing macrophage precursors, which was accompanied by a partial demethylation of CpG sites. This indicates that a partially accessible chromatin structure of lineage-specific genes is a hallmark of hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Thyroid hormone-regulated enhancer blocking: cooperation of CTCF and thyroid hormone receptor

The highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed, zinc finger protein CTCF is involved in enhancer blocking, a mechanism crucial for shielding genes from illegitimate enhancer effects. Interestingly, CTCF-binding sites are often flanked by thyroid hormone response elements (TREs), as at the chicken lysozyme upstream silencer. Here we identify a similar composite site positioned upstream of the human c-myc gene. For both elements, we demonstrate that thyroid hormone abrogates enhancer blocking. Relief of enhancer blocking occurs even though CTCF remains bound to the lysozyme chromatin. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of the lysozyme upstream region revealed that histone H4 is acetylated at the CTCF-binding site. Loss of enhancer blocking by the addition of T3 led to increased histone acetylation, not only at the CTCF site, but also at the enhancer and the promoter. Thus, when TREs are adjacent to CTCF-binding sites, thyroid hormone can regulate enhancer blocking, thereby providing a new property for what was previously thought to be constitutive enhancer shielding by CTCF.

Transcriptional regulation of granulocyte and monocyte development

Granulocytes and monocytes develop from a common myeloid progenitor. Early granulopoiesis requires the C/EBPalpha, PU.1, RAR, CBF, and c-Myb transcription factors, and terminal neutrophil differentiation is dependent upon C/EBPepsilon, PU.1, Sp1, CDP, and HoxA10. Monopoiesis can be induced by Maf-B, c-Jun, or Egr-1 and is dependent upon PU.1, Sp1, and ICSBP. Signals eminating from cytokine receptors modulate factor activities but do not determine cell fates. Orchestration of the myeloid developmental program is achieved via cooperative gene regulation, via synergistic and inhibitory protein-protein interactions, via promoter auto-regulation and cross-regulation, via regulation of factor levels, and via induction of cell cycle arrest: For example, c-Myb and C/EBPalpha cooperate to activate the mim-1 and NE promoters, PU.1, C/EBPalpha, and CBF, regulate the NE, MPO, and M-CSF Receptor genes. PU.1:GATA-1 interaction and C/EBP suppression of FOG transcription inhibits erythroid and megakaryocyte gene expression. c-Jun:PU.1, ICSBP:PU.1, and perhaps Maf:Jun complexes induce monocytic genes. PU.1 and C/EBPalpha activate their own promoters, C/EBPalpha rapidly induces PU.1 and C/EBPepsilon RNA expression, and RARalpha activates the C/EBPepsilon promoter. Higher levels of PU.1 are required for monopoiesis than for B-lymphopoiesis, and higher C/EBP levels may favor granulopoiesis over monopoiesis. CBF and c-Myb stimulate proliferation whereas C/EBPalpha induces a G1/S arrest; cell cycle arrest is required for terminal myelopoiesis, perhaps due to expression of p53 or hypo-phosphorylated Rb.

CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins are required for granulopoiesis independent of their induction of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor

Potential redundancy among members of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family in myeloid cells is indicated by the ability of C/EBPbeta to replace C/EBPalpha in vivo, by the expression of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) on C/EBPalpha(-/-) cell lines, and by our finding that as with C/EBPalpha-estrogen receptor (C/EBPalpha-ER), either C/EBPbeta-ER or C/EBPdelta-ER can induce terminal granulopoiesis in 32D cl3 cells. To assess the consequences of globally inhibiting C/EBPs, we employed KalphaER, containing a Kruppel-associated box (KRAB) transrepression domain, the C/EBPalpha DNA-binding domain, and an ER ligand-binding domain. C/EBPs have a common DNA-binding consensus, and activation of KalphaER repressed transactivation by endogenous C/EBPs 50-fold and reduced endogenous G-CSFR expression. In 32D cl3 cells coexpressing exogenous G-CSFR, activation of KalphaER prevented and even reversed myeloperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and C/EBPepsilon RNA induction by G-CSF. In contrast, induction of PU.1 and CD11b, a gene regulated by PU.1 but not by C/EBPs, was unaffected. A KalphaER variant incapable of binding DNA owing to an altered leucine zipper did not affect 32D cl3 differentiation. Transduction of KalphaER into murine hematopoietic progenitor cells suppressed the formation of granulocyte colony-forming units, even in cytokines that enable C/EBPalpha(-/-) progenitors to differentiate into neutrophils. The formation of macrophage and of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units were also inhibited, but erythroid burst-forming units grew normally. Thus, in 32D cl3 cells and perhaps normal progenitors, C/EBPs are required for granulopoiesis beyond their ability to induce receptors for G-CSF and other cytokines. One requisite activity may be activation of the C/EBPepsilon gene by C/EBPalpha, as either C/EBPalpha-ER or C/EBPbeta-ER rapidly elevated C/EBPepsilon RNA in 32D cl3 cells in the presence of cycloheximide but not actinomycin D.

Identification of factors mediating the developmental regulation of the early acting -3.9 kb chicken lysozyme enhancer element

The chicken lysozyme gene -3.9 kb enhancer forms a DNase I hypersensitive site (DHS) early in macrophage differentiation, but not in more primitive multipotent myeloid precursor cells. A nucleosome becomes precisely positioned across the enhancer in parallel with DHS formation. In transfection assays, the 5'-part of the -3.9 kb element has ubiquitous enhancer activity. The 3'-part has no stimulatory activity, but is necessary for enhancer repression in lysozyme non-expressing cells. Recent studies have shown that the chromatin fine structure of this region is affected by inhibition of histone deacetylase activity after Trichostatin A (TSA) treatment, but only in lysozyme non-expressing cells. These results indicated a developmental modification of chromatin structure from a dynamic, but inactive, to a stabilised, possibly hyperacetylated, active state. Here we have identified positively and negatively acting transcription factors binding to the -3.9 kb enhancer and determined their contribution to enhancer activity. Furthermore, we examined the influence of TSA treatment on enhancer activity in macrophage cells and lysozyme non-expressing cells, including multipotent macrophage precursors. Interestingly, TSA treatment was able to restore enhancer activity fully in macrophage precursor cells, but not in non-macrophage lineage cells. These results suggest (i) that the transcription factor complement of multipotent progenitor cells is similar to that of lysozyme-expressing cells and (ii) that developmental regulation of the -3.9 kb enhancer is mediated by the interplay of repressing and activating factors that respond to or initiate changes in the chromatin acetylation state.