Impact of Collecting-System Repair during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Perirenal Abscess After Partial Nephrectomy Because of Migration of Upper Calix Stone and Urine Leakage: A Case Report

Background: Nephron-sparing surgery has been shown to achieve oncological results equivalent to those of radical nephrectomy in patients with compromised renal function who have renal tumors <4 cm. However, technical difficulties and potential surgical complications remain challenges to the surgeon. Various factors, such as tumor size and location, collecting system invasion, and patient's expectations, are major concerns that may affect the feasibility of performing an effective partial nephrectomy. We report a patient with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open partial nephrectomy and suffered from complications of perirenal abscess because of stone migration, obstruction, and subsequence urine leakage.

Case Presentation: A 63-year-old female with an incidental finding of a 4-cm renal tumor on the left kidney underwent an effective open partial nephrectomy at our institute. There were no intraoperative complications and the drainage tube was removed 3 days later. The patient visited our emergency department 1 month later with high fever. She was diagnosed with severe sepsis and perirenal abscess formation. Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed for prompt decompression. A sequential imaging study with CT and antegrade pyelography revealed one 0.5-cm stone, which migrated from the calix to proximal ureter postoperatively and subsequently caused obstruction and dramatic urine leakage. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy was performed with ureteral stenting. Postoperatively, the urinary leakage and abscess formation resolved.

Conclusion: Nephron-sparing surgery is one of the most challenging procedures in the management of renal cancer. Urine leakage after partial nephrectomy may occur when a large tumor involves the collecting system. Postoperative ureteral obstruction is also a risk factor of urinary leakage. Watertight repair with a Double J catheter before operation may be required.

Improved laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma based on the precise anatomy of the nephron

The aim of the present study was to investigate a method of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on the precise anatomy of the nephron, and to decrease the incidence of hemorrhage and urinary leakage. Between January 2012 and December 2013, 31 patients who presented to the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army (Beijing, China) were treated for RCC. The mean tumor size was 3.4±0.7 cm in diameter (range, 1.2-6.0 cm). During surgery, the renal artery was blocked, and subsequently, an incision in the renal capsule and renal cortex was performed, at 3-5 mm from the tumor edge. Subsequent to the incision of the renal parenchyma, scissors with blunt and sharp edge were used to separate the base of the tumor from the normal renal medulla, in the direction of the ray medullary in the renal pyramids. The basal blood vessels were incised following the hemostasis of the region using bipolar coagulation. The minor renal calyces were stripped carefully and the wound was closed with an absorbable sutures. The arterial occlusion time, duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding volume, post-operative drainage volume, pathological results and complications were recorded. The surgery was successful for all patients. The estimated average intraoperative bleeding volume was 55.7 ml, the average surgical duration was 95.5 min, the average arterial occlusion time was 21.2 min, the average post-operative drainage volume was 92.3 ml and the average post-operative length of hospital stay was 6.1 days. No hemorrhage or urinary leakage was observed in the patients following the surgery. LNSS for RCC based on the precise anatomy of the nephron was concluded to be effective and feasible. The surgery is useful for the complete removal of tumors and guarantees a negative margin, which may also decrease the incidence of hemorrhage and urinary leakage following surgery.

The sheep as a model for healing studies after partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

The pig has been considered the best model for renal surgery. However, recent research has demonstrated that the kidney of pigs heals differently from that of humans. The objective of this study was to evaluate sheep as an alternative animal model for studying collecting system healing after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The caudal pole of the left kidney was removed from eight female adult domestic sheep using laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Monopolar energy was used for hemostasis only in the parenchyma, avoiding coagulation near the collecting system, which was left opened. After 14 d, all animals were euthanized, and their left kidney was removed. Serum levels of urea and creatinine were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively (on days 2, 6, 10, and 14), and peritoneal fluid samples were collected during necropsy for urea and creatinine evaluation. An ex vivo retrograde pyelogram was performed, and a retrograde injection of methylene blue ink was administered to evaluate urinary leakage. Samples from the operated pole were analyzed using histologic methods.

RESULTS

During necropsy, an urinoma surrounding the operated kidney was observed in one animal. Peritoneal fluid levels of urea and creatinine were elevated. Retrograde pyelograms exhibited contrast-medium extravasation through the operated pole in all kidneys. The opened collecting system was also confirmed by methylene blue ink injection. The operated pole was covered by collagenous tissue and adhered to adjacent organs.

CONCLUSIONS

Sheep should be considered as an adequate experimental model for research on collecting system healing after partial nephrectomy.

Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma continues to increase with utilization of diagnostic abdominal imaging with migration towards a proportionally greater detection of small renal masses (SRM). Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become an attractive minimally invasive treatment modality for SRM's due to the technical advantages and shortened learning curve compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) while preserving comparable perioperative outcomes. With advances in ablative approaches for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and controversy surrounding the role of extirpative surgery for SRM's, systematic understanding of the complications associated with RAPN has become even more imperative. This review aims to summarize and evaluate the contemporary literature, compile reported intraoperative complications, describe conventional and nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) specific postoperative complications, and assess factors associated with an increased likelihood for perioperative complications following RAPN.

Internal validation of the renal pelvic score: a novel marker of renal pelvic anatomy that predicts urine leak after partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To internally validate the renal pelvic score (RPS) in an expanded cohort of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our prospective institutional renal cell carcinoma database was used to identify all patients undergoing PN for localized renal cell carcinoma from 2007 to 2013. Patients were classified by RPS as having an intraparenchymal or extraparenchymal renal pelvis. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between RPS and urine leak.

RESULTS

Eight hundred thirty-one patients (median age, 60 ± 11.6 years; 65.1% male) undergoing PN (57.3% robotic) for low (28.9%), intermediate (56.5%), and high complexity (14.5%) localized renal tumors (median size, 3.0 ± 2.3 cm; median nephrometry score, 7.0 ± 2.6) were included. Fifty-four patients (6.5%) developed a clinically significant or radiographically identified urine leak. Seventy-two of 831 renal pelvises (8.7%) were classified as intraparenchymal. Intrarenal pelvic anatomy was associated with a markedly increased risk of urine leak (43.1% vs 3.0%; P <.001), major urine leak requiring intervention (23.6% vs 1.7%; P <.001), and minor urine leak (19.4% vs 1.2%; P <.001) compared with that in patients with an extrarenal pelvis. After multivariate adjustment, RPS (intraparenchymal renal pelvis; odds ratio [OR], 24.8; confidence interval [CI], 11.5-53.4; P <.001) was the most predictive of urine leak as was tumor endophyticity ("E" score of 3 [OR, 4.5; CI, 1.3-15.5; P = .018]), and intraoperative collecting system entry (OR, 6.1; CI, 2.5-14.9; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Renal pelvic anatomy as measured by the RPS best predicts urine leak after open and robotic partial nephrectomy. Although external validation of the RPS is required, preoperative identification of patients at increased risk for urine leak should be considered in perioperative management and counseling algorithms.

Haemostatics in surgery and our experience in the enucleoresection of renal cell carcinoma

Background

30 patients, with T1 renal cell carcinomas (RCC) who underwent open enucleoresection of the tumour, were randomized to the use of a topical haemostatic agent (Floseal) or to an infrared-sapphire coagulator (ISC), to compare their efficacy in achieving haemostasis. Methods: Successful intra-operative haemostasis, intra- and post-operative bleeding, operative time, hospital discharge were evaluated.

Results

Statistically higher rates of successful haemostasis and shorter time-to-haemostasis (8,1 vs 12,9 min) were observed in the FloSeal group (p < 0.001 both). Patients operative time was not different between Group 1 vs 2 (58.7 ± 12 vs 62.4 ± 15; p > 0.05). The average blood loss during surgery was less (60 +/- 25.5 mL) for the FloSeal group than for the ISC group (85 +/- 40.5 mL) (p < 0.05). Postoperative blood loss was 25 +/- 5 mL and 40 +/- 45 mL for Floseal and ISC respectively, (p < 0.05). Length of the postoperative hospital discharge was 2.5 +/- 1.2 days for FloSeal group and 3.5 +/- 1.3 for the Group 2 (p < 0.05). No major immediate or delayed complications were observed in either Groups.

Conclusions

The use of Floseal and ISC offer a safe and efficacy haemostasis in the enucleoresection of RCC. Moreover, our results show a less intra-operative and post-operative blood loss as well as a shorter time to haemostasis of Floseal in respect to ISC.

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes

PURPOSE

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy is rapidly emerging as an alternative to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal malignancy. We present the largest multi-institution comparison of the 2 approaches to date, describing outcomes from 3 experienced minimally invasive surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review, evaluating 118 consecutive laparoscopic partial nephrectomies and 129 consecutive robot assisted partial nephrectomies performed between 2004 and 2008 by 3 experienced minimally invasive surgeons at 3 academic centers. Perioperative data were recorded along with clinical and pathological outcomes.

RESULTS

The robot assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (2.3 vs 2.4) and radiographic tumor size (2.9 vs 2.6 cm), respectively. Comparison of operative data revealed no significant differences in terms of overall operative time (189 vs 174 minutes), collecting system entry (47% vs 54%), pathological tumor size (2.8 vs 2.5 cm) and positive margin rate (3.9% vs 1%) for robot assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was less for robot assisted vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (155 vs 196 ml, p = 0.03) as was length of hospital stay (2.4 vs 2.7 days, p <0.0001). Warm ischemia times were significantly shorter in the robot assisted partial nephrectomy series (19.7 vs 28.4 minutes, p <0.0001). Subset analysis based on complexity revealed that tumor complexity had no effect on operative time or estimated blood loss for robot assisted partial nephrectomy, although complexity did affect these factors for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In addition, for simple and complex tumors robot assisted partial nephrectomy provided significantly shorter warm ischemic time than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (15.3 vs 25.2 minutes for simple, p <0.0001; 25.9 vs 36.7 minutes for complex, p = 0.0002). There were no intraoperative complications during robot assisted partial nephrectomy vs 1 complication during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Postoperative complication rates were similar for robot assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (8.6% vs 10.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy is a safe and viable alternative to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, providing equivalent early oncological outcomes and comparable morbidity to a traditional laparoscopic approach. Moreover robot assisted partial nephrectomy appears to offer the advantages of decreased hospital stay as well as significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter warm ischemia time, the latter of which may help to provide maximal preservation of renal reserve. In addition, operative parameters for robot assisted partial nephrectomy appear to be less affected by tumor complexity compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Interestingly while the advantages of robotic surgery have historically been believed to aid laparoscopic naïve surgeons, these data indicate that robot assisted partial nephrectomy may also benefit experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience

CONTEXT

The initial excitement about the laparoscopic treatment of renal masses has been tempered by concerns related to increased operative time, technical complexity, and the suitability of laparoscopic approaches to oncologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of intraoperative and postoperative complications and their prevention and management during laparoscopic surgery of renal tumors.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review of the Medline and Google Scholar databases was performed, searching for renal cell carcinoma, renal mass, laparoscopy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, open radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic cryoablation, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, complications, intra-operative, and post-operative. English-language articles published between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), whether transperitoneal or retroperitoneal, can be performed safely. The overall complication rate is low and does not significantly differ from that of the open experience. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), in contrast, is a technically challenging procedure. Although the intermediate oncologic outcomes are comparable to those of the open experience, there are concerns related to warm ischemia time, and there is a risk of major complications such as urinary leakage and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. Laparoscopic-assisted ablative therapies (cryotherapy and radiofrequency) are being performed more commonly for the treatment of small exophytic renal lesions with a low complication rate and intermediate oncologic outcomes similar to LRN and LPN.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications associated with the laparoscopic management of renal masses vary among the different procedures and with surgeon experience. The rate of complication appears to be similar to that of open surgery.

Risk factors and management of urine leaks after partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

As nephron sparing surgery is used more frequently for select renal tumors, the incidence of urine leaks will likely increase. To our knowledge the risk factors of and management strategies for urine leaks have not been studied. We report our experience with the risk factors of and management for urine leaks after open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 127 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy between 2001 and 2007, including 70 with open and 57 with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, as performed by 3 surgeons. Urine leak was defined as drain output consistent with urine greater than 48 hours after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Of the patients 21 experienced a urine leak after partial nephrectomy, including 13.3% overall, and 10.5% after laparoscopic and 18.5% after open partial nephrectomy. Patients with a urine leak had significantly greater tumor size (3.2 vs 2.4 cm, p <0.044), endophytic locations (57% vs 19%, p <0.00027) and repair of collecting system defects during partial nephrectomy (95% vs 56%, p <0.00072). There was no association with the number of tumors removed, estimated blood loss, ischemia time, body mass index, age or other surgical complications. The median duration of urine leak was 20 days. While most urine leaks resolved with prolonged drainage, 38% of cases required further intervention. Patient age at surgery was the only factor that correlated with prolonged (greater than 30 days) urine leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine leak is a complication unique to partial nephrectomy that is more commonly noted when a larger endophytic mass involves the renal collecting system. Most leaks resolve with prolonged drainage or replacement of a ureteral stent.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: how far have we gone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several technical modifications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy have resulted in a reduction of complications and warm ischemia time. The most recent results are reviewed with a focus on oncologic outcome and postoperative renal function.

RECENT FINDINGS

The indications for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are the same as for open surgery. All tumors up to 4 cm should be included and selected tumors up to 7 cm may be considered as well. In experienced hands, the complication rate is considerably low. Oncologic outcome is comparable with open partial nephrectomy and 5-year survival data have been published recently. Long warm ischemia time may be of some concern. The published functional results are excellent. Cost should not be the main argument in favor of a method. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, however, combines advantages for the patient with lower cost as shown by two studies.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy duplicates the principles of open surgery and has been standardized to a great extent. It is technically difficult and is being performed by a small number of centers only; however, the interest of the urologists and patient demand is growing quickly. At the present time, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cannot be considered a standard of care, but excellent results have been reported when performed by experienced laparoscopists.