1
|
Costello S, Santillan D, Shelby A, Bowdler N. Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding After Planned Cesarean Birth Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Breastfeed Med 2024; 19:166-176. [PMID: 38416483 PMCID: PMC10951620 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Background: Benefits of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mother and newborn are widely documented, including improved breastfeeding outcomes. While promoting immediate SSC is standard practice for vaginal birth, it happens less often after cesarean birth. It is not known how changes in hospital practices and staffing shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic have influenced the practice of SSC in the operating room (OR). This study aims to identify the relationship between SSC after cesarean birth and breastfeeding and compare SSC before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single institution. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 244 subjects who had scheduled cesarean births during 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was newborn feeding at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were time to initiate breastfeeding, newborn feeding at 4-8-weeks postpartum, and location of SSC initiation in 2019 versus 2020. Results: SSC within 3 days of birth was significantly associated with feeding type on discharge and/or 4-8 weeks postpartum. More subjects intending to exclusively breastfeed met this intention at discharge with SSC in the OR. Newborns who had SSC in the OR had significantly earlier initiation of breastfeeding. There was an increase in SSC in the OR between 2019 (27%) and 2020 (39%). Conclusion: SSC in the OR was associated with improved short-term breastfeeding outcomes in our study. If immediate SSC is not possible, SSC within 3 days of birth may have breastfeeding benefits. The increase in SSC in the OR during the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that SSC practices can be implemented, despite challenging circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Costello
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Donna Santillan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Alyssa Shelby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Noelle Bowdler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuerva MJ, Carbonell M, Boria F, Gil MM, De La Calle M, Bartha JL. Influence on operative time of immediate skin-to-skin care in low-risk primary cesarean births for breech presentation: Retrospective cohort study. Birth 2023; 50:571-577. [PMID: 36265127 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple benefits for both, mother and baby have been reported from immediate skin-to-skin care (SSC). The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of SSC on operative time and blood loss in primary cesarean births for breech presentation. METHODS A SSC protocol for cesarean birth was implemented in our institution on February 25, 2019. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared the outcomes of planned primary cesarean births for breech presentation at term before and after its implementation. RESULTS Data from 110 women who had a cesarean birth for breech presentation at term were analyzed, 55 in each group. Group 1 were women who had immediate SSC and Group 2 were women without immediate SSC. Maternal and surgical characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was 3.22 minutes shorter in the immediate SSC group compared with the not immediate SSC group (37.13 ± 12.27 vs 40.35 ± 12.23 minutes; P = 0.171). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, immediate SSC following a low-risk cesarean birth for breech presentation neither prolongs the operative time nor increases blood loss during the procedure. Although we were unable to demonstrate a significant reduction in the operative time with the immediate SSC protocol, a decrease of 3 minutes was noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Javier Cuerva
- Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- School of Health Sciences, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Carbonell
- Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Félix Boria
- Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Mar Gil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejon de Ardoz, Spain
- School of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - María De La Calle
- Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- School of medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Bartha
- Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- School of medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mena-Tudela D, Soriano-Vidal FJ, Vila-Candel R, Quesada JA, Martínez-Porcar C, Martin-Moreno JM. Is Early Initiation of Maternal Lactation a Significant Determinant for Continuing Exclusive Breastfeeding up to 6 Months? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3184. [PMID: 36833878 PMCID: PMC9966801 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) within the first hour after birth. However, certain perinatal factors, namely caesarean section, may prevent this goal from being achieved. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between EIBF (maternal lactation in the first hours and degree of latching before hospital discharge) and the maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding (MBF) up to the recommended 6 months of age (as advocated by the WHO). METHODS This observational, retrospective cohort study included a random sample of all births between 2018 and 2019, characterising the moment of breastfeeding initiation after birth and the infant's level of breast latch (measured by LATCH assessment tool) prior to hospital discharge. Data were collected from electronic medical records and from follow-up health checks of infants up to 6 months postpartum. RESULTS We included 342 women and their newborns. EIBF occurred most often after vaginal (p < 0.001) and spontaneous births with spontaneous amniorrhexis (p = 0.002). LATCH score <9 points was associated with a 1.4-fold relative risk of abandoning MBF (95%CI: 1.2-1.7) compared with a score of 9-10 points. CONCLUSIONS Although we were unable to find a significant association between EIBF in the first 2 h after birth and MBF at 6 months postpartum, low LATCH scores prior to discharge were associated with low MBF, indicating the importance of reinforcing the education and preparation efforts of mothers in the first days after delivery, prior to the establishment of an infant feeding routine upon returning home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desirée Mena-Tudela
- Department of Nursing, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Soriano-Vidal
- Department of Nursing, Universitat de València, 46007 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Xàtiva-Oninyent Health Department, 46800 Xàtiva, Spain
| | - Rafael Vila-Candel
- Department of Nursing, Universitat de València, 46007 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Spain
| | - José Antonio Quesada
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Elche, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 03550 Alicante, Spain
| | - Cristina Martínez-Porcar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Spain
| | - Jose M. Martin-Moreno
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Clinic University Hospital, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
George S, Showalter D, Graham K. Implementing the Role of Neonatal Assessment Nurse to Improve Skin-to-Skin Care and Breastfeeding Exclusivity. Nurs Womens Health 2023; 27:79-89. [PMID: 36773627 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve rates of exclusive breastfeeding during the postpartum hospital stay by implementing a new role of dedicated neonatal assessment nurse (NAN), whose primary function was neonatal care beginning immediately after birth. DESIGN Quality improvement project with plan-do-study-act using evidence-based guidelines for implementing the NAN role. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM Labor and delivery department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in the southeastern United States; breastfeeding exclusivity rates at this hospital were in the range of 50%. PARTICIPANTS Registered nurses employed in the labor-delivery-recovery unit, mother-baby unit, and NICU. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS The NAN role was implemented to promote immediate skin-to-skin care (SSC) for stable newborns after vaginal and cesarean birth. Each NAN's competency was evaluated at the beginning and end of the education session through a pretest/posttest, and a skills validation was used to affirm their readiness for the new role. The outcome measure was breastfeeding exclusivity at the time of discharge from the hospital. SSC initiation and duration immediately after birth were the process measures. RESULTS Twenty-five bedside registered nurses participated in this quality improvement project. There was a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores (p < .001), indicating a knowledge increase. All nurses met the skills validation criteria. The rate of SSC immediately after vaginal birth increased from 49% to 82% and after cesarean birth from 33% to 63%. Breastfeeding exclusivity rate at the time of discharge from the hospital increased from 50% to 86%. CONCLUSION The NAN role provided transitional care at the bedside without the separation of mothers and newborns. This was an innovative role, without the need to hire new staff, that provided evidence-based care, resulting in improved SSC and exclusivity of breastfeeding before discharge.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT, Ng KC, Olasveengen TM, Singletary EM, Soar J, Cheng A, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Scholefield BR, Smyth MA, Welsford M, Zideman DA, Acworth J, Aickin R, Andersen LW, Atkins D, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Bierens J, Borra V, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Bray JE, Breckwoldt J, Callaway CW, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Castrén M, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Couto TB, Dainty KN, Davis PG, de Almeida MF, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Donnino MW, Douma MJ, Duff JP, Dunne CL, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Fabres JG, Fawke J, Finn J, Foglia EE, Folke F, Gilfoyle E, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hosono S, Hsieh MJ, Hsu CH, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Kim HS, Kleinman M, Kloeck DA, Kudenchuk PJ, Lagina AT, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Lin YJ, Lockey AS, Maconochie IK, Madar J, Malta Hansen C, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Morgan P, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni V, Nakwa FL, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nemeth M, Neumar RW, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall GA, O'Neill BJ, Gene Ong YK, Orkin AM, Paiva EF, Parr MJ, Patocka C, Pellegrino JL, Perkins GD, Perlman JM, Rabi Y, Reis AG, Reynolds JC, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sakamoto T, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer GM, Schnaubelt S, Semeraro F, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Sugiura T, Tijssen JA, Trevisanuto D, Van de Voorde P, Wang TL, Weiner GM, Wyllie JP, Yang CW, Yeung J, Nolan JP, Berg KM. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Pediatrics 2023; 151:189896. [PMID: 36325925 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT, Ng KC, Olasveengen TM, Singletary EM, Soar J, Cheng A, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Scholefield BR, Smyth MA, Welsford M, Zideman DA, Acworth J, Aickin R, Andersen LW, Atkins D, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Bierens J, Borra V, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Bray JE, Breckwoldt J, Callaway CW, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Castrén M, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Chung SP, Considine J, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Couto TB, Dainty KN, Davis PG, de Almeida MF, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Donnino MW, Douma MJ, Duff JP, Dunne CL, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Fabres JG, Fawke J, Finn J, Foglia EE, Folke F, Gilfoyle E, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hosono S, Hsieh MJ, Hsu CH, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Kim HS, Kleinman M, Kloeck DA, Kudenchuk PJ, Lagina AT, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Lin YJ, Lockey AS, Maconochie IK, Madar RJ, Malta Hansen C, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Morgan P, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni V, Nakwa FL, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nemeth M, Neumar RW, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall GA, O'Neill BJ, Ong YKG, Orkin AM, Paiva EF, Parr MJ, Patocka C, Pellegrino JL, Perkins GD, Perlman JM, Rabi Y, Reis AG, Reynolds JC, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sakamoto T, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer GM, Schnaubelt S, Semeraro F, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Sugiura T, Tijssen JA, Trevisanuto D, Van de Voorde P, Wang TL, Weiner GM, Wyllie JP, Yang CW, Yeung J, Nolan JP, Berg KM, Cartledge S, Dawson JA, Elgohary MM, Ersdal HL, Finan E, Flaatten HI, Flores GE, Fuerch J, Garg R, Gately C, Goh M, Halamek LP, Handley AJ, Hatanaka T, Hoover A, Issa M, Johnson S, Kamlin CO, Ko YC, Kule A, Leone TA, MacKenzie E, Macneil F, Montgomery W, O’Dochartaigh D, Ohshimo S, Palazzo FS, Picard C, Quek BH, Raitt J, Ramaswamy VV, Scapigliati A, Shah BA, Stewart C, Strand ML, Szyld E, Thio M, Topjian AA, Udaeta E, Vaillancourt C, Wetsch WA, Wigginton J, Yamada NK, Yao S, Zace D, Zelop CM. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation 2022; 146:e483-e557. [PMID: 36325905 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT, Ng KC, Olasveengen TM, Singletary EM, Soar J, Cheng A, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Scholefield BR, Smyth MA, Welsford M, Zideman DA, Acworth J, Aickin R, Andersen LW, Atkins D, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Bierens J, Borra V, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Bray JE, Breckwoldt J, Callaway CW, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Castrén M, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Couto TB, Dainty KN, Davis PG, de Almeida MF, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Donnino MW, Douma MJ, Duff JP, Dunne CL, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Fabres JG, Fawke J, Finn J, Foglia EE, Folke F, Gilfoyle E, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hosono S, Hsieh MJ, Hsu CH, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Kim HS, Kleinman M, Kloeck DA, Kudenchuk PJ, Lagina AT, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Lin YJ, Lockey AS, Maconochie IK, Madar RJ, Malta Hansen C, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Morgan P, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni V, Nakwa FL, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nemeth M, Neumar RW, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall GA, O'Neill BJ, Gene Ong YK, Orkin AM, Paiva EF, Parr MJ, Patocka C, Pellegrino JL, Perkins GD, Perlman JM, Rabi Y, Reis AG, Reynolds JC, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sakamoto T, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer GM, Schnaubelt S, Semeraro F, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Sugiura T, Tijssen JA, Trevisanuto D, Van de Voorde P, Wang TL, Weiner GM, Wyllie JP, Yang CW, Yeung J, Nolan JP, Berg KM, Cartledge S, Dawson JA, Elgohary MM, Ersdal HL, Finan E, Flaatten HI, Flores GE, Fuerch J, Garg R, Gately C, Goh M, Halamek LP, Handley AJ, Hatanaka T, Hoover A, Issa M, Johnson S, Kamlin CO, Ko YC, Kule A, Leone TA, MacKenzie E, Macneil F, Montgomery W, O’Dochartaigh D, Ohshimo S, Stefano Palazzo F, Picard C, Quek BH, Raitt J, Ramaswamy VV, Scapigliati A, Shah BA, Stewart C, Strand ML, Szyld E, Thio M, Topjian AA, Udaeta E, Vaillancourt C, Wetsch WA, Wigginton J, Yamada NK, Yao S, Zace D, Zelop CM. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Resuscitation 2022; 181:208-288. [PMID: 36336195 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimising pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ramaswamy VV, de Almeida MF, Dawson JA, Trevisanuto D, Nakwa FL, Kamlin CO, Hosono S, Wyckoff MH, Liley HG. Maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth in late preterm and term infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2022; 180:81-98. [PMID: 36174764 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM Prevention of hypothermia after birth is a global problem in late preterm and term neonates. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate delivery room strategies to maintain normothermia and improve survival in late preterm and term neonates (≥34 weeks' gestation). METHODS Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and international clinical trial registries were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for each study and GRADE certainty of evidence for each outcome were assessed. RESULTS 25 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs were included. Room temperature of 23 °C compared to 20 °C improved normothermia [Risk Ratio (RR), 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.26, 1.11-1.42)] and body temperature [Mean Difference (MD), 95% CI: 0.30 °C, 0.23-0.37 °C), and decreased moderate hypothermia (RR, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.16-0.42). Skin to skin care (SSC) compared to no SSC increased body temperature (MD, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.10-0.52), reduced hypoglycemia (RR, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.05-0.53) and hospital admission (RR, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.14-0.83). Though plastic bag or wrap (PBW) alone or when combined with SSC compared to SSC alone improved temperatures, the risk-benefit balance is uncertain. Clinical benefit or harm could not be excluded for the primary outcome of survival for any of the interventions. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Room temperature of 23 °C and SSC soon after birth may prevent hypothermia in late preterm and term neonates. Though PBW may be an effective adjunct intervention, the risk-benefit balance needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V V Ramaswamy
- Ankura Hospital for Women and Children, Hyderabad, India
| | - M F de Almeida
- Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J A Dawson
- Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Trevisanuto
- Medical School, University of Padua, Azienda Ospedaliera Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - F L Nakwa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
| | - C O Kamlin
- Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Hosono
- Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - M H Wyckoff
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - H G Liley
- Faculty of Medicine and Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Australia. hliley%
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez‐Jiménez JM, Luque‐Oliveros M, Gonzalez‐Perez D, Rivera‐Sequeiros A, Rodriguez‐Blanco C. Does immediate skin-to-skin contact at caesarean sections promote uterine contraction and recovery of the maternal blood haemoglobin levels? A randomized clinical trial. Nurs Open 2022; 10:649-657. [PMID: 36166391 PMCID: PMC9834552 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM We analysed whether immediate skin-to-skin contact between the healthy newborn and the mother after a caesarean section has a modulatory role on postpartum haemorrhage and uterine contraction. DESIGN Unblinded, randomized clinical trial, simple random sampling, conducted in women undergoing caesarean sections. METHODS Of the population identified, the caesarean section total (N = 359), 23.2% (N = 83) met the inclusion criteria: scheduled caesarean section, accepting skin-to-skin contact, good level of consciousness. They were randomly allocated to the intervention group, skin-to-skin contact (N = 40), and to the control group, usual procedure (N = 40). There were three losses. Clinical variables: plasma haemoglobin, uterine contraction, breastfeeding, postoperative pain, were measured, and subjective variables: maternal satisfaction, comfort, comparison with previous caesarean section and newborn crying. RESULTS Women with skin-to-skin contact had greater uterine contraction after caesarean section. The maternal plasma haemoglobin levels at discharge were significantly higher. It was associated with higher breastfeeding rate, satisfaction, comfort levels and with less maternal pain and less crying in the newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Miguel Pérez‐Jiménez
- Departamento de Enfermería, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and PodiatryHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, University of SevillaSevillaSpain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sheedy GM, Stulz VM, Stevens J. Exploring outcomes for women and neonates having skin-to-skin contact during caesarean birth: A quasi-experimental design and qualitative study. Women Birth 2022; 35:e530-e538. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Immediate and Sustained Skin-to-Skin Contact for Healthy Late Preterm and Term Newborns After Birth: AWHONN Practice Brief Number 14. Nurs Womens Health 2021; 25:e9-e11. [PMID: 34462236 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Immediate and Sustained Skin-to-Skin Contact for Healthy Late Preterm and Term Newborns After Birth: AWHONN Practice Brief Number 14. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2021; 50:e13-e15. [PMID: 34462182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
13
|
Gupta N, Deierl A, Hills E, Banerjee J. Systematic review confirmed the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact but highlighted lack of studies on very and extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110:2310-2315. [PMID: 33973279 DOI: 10.1111/apa.15913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) for all gestational ages. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for papers published in English from 1 January 1975 to 31 March 2020. Early SSC was defined as when the infant was placed directly onto the mother's chest within 180 min of birth. Two authors independently searched the databases, appraised study quality and extracted the study design and outcome data. The primary outcomes were the infants' physiological stability after birth: thermoregulation and stabilisation. The secondary outcomes were exclusive breastfeeding and mother-infant interaction. RESULTS We reviewed 30 studies that assessed the benefits of early SSC: 22 comprised term-born healthy infants and eight focused on preterm or ill infants. These included various gestational ages, birth methods and cultural backgrounds. The studies demonstrated that early SSC stabilised neonatal physiological parameters, promoted exclusive breastfeeding and supported bonding. Most of the data were from term and late preterm births. CONCLUSION This systematic review showed that early SSC could be beneficial. Further studies that focus on providing very and extremely preterm infants with SSC, and parental experiences, are needed to enable SSC to be adopted as routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Gupta
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
| | | | - Emily Hills
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
| | - Jayanta Banerjee
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
- Imperial College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Crenshaw JT, Adams ED, Gilder RE, Nolte HG. Measuring health professionals' beliefs about skin-to-skin care during a cesarean. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2021; 17:e13219. [PMID: 34159712 PMCID: PMC8476431 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Women and their newborns are at risk of delayed or withheld skin‐to‐skin care (SSC) during a caesarean, which is about one‐third of births, worldwide. To date, no instrument exists to assess health professionals' (HPs) beliefs, and potential barriers and strategies for implementing SSC during a cesarean. The study aims were to (1) develop an instrument, Health Professionals' Beliefs about Skin‐to‐Skin Care During a Cesarean (SSCB), (2) establish its validity and reliability and (3) describe HPs' beliefs about SSC during a caesarean. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were used to test the SSCB and describe HPs' beliefs. SSCB analysis yielded a content validity of 0.83 and reliability of α = 0.9. We grouped all practice roles as either nurses or physicians. The mean rank score for nurses (n = 120, M = 90) was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than physicians (n = 46, M = 79). Despite this difference, scores for both roles reflected support for SSC. Participants identified hospital readiness to implement SSC and maintaining maternal and newborn safety as major issues. SSCB is a valid, reliable instrument to measure HPs' beliefs about SSC during a caesarean birth. HPs can use the SSCB during quality improvement initiatives to improve access to immediate SSC for women who have a caesarean birth. Improved access can enhance breastfeeding outcomes and promote optimal maternal and child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette T Crenshaw
- School of Nursing: Professor, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States, USA
| | - Ellise D Adams
- College of Nursing; PhD Program Coordinator, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Richard E Gilder
- Owner, The Gilder Company, Dallas, TX, USA.,Adjunct Faculty: School of Nursing, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States, USA
| | - Hannah G Nolte
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.,Private practice: Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, Hayden and Associates TMS Therapy Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deys L, Wilson PV, Meedya DS. What are women's experiences of immediate skin-to-skin contact at caesarean section birth? An integrative literature review. Midwifery 2021; 101:103063. [PMID: 34157585 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin-to-skin is a well-established practice at vaginal births promoting the health of women and babies. Facilitation of skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth is growing despite environmental and historical challenges. This is led by the expectancy of women and of health professionals increasingly understanding its importance. OBJECTIVE To synthesise original research that explores the experience of women having immediate and uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact at caesarean section when woman and baby are well. DESIGN Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES The databases of SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL plus, Wiley Online, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and MIDIRS were used to identify studies from 2010-2020. Hand searching of library journals, reference and citation lists were also used. METHODS The framework of Whittemore and Knafl (2005) was used to guide the literature search, thematic analysis, and synthesis of original research. Initial screening against inclusion criteria was utilised for English-published papers of full-term, well, woman and baby dyads who experienced skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth. Papers were not limited by methodology. The validated Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for critical quality appraisal (Bartlett et al., 2018). FINDINGS In total, 750 results were returned in the initial search and a final 13 papers were included in this review including quantitative (6), qualitative (5) and mixed method (2) designs. Immediate and uninterrupted skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth, when mother and baby are well, is safe, appropriate and desired by women, improving birth experience and satisfaction. Three main themes were identified with sub-themes - Positive birth experience (satisfaction; breastfeeding goals); Sense of control (empowered; birth, not a procedure); Natural (wanting to hold their baby; becoming a mother). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review show that skin-to-skin improves the experience for women, and particularly empowers women having a caesarean section giving them a sense of a more natural birth. Women see skin-to-skin as an opportunity to maintain control and not be separated from their baby. Many studies have focused on the benefits of skin-to-skin but less so on the wants and choices of women. Women want to see, hold and feed their babies but are unable to achieve this of their own volition during a surgical birth. Understanding how women value this close physical contact can seek to inform further research on the impact of separation. This can inform policy and practice development in maternity care services to ensure best outcomes for both women and infants. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The practice of skin-to-skin and keeping mother and baby together is valued by women and justified by research as best-practice for health and well-being. The findings of this paper highlight the importance of maternity settings facilitating both skin-to-skin and non-separation for all women and their newborns, even more so at caesarean section births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Deys
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia; Clinical Midwife Consultant/IBCLC/RN, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia; Maternal & Women's Health, Locked Bag 8808, South Coast Mail Centre, NSW 2521, Australia.
| | - Professor Valerie Wilson
- University of Wollongong School of Nursing and Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frederick A, Fry T, Clowtis L. Intraoperative Mother and Baby Skin-to-Skin Contact during Cesarean Birth: Systematic Review. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2020; 45:296-305. [PMID: 33095544 DOI: 10.1097/nmc.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Experts recommend immediate skin-to-skin (SSC) contact for all alert and stable mothers and newborns after birth. Clinicians are working to incorporate immediate (intraoperative) SSC during cesarean birth. The purpose of this systematic review is to describe the state of the science of intraoperative SSC for mother and baby and increase clinician's awareness of its potential benefits and risks. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A systematic approach was followed throughout the review process. CINAHL, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched using strategies constructed by an academic health sciences librarian. Articles included in the review focused on SSC initiated during cesarean birth. RESULTS Thirteen studies were selected for the mixed-method systematic review. Six prospective studies, four retrospective chart reviews, and three qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Maternal stress levels were reduced, whereas comfort, oxytocin, and antioxidant levels increased with intraoperative SSC. Physiologic measures of successful newborn transition showed little difference between newborns held in intraoperative SSC and those who were not. Synthesis of qualitative experiences revealed mothers' intense desire to hold and know their baby immediately after birth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Intraoperative SSC is a safe, beneficial, and highly desirable practice for mothers and newborns experiencing cesarean birth. Although barriers exist to its implementation, nurses can facilitate and support this practice. Evidence-based, family-centered intraoperative SSC should be offered to all stable mothers and babies according to recommendations and in a manner that promotes safe outcomes, including following current nurse staffing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anitra Frederick
- Dr. Anitra Frederick is a Clinical Assistant Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth), Houston, TX. Dr. Frederick can be reached via email at Dr. Tena Fry is APRN for Women's and Newborn Services, The Children's Hospital of Oklahoma City, OK. Dr. Licia Clowtis is Postdoctoral Fellow, Case Western Reserve University, Francis Bolton College of Nursing, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Promoting and Protecting the Gastrointestinal Newborn Microbiome Through Breastfeeding Practices. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2020; 34:222-230. [PMID: 32697542 DOI: 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Since newborns are a vulnerable population that cannot protect their own microbiome, healthcare professionals can promote, advocate, and assist with breastfeeding promotion to protect the healthy development of the newborn gastrointestinal microbiome. The newborn gastrointestinal microbiome is a dynamic community of bacteria that influence health. Breastfeeding seeds and feeds the newborn gastrointestinal microbiome. A disruption in the balance of the gastrointestinal microbiome can result in adverse health outcomes. This clinical article makes an evidence-based connection between breastfeeding and the establishment of the newborn gastrointestinal microbiome through breastfeeding promotion strategies during the childbearing year. Suggestions for healthcare profession education and future research that will continue to inform the understanding of healthy development of the microbiome will be provided. By assisting with breastfeeding promotion, healthcare professionals can protect the newborn gastrointestinal microbiome and promote overall newborn, infant, and child health.
Collapse
|