Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users' Attitudes About Sexually Transmitted Infections and Its Influence on Condom Use: A Mixed-Method Study in Belgium

A Differentiated HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery Model for High-Risk Groups in Nanning City, South China: Findings from a Pilot Program

In China, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV-serodiscordant couples is low. We offered differentiated PrEP options tailored to MSM in a community-based organization (CBO) setting, and to HIV-serodiscordant couples attempting conception in a specialized HIV care clinic. The CBO facilitated PrEP by linkage with a telemedicine platform for virtual consultation; additional online follow-up on social media was conducted by peers. PrEP was taken properly in 88.7% of visits. Retention was 82.4% at Month 6. MSM having HIV-infected partners over the past 6 months were more likely to adhere to PrEP; ≥ 50 years old and daily oral PrEP were significant predictors for failing in retention. Five pregnancies were reported in the clinic. A peer-led and social media, telemedicine-assisted PrEP model within a CBO is a feasible approach to roll out PrEP among MSM. Integrated PrEP in specialized HIV clinics is appropriate for serodiscordant couples attempting conception.

Contextualized Experiences and Predictors of Condom Use in a Flemish Population: A Mixed Methods Study

This study aims to address the gap in understanding condom use (CU) behavior in Flanders (the Dutch-speaking community in Belgium) by applying a mixed methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data. Utilizing a large-scale survey of over 14,000 participants and 11 in-depth interviews, the study explores key factors influencing CU, including (amongst others) relationship status, attitudes toward condoms, and STI testing. Quantitative findings highlight significant predictors such as the type of partner (casual vs. steady), STI testing behaviors, and negative attitudes toward condoms. Qualitative insights further reveal personal experiences that complicate CU decisions, such as the disruption of sexual flow and emotional dynamics within relationships. These findings underscore the complexity of CU behavior, showing that practical barriers (e.g., discomfort, fit) and personal beliefs play pivotal roles. The study concludes that targeted public health interventions could focus on improving condom accessibility and addressing both practical and emotional factors. Recommendations for sexual health education include promoting communication around CU and enhancing condom experimentation and fit. These findings contribute valuable insights into enhancing sexual health outcomes through more nuanced, contextualized approaches to condom use.

Perceptions, experiences and concerns with sexually transmitted infections among current and former PrEP users: a longitudinal qualitative study of gay, bisexual and queer men in Canada

Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been attributed to heightened rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), ostensibly due to increased condomless anal sex (CAS) and greater frequency of STI testing. Few qualitative studies have assessed how gay, bisexual and queer men (GBQM) who use PrEP perceive STIs and how these attitudes have evolved post-PrEP uptake. We investigated the perspectives of current and former PrEP users on STIs. Methods Annual, in-depth longitudinal interviews were conducted with 38 current and former PrEP users in Ontario (n =18) and British Columbia (n =20), Canada, as part of a mixed-methods implementation science study (2020-2022). Over 3years, 109 interviews were conducted. Data analysis included reflexive thematic coding and longitudinal recurrent cross-sectional analysis using NVivo 12. Results Four STI-related themes emerged: (1) lack of STI-related concerns due to treatment and prevention optimism, (2) stigma-related concerns, (3) perceived risk among other PrEP users due to increased CAS, and (4) inconsistent testing concerns among non-PrEP users. Over time, some STI-related anxieties decreased with increased knowledge and reduced stigma. However, concerns persisted for other participants due to perceived risky sexual behaviours among other PrEP users and non-PrEP users. Both current and former PrEP users who expressed STI-related apprehensions consistently indicated adopting risk-reduction strategies, including condom use and having fewer sexual partners throughout the study. Conclusions Findings show how varied STI perceptions and experiences among current and former PrEP users shaped sexual decision-making over time. Providers, public health experts, and policymakers should develop a more comprehensive strategy to address STI concerns among GBQM.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use trajectories and incidence of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among PrEP users in Belgium: a cohort analysis of insurance claims data from 2017 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Since June 2017, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been reimbursed in Belgium for people at substantial risk of HIV. To inform the national PrEP programme, we described sociodemographic characteristics of PrEP users, PrEP dispensing practices, testing for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs; gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis), and incidence of HIV and STIs.

METHODS

Analysis of routinely collected social health insurance claims data from all individuals who were dispensed at least one PrEP prescription between June 2017 and December 2019. Using logistic regression adjusted for age, we examined associations between sociodemographic characteristics and having been dispensed PrEP only once in the first six months of PrEP use.

RESULTS

Overall, 4559 individuals were dispensed PrEP. Almost all PrEP users were male (99.2%, 4522/4559), with a median age of 37 years (IQR 30-45). A minority were entitled to an increased healthcare allowance (11.4%, 514/4559). 18% (657/3636) were dispensed PrEP only once in the first six months of PrEP use. PrEP users younger than 25 years, unemployed, entitled to an increased healthcare allowance, and who initiated PrEP between January 2019 and June 2019 were more likely to have had no PrEP dispensing after initiation compared to their counterparts. The testing rates for bacterial STIs and HIV were 4.2 tests per person-year (95% CI 4.1-4.2) and 3.6 tests per person-year (95% CI 3.5-3.6), respectively. Twelve individuals were identified to have seroconverted during the study period, resulting in an HIV incidence rate of 0.21/100 person-years (95% CI 0.12-0.36). The incidence of bacterial STIs was 81.2/100 person-years (95% CI 78.7-83.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights challenges in PrEP persistence and a high incidence of bacterial STIs among individuals receiving PrEP. Tailored prevention support is crucial for individuals with ongoing HIV risk to optimise PrEP effectiveness. Integrated STI testing and prevention interventions within PrEP care are necessary to mitigate STI acquisition and transmission among PrEP users.

Use of preexposure prophylaxis and condom purchasing decisions

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but not other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Men who have sex with men (MSM) who take PrEP tend to report reduced condom use, but little is known about the underlying mechanisms. For this study, MSM who take PrEP (i.e., PrEP experienced; n = 88) and MSM who do not (i.e., PrEP naïve; n = 113) completed an online study, including the condom purchase task (CoPT). The CoPT assesses decisions to purchase condoms across escalating prices (range: free-$55) for sex with different types of hypothetical partners: those least likely to have an STD (least STD) and those that participants most want to have sex with (most want sex with). When condoms were free, PrEP-experienced MSM had a lower rate of condom purchasing than did PrEP-naïve MSM. For both partner types, PrEP-experienced MSM reached a price break point (i.e., would not buy condoms) at a lower price than did PrEP-naïve pariticipants. For the most-want-sex-with partner at the price at which participants elected not to buy condoms, only 23% of PrEP-experienced MSM chose to abstain from sex when not purchasing condoms versus 53% among PrEP-naïve MSM. Similar patterns were observed for the least-STD partner. The results support the potential utility of the CoPT in identifying behavioral mechanisms related to condom use and PrEP.

HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care in Belgium: A mixed-methods Study on PrEP Users' Experiences and Service Delivery Preferences

In Belgium, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services are mainly provided through specialised HIV clinics. To optimise PrEP uptake and retention in care, we require insights into users' perspectives on PrEP care. We aimed to elicit experiences with, and preferences for, PrEP service delivery among PrEP users in Belgium, including willingness to involve their family physician (FP) in PrEP care. We adopted a sequential mixed-methods design. We used a web-based longitudinal study among 326 PrEP users that consisted of two questionnaires at six-month intervals, and complemented this with 21 semi-structured interviews (September 2020-January 2022). We conducted descriptive analyses and logistic regression to examine factors associated with willingness to involve their FP in PrEP care. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Survey respondents reported high satisfaction with care received in HIV clinics [median score 9 (IQR 8-10), 10='very satisfied']. Interviews revealed the importance of regular HIV/STI screening, and the expertise and stigma-free environment of HIV clinics. Yet, they also contextualised service delivery barriers reported in the questionnaire, including the burden of cost and challenges integrating PrEP visits into their private and professional lives. Although 63.8% (n = 208/326) of baseline respondents preferred attending an HIV clinic for PrEP follow-up, 51.9% (n = 108/208) of participants in the follow-up questionnaire reported to be willing to have their FP involved in PrEP care. Participants reporting trust in FPs' PrEP and sexual health expertise, or who didn't feel judged by their FP, were more likely to be willing to involve them in PrEP care. Therefore, we recommend a differentiated PrEP service delivery approach, including involving FPs, to make PrEP care more client-centred.

Patterns of PrEP and condom use among PrEP users in Belgium: a web-based longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Tailoring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) service delivery is key to scaling-up PrEP uptake. Optimal implementation of tailored services requires, among other things, insights into patterns of PrEP use, sexual behaviours and condom use over time.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and January 2022, we conducted a web-based, longitudinal study among PrEP users in Belgium. In three questionnaire rounds every six-months, we assessed PrEP and condom use, and sex with steady, casual and anonymous partners in the preceding three months. Based on the patterns of PrEP use in the preceding three months, we identified distinct PrEP use categories. We investigated differences in baseline socio-demographics and sexual behaviours by PrEP use category using Fisher's exact and one-way ANOVA tests. Patterns in PrEP and condom use over time were examined using descriptive analyses and visualised in alluvial diagrams.

RESULTS

In total, 326 participants completed the baseline questionnaire, and 173 completed all three questionnaires. We identified five distinct PrEP use categories: daily (≥ 90 pills), almost daily (75-89 pills), long period (> 7 consecutive days and < 75 pills) with or without additional short period use, short period (1-7 consecutive days and < 75 pills) and no PrEP use (0 pills). During the study, percentages of individuals in each PrEP use category varied, but did not change significantly over time. At baseline, daily and almost daily users were more likely to report five or more casual sex partners, ten or more anonymous sex partners and anal sex on a weekly basis with casual or anonymous partners compared to those using PrEP for long or short periods. Up to 12.6% (n = 16/127) of participants reporting anal sex with casual or anonymous partners, indicated always using condoms and PrEP with these partners. One in three (n = 23/69) participants who reported anal sex with steady partners had condomless anal sex and did not use PrEP with these partners; with casual or anonymous partners less than 3% reported this.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that there is little variation in PrEP use over time and that PrEP use was associated with sexual behaviours, which could be taken into account when designing tailored PrEP care.

Exploring Current Practice, Knowledge, and Challenges of Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Japanese Health Care Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Web Survey

We conducted a web-based survey targeting physicians in specialties of treating sexually transmitted infection (STI) and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients to understand the current STI/HIV care practices and their acceptability of and barriers to the prescription of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Japan. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize survey responses. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with willingness to prescribe PrEP. Of 316 survey respondents, 57 were specialized in HIV, 90 STI/Urology/Proctology, 55 Obstetrics/Gynecology, and 114 General Practice/Internal Medicine/Dermatology. Proportion of HIV-specialized physicians who interview the patients about risk behaviors tended to be higher than other physician groups (84.2% vs. 54.8%, 47.3%, and 50.9%, respectively), and 53 - 75% of non-HIV-specialized physicians reported that they were incapable of making decisions on HIV medications. Higher PrEP knowledge enhanced the willingness to recommend and prescribe PrEP drugs (odds ratio: 2.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-4.10, p = 0.0044), and 45.4% physicians with no PrEP knowledge raised the concern of incapability to respond and manage when an individual is infected with HIV. Educational opportunities on management and prevention measures for both STI and HIV may encourage non-HIV-specialized physicians to be involved in HIV care and to enhance initiation of HIV tests and adoption of PrEP.