Dr. MILK: support program for physician mothers

Alleviating stressfeeding in the emergency department: Elucidating the tensions induced by workplace lactation space issues

Objectives

Women remain underrepresented in the emergency medicine (EM) workforce, academic EM, and institutional leadership. In order to support women physicians in EM, we must explore factors that contribute to attrition and workplace satisfaction. For example, tensions between workplace and familial roles are important to consider as women navigate careers in EM. The logistics and stressors of workplace lactation pose a particular challenge during an already stressful time for a new mother returning to work in a busy emergency department (ED), but limited empirical data exist regarding this experience. We aimed to explore the stressors associated with workplace lactation spaces in order to better inform the creation of lactation spaces for individuals working in EDs.

Methods

Our team used an exploratory qualitative design to investigate lactation-specific stressors and understand their relationship to individuals' needs when lactating in EM workplace environments. A total of 40 individuals were interviewed, highlighting post-pregnancy return-to-work (RTW) experiences of medical students, residents, advanced practice professionals, nurses, fellows, and faculty. Interviews were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

We identified both tangible and intangible characteristics of lactation spaces that contribute to stress for lactating individuals. Additionally, we discovered that participants frequently noted a desire to work simultaneously while pumping in order to feel they were self-actualizing in their dual roles of parent and clinician. Among tangible items, access to a computer within lactation space was a key driver of ability to fulfill dual roles. Among intangible characteristics, we identified three distinct, yet interrelated, subthemes, including the need for lactation spaces to be respectful of individuals' time, privacy, and general health and well-being.

Conclusions

This study suggests that meeting basic lactation needs with thoughtfully designed lactation spaces can empower individuals in their roles both as a lactating parent and a clinician. EM leadership can evaluate existing lactation spaces to ensure they meet the tangible and intangible needs of lactating physicians, trainees, advanced practice professionals, and nurses.

A Delphi-Style Evaluation of a Skin Assessment Simulation Using Clinical Vignettes and a Breast Health Training Tool

INTRODUCTION

Breast and skin assessment are both required clinical skills across health professional training programs. The breast is an ideal "canvas" for the development of a simulation exercise focused on the identification and diagnosis of skin conditions that could present anywhere on the body alongside unique conditions specific to the breast and nipple-areolar complex. A skin assessment simulation on a breast model has not been described.

METHODS

Investigators developed 20 clinical vignettes for breast and skin conditions (ie, features) depicted on a set of 10 single silicone breast models in 4 skin tones. A modified Delphi approach was used to evaluate the appropriateness of the clinical vignettes and realism of features. A convenience sample of 136 licensed physicians was recruited online. In round 1, participants rated the realism of features and suggested descriptors for each feature. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, selected a diagnosis based on clinical vignettes, and assessed the utility of the Breast Health Training Tool for health professionals.

RESULTS

In round 1, participants (n = 38) agreed (5.1/6) that the features were realistic. In round 2, participants (n = 24) agreed (4.6/6) with the descriptors. Most (>50%) participants agreed on a diagnosis for each feature. Participants (n = 27) agreed (5.3/6) that this tool is useful for health professional education.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evaluation of a simulation tool for teaching breast examination and identification of skin conditions on the nipple-areolar complex and breast tissue in multiple skin tones, simultaneously filling the gap in women's breast, lactation, and skin health education.

Lactation Education for Surgeons: American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Survey Demonstrates Strong Member Interest in Expanded Training

BACKGROUND

The availability and extent of breastfeeding-specific surgical training has not been previously described. We aimed to survey breast surgeons on their lactation education and desire for additional knowledge.

METHODS

Members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons were invited via email to anonymously complete an electronic survey from 27 October 2021 to 23 January 2022. The survey content included demographic information, sources of lactation education, and desired topics and methods for further training. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 2698 surveys were delivered and 542 (20.1%) completed. While nearly all respondents (99%) reported treating lactating patients at least once or twice per year, 78% reported that their training was inadequate. The most frequently cited sources of lactation information were peer-to-peer informal knowledge sharing (50%) and personal experience with breastfeeding (44%). Nearly all respondents (99%) agreed that formal lactation education would benefit breast surgeons. Specific topics of interest included management of patients with complications of lactation (48%), management of lactating patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer (47%), and counseling patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer who desire to breastfeed (46%). The most frequently recommended educational formats included presentation at a national conference (60%), evidence-based management guidelines (58%), webinar (55%), and workshop/course (47%).

CONCLUSION

Breast surgeons self-report minimal formal training in the management of benign and malignant breast disease in lactating patients and strong desire for expanded education. Development of clinical practice guidelines and additional educational content for surgeons should be considered to meet the needs of this patient population.

An Application of Kane's Validity Framework to Evaluate Formative and Summative Assessment Instruments for Telesimulations in Clinical Lactation

INTRODUCTION

Health professional learners have limited exposure to breastfeeding patients from diverse backgrounds in clinical rotations. Instead, simulation-based training is used for lactation skills training. There are no validated or standardized simulations and assessment rubrics for lactation. In this pilot, breastfeeding telesimulations with standardized patients (SPs) wearing a high-fidelity breast model matching their skin tone were developed. The validity of Formative and Summative Assessment Rubrics (FAR, SAR) were assessed following Kane's validity framework. The objective was to provide initial evidence for the validity of the FAR and SAR as constructs of competence in lactation support at the entry to practice or practice level.

METHODS

Three breastfeeding case scenarios, FAR, and SAR were developed and evaluated with clinical lactation specialists (evaluators, n = 17) and SPs. The FAR was used in practice telesimulations where SPs' (n = 14) performance and telesimulation feasibility were assessed. The FAR was updated in preparation for a pilot study where medical students (n = 13) completed the 3 telesimulations. In the pilot, the updated FAR was used by SPs (n = 6) to assess medical students' performance of clinical skills. After the pilot, rubrics were updated after focus groups with SPs and discussions with evaluators. Evaluators (n = 3) graded students' posttelesimulation documentations using the SAR. Cronbach ɑ level and the intraclass correlation coefficient were assessed iteratively to collect evidence for the scoring, generalizability, and extrapolation of the FAR and SAR according to Kane's framework.

RESULTS

The FAR and SAR were found to have acceptable internal consistency and moderate to high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.55-0.94), which provided evidence for scoring and generalizability of the instruments. Evaluators agreed that SPs' performances were realistic (5.6/6), and SPs' feedback was organized (5.5/6) and helpful (5.6/6), which provided evidence for extrapolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial evidence for validity of scoring, generalization, and extrapolation FAR and SAR (according to Kane's framework) in assessing health professional learner's performance of clinical lactation skills has been presented. These results from a pilot study suggest that the FAR and SAR are reliable instruments for assessing learners' clinical performance in a breastfeeding-focused telesimulation where the SP wears a high-fidelity breast model matching their skin tone. Additional studies will be required to collect evidence according to all 4 categories of Kane's framework for the validity of the FAR and SAR.

Development of Team Behavior Skills and Clinical Lactation Competence Among Medical Students Engaging in Telesimulations with Standardized Patients

Objective: The aims of this pilot feasibility study were to determine if telesimulations with standardized patients (SPs) wearing high-fidelity breast models impact students' team behavior and clinical competence in lactation support. Materials and Methods: Medical students (N = 19) completed five telesimulations: Cases 1, 2, 5 in a team, 3 as individual, and 4 randomized. SPs used the Formative Assessment Rubric (FAR) to evaluate interpersonal and clinical competence. Collaboration skills within team-based telesimulations (Cases 2 and 4) were rated using the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR). Satisfaction data were collected from a focus group and written evaluation. Descriptive statistics were calculated for FAR, ICAR, and written evaluations. Appropriate nonparametric tests were used to measure FAR and ICAR differences over time or between team and individual telesimulations and the relationship between FAR and ICAR scores. Content analysis was used to generate themes from focus group data. Results: Learners' interpersonal and lactation-specific competence improved over time (p = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Learners were able "to accept responsibility for their actions" more but spent less time "seeking perspectives from peers" in Case 4 compared with Case 2 (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Themes from the focus group related to the value of team telesimulations to learn clinical lactation skills and learn about one's role in a team. Learners agreed they developed clinical lactation skills (>4.5/5-pt). Conclusions: Opportunities to work collaboratively in telesimulations with a SP prepare learners for professional collaborations to effectively care for breast/chestfeeding dyads.

Challenges and Solutions for Physician Mothers: A Critical Review of the Literature

Physician mothers face unique challenges related to family planning, pregnancy, childcare, work-life integration, inequities, and biases that may have serious widespread implications. There is a paucity of available information on the extent and ramifications of such challenges and related solutions. The purpose of this critical review of the literature was to identify and summarize challenges and solutions pertaining to physician mothers. A comprehensive literature search of databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCO MegaFILE, and APA PsycInfo on Ovid) from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, identified empirical articles that addressed challenges, policies, or solutions specific to physician mothers. Search terms included: physician, doctor, surgeon, specialist, hospitalist, pediatrician, woman, female, gender, mom, mother, maternity, breastfeed, pregnant, baby, infant, parent, parenthood, child,bias, status, stigma, inequity, discrimination, equal, unequal, justice, childcare, daycare, babysit, and nanny in various combinations. Seventy-one articles met inclusion criteria and were analyzed to identify categories and themes related to challenges and solutions for physician mothers. Themes for challenges were categorized by level of influence (individual, organizational and health care system, and societal); themes for solutions were categorized by approach and intervention (mentorship, childbearing and child-rearing support, addressing barriers to career satisfaction and work-life integration, and identification and reduction of maternal bias in medicine). Physician mothers face challenges that have negative implications for individuals, organizations and the health care system, and society. Clear understanding of associated challenges and potential solutions is a critical first step to address biases and barriers affecting physician mothers.

Maternity Experiences and Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Physicians

INTRODUCTION

Postpartum employment has been recognized as a significant obstacle to breastfeeding continuation rates in the general population. Multiple additional factors can influence emergency medicine (EM) physician mothers’ ability to continue breastfeeding upon return to work. These include the unpredictable nature of emergency room volumes and acuity, absence of protected lactation time or facilities, and varying levels of support from colleagues. This study investigated a sample of female EM physicians’ current perceptions and experiences regarding breastfeeding practices and identified modifiable work-place factors affecting their decision to wean. The authors hypothesized that EM physician mothers would have excellent breastfeeding initiation rates but be largely unable to maintain breastfeeding practices upon returning to work.

METHODS

A 34-item survey questionnaire evaluated demographics, perceptions, and experiences with breastfeeding with a convenience sample of EM attending and resident physicians from two Michigan academic community hospitals.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine surveys were completed, representing a participant response rate of 88.6%. Breastfeeding had been initiated by all respondent mothers, all of whom returned to full-time employment after delivery. Upon return to work, 15 (75%) respondents continued to exclusively breastfeed. The goal of participants was to breastfeed for an average of 7.1 months (± 4.1 months), although the average duration children were exclusively breastfed was 5.8 months (± 4.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, the reasons for decreased breastfeeding after return to work in an EM residency program setting are multifactorial and include some modifiable interpersonal and institutional influences. These findings support the implementation of work-place strategies and policies to promote successful breastfeeding practices among EM resident and attending physician mothers returning to work.

Experiences of breast feeding at work for physicians, residents and medical students: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarise the available literature regarding breastfeeding experiences of medical students, residents and physicians.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles of any design, including non-peer reviewed data that examine the experiences of breast feeding of medical students, residents and staff physicians.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science.

RISK OF BIAS

All peer-reviewed studies underwent risk-of-bias assessment using relevant tools, depending on the study design.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 71 citations; 51 surveys, 3 narrative descriptions, 9 editorials or letters to the editor, and 3 reviews.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Included articles were heterogeneous with respect to their study design, target population and outcomes reported. Most articles had a high risk of bias. Only five articles reported the impact of an intervention.

DESCRIPTION OF EFFECT

Despite heterogeneity, the majority of articles described important barriers to breast feeding for physicians, residents and medical students. These barriers were similar across studies, and included inadequate and inaccessible space, time constraints and inflexible scheduling, and lack of colleague support. The consequences of these barriers included low milk supply and early discontinuation of breast feeding.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF EVIDENCE

Due to the observed heterogeneity of articles identified in this review, we are unable to assess trends in barriers or duration of breastfeeding over time.

INTERPRETATION

Interventions to overcome systemic and cultural barriers to breast feeding are needed to meet legal obligations of workplaces for physicians and trainees. These interventions should be formally evaluated using implementation science or quality improvement methods.

Female hospital workers in Morocco: factors influencing breastfeeding duration with self-reported experiences

Health workers (HW) could be at risk of early weaning because of working conditions. Our aim was to determine factors influencing the duration of breastfeeding among Moroccan hospital workers, and to explore their breastfeeding (BF) experiences. A cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals in Rabat/Morocco (from November 2015 to April 2016), including each woman working in the hospital, with at least one living child and who accepted to be interviewed. Data of 203 hospital workers were analyzed. The median age was 39. The median duration of any breastfeeding was 8 months. Among different categories of HW, physicians had the lowest duration of breastfeeding. Factors significantly correlated to longer duration of breastfeeding were infant rank (p = 0.003), early initiation of breastfeeding (p < 0.001), access to milk storage generally (p = 0.04), husband's opinion on breastfeeding (p < 0.001) and category of hospital worker (p = 0.01). Three central themes emerged from the analysis of qualitative data: "Breastfeeding health worker has to assume her work duties as any other health worker", "the expression of need for support", and "the lack of knowledge on breastfeeding". In light of these results, we believe that physicians are a high-risk group of premature complete weaning; many actions should be taken for all HW to enhance their knowledge and giving them support.

A Socioecological Approach to Understanding Workplace Lactation Support in the Health Care Setting

Introduction: The percentage of working women with children under the age of 3 has nearly doubled since the 1970s, elevating the importance of understanding and improving workplace lactation support. This study aimed to examine employee perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support within a single health care system. We used a socioecological approach and included the views of a broad range of employees with and without lactation experience to capture diverse perspectives at multiple levels. Materials and Methods: Employees were recruited from an integrated health care system in the southeastern United States. Five focus groups were conducted during June to August 2017. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, with key themes organized at four levels of analysis: individual, interpersonal, departmental, and organizational. Results: Thirty-five clinical and nonclinical employees participated. Employees shared varied perspectives on workplace lactation support, which emphasized the: (1) importance of having a lactation policy, (2) critical role of leadership in setting the tone for workplace lactation, and (3) differential experience between clinical and non-clinical lactating employees. Conclusion: Employee experiences with lactation support in the health care setting are influenced by individual, interpersonal, departmental, and organizational factors that must be considered in the design of effective workplace lactation support programs. Policies and programs that align with organizational values and accommodate the needs of employees in varying roles are recommended. By using a socioecological perspective, this study identifies practical strategies for implementing, improving, and sustaining workplace lactation support across multiple levels of a large health care organization.

Advancing the Mission of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Through Innovation in Teaching

BACKGROUND

Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry, similar to other medical specialties, relies on the education of students, residents, fellows, and life-long learners for growth of the field. C-L psychiatry is unique as it exists at the intersection of psychiatry with other medical subspecialties. Traditional teaching methods have been used in C-L psychiatry programs for more than 50 years, while technology has recently advanced as available resources and the learning styles of today's learners have evolved. A growing number of younger trainees are taking advantage of new ways to learn.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine both traditional and novel teaching methodologies and how each of these educational methodologies fits within adult learning theory and in the context of how digital natives learn about C-L psychiatry.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we drew upon the experiences of the authors as both life-long learners and educators. We then reviewed the literature pertaining to teaching methods that have been used in C-L psychiatry as well as emerging methods that could potentially be used in C-L psychiatry.

RESULTS

C-L psychiatry has used traditional teaching methods such as readings, didactic lectures, case-based rounds, and problem-based learning. Novel teaching methodologies such as teaching rotations, simulations, social media, podcasts, movie clubs, and the use of mobile tablet computers have been used in general psychiatry and other medical specialties, while literature specific to C-L psychiatry was sparse.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunities abound to make use of new teaching methodologies and technologies to appeal to future generations of C-L psychiatrists.

Lactation Space Experiences and Preferences Among Health Care Workers in an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive workplace lactation support programs can reduce the risk for early breastfeeding discontinuation; however, scant evidence is available to inform user-centered design of employee lactation spaces. This study describes health care workers' preferences for lactation space.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2016-2017, a convenience sample of 151 women who pumped at work at an academic medical center reported on demographics, lactation experiences, and room and equipment preferences through an online survey.

RESULTS

Respondents worked in research and administration (32%), were nurses (30%), physicians and medical students (19%), or allied health or clinical support staff (19%). Seventy percent had ever used one of the hospital's dedicated lactation spaces. Forty-nine percent ranked hospital-grade pumps the most important piece of lactation room equipment; 83% preferred multiple occupancy lactation suites; and the average maximum acceptable distance to lactation space was 5.6 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal lactation infrastructure supports the immediate and long-term health of female workers and their children. User needs and preferences can guide design of lactation space to ensure a minimum standard for design, equipment, and distance. Workers may have different preferences depending on roles and experiences; thus, a variety of solutions may be most effective.

Barriers to Breastfeeding in Female Physicians

BACKGROUND

Breast milk is considered the normative nutrition for human infants, and exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life is recommended by several national and global societies. Female physicians are a high-risk group for early unintended weaning. We aimed to assess and compare the most common barriers to successful breastfeeding perceived by female physicians in various stages of training and practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female faculty physicians and trainees (medical students, resident physicians, and fellows) affiliated with a large medical university in 2016 were surveyed via an anonymous web-based survey distributed through institutional e-mail lists. The three-item survey assessed role, breastfeeding experience, and perceived barriers to successful breastfeeding. Comparisons between groups were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 1,301 women with 223 responses included in analysis. The majority (57%) of respondents had never breastfed; of those, 87% reported plans to breastfeed in the future. Ninety-seven percent of women with breastfeeding experience reported at least one perceived barrier to successful breastfeeding. Trainees identified more barriers compared with faculty physicians (median count 5 versus 3, p = 0.014). No individual barrier reached statistical significance when comparing between faculty and trainees. The most frequently identified barriers to breastfeeding were lack of time and appropriate place to pump breast milk, unpredictable schedule, short maternity leave, and long working hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and medical students who breastfeed face occupation-related barriers that could lead to early unintended weaning. Trainees and faculty report similar barriers. Institutional support may help improve some barriers to successful breastfeeding in female physicians.