A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Antiretroviral Treatment Preferences: What Do Patients Really Want?

Use of Stated Preference Methods in HIV Treatment and Prevention Research in the United States: A Systematic Review

Stated preference (SP) methods are increasingly being applied to HIV-related research and continuously provide researchers with health utility scores of select healthcare products or services that populations consider important. Following PRISMA guidelines, we sought to understand how SP methods have been applied in HIV-related research. We conducted a systematic review to identify studies meeting the following criteria: SP method is clearly stated, conducted in the United States, was published between 01/01/2012 and 02/12/2022, and included adults aged 18 and over. Study design and SP method application were also examined. We identified six SP methods (e.g., Conjoint Analysis, Discrete Choice Experiment) across 18 studies, which were categorized into one of two groups: HIV prevention and HIV treatment-care. Categories of attributes used in SP methods largely focused on: administration, physical/health effects, financial, location, access, and external influences. SP methods are innovative tools capable of informing researchers on what populations consider most beneficial when deciding on treatment, care, or prevention options for HIV.

‘We want it all’: ART preferences assessed by D esirability of O utcome R anking

OBJECTIVES

Understanding how people living with HIV (PLWH) view antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescribing choices is fundamental to patient-centred care. We used the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) approach to explore patient ART preferences.

METHODS

Seventy-four PLWH entered the study, 20 into the 'pilot study', and 54 in the 'comparative study'. Participants ranked five different hypothetical patient stories by desirability. Each story comprised five narrative lines, each line addressing one treatment characteristic drawn from one of five pre-selected domains (treatment failure, treatment difficulty, adverse effects, long-term complications, life events). Narrative lines could be favourable or adverse. In the pilot study the number of adverse domains varied from one to five. Comparative study stories were fixed at two adverse versus three favourable domains, to test the relative ranking of different domains.

RESULTS

The pilot study identified a relationship between the number of adverse domains and rank (R²  = 0.54; p < 0.0001, Friedman test), however pairwise differences in ranking were not significant beyond three adverse domains. In the comparative study, all domains were ranked equally across the cohort (p = 0.88; Friedman test). In pre-defined demographic subgroup analyses, women ranked the 'treatment failure' domain significantly less desirable than men (p = 0.0014, Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSIONS

People living with HIV appear to care equally about all aspects of ART. The observation that male and female PLWH have different treatment priorities merits further investigation in larger studies. Interindividual differences highlight the importance of individualized shared decision-making and treatment personalization. DOOR may have a role as a pre-treatment assessment tool as well as a research technique.

Content validation of a new measure of patient-reported barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence, the I-Score: results from a Delphi study

Background

Over a third of people living with HIV (PLHIV) have suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Measures of barriers to ART adherence often lack comprehensiveness. To help manage ART adherence barriers in HIV care, we are developing a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of these barriers (the I-Score).

Methods

We assessed the content validity of 100 items (distinct barriers) to retain only those most relevant to both PLHIV and HIV health/social service providers. A web-based Delphi was conducted in Canada and France, collecting data from December 2018 to October 2019. Items were evaluated on relevance (the combined rated importance and actionability for HIV care of items among both PLHIV and providers); comprehensibility (rated item clarity); comprehensiveness (examined against our conceptual framework); cross-cultural equivalence (based on comparisons by questionnaire language (English, French) and country of residence). Pearson’s chi-square tests were used for comparisons by language, country, gender, and stakeholder group (PLHIV, providers).

Results

Panelists included 40 PLHIV and 57 providers (66% response rate). Thirty-one items were retained based on consensus thresholds for relevance (minimum: 50% for PLHIV, 60% for providers) and showed good comprehensibility and comprehensiveness, when compared to our conceptual framework (representation of: 6/6 domains, 15/20 subdomains). No significant difference in relevance based on language or country was found among retained items, suggestive of cross-cultural equivalence. Among all 100 items, only 6 significant differences on relevance were observed for gender. For 62 items, the relevance ratings of PLHIV and providers differed significantly, with providers showing greater endorsement of all items but one.

Discussion

The Delphi led to a much-needed item reduction. Remaining items highlight the panel’s multidimensional priorities for the PROM on ART adherence barriers, with few, if any, differences by language, country, and gender. While the analyses may lack generalizability and power, the sample size is considered adequate for a PROM validation study.

Conclusion

Retained items showed good content validity. The different patterns of item endorsement observed underscore the utility of engaging multiple stakeholder groups in PROM development for use in clinical practice. The greater endorsement of items by providers versus patients merits further investigation, including the implications of such differentials for measure development.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00435-0.

Attitudes and Perspectives of People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Findings From the Positive Perspectives Survey in Slovakia

Objectives: To investigate the perspectives and attitudes of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) in Slovakia. Methods: A cross-sectional, computer-assisted web survey on health status, emotional support, stigmatisation, communication with physician, treatment, perception, decision-making, concerns, and treatment history. A representative sample of >10% of all PLHIV (N = 895) in Slovakia was invited to participate. Results: Mean age of the 117 respondents was 35.4 (±8.9) years, 52.8% had higher education, and 67.0% were in full-time employment. Most (89.4%) were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 81.8% had undetectable viral load. Most (85.1%) were satisfied with their ART, and side effects were the primary reason for switching therapies. Most (60.8%) had informed only close friends or relatives about their HIV status, only 3 (2.9%) spoke openly about it, and 60.0% hid their ART from others. Of the 31 respondents (31.6%) who experienced stigmatisation, it was primarily from dentists and other physicians who refused to treat them. Conclusion: In general, PLHIV in Slovakia receive ART and are satisfied with it. They do not speak openly about their HIV status, and some have experienced discrimination.

Patients' preferences for antiretroviral therapy service provision: a systematic review

Background

Achieving global targets of adherence to treatment, retention in care, and treatment success remains a challenge. Health system investment to make antiretroviral therapy services more responsive to patients’ needs and values could address these impediments. Appropriate resource allocation to implement differentiated HIV treatment services demands research evidence. This study aimed to provide an overview of the patients’ preferences for antiretroviral therapy service delivery features.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL) and search engines (Google and Google Scholar) were searched. This review has followed a convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration. Data from the included studies were systematically extracted, tabulated, and summarised in a narrative review. Studies that analysed preferences for antiretroviral therapy regardless of the method used and published in the English language in any year across the world and HIV positive clients who were 15 years and above on 4th February 2021 were included for this review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. A thematic synthesis of the data from the findings section of the main body of the qualitative study was undertaken. ATLAS.ti software version 7 was used for qualitative synthesis.

Results

From the 1054 retrieved studies, only 23 studies (16 quantitative, three qualitative, and four mixed-methods) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of attributes used in all included quantitative studies was 6 (Inter Quartile Range 3). In this review, no study has fulfilled the respective criteria in the methodological quality assessment. In the quantitative synthesis, the majority of participants more valued the outcome, whereas, in the qualitative synthesis, participants preferred more the structure aspect of antiretroviral therapy service. The thematic analysis produced 17 themes, of which ten themes were related to structure, three to process, and four to outcome dimension of Donabedian’s quality of care model. The findings from individual quantitative and qualitative syntheses complement each other.

Conclusions

In this review, participants’ value for antiretroviral therapy service characteristics varied across included studies. Priorities and values of people living with HIV should be incorporated in the policy, practice, research, and development efforts to improve the quality of antiretroviral therapy service hence avoid poor patient outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00310-7.

Reasons for Choice of Antiretroviral Regimens in HIV Patients Presenting Late for Initial Treatment in Europe

The choice of an optimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) in naive patients presenting late for initial therapy with advanced HIV infection, that is, with a CD4 cell count <200/μL and/or an AIDS-defining disease (late presenters, LPs), is still a challenge, even for HIV specialists. At present, there is little information on the decision process and selection criteria that physicians must take into account when choosing the presumably optimal initial ART for LPs. This study analyzes reasons for the individual choice of first-line ART in HIV LPs. We conducted a prospective multi-center study to analyze the decision-making process of physicians treating naive HIV patients presenting with a CD4 cell count <200/μL and/or an AIDS-defining condition. Two European HIV treatment centers based in Frankfurt (Germany) and A Coruna (Spain) participated in the study. Physicians documented the reasons that led to their decision for a specific first-line ART regimen. A questionnaire was designed for the study. Decisions of the participating physicians were evaluated. A total of 52 treatment decisions were analyzed. Evaluation of the choice of antiretroviral treatment demonstrated that for the overall group of physicians, simplicity of the regimen was the most important selection criterion in 34.6% of cases. The presence of comorbidities was given as the decisive selection criterion in 26.9%, followed by experience with the chosen drugs in 21.2% of cases. In the group of physicians choosing an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimen for first-line ART, the same selection criteria were identified as in the overall group; 33.3% of clinicians selected an INSTI-based regimen because of its simplicity. The presence of comorbidities was the second most frequent decisive criterion (31.0%), followed by personal experience with the prescribed ART (23.8%). In the protease inhibitor group, simplicity was also the most common selection criterion with 40%. Results of clinical trials were stated as the most important criterion for the selection of ART in 38% of all cases, followed by the expected adherence of the patient (22%). Among the physicians who used a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen, patients' desire to have children was the most frequent criterion for selection of ART (60%). An ongoing pregnancy was the second most frequent selection criterion, followed by ART's simplicity (8%). For patients treated with a single-tablet regimen, simplicity of ART was comprehensibly the most important decisive criterion (54.5%). Experience with the chosen drugs was the decisive selection criterion in 24.2%, followed by comorbidities in 18.2% of cases. Physicians' selection of individual ART in patients presenting late for first-line treatment seems to be predominantly dependent on patient-centered factors such as adherence issues as well as the clinical experience of physicians with the prescribed drugs.

Sobieszczyk M, Olender S, Gordon P, Zucker J, Tross S, Castor D, H. Remien R. Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy: The Need for a Health Equity Approach

Immediate antiretroviral therapy (iART), defined as same-day initiation of ART or as soon as possible after diagnosis, has recently been recommended by global and national clinical care guidelines for patients newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Based on San Francisco’s Rapid ART Program Initiative for HIV Diagnoses (RAPID) model, most iART programs in the US condense ART initiation, insurance acquisition, housing assessment, and mental health and substance use evaluation into an initial visit. However, the RAPID model does not explicitly address structural racism and homophobia, HIV-related stigma, medical mistrust, and other important factors at the time of diagnosis experienced more poignantly by African American, Latinx, men who have sex with men (MSM), and transgender patient populations. These factors negatively impact initial and subsequent HIV care engagement and exacerbate significant health disparities along the HIV care continuum. While iART has improved time to viral suppression and linkage to care rates, its association with retention in care and viral suppression, particularly in vulnerable populations, remains controversial. Considering that in the US the HIV epidemic is sharply defined by healthcare disparities, we argue that incorporating an explicit health equity approach into the RAPID model is vital to ensure those who disproportionately bear the burden of HIV are not left behind.

Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment

OBJECTIVE

Limited data describe patient preferences for the growing number of antiretroviral therapies (ARTs). We quantified preferences for key characteristics of modern ART deemed relevant to shared decision making.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment survey elicited preferences for ART characteristics, including dosing (frequency and number of pills), administration characteristics (pill size and meal requirement), most bothersome side effect (from diarrhea, sleep disturbance, headaches, dizziness/difficulty thinking, depression, or jaundice), and most bothersome long-term effect (from increased risk of heart attacks, bone fractures, renal dysfunction, hypercholesterolemia, or hyperglycemia). Between March and August 2017, the discrete choice experiment was fielded to 403 treatment-experienced persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), enrolled from 2 infectious diseases clinics in the southern United States and a national online panel. Participants completed 16 choice tasks, each comparing 3 treatment options. Preferences were analyzed using mixed and latent class logit models.

RESULTS

Most participants were male (68%) and older (interquartile range: 42-58 years), and had substantial treatment experience (interquartile range: 7-21 years). In mixed logit analyses, all attributes were associated with preferences. Side and long-term effects were most important, with evidence of substantial preference heterogeneity. Latent class analysis identified 5 preference classes. For classes 1 (40%), 2 (24%), and 3 (21%), side effects were most important, followed by long-term effects. For class 4 (10%), dosing was most important. Class 5 (4%) was largely indifferent to ART characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Overall, treatment-experienced persons living with HIV valued minimizing side effects and long-term toxicities over dosing and administration characteristics. Preferences varied widely, highlighting the need to elicit individual patient preferences in models of shared antiretroviral decision making.

Switching from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide Significantly Worsens the Lipid Profile in a Real-World Setting

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has increasingly been replaced by tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) because of reduced kidney and bone toxicity with TAF. This switch has, however, caused worsening of lipid concentrations in clinical trials, but data from any real-world setting are scarce. The objective of this study was to characterize the effect of TDF to TAF switch on plasma lipid concentrations in a real-world clinic population. This is a retrospective study comparing lipid concentrations and other laboratory parameters between the last visit on TDF and the first visit after at least a 2-month exposure to TAF. A total of 490 HIV-positive subjects were included in the study. The median (interquartile range) increase was 23.2 (0-38.7) mg/dL in total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and 15.5 (0-30.9) mg/dL in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (p < 0.001). The ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased by 0.2 (-0.2 to 0.6), p < 0.001. The proportion of patients having optimal LDL cholesterol concentration by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) decreased from 30.8% to 17.8% and proportion having dyslipidemia or severe dyslipidemia increased from 30.2% to 50.3% after the switch. Demographic characteristics, antiretroviral agents, or comedication did not affect the changes in lipid concentrations. Plasma creatinine decreased by 0.03 (-0.09 to 0.03) mg/dL (p < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased by 0.5 (-2.3 to 3.2) mL/min (p = 0.009). Switching from TDF to TAF caused a statistically significant worsening of the lipid profile that may have clinical relevance. The benefit of the lipid-lowering effect of TDF should be considered in selected patients with low risk for kidney and bone toxicity.

Assessing the Content Validity of a New Patient-Reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Electronic Administration in Routine HIV Care: Proposal for a Web-Based Delphi Study

Background

Adherence to lifesaving antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV infection remains a challenge for many patients. Routine screening for barriers to ART adherence could help make HIV care more patient-centered and prevent virologic rebound or failure. Our team is currently developing a new HIV-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of these barriers for use in Canada and France along with a digital app for its electronic administration. In our previous work, we developed the PROM’s multidimensional conceptual framework and generated 100 English items, which have been translated to French.

Objective

This study aims to use a Web-based Delphi to help validate and select the content of this new HIV-specific PROM, based on the perspective of anglophone and francophone patients and providers in Canada and France. Here, we present the proposal for this Delphi.

Methods

This modified Delphi will involve a diverse panel of patients (n=32) and providers (n=52) recruited especially from the 9 sites of the PROM development study (site locations in Canada: Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver; in France: Paris, Nantes, Clermont-Ferrand, Saint-Martin, Cayenne). Overall, 2 rounds of Web-based questionnaires will be conducted. The threshold for consensus is set at 60% and will determine which items are carried forward to the second round. Per item, 3 aspects will be rated: importance as a barrier to ART adherence, relevance for HIV care, and clarity. In both rounds, space will be available for free text comments. Overall comprehensiveness will be assessed in the second round.

Results

This study has undergone a methodological review by experts in patient-oriented research. It has received approval from a research ethics board of the McGill University Health Centre. It is financially supported, in part, by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research-Quebec Support Unit (M006). As of May 21, 2019, 15 people living with HIV and 25 providers completed the first round of the Delphi (24 from Canada and 16 from France).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first Delphi to seek consensus on the most relevant and clinically actionable barriers to ART adherence, collecting opinions on an extensive list of barriers. Drawing on a relatively large and diverse panel of HIV patients and providers, it essentially engages key stakeholders in decision making about the PROM’s final content, helping to ensure its utility and adoption.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/12836