1
|
Lawton J, Rankin D, Hartnell S, Lee T, Dover AR, Reynolds RM, Hovorka R, Murphy HR, Hart RI. Healthcare professionals' views about how pregnant women can benefit from using a closed-loop system: Qualitative study. Diabet Med 2023; 40:e15072. [PMID: 36807582 PMCID: PMC10947358 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest is growing in how closed-loop systems can support attainment of within-target glucose levels amongst pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. We explored healthcare professionals' views about how, and why, pregnant women benefitted from using the CamAPS FX system during the AiDAPT trial. METHODS We interviewed 19 healthcare professionals who supported women using closed-loop during the trial. Our analysis focused on identifying descriptive and analytical themes relevant to clinical practice. RESULTS Healthcare professionals highlighted clinical and quality-of-life benefits to using closed-loop in pregnancy; albeit, they attributed some of these to the continuous glucose monitoring component. They emphasised that the closed-loop was not a panacea and that, to gain maximum benefit, an effective collaboration between themselves, the woman and the closed-loop was needed. Optimal performance of the technology, as they further noted, also required women to interact with the system sufficiently, but not excessively; a requirement that they felt some women had found challenging. Even where healthcare professionals felt that this balance was not achieved, they suggested that women had still benefitted from using the system. Healthcare professionals reported difficulties predicting how specific women would engage with the technology. In light of their trial experiences, healthcare professionals favoured an inclusive approach to closed-loop rollout in routine clinical care. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals recommended that closed-loop systems be offered to all pregnant women with type 1 diabetes in the future. Presenting closed-loop systems to pregnant women and healthcare teams as one pillar of a three-party collaboration may help promote optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - David Rankin
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| | - Tara Lee
- Norwich Medical SchoolNorwichUK
- Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNorwichUK
| | - Anna R. Dover
- Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Infirmary of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Rebecca M. Reynolds
- Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Infirmary of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Cardiovascular ScienceUniversity of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research InstituteEdinburghUK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust‐MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Helen R. Murphy
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
- Norwich Medical SchoolNorwichUK
- Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNorwichUK
| | - Ruth I. Hart
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal RM, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R, Kovatchev BP, Messer LH, Parkin CG, Ambler-Osborn L, Amiel SA, Bally L, Beck RW, Biester S, Biester T, Blanchette JE, Bosi E, Boughton CK, Breton MD, Brown SA, Buckingham BA, Cai A, Carlson AL, Castle JR, Choudhary P, Close KL, Cobelli C, Criego AB, Davis E, de Beaufort C, de Bock MI, DeSalvo DJ, DeVries JH, Dovc K, Doyle FJ, Ekhlaspour L, Shvalb NF, Forlenza GP, Gallen G, Garg SK, Gershenoff DC, Gonder-Frederick LA, Haidar A, Hartnell S, Heinemann L, Heller S, Hirsch IB, Hood KK, Isaacs D, Klonoff DC, Kordonouri O, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Lawton J, Lal RA, Leelarathna L, Maahs DM, Murphy HR, Nørgaard K, O’Neal D, Oser S, Oser T, Renard E, Riddell MC, Rodbard D, Russell SJ, Schatz DA, Shah VN, Sherr JL, Simonson GD, Wadwa RP, Ward C, Weinzimer SA, Wilmot EG, Battelino T. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev 2023; 44:254-280. [PMID: 36066457 PMCID: PMC9985411 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe Phillip
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Revital Nimri
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | | | - Thomas Danne
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Boris P Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lia Bally
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, FL 33647, USA
| | - Sarah Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia E Blanchette
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
- Center for Diabetes and Obesity, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Emanuele Bosi
- Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and San Raffaele Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte K Boughton
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Sue A Brown
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Albert Cai
- The diaTribe Foundation/Close Concerns, San Diego, CA 94117, USA
| | - Anders L Carlson
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Jessica R Castle
- Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kelly L Close
- The diaTribe Foundation/Close Concerns, San Diego, CA 94117, USA
| | - Claudio Cobelli
- Department of Woman and Child’s Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Amy B Criego
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Elizabeth Davis
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Carine de Beaufort
- Diabetes & Endocrine Care Clinique Pédiatrique DECCP/Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg, and Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch sur Alzette, GD Luxembourg/Department of Paediatrics, UZ-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martin I de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Daniel J DeSalvo
- Division of Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77598, USA
| | - J Hans DeVries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Klemen Dovc
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children’s Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital—Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Naama Fisch Shvalb
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Satish K Garg
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Dana C Gershenoff
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Linda A Gonder-Frederick
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Ahmad Haidar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Simon Heller
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Diana Isaacs
- Cleveland Clinic, Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - David C Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA 94010, USA
| | - Olga Kordonouri
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Lori Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rayhan A Lal
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David M Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Helen R Murphy
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - David O’Neal
- Department of Medicine and Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sean Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Tamara Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, and Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Michael C Riddell
- School of Kinesiology & Health Science, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Rodbard
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC, Potomac, MD, USA
| | - Steven J Russell
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Desmond A Schatz
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 02114, USA
| | - Viral N Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Pediatric Endocrinology, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Gregg D Simonson
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Candice Ward
- Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stuart A Weinzimer
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Pediatric Endocrinology, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Emma G Wilmot
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Derby, UK
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children’s Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Limbert C, Tinti D, Malik F, Kosteria I, Messer L, Jalaludin MY, Benitez-Aguirre P, Biester S, Corathers S, von Sengbusch S, Marcovecchio ML. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1243-1269. [PMID: 36537530 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Limbert
- Unit of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Hospital Dona Estefânia, Lisbon, Portugal.,Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Davide Tinti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Faisal Malik
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ioanna Kosteria
- Department of Endocrinology, Growth & Development, "P&A Kyriakou" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Paul Benitez-Aguirre
- Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Biester
- Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Children's Hospital "Auf der Bult", Hannover, Germany
| | - Sarah Corathers
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Simone von Sengbusch
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Campus Lübeck, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - M Loredana Marcovecchio
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ware J, Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery: update on the state of the field and emerging technologies. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:859-875. [PMID: 36331211 PMCID: PMC9780196 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2142556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the last five years, closed-loop insulin delivery systems have transitioned from research-only to real-life use. A number of systems have been commercialized and are increasingly used in clinical practice. Given the rapidity of new developments in the field, understanding the capabilities and key similarities and differences of current systems can be challenging. This review aims to provide an update on the state of the field of closed-loop insulin delivery systems, including emerging technologies. AREAS COVERED We summarize key clinical safety and efficacy evidence of commercial and emerging insulin-only hybrid closed-loop systems for type 1 diabetes. A literature search was conducted and clinical trials using closed-loop systems during free-living conditions were identified to report on safety and efficacy data. We comment on emerging technologies and adjuncts for closed-loop systems, as well as non-technological priorities in closed-loop insulin delivery. EXPERT OPINION Commercial hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems are efficacious, consistently improving glycemic control when compared to standard therapy. Challenges remain in widespread adoption due to clinical inertia and the lack of resources to embrace technological developments by health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kimbell B, Rankin D, Hart RI, Allen JM, Boughton CK, Campbell F, Fröhlich‐Reiterer E, Hofer SE, Kapellen TM, Rami‐Merhar B, Schierloh U, Thankamony A, Ware J, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Parents' views about healthcare professionals having real-time remote access to their young child's diabetes data: Qualitative study. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:799-808. [PMID: 35561092 PMCID: PMC9544441 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We explored parents' views about healthcare professionals having remote access to their young child's insulin and glucose data during a clinical trial to inform use of data sharing in routine pediatric diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Interviews with 33 parents of 30 children (aged 1-7 years) with type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized trial (KidsAP02) comparing hybrid closed-loop system use with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS Parents reported multiple benefits to healthcare professionals being able to remotely access their child's glucose and insulin data during the trial, despite some initial concerns regarding the insights offered into everyday family life. Key benefits included: less work uploading/sharing data; improved consultations; and, better clinical input and support from healthcare professionals between consultations. Parents noted how healthcare professionals' real-time data access facilitated remote delivery of consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how these were more suitable for young children than face-to-face appointments. Parents endorsed use of real-time data sharing in routine clinical care, subject to caveats regarding data access, security, and privacy. They also proposed that, if data sharing were used, consultations for closed-loop system users in routine clinical care could be replaced with needs-driven, ad-hoc contact. CONCLUSIONS Real-time data sharing can offer clinical, logistical, and quality-of-life benefits and enhance opportunities for remote consultations, which may be more appropriate for young children. Wider rollout would require consideration of ethical and cybersecurity issues and, given the heightened intrusion on families' privacy, a non-judgmental, collaborative approach by healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Rankin
- Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Ruth I. Hart
- Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Janet M. Allen
- Wellcome Trust‐MRC Institute of Metabolic ScienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK,Department of PaediatricsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Paediatric DiabetesLeeds Children's HospitalLeedsUK
| | | | - Sabine E. Hofer
- Department of Pediatrics IMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | - Thomas M. Kapellen
- Hospital for Children and AdolescentsUniversity of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany/Hospital for Children and Adolescents am Nicolausholz Bad KösenLeipzigGermany
| | - Birgit Rami‐Merhar
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Comprehensive Center for PediatricsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Ulrike Schierloh
- Department of Pediatric Diabetes and EndocrinologyClinique Pédiatrique, Centre HospitalierLuxembourg CityLuxembourg
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK,Children's Services, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAddenbrooke's HospitalCambridgeUK
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust‐MRC Institute of Metabolic ScienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK,Department of PaediatricsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust‐MRC Institute of Metabolic ScienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK,Department of PaediatricsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kimbell B, Rankin D, Hart RI, Allen JM, Boughton CK, Campbell F, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Hofer SE, Kapellen TM, Rami-Merhar B, Schierloh U, Thankamony A, Ware J, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Parents' experiences of using a hybrid closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) to care for a very young child with type 1 diabetes: Qualitative study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 187:109877. [PMID: 35469973 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To explore parents' experiences of using a hybrid closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) when caring for a very young child (aged 1-7 years) with type 1 diabetes. METHODS Interviews with n = 33 parents of 30 children who used the system during a randomised controlled trial. Data analysis used a descriptive thematic approach. RESULTS While some parents were initially reticent about handing control to the system, all reported clinical benefits to using the technology, having to do less diabetes-related work and needing less clinical input over time. Parents welcomed opportunities to enhance the system's efficacy (using Ease-off and Boost functions) as required. Parents described how the system's automated glucose control facilitated more normality, including sleeping better, worrying less about their child, and feeling more confident and able to outsource care. Parents also described more normality for the child (alongside better sleep, mood and concentration, and lessened distress) and siblings. Parents liked being able to administer insulin using a smartphone, but suggested refinements to device size and functionality. CONCLUSIONS Using a hybrid closed-loop system in very young children can facilitate greater normality and may result in a lessened demand for health professionals' input. Systems may need to be customised for very young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Kimbell
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - David Rankin
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ruth I Hart
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Janet M Allen
- Wellcome Trust - MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte K Boughton
- Wellcome Trust - MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Sabine E Hofer
- Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas M Kapellen
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Hospital for Children and Adolescents am Nicolausholz Bad Kösen, Germany
| | - Birgit Rami-Merhar
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrike Schierloh
- Department of Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Clinique Pédiatrique, Centre Hospitalier, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Children's Services, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust - MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust - MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Murata
- Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee TTM, Collett C, Man MS, Hammond M, Shepstone L, Hartnell S, Gurnell E, Byrne C, Scott EM, Lindsay RS, Morris D, Brackenridge A, Dover AR, Reynolds RM, Hunt KF, McCance DR, Barnard-Kelly K, Rankin D, Lawton J, Bocchino LE, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Wilinska ME, Hovorka R, Murphy HR. AiDAPT: automated insulin delivery amongst pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomized controlled trial - study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:282. [PMID: 35382796 PMCID: PMC8982306 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes strive for tight glucose targets (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) to minimise the risks of obstetric and neonatal complications. Despite using diabetes technologies including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pumps and contemporary insulin analogues, most women struggle to achieve and maintain the recommended pregnancy glucose targets. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of automated closed-loop insulin delivery improves antenatal glucose levels in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Methods/design A multicentre, open label, randomized, controlled trial of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and a HbA1c of ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) at pregnancy confirmation and ≤ 86 mmol/mol (10%) at randomization. Participants who provide written informed consent before 13 weeks 6 days gestation will be entered into a run-in phase to collect 96 h (24 h overnight) of CGM glucose values. Eligible participants will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to CGM (Dexcom G6) with usual insulin delivery (control) or closed-loop (intervention). The closed-loop system includes a model predictive control algorithm (CamAPS FX application), hosted on an android smartphone that communicates wirelessly with the insulin pump (Dana Diabecare RS) and CGM transmitter. Research visits and device training will be provided virtually or face-to-face in conjunction with 4-weekly antenatal clinic visits where possible. Randomization will stratify for clinic site. One hundred twenty-four participants will be recruited. This takes into account 10% attrition and 10% who experience miscarriage or pregnancy loss. Analyses will be performed according to intention to treat. The primary analysis will evaluate the change in the time spent in the target glucose range (3.5-7.8 mmol/l) between the intervention and control group from 16 weeks gestation until delivery. Secondary outcomes include overnight time in target, time above target (> 7.8 mmol/l), standard CGM metrics, HbA1c and psychosocial functioning and health economic measures. Safety outcomes include the number and severity of ketoacidosis, severe hypoglycaemia and adverse device events. Discussion This will be the largest randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of closed-loop insulin delivery during type 1 diabetes pregnancy. Trial registration ISRCTN 56898625 Registration Date: 10 April, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara T M Lee
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Rosalind Franklin Road, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Corinne Collett
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Mei-See Man
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Matt Hammond
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Lee Shepstone
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eleanor Gurnell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Caroline Byrne
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eleanor M Scott
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robert S Lindsay
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Damian Morris
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, East Suffolk & North Essex Foundation Trust, The Ipswich Hospital, Suffolk, UK
| | - Anna Brackenridge
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna R Dover
- Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rebecca M Reynolds
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - David R McCance
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | | - David Rankin
- The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Julia Lawton
- The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | | | - Judy Sibayan
- Jaeb Center For Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center For Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Malgorzata E Wilinska
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen R Murphy
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Rosalind Franklin Road, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK. .,Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ware J, Hovorka R. Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery. Metabolism 2022; 127:154953. [PMID: 34890648 PMCID: PMC8792215 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, we have seen considerable advances across diabetes therapies. The more recent advent of glucose-responsive automated insulin delivery has started to revolutionise the management of type 1 diabetes in children and adults. Evolution of closed-loop insulin delivery from research to clinical practice has been rapid, and multiple systems are now commercially available. In this review, we summarise key evidence on currently available closed-loop systems and those in development. We comment on dual-hormone and do-it-yourself systems, as well as reviewing clinical evidence in special populations such as very young children, older adults and in pregnancy. We identify future directions for research and barriers to closed-loop adoption, including how these might be addressed to ensure equitable access to this novel therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Automated insulin delivery (AID) is the most recent advance in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. It has the potential to achieve glycemic targets without disabling hypoglycemia, to improve quality of life and reduce diabetes distress and burden associated with self-management. Several AID systems are currently licensed for use by people with T1D in Europe, United States, and the rest of the world. Despite AID becoming a reality in routine clinical practice over the last few years, the commercially hybrid AID and other systems, are still far from a fully optimized automated diabetes management tool. Implementation of AID systems requires education and support of healthcare professionals taking care of people with T1D, as well as users and their families. There is much to do to increase usability, portability, convenience and to reduce the burden associated with the use of the systems. Co-design, involvement of people with lived experience of T1D and robust qualitative assessment is critical to improving the real-world use of AID systems, especially for those who may have greater need. In addition to this, information regarding the psychosocial impact of the use of AID systems in real life is needed. The first commercially available AID systems are not the end of the development journey but are the first step in learning how to optimally automate insulin delivery in a way that is equitably accessible and effective for people living with T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marga Giménez
- Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology and
Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERDEM, Centro de Investigación
Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas, Madrid, Spain
- IDIBAPS, Institut
d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Conget
- Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology and
Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERDEM, Centro de Investigación
Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas, Madrid, Spain
- IDIBAPS, Institut
d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nick Oliver
- Department of Metabolism,
Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,
London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Determination of criteria for assessing the quality of training future specialists for higher education. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/ijem-03-2021-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe most important problem for higher education in the post-COVID period is the production of highly qualified specialists for the labor market. The purpose of this study is to determine effective criteria for assessing the quality of training of future specialists and the adequacy of their readiness to solve real problems of the future specialty.Design/methodology/approachA study was carried out among students in order to determine some of the most important characteristics of them as future specialists. Based on the survey results, non-academic indicators were identified that participants perceive as significant for a highly professional employee. The empirical study included 300 undergraduate students from four universities (66% women and 34% men aged 20–21). All participants represent full-time training.FindingsThe survey showed that the participants identified the ability to learn and personal development as the most significant personal qualities.Originality/valueMany criteria for assessing the quality of training of specialists in different professional fields have not been precisely defined. Several ways of solving this problem can be proposed: developing criteria for assessing quality in hiring; revising the methods of work of universities; presenting to students the criteria for development in the profession or adopting international criteria for assessing pedagogical quality.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wagner S, Addington KS, Varming A, Hempler NF. Caught between good intentions and rigid structures: A qualitative description of professionals' experiences with health promotion in mental health services. Scand J Caring Sci 2021; 36:663-672. [PMID: 34355422 DOI: 10.1111/scs.13023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Compared with the general population, people with mental illness are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes due to poor diet, medication and inactive lifestyle. People with mental illness and members of the general population are equally interested in health behaviour change, but those with mental illness experience communication barriers with professionals. The study aimed to explore philosophies that social care and healthcare professionals apply to health promotion activities targeting people with mental illness and challenges they face in applying these philosophies across multiple settings. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 social and healthcare professionals in a range of settings in 2016-2019. Descriptive qualitative analysis was applied to interview data. RESULTS Interviewees faced many structural challenges in the organisation of their work, which did not coincide with their philosophy or intentions in relation to health promotion. Three philosophical categories were identified: (a) health promotion approach, (b) elements of care and (c) social relations. Many interviewees intended to apply philosophies of broadly defined health, dialogue-based health education, and incremental approaches to health behaviour change. They wanted to provide holistic and flexible care and they valued peer-to-peer activities, family and friend involvement in care and a trusting relationship between the professional and the person with mental illness. However, rigid structures determining the organisation of health promotion challenged professionals' ability to follow their philosophical intentions. CONCLUSION Interviewees aspired to a collaborative, empowering and person-centred approach, but practical and structural factors made this difficult to achieve in practice. Major changes are required at the organisational level, implemented with the active involvement of professionals and people with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Wagner
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Health Promotion Research, Gentofte, Denmark
| | | | - Annemarie Varming
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Health Promotion Research, Gentofte, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinsker JE, Müller L, Constantin A, Leas S, Manning M, McElwee Malloy M, Singh H, Habif S. Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycemic Results with Initiation of Control-IQ Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:120-127. [PMID: 32846114 PMCID: PMC7868573 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background: The t:slim X2™ insulin pump with Control-IQ™ technology, an advanced hybrid closed-loop system, became available in the United States in early 2020. Real-world outcomes with use of this system have not yet been comprehensively reported. Methods: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (≥14 years of age) who had ≥21 days of pump usage data were invited via email to participate. Participants completed psychosocial questionnaires (Technology Acceptance Scale [TAS], well-being index [WHO-5], and Diabetes Impact and Devices Satisfaction [DIDS] scale) at timepoint 1 (T1) (at least 3 weeks after starting Control-IQ technology) and the DIDS and WHO-5 at timepoint 2 (T2) (4 weeks from T1). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and glycemic outcomes were reviewed at each timepoint. Results: Overall, 9,085 potentially eligible individuals received the study invite. Of these, 3,116 consented and subsequently 1,435 participants completed questionnaires at both T1 and T2 and had corresponding glycemic data available on the t:connect® web application. Time in range was 78.2% (70.2%-85.1%) at T1 and 79.2% (70.3%-86.2%) at T2. PROs reflected high device-related satisfaction and reduced diabetes impact at T2. Factors contributing to high trust in the system included sensor accuracy, improved diabetes control, reduction in extreme blood glucose levels, and improved sleep quality. In addition, participants reported improved quality of life, ease of use, and efficient connectivity to the continuous glucose monitoring system as being valuable features of the system. Conclusions: Continued real-world use of the t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ technology showed improvements in psychosocial outcomes and persistent achievement of recommended TIR glycemic outcomes in people with T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lars Müller
- University of California San Diego, Design Lab, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Scott Leas
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Data Science, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Michelle Manning
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Behavioral Sciences, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Harsimran Singh
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Behavioral Sciences, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Steph Habif
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Behavioral Sciences, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tubiana-Rufi N, Schaepelynck P, Franc S, Chaillous L, Joubert M, Renard E, Reznik Y, Abettan C, Bismuth E, Beltrand J, Bonnemaison E, Borot S, Charpentier G, Delemer B, Desserprix A, Durain D, Farret A, Filhol N, Guerci B, Guilhem I, Guillot C, Jeandidier N, Lablanche S, Leroy R, Melki V, Munch M, Penfornis A, Picard S, Place J, Riveline JP, Serusclat P, Sola-Gazagnes A, Thivolet C, Hanaire H, Benhamou PY. Practical implementation of automated closed-loop insulin delivery: A French position statement. DIABETES & METABOLISM 2020; 47:101206. [PMID: 33152550 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Automated closed-loop (CL) insulin therapy has come of age. This major technological advance is expected to significantly improve the quality of care for adults, adolescents and children with type 1 diabetes. To improve access to this innovation for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to promote adherence to its requirements in terms of safety, regulations, ethics and practice, the French Diabetes Society (SFD) brought together a French Working Group of experts to discuss the current practical consensus. The result is the present statement describing the indications for CL therapy with emphasis on the idea that treatment expectations must be clearly defined in advance. Specifications for expert care centres in charge of initiating the treatment were also proposed. Great importance was also attached to the crucial place of high-quality training for patients and healthcare professionals. Long-term follow-up should collect not only metabolic and clinical results, but also indicators related to psychosocial and human factors. Overall, this national consensus statement aims to promote the introduction of marketed CL devices into standard clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Tubiana-Rufi
- Endocrinologie et Diabétologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP Nord, Université de Paris et Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques AJD, Paris, et SFEDP, France
| | - P Schaepelynck
- Nutrition-Endocrinologie-Maladies Métaboliques, pôle ENDO, Hôpital de la Conception, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - S Franc
- Diabétologie, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, CERITD, Bioparc Genopole Evry-Corbeil, LBEPS, Université Evry, IRBA, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France
| | - L Chaillous
- Endocrinologie Diabétologie Nutrition, Institut du Thorax, CHU, Nantes, France
| | - M Joubert
- Université de Caen et Endocrinologie Diabétologie, CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
| | - E Renard
- Endocrinologie, Diabète, Nutrition et CIC INSERM 1411, CHU, Montpellier, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, France
| | - Y Reznik
- Université de Caen et Endocrinologie Diabétologie, CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
| | - C Abettan
- Endocrinologie Diabétologie Nutrition, Institut du Thorax, CHU, Nantes, France
| | - E Bismuth
- Endocrinologie et Diabétologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP Nord, Université de Paris et Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques AJD, Paris, et SFEDP, France
| | - J Beltrand
- APHP Centre, Université de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris et Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques AJD, Paris, et SFEDP, France
| | - E Bonnemaison
- Unité de Spécialités Pédiatriques, Hôpital Clocheville, CHRU de Tours, et SFEDP, France
| | - S Borot
- Université Franche-Comté et Endocrinologie, Nutrition et Diabétologie, CHU, Besançon, France
| | | | - B Delemer
- Endocrinologie Diabétologie, CHU, Reims, et Présidente du CNP d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, France
| | - A Desserprix
- IDE I-ETP, Hotel Dieu Le Creusot (71), Groupe SOS Santé et Vice-présidente de la SFD-Paramédical, France
| | - D Durain
- Cadre de Santé Endocrinologie et Diabétologie et ETP, CHRU, Nancy et SFD-Paramédical, France
| | - A Farret
- Endocrinologie, Diabète, Nutrition, CHU, Montpellier, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, France
| | - N Filhol
- Endocrinologie et Diabétologie, Hôpital de la Conception, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - B Guerci
- Université de Lorraine et Endocrinologie Diabétologie Maladies Métaboliques et Nutrition, CHU, Nancy, France
| | - I Guilhem
- Endocrinologie-Diabétologie-Nutrition, CHU, Rennes, France
| | - C Guillot
- Sociologue responsable du Diabète LAB, FFD, Paris, France
| | - N Jeandidier
- Université de Strasbourg et Endocrinologie Diabétologie Nutrition, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France
| | - S Lablanche
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1055, LBFA, Endocrinologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, France
| | - R Leroy
- Cabinet libéral d'endocrinologie diabétologie, Lille, France
| | - V Melki
- Diabétologie, Maladies Métaboliques et Nutrition, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - M Munch
- Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Maladies Métaboliques, CHU Strasbourg, France
| | - A Penfornis
- Université Paris-Saclay et Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, CHSF Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - S Picard
- Cabinet d'Endocrino-Diabétologie, Point Médical, Dijon et FENAREDIAM, France
| | - J Place
- Ingénieur d'Études, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, France
| | - J P Riveline
- Centre Universitaire du Diabète, Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - P Serusclat
- Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste Les Portes du Sud, Vénissieux, France
| | - A Sola-Gazagnes
- Endocrinologie Diabétologie, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France
| | - C Thivolet
- Centre du Diabète DIAB-eCARE, Hospices Civils de Lyon et Président de la SFD, France
| | - H Hanaire
- Université de Toulouse et Diabétologie, Maladies Métaboliques et Nutrition, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - P Y Benhamou
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1055, LBFA, Endocrinologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Président du groupe de travail Télémédecine et Technologies Innovantes de la SFD, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fuchs J, Hovorka R. Closed-loop control in insulin pumps for type-1 diabetes mellitus: safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17:707-720. [PMID: 32569476 PMCID: PMC7441745 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1784724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Type 1 diabetes is a lifelong disease with high management burden. The majority of people with type 1 diabetes fail to achieve glycemic targets. Algorithm-driven automated insulin delivery (closed-loop) systems aim to address these challenges. This review provides an overview of commercial and emerging closed-loop systems. AREAS COVERED We review safety and efficacy of commercial and emerging hybrid closed-loop systems. A literature search was conducted and clinical trials using day-and-night closed-loop systems during free-living conditions were used to report on safety data. We comment on efficacy where robust randomized controlled trial data for a particular system are available. We highlight similarities and differences between commercial systems. EXPERT OPINION Study data shows that hybrid closed-loop systems are safe and effective, consistently improving glycemic control when compared to standard therapy. While a fully closed-loop system with minimal burden remains the end-goal, these hybrid closed-loop systems have transformative potential in diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Fuchs
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fuchs J, Hovorka R. COVID-19 and Diabetes: Could Diabetes Technology Research Help Pave the Way for Remote Healthcare? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:735-736. [PMID: 32475169 PMCID: PMC7673188 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820929714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Fuchs
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, UK
- Roman Hovorka, PhD, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 289, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|