Association Between Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use and Breastfeeding Duration

Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking, E-cigarette Use, and Dual Use Among Urban and Rural Women During the Peripartum Period, PRAMS 2015-2020

OBJECTIVES

Evidence has emerged on the health dangers of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use among pregnant women and neonates. We examined whether rural residence is a risk factor for smoking and e-cigarette use among women during the peripartum period in the United States.

METHODS

This study was based on pooled cross-sectional 2015-2020 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. The outcome was exclusive smoking, exclusive e-cigarette use, and use of both products (ie, dual use) versus use of neither tobacco product by women with live infants aged 2 to 6 months. We examined rural-urban differences in outcome by using univariate and multivariable multinomial logistic regressions with post hoc contrasts and marginal analyses, adjusting for complex survey design and nonresponse.

RESULTS

During the peripartum period, 5.0% of women were smoking combustible cigarettes, 5.0% were using e-cigarettes, and 1.9% were using both tobacco products. The crude prevalence of e-cigarette use was 1.1 percentage point higher, and the adjusted prevalence was 0.8 percentage points lower for rural versus urban women (P < .001 for both). Among rural women, 6.7% (95% CI, 6.3%-7.1%) smoked combustible cigarettes exclusively and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.3%-2.8%) used both products, as compared with 4.5% (95% CI, 4.4%-4.8%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-1.8%) of urban women, respectively, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal sociodemographic and health-related characteristics differed by combustible smoking versus e-cigarette use during the peripartum period. The effect of residence on e-cigarette use was significantly confounded by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, resulting in clinically comparable prevalence of e-cigarette use in rural and urban mothers with live infants aged 2 to 6 months.

Population-Based Disease Odds for E-Cigarettes and Dual Use versus Cigarettes

BACKGROUND: E-cigarettes are promoted as less harmful than cigarettes. There has not been a direct comparison of health effects of e-cigarettes or dual use (concurrently using e-cigarettes and cigarettes) with those of cigarettes in the general population. METHODS: Studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsychINFO published through October 1, 2023, were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis if five or more studies were identified with a disease outcome. We assessed risk of bias with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposure and certainty with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. Outcomes with fewer studies were summarized but not pooled. RESULTS: We identified 124 odds ratios (94 cross-sectional and 30 longitudinal) from 107 studies. Pooled odds ratios for current e-cigarette versus cigarette use were not different for cardiovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.14), stroke (0.73; 0.47 to 1.13), or metabolic dysfunction (0.99; 0.91 to 1.09) but were lower for asthma (0.84; 0.74 to 0.95), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.53; 0.38 to 0.74), and oral disease (0.87; 0.76 to 1.00). Pooled odds ratios for dual use versus cigarettes were increased for all outcomes (range, 1.20 to 1.41). Pooled odds ratios for e-cigarettes and dual use compared with nonuse of either product were increased (e-cigarette range, 1.24 to 1.47; dual use, 1.49 to 3.29). All included studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. Results were generally not sensitive to study characteristics. Limited studies of other outcomes suggest that e-cigarette use is associated with additional diseases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to reassess the assumption that e-cigarette use provides substantial harm reduction across all cigarette-caused diseases, particularly accounting for dual use.

Perinatal Smoking and E-cigarette Use and Their Relationship with Breastfeeding: PRAMS 2015-2020

Introduction: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use poses concerns among women of child-bearing age. We examined prevalence of breastfeeding among the U.S. women and characteristics associated with exclusive use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, or both products. Materials and Methods: Our study is based on pooled cross-sectional data from 2015-2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Two outcomes were breastfeeding initiation and breastfeeding duration for over 6 months, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Binary logistic regressions were used to examine associations between each outcome and type of tobacco products unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders, with post hoc estimation of average adjusted predictions, marginal effects, and contrasts of margins in Stata. Results: Adjusted prevalence of breastfeeding initiation was significantly higher in women who used e-cigarettes (86.15%) than conventional cigarettes (72.16%) or both products (79.54%). Similarly, a significantly higher percentage of women who used e-cigarettes continued breastfeeding after 6 months (49.20%) than women who smoked conventional cigarettes (31.30%) or both products (29.83%). Among women who neither smoked nor used e-cigarettes, 85.29% initiated breastfeeding and 57.20% continued breastfeeding as recommended by the AAP. Conclusion: Likelihood of breastfeeding initiation and continuation in women using e-cigarettes was comparable to those who neither smoked nor used e-cigarettes. Future research needs to elucidate differences in breastfeeding by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of women who smoke or use both products compared to those who use e-cigarettes. Understanding women's motivation behind use of a particular tobacco product is also important, so mothers who smoke e-cigarettes are not incorrectly perceived as safer users and excluded from tobacco cessation interventions.

The Association of Maternal Smoking and Drinking Changes During Pregnancy and Postpartum Breastfeeding Pattern and Duration

Objectives: To conduct a secondary data analysis of how changes in smoking and drinking during pregnancy impact status of any breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration in a national cohort. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data between 2009 and 2017 (n = 334,203). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on the status of any breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration. Results: A dose-dependent inverse relationship was found in which women who smoked the same or more or resumed smoking during pregnancy showed the lowest likelihood and shortest duration of breastfeeding, followed by reduced smokers, quitters, and nonsmokers. Women with a history of alcohol use were significantly more likely to breastfeed compared with women without a history of alcohol use. Conclusions: The profile of smoking change during pregnancy impacts the likelihood and duration of breastfeeding in a dose-dependent and inverse manner. No such relationship was found with drinking change during pregnancy. Public Health Implications: Significant public health efforts should focus on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions for prenatal smoking cessation and educating providers and maternal populations on the adverse effect of postpartum alcohol exposure.

The risk profile of electronic nicotine delivery systems, compared to traditional cigarettes, on oral disease: a review

The use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has exploded, especially among teenagers and new smokers, amid widespread awareness of the dangers of traditional tobacco and restrictions on smoking. However, the risk effects of ENDS on physical health, especially oral health, are still ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to review the available evidence on risks of ENDS on oral health, and compares the differences between ENDS and traditional cigarettes. For heavy smokers, transferring the addiction of tobacco to ENDS can be less harmful to periodontal condition and physical health but is not completely without risk. The components of ENDS vapor have cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic properties, and its usage may be associated with a wide range of oral health sequelae. The chemicals in ENDS increase the susceptibility to tooth decay, increase the risk of periodontal disease, peri-implant, and oral mucosal lesions. Nicotine aerosols from ENDS can be a potential risk factor for oral cancer due to the presence of carcinogenic components. Compared to smoking traditional cigarettes, the harm associated with ENDS use may be underestimated due to the reduced ability to control vaping behavior, ease of ENDS access, fewer vaping area restrictions, and better taste. Currently, the available evidence suggests that ENDS may be a safer alternative to traditional tobacco products. Though most oral symptoms experienced by ENDS users are relatively mild and temporary compared to traditional cigarettes, the dangers of ENDS still exist. However, further research with longer follow-up periods is required to establish the long-term safety of ENDS.

Association Between a History of Hookah Use and Breastfeeding Duration

Background: There is limited evidence on the relationship between hookah use and breastfeeding. This study examines the association between a history of hookah use and breastfeeding duration among women in the United States. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 96,392 women from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2016-2019 data. The main outcome of interest was any breastfeeding for at least 3 months. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 68.3% of women breastfed for at least 3 months and 4.6% reported using hookah in the last 2 years. Women who reported using hookah in the last 2 years were significantly less likely to breastfeed for at least 3 months compared with women who did not report using hookah in the last 2 years (56.0% versus 68.9%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, the odds of breastfeeding for at least 3 months were significantly lower in women who used hookah in the last 2 years compared with those who did not use hookah; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.82 (0.74-0.92; p < 0.001). Additionally, the odds of breastfeeding for at least 3 months were significantly lower for dual users of hookah and cigarettes 0.48 (0.33-0.68; p < 0.001). Conclusion: A history of hookah use is associated with early weaning, independent of potential confounders. This finding suggests the need for educating women about the negative consequences of hookah use on breastfeeding during preconception, prenatal, and postpartum care encounters.

Association Between Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Duration

Background: Prenatal vaccination and breastfeeding are both health promotional behaviors. The benefits of breastfeeding are widely investigated and well established, as well as the effectivity and the safety of the influenza vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the association between the prenatal health behavior of influenza vaccination and breastfeeding duration for at least 3 months in the United States. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted using 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System data consisting of 83,976 postpartum women. Results: Overall, 68.3% (n = 57,269) breastfed for at least 3 months and 56.6% (n = 48,834) received the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Women who did not receive the influenza vaccine during pregnancy were significantly less likely to breastfeed compared with women who received the vaccine during pregnancy (64.5% versus 71.1%; p < 0.001). Significant covariates associated with ≥3-month breastfeeding duration included maternal sociodemographic factors, infant factors, maternal health factors, and prenatal health behaviors. In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the odds of breastfeeding at least 3 months were significantly lower in women who did not receive the influenza vaccine during pregnancy compared with those who were vaccinated (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.98; p = 0.005). Discussion: Findings from this large, nationally representative sample of U.S. mothers indicate an association between the health-promotional behaviors of prenatal influenza vaccination and breastfeeding duration postpartum. Recommendations and education by health care providers should include a focus on maternal health behaviors to support positive maternal-infant health outcomes including reduced risk of infection and extended breastfeeding duration.