Metabolic clearance rate is a more robust and physiological parameter for insulin sensitivity than glucose infusion rate in the isoglycemic glucose clamp technique

Glucose and protein metabolic responses to an energy- but not protein- restricted diet in type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To test the effect of energy restriction with maintained protein intake on body composition and on insulin sensitivity of glucose and protein metabolism in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After 3 days of an isoenergetic diet with 1.2 g/kg/d protein, obese adults with T2D (three women, two men) followed a 5-week diet providing 60% of energy requirements with 45% carbohydrate, and with protein maintained at pre-intervention level. Isotopic tracers were used to quantify whole-body glucose (3-³ H-glucose) and protein (¹³ C-leucine) metabolism pre- (day 4) and post-intervention (day 39), in the postabsorptive state and during a hyperinsulinaemic, isoglycaemic, isoaminoacidaemic clamp. Body composition was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

After energy restriction, 6% weight loss occurred via total body (11%) and visceral fat losses (25%), but lean mass was preserved. Fasting glucose level, serum insulin level, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index and C-peptide level decreased significantly (29%, 38%, 54% and 38%, respectively) as did other cardiometabolic risk factors. Between clamp studies, postabsorptive protein turnover and oxidation rates decreased (12% and 32%), resulting in less negative net balance, consistent with protein conservation. The rates of glucose turnover decreased, and glucose metabolic clearance rate improved (24%). During the clamp, protein flux was lower (9%) and breakdown suppressed (12%), and net balance became less negative but not different. Although glucose turnover did not differ, metabolic clearance improved by 47%.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese adults with T2D, an energy-restricted diet with maintained protein intake of ~1.2 g/kg/d improved the kinetics of protein metabolism (particularly in the postabsorptive state), and preserved lean body mass and increased glucose metabolic clearance rate.

Insulin Sensitivity Is Not Decreased in Adult Patients With Hypopituitarism Without Growth Hormone Replacement

Decreased insulin sensitivity in patients with hypopituitarism without GH replacement (pHP-WGHR) remains conflicting in literature. It is known that these patients present a decrease in free fat mass and an increase in fat mass. Typically, these kinds of alterations in body composition are associated with a decrease in insulin sensitivity; however, there is no consensus if this association is found in pHP-WGHR. Thus, we investigated pHP-WGHR regarding insulin sensitivity by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, the gold standard method, and body composition. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated 15 pHP-WGHR followed up in a Service of Neuroendocrinology and 15 individuals with normal pituitary function as a control group with similar age, gender and body mass index. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Kappa coefficient evaluated the agreement between these two methods. Percentage of fat mass, percentage of free fat mass, fat mass weight and free fat mass weight were assessed by electrical bioimpedance. The pHP-WGHR presented similar insulin sensitivity to control group by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, both by the M-value, (p = 0.0913) and by the area under the glucose infusion rate curve, (p = 0.0628). These patients showed lower levels of fasting glycemia (p = 0.0128), insulin (p = 0.0007), HOMA-IR (p = 0.009). HOMA-IR shows poor concordance with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (Kappa = 0.16) in pHP-WGHR, while in the control group the agreement was good (Kappa = 0.53). The pHP-WGHR presented higher values of percentage of fat mass (p = 0.0381) and lower values of percentage of free fat mass (p = 0.0464) and free fat mass weight (0.0421) than the control group. This study demonstrated that the insulin sensitivity evaluated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in pHP-WGHR was similar to individuals with normal pituitary function, despite the pHP-WGHR presenting higher fat mass percentage. HOMA-IR was not a good method for assessing insulin sensitivity in pHP-WGHR.

Interaction between plasma fetuin-A and free fatty acids predicts changes in insulin sensitivity in response to long-term exercise

The hepatokine fetuin‐A can together with free fatty acids (FFAs) enhance adipose tissue (AT) inflammation and insulin resistance via toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4). Although some of the health benefits of exercise can be explained by altered release of myokines from the skeletal muscle, it is not well documented if some of the beneficial effects of exercise can be explained by altered secretion of hepatokines. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of interaction between fetuin‐A and FFAs on insulin sensitivity after physical exercise. In this study, 26 sedentary men who underwent 12 weeks of combined endurance and strength exercise were included. Insulin sensitivity was measured using euglycemic‐hyperinsulinemic clamp, and AT insulin resistance was indicated by the product of fasting plasma concentration of FFAs and insulin. Blood samples and biopsies from skeletal muscle and subcutaneous AT were collected. Several phenotypic markers were measured, and mRNA sequencing was performed on the biopsies. AT macrophages were analyzed based on mRNA markers. The intervention improved hepatic parameters, reduced plasma fetuin‐A concentration (~11%, P < 0.01), slightly changed FFAs concentration, and improved glucose infusion rate (GIR) (~33%, P < 0.01) across all participants. The change in circulating fetuin‐A and FFAs interacted to predict some of the change in GIR (β = −42.16, P = 0.030), AT insulin resistance (β = 0.579, P = 0.003), gene expression related to TLR‐signaling in AT and AT macrophage mRNA (β = 94.10, P = 0.034) after exercise. We observed no interaction effects between FFAs concentrations and leptin and adiponectin on insulin sensitivity, or any interaction effects between Fetuin‐A and FFAs concentrations on skeletal muscle TLR‐signaling. The relationship between FFAs levels and insulin sensitivity seemed to be specific for fetuin‐A and the AT. Some of the beneficial effects of exercise on insulin sensitivity may be explained by changes in circulating fetuin‐A and FFAs, promoting less TLR4 signaling in AT perhaps by modulating AT macrophages.