DNA storage under high temperature conditions does not affect performance in human leukocyte antigen genotyping via next-generation sequencing (DNA integrity maintained in extreme conditions)

Novel buffer for long-term preservation of DNA in biological material at room temperature

The collection and preservation of biological material before DNA analysis is critical for inter alia biomedical research, medical diagnostics, forensics and biodiversity conservation. In this study, we evaluate an in-house formulated buffer called the Forensic DNA Laboratory-buffer (FDL-buffer) for preservation of biological material for long term at room temperature. Human saliva stored in the buffer for 8 years, human blood stored for 3 years and delicate animal tissues from the jellyfish Pelagia noctiluca comb jelly Beroe sp., stored for 4 and 6 years respectively consistently produced high-quality DNA. FDL-buffer exhibited compatibility with standard organic, salting out and spin-column extraction methods, making it versatile and applicable to a wide range of applications, including automation.

Multivariate Evaluation of DNA Quality Differences in Different Preanalytical Procedures in Mouse Livers

Successful histogenetic research relies on proper handling of tissue samples to maximize DNA quality. As the largest gland in the body, the liver is particularly sensitive to sample mishandling owing to its enzymatic and transcriptional activity. However, the impact of preanalytical procedures on the quality of extracted liver DNA remains poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the impact of extraction methods, duration of ex vivo liver ischemia, liver storage time, and temperature on extracted DNA quality. Comprehensive parameters such as DNA yields, purity, DNA integrity number, the percentage of double-stranded DNA (%dsDNA), and PCR amplification of the GAPDH gene fragment were assessed to identify the quality of extracted DNA. Our results revealed that these preanalytical processes had little effect on DIN values and PCR efficiency of GAPDH gene fragments for each sample, whereas the DNA yields, purity, and %dsDNAs varied widely across different processes. For liver DNA extraction, RNase is necessary to isolate "pure" DNA, and the presence of RNase could significantly increase the %dsDNA. In addition, significant increases in the yields, purity, and %dsDNA of extracted DNA were observed in the TissueLyser-processed livers compared with the mortar and pestle or shear cell disruption methods. Further investigation revealed that livers experiencing longer periods of ex vivo ischemia resulted in significantly compromised DNA yields, and to obtain sufficient DNA, the ex vivo liver ischemia should be limited to within 30 minutes. Moreover, compared with storage of livers at -80°C, storage of livers in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen yielded a higher quality of the extracted DNA. Our findings exhibited significant implications for liver-derived DNA quality assessment and management.

Suitability of dried DNA for long-range PCR amplification and HLA typing by next-generation sequencing

Storage and stable shipment of genomic DNA are of great concern to laboratories that may need to perform testing off archived samples. There are some dry-state storage methods that are available that have the potential to provide a way to store samples at room temperature for long periods of time as well as offer a means to ship DNA to other facilities without the same safety concerns that come with shipping liquid samples. The recovered DNA should be of sufficient integrity such that downstream applications can be performed without concern of the sample quality. This work describes sample properties between two methods of DNA storage, dried (room temperature) and traditional (-80 °C). DNA was evaluated for purity, fragment length, and the ability to generate HLA typing using next-generation sequencing.

Evaluation of Two Matrices for Long-Term, Ambient Storage of Bacterial DNA

BACKGROUND

Culture-independent molecular analyses allow researchers to identify diverse microorganisms. This approach requires microbiological DNA repositories. The standard for DNA storage is liquid nitrogen or ultralow freezers. These use large amounts of space, are costly to operate, and could fail. Room temperature DNA storage is a viable alternative. In this study, we investigated storage of bacterial DNA using two ambient storage matrices, Biomatrica DNAstable^® Plus and GenTegra^® DNA.

METHODS

We created crude and clean DNA extracts from five Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Extracts were stored at -30°C (our usual DNA storage temperature), 25°C (within the range of temperatures recommended for the products), and 50°C (to simulate longer storage time). Samples were stored at -30°C with no product and dried at 25°C and 50°C with no product, in Biomatrica DNAstable Plus or GenTegra DNA. We analyzed the samples after 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 weeks using the Nanodrop 1000 to determine the amount of DNA in each aliquot and by real-time PCR for the S. pneumoniae genes lytA and psaA. Using a 50°C storage temperature, we simulated 362 weeks of 25°C storage.

RESULTS

The average amount of DNA in aliquots stored with a stabilizing matrix was 103%-116% of the original amount added to the tubes. This is similar to samples stored at -30°C (average 102%-121%). With one exception, samples stored with a stabilizing matrix had no change in lytA or psaA cycle threshold (Ct) value over time (Ct range ≤2.9), similar to samples stored at -30°C (Ct range ≤3.0). Samples stored at 25°C with no stabilizing matrix had Ct ranges of 2.2-5.1.

CONCLUSION

DNAstable Plus and GenTegra DNA can protect dried bacterial DNA samples stored at room temperature with similar effectiveness as at -30°C. It is not effective to store bacterial DNA at room temperature without a stabilizing matrix.