1
|
Ferrannini G, De Bacquer D, Gyberg V, De Backer G, Kotseva K, Mellbin LG, Risebrink R, Tuomilehto J, Wood D, Rydén L. Saving time by replacing the standardised two-hour oral glucose tolerance test with a one-hour test: Validation of a new screening algorithm in patients with coronary artery disease from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183:109156. [PMID: 34843858 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) combining fasting (FPG) and 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) is the most sensitive method for detecting type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Since it is considered time-consuming, we aim at validating a previously proposed screening algorithm based on a 1-hour plasma glucose (1hPG) with a 12 mmol/L threshold. METHODS Nine-hundred-eighteen patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) without known T2DM from the EUROASPIRE V cross-sectional survey underwent an OGTT. The reference for T2DM was 2hPG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L. T2DM diagnosis by HbA1c ≥ 6.5%(48 mmol/mol), FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, and 1hPG ≥ 12 mmol/L were compared with the outcome of 2hPG. RESULTS Mean FPG, HbA1c and 2hPG were 6.1 mmol/L, 5.6%(38 mmol/mol) and 7.8 mmol/L respectively. Ninety-six patients (10%) were diagnosed with T2DM according to 2hPG. Using this definition, in the group with FPG < 6.5 mmol/L and 1hPG < 12 only 5 (1%) were misdiagnosed as false negatives. All patients with a FPG > 8.0 mmol/L and 1hPG > 15.0 mmol/L were identified as having T2DM. According to the algorithm, in 79% of patients T2DM could be excluded by combining FPG < 6.5 mmol/L and 1hPG < 12 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS T2DM Screening by means of an algorithm combining FPG and 1hPG limits the demand of a 2hOGTT in 79% of CAD patients without known T2DM. HbA1c did not add to the information derived from this algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Ferrannini
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Dirk De Bacquer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Viveca Gyberg
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guy De Backer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kornelia Kotseva
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Linda G Mellbin
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rebecca Risebrink
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jaakko Tuomilehto
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Diabetes Research Group, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - David Wood
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lars Rydén
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferrannini G, De Bacquer D, Vynckier P, De Backer G, Gyberg V, Kotseva K, Mellbin L, Norhammar A, Tuomilehto J, Wood D, Rydén L. Gender differences in screening for glucose perturbations, cardiovascular risk factor management and prognosis in patients with dysglycaemia and coronary artery disease: results from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE surveys. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2021; 20:38. [PMID: 33573665 PMCID: PMC7879645 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-021-01233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gender disparities in the management of dysglycaemia, defined as either impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM), in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients are a medical challenge. Recent data from two nationwide cohorts of patients suggested no gender difference as regards the risk for diabetes-related CV complications but indicated the presence of a gender disparity in risk factor management. The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in screening for dysglycaemia, cardiovascular risk factor management and prognosis in dysglycemic CAD patients. Methods The study population (n = 16,259; 4077 women) included 7998 patients from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE IV (EAIV: 2012–2013, 79 centres in 24 countries) and 8261 patients from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V (EAV: 2016–2017, 131 centres in 27 countries) cross-sectional surveys. In each centre, patients were investigated with standardised methods by centrally trained staff and those without known diabetes were offered an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The first of CV death or hospitalisation for non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or revascularization served as endpoint. Median follow-up time was 1.7 years. The association between gender and time to the occurrence of the endpoint was evaluated using Cox survival modelling, adjusting for age. Results Known diabetes was more common among women (32.9%) than men (28.4%, p < 0.0001). OGTT (n = 8655) disclosed IGT in 17.2% of women vs. 15.1% of men (p = 0.004) and diabetes in 13.4% of women vs. 14.6% of men (p = 0.078). In both known diabetes and newly detected dysglycaemia groups, women were older, with higher proportions of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and obesity. HbA1c was higher in women with known diabetes. Recommended targets of physical activity, blood pressure and cholesterol were achieved by significantly lower proportions of women than men. Women with known diabetes had higher risk for the endpoint than men (age-adjusted HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.43). Conclusions Guideline-recommended risk factor control is poorer in dysglycemic women than men. This may contribute to the worse prognosis in CAD women with known diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Ferrannini
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Dirk De Bacquer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Vynckier
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy De Backer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Viveca Gyberg
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurobiology, Centre for Family Medicine, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, D2, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Kornelia Kotseva
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland-Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Republic of Ireland.,St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, The Bays, S Wharf Rd, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Linda Mellbin
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.,Heart, Vascular and Neuro Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Eugeniavägen 3, 17164, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Norhammar
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.,Capio St Görans Hospital, Sankt Göransplan 1, 11219, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jaakko Tuomilehto
- Public Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Diabetes Research Group, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - David Wood
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland-Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Republic of Ireland
| | - Lars Rydén
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferrannini G, Norhammar A, Gyberg V, Mellbin L, Rydén L. Is Coronary Artery Disease Inevitable in Type 2 Diabetes? From a Glucocentric to a Holistic View on Patient Management. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:2001-2009. [PMID: 32661109 DOI: 10.2337/dci20-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Norhammar
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Viveca Gyberg
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda Mellbin
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Rydén
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferrannini G, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kotseva K, Mellbin L, Wood D, Rydén L. Screening for Glucose Perturbations and Risk Factor Management in Dysglycemic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease-A Persistent Challenge in Need of Substantial Improvement: A Report From ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:726-733. [PMID: 32079627 DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dysglycemia, in this survey defined as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes, is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. This European survey investigated dysglycemia screening and risk factor management of patients with CAD in relation to standards of European guidelines for cardiovascular subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The European Society of Cardiology's European Observational Research Programme (ESC EORP) European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) V (2016-2017) included 8,261 CAD patients, aged 18-80 years, from 27 countries. If the glycemic state was unknown, patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c. Lifestyle, risk factors, and pharmacological management were investigated. RESULTS A total of 2,452 patients (29.7%) had known diabetes. OGTT was performed in 4,440 patients with unknown glycemic state, of whom 41.1% were dysglycemic. Without the OGTT, 30% of patients with type 2 diabetes and 70% of those with IGT would not have been detected. The presence of dysglycemia almost doubled from that self-reported to the true proportion after screening. Only approximately one-third of all coronary patients had completely normal glucose metabolism. Of patients with known diabetes, 31% had been advised to attend a diabetes clinic, and only 24% attended. Only 58% of dysglycemic patients were prescribed all cardioprotective drugs, and use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (3%) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (1%) was small. CONCLUSIONS Urgent action is required for both screening and management of patients with CAD and dysglycemia, in the expectation of a substantial reduction in risk of further cardiovascular events and in complications of diabetes, as well as longer life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Ferrannini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate School of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dirk De Bacquer
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy De Backer
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kornelia Kotseva
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France.,National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland-Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K
| | - Linda Mellbin
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - David Wood
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France.,National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland-Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Kamecke U, Liebing C, Pleus S, Freckmann G. Measurement accuracy of two professional-use systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58:445-455. [PMID: 31693491 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background The professional-use systems HemoCue® Glucose 201+ (HC201+) and HemoCue® Glucose 201 RT (HC201RT) are widely used for point-of-care testing (POCT) of blood glucose (BG). HC201RT utilizes unit-use microcuvettes which can be stored at room temperature, whereas HC201+ microcuvettes have to be stored at <8 °C. In this study, system accuracy of HC201+ and HC201RT was evaluated using capillary and venous blood samples. Methods For each system, two reagent system lots were evaluated within a period of 2 years based on testing procedures of ISO 15197:2013, a standard applicable for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) systems. For each reagent system lot, the investigation was performed by using 100 capillary and 95 to 99 venous blood samples. Comparison measurements were performed with a hexokinase laboratory method. Accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2013 and POCT12-A3 were applied. In addition, bias was analyzed according to Bland and Altman, and error grid analysis was performed. Results When measuring capillary samples, both systems fulfilled accuracy requirements of ISO 15197:2013 and POCT12-A3 with the investigated reagent system lots. When measuring venous samples, only HC201+ fulfilled these requirements. Bias between HC201+ and reference measurements was more consistent over venous and capillary samples and microcuvette lots than for HC201RT. Error grid analysis showed that clinical actions might have been different depending on which system was used. Conclusions In this study, HC201+ showed a high level of accuracy irrespective of the sample type (capillary or venous). In contrast, HC201RT measurement results were markedly affected by the type of sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Baumstark
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Jendrike
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ulrike Kamecke
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christina Liebing
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan Pleus
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kristensen K, Wangel AM, Katsarou A, Shaat N, Simmons D, Fadl H, Berntorp K. Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Point-of-Care Methods for Glucose versus Hospital Laboratory Method Using Isotope Dilution Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry as Reference. J Diabetes Res 2020; 2020:7937403. [PMID: 32280717 PMCID: PMC7115054 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7937403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Sweden, both glucose analyzers in accredited laboratories and point-of-care glucose devices are used for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the HemoCue Glucose 201+ (HC201+) and RT (HC201RT) systems with that of the hospital central laboratory hexokinase method (CL) based on lyophilized citrate tubes, using the isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID GC-MS) as reference. METHODS A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed on 135 women screened positive for GDM. Diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization 2013 diagnostic thresholds for fasting (n = 135), 1 h (n = 135), 1 h (n = 135), 1 h (. RESULTS Significantly more women were diagnosed with GDM by HC201+ (80%) and CL (80%) than with the reference (65%, P < 0.001) based on fasting and/or 2 h thresholds, whereas the percentage diagnosed by HC201RT (60%) did not differ significantly from the reference. In Bland-Altman analysis, a positive bias was observed for HC201+ (4.2%) and CL (6.1%) and a negative bias for HC201RT (-1.8%). In the surveillance error grid, 95.9% of the HC201+ values were in the no-risk zone as compared to 98.1% for HC201RT and 97.5% for CL. CONCLUSIONS A substantial positive bias was found for CL measurements resulting in overdiagnosis of GDM. Our findings suggest better performance of HC201RT than HC201+ in GDM diagnosis. The results may have possible implications for GDM diagnosis in Sweden and require further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Kristensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anne-Marie Wangel
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anastasia Katsarou
- Department of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nael Shaat
- Department of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - David Simmons
- Macarthur Clinical School, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Helena Fadl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Kerstin Berntorp
- Department of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|