Monoclonal Antibodies During Breastfeeding

Guselkumab - In Psoriasis and Beyond

INTRODUCTION

Guselkumab is an interleukin 23p19 inhibitor, and the first in this group, to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis. Apart from its utility in psoriasis, there are a number of other dermatologic conditions where guselkumab has demonstrated value.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this narrative review is to describe the utility of guselkumab in psoriasis as well as its implication in off-label dermatologic disorders.

METHODS

Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus and ResearchGate were searched for scholarly articles related to guselkumab and its utility in dermatology using the search terms "Guselkumab" AND "Psoriasis" AND "other dermatological disorders".

RESULTS

Guselkumab is a valuable biologic agent for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy. It has also been used successfully for other dermatologic disorders like hidradenitis suppurativa, lichen planus, pityriasis rubra pilaris and pyoderma gangrenosum. Recently, its utility in Stewart-Treves angiosarcoma (STA) has been exemplified.

CONCLUSION

Guselkumab usage is not limited to psoriasis. Its benefit extends to many more dermatologic conditions. Its utility in STA could open an avenue for its application in the field of oncology. Furthermore, it has an acceptable safety profile.

High accumulation of nivolumab in human breast milk: A case report

Nivolumab is an immunotherapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is used for the treatment of several types of cancer. The evidence on its use during lactation is lacking. Here, we report on a 39-year-old woman with metastasized melanoma who was treated with 480 mg nivolumab every four weeks during lactation. Breast milk samples were collected over the course of 34 days, including two cycles of nivolumab. The highest measured concentration of nivolumab during the first cycle was 503 ng/mL at day 13. The cumulative relative infant dose (RID) over the first cycle (28 days) was 9.8 %. The highest overall measured nivolumab concentration was 519 ng/mL at day 33, five days after administration of the second nivolumab cycle. Nivolumab seems to accumulate in breast milk over two consecutive cycles, hence the RIDs of consecutive cycles are expected to be higher. To draw further conclusions regarding safety of breastfeeding during nivolumab therapy, more information about the oral bioavailability of nivolumab in newborns, the nivolumab steady-state concentrations in breast milk and its pharmacodynamic effects are needed.

The use of erenumab for migraine prophylaxis during pregnancy: A case report and narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of a woman who continued erenumab for migraine prophylaxis throughout her pregnancy and to review the literature for pregnancy safety data for the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor and ligand-directed therapies currently approved for migraine prophylaxis in the United States.

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common headache disorder that can be significantly disabling. Many people experiencing migraine seek out preventative therapies to improve their quality of life. Unfortunately, currently approved prophylactic agents may not be safe to use during pregnancy, potentially limiting the use of these agents in women of childbearing potential. As the newest class of prophylactic agents for migraine, CGRP agents have limited pregnancy safety data in humans.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted through the PubMed database using the terms pregnancy and either erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab, rimegepant, or atogepant. Additional sources of information such as prescribing information, assessment reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and manufacturer data were sought.

RESULTS

One case report was found in the literature documenting a human pregnancy with no adverse effects in the baby after exposure to erenumab. However, the last dose was administered in the second week of pregnancy and discontinued thereafter. The evaluation of 92 safety reports describing maternal exposure prior to or during pregnancy to either erenumab, galcanezumab, or fremanezumab was located. Incidence of miscarriage and congenital anomalies appear to be similar to rates in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of erenumab during pregnancy in our patient resulted in no known harm to the child. This case is unique in that the mother continued to receive erenumab throughout the pregnancy. Safety data is lacking regarding the use of these agents during pregnancy, despite their frequent use in women of childbearing potential.