Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Renal Tumors: Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes

Contrast enhancement early after renal malignancy cryoablation: imaging findings associated with benignity

OBJECTIVES

Contrast enhancement by MRI done early after cryoablation for renal malignancies may suggest residual tumor (RT). However, we have observed MRI enhancement within 48 h of cryoablation in patients who had no contrast enhancement 6 weeks later. Our purpose was to identify features of 48-h contrast enhancement in patients without RT.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation of renal malignancies in 2013-2020, exhibited cryoablation-zone MRI contrast enhancement 48 h later, and had available 6-week MRI scans. Persistent or growing CE at 6 weeks vs. 48 h was classified as RT. A washout index was calculated for each 48-h MRI, and its performance for predicting RT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients with 72 cryoablation procedures and 83 cryoablation zones exhibiting 48-h contrast enhancement; mean age was 66 ± 17 years. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma accounted for 95% of tumors. Of the 83 48-h enhancement zones, RT was observed in eight while 75 were benign. The 48-h enhancement was consistently visible at the arterial phase. Washout was significantly associated with RT (p < 0.001) and gradually increasing contrast enhancement with benignity (p < 0.009). A washout index below  - 1.1 predicted RT with 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity.

CONCLUSION

MRI contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies was usually benign. Washout was associated with residual tumor, with a washout index value below  - 1.1 exhibiting good performance in predicting residual tumor. These findings may help to guide decisions about repeat cryoablation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies rarely indicates residual tumor, which is characterized by washout with a washout index lower than  - 1.1.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast enhancement at the arterial phase of magnetic resonance imaging done 48 h after cryoablation of a renal malignancy is usually benign. • Residual tumor manifesting as contrast enhancement at the arterial phase is characterized by subsequent marked washout. • A washout index below  - 1.1 has 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity for residual tumor.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Renal Masses

Although the incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma has increased in recent decades due to greater use of imaging, the treatment has shifted to less invasive, nephron-sparing approaches. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one accepted treatment modality for patients with small renal masses, and it has the advantage of being minimally invasive and highly nephron sparing, with the additional benefits of reduced blood loss and complication rates. We describe our experience with RFA with an accompanying instructional video outlining the procedure's key components.

Surveillance post-radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses: Recurrence and followup

INTRODUCTION

Small renal masses (SRMs), enhancing tumors <4 cm in diameter, are suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The incidence of SRMs have risen with the increased quality and frequency of imaging. Partial nephrectomy is widely accepted as a nephron-sparing approach for the management of clinically localized RCC, with a greater than 90% disease-specific survival for stage T1a. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been emerging as an alternative management strategy, with evidence suggesting RFA as a safe alternative for SRMs. We aimed to evaluate the time to recurrence and recurrence rates of SRMs treated with RFA at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review between October 2011 and May 2019 identified 141 patients with a single SRM treated with RFA at Hamilton Health Sciences and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. Patients with familial syndromes and distant metastases were excluded. Repeat RFAs of the ipsilateral kidney for incomplete ablation were not considered a new procedure. The primary variable measured was time from initial ablation to recurrence. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify possible prognostic variables for tumor recurrence defined a priori, including age, gender, mass size, RENAL nephrometry, and PADUA scores.

RESULTS

The overall average age of our patients was 69.0±11.1 years, with 71.6% being male. Average tumor size was 2.6±0.8 cm. There were 22/154 total recurrences (15.6%) post-RFA. Median followup time was 67 (18-161) months. Those with new recurrences had median time to recurrence of 15 months and no recurrence beyond 53 months. Thirteen of 141 patients had residual disease (9.2%) and were identified within the first eight months post-RFA. The only prognostic variable identified as a predictor of residual disease was tumor size (hazard ratio 2.265; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the risk of a new recurrence following RFA for SRMs is 6.4%. Most recurrences (9.2%) were a result of residual tumor at the ablation site identified within the first eight months post-RFA. No recurrences were identified beyond 53 months, with a total median followup time of 67 months. Tumor size alone, without need for complex scoring systems, may serve as a predictor of incomplete ablation following RFA and could be used to assist in shared decision-making on management strategies.

Traitements ablatifs des tumeurs du rein localisées : radiofréquence ou cryothérapie ?

La radiofréquence et la cryothérapie sont les deux principales techniques ablatives et les principales alternatives à la chirurgie pour le traitement des petites masses rénales. Deux méta-analyses ont comparé radiofréquence et cryothérapie, et conclu à leur équivalence en termes de succès, de récidive et de complications. La cryothérapie est plus coûteuse, techniquement plus compliquée (plusieurs ponctions pour plusieurs cryodes, durée de traitement plus longue), et paraît plus adaptée aux tumeurs complexes (centrorénale et/ou au contact de la voie excrétrice). La voie d’abord percutanée est privilégiée par rapport à la laparoscopie pour sa morbidité moindre et un positionnement des aiguilles guidé par l’imagerie qui est plus précis.

[Ablative therapy in kidney cancer: Oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost]

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of kidney cancer has increased significantly over the past few decades presumably due to the increased use of imaging. The aim of this article is to describe contemporary outcomes of ablative therapy and to compare them to other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words; from January 2005 through May 2017, and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Ninety-one articles were analyzed. We described the outcomes of ablative therapy in relation to the energy used and the approach, and compared these outcomes to the other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes. We analyzed these studies in order to search for predictive factors influencing the results of ablative therapy. We also analyzed the economic burden of small renal tumor management.

CONCLUSION

The strength of evidence is based almost entirely on retrospective studies and is susceptible to the inherent limitations of this study design. Although, the evidence was low among studies, our revue showed that, in elderly patients treated with ablative therapy for cT1a tumors, the cancer-specific survival was comparable to partial nephrectomy with differences in overall survival that are explained by competing risks of death in the old population. Considering the functional results, the renal function preservation seems to be comparable between the 2 groups while the perioperative morbidity is higher in the partial nephrectomy group. The evidence base medicine at this time cannot support the extension of the indications of ablative therapy beyond the actual implementations.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Alternative Nephron-Sparing Treatment Options for Small Renal Masses, a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is (partial) nephrectomy. For patients where surgery is not the treatment of choice, for example in the elderly, in case of severe comorbidity, inoperability, or refusal of surgery, alternative treatment options are available. These treatment options include active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In the present overview, the efficacy, safety, and outcome of these different options are summarized, particularly focusing on recent developments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases of MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The search was performed in December 2016, and included a search period from 2010 to 2016. The terms and synonyms used were renal cell carcinoma, active surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The database search identified 2806 records, in total 73 articles were included to assess the rationale and clinical evidence of alternative treatment modalities for small renal masses. The methodological quality of the included articles varied between level 2b and level 4.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatment modalities, such as AS, RFA, CA, MWA, and SBRT, are treatment options especially for those patients who are unfit to undergo an invasive treatment. There are no randomized controlled trials available comparing surgery and less invasive modalities, leading to a low quality on the reported articles. A case-controlled registry might be an alternative to compare outcomes of noninvasive treatment modalities in the future.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Renal Cancer in Von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Management of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL) represents a clinical dilemma: the oncologic outcomes must be weighed against preservation of renal function. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently used in selected cases for treatment of small-size RCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, complications, and functional and oncologic outcomes of RFA in the treatment of RCC in VHL patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RCCs were treated with ultrasound-guided RFA or with laparoscopic RFA. Clinical and radiologic response, disease recurrence, and survival outcomes were evaluated during follow-up. Early and late complications were recorded and graded.

RESULTS

Nine RCC patients underwent RFA. The median number of RCCs per patient was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Among these 9 patients, a total of 20 RCCs were treated by RFA (19 ultrasound-guided RFA and 1 laparoscopic procedure). Median RCC size was 2.5 cm (interquartile range, 2.0-3.0). RFA did not impair renal function (P = .35). In 2 cases disease persisted, and in 1 case disease recurred after 18 months. These patients were retreated with ultrasound-guided RFA with complete response and no renal function impairment. RFA treatment was overall well tolerated and safe. No complications were recorded. Postoperative stay was no longer than 1 day.

CONCLUSION

RCC occurred in about two-thirds of VHL patients, who had young age at presentation; it was frequently multifocal and recurrent. The use of RFA, with extended indications, could represent a tailored treatment for VHL patients, reducing the risk of renal failure and resulting in satisfying oncologic results.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small renal cancer

Partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from the perspective of cancer management and renal function. However, when patients with RCC are of advanced age, exhibit severe comorbidities, including cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, or have hereditary RCC, ablative therapies, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation are useful treatment options. In the present study, the clinical outcomes of percutaneous RFA for treating small RCC were evaluated. Between December 2005 and March 2015, 40 patients (41 renal tumors in total) underwent RFA and a total of 50 sessions of RFA were performed. The average tumor size was 2.5 cm. A total of 18 tumors were exophytic and 23 were parenchymal. Of the 41 tumors, 85.4% were completely ablated by initial RFA and the rate of complete ablation following reablation for residual viable lesions was 95.1%. Local recurrence-free survival following complete ablation was 84.2% at 3 years. A patient with a 4.7 cm RCC tumor rapidly progressed following four RFA treatments until complete ablation was achieved. The metastasis-free survival rate following initial RFA was 95.7% at 3 years. The RCC-specific survival was 100% (mean follow-up, 38 months). Adverse events occurred in five sessions (10%); however, only 1 patient with arteriovenous fistula required intervention (transarterial embolization). The mean hospital stay following RFA was 3.2 days. The mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate following RFA was 2.7%. The results of the present study indicate that percutaneous RFA was an effective treatment for small RCCs with respect to management of cancer, minimal invasiveness and minimal loss of renal function, particularly in patients for whom surgery would be a high risk and those at increased risk of deterioration of renal function.

Non-Surgical Ablative Therapy for Management of Small Renal Masses-Current Status and Future Trends

A large number of small renal masses (SRMs) with size less than 4 cm are being identified due to advances in diagnostic imaging. As the natural history of these tumours remains unknown, there is no reliable way to predict their behaviour or future growth. Although, partial nephrectomy is the gold standard for treatment of these tumours, ablative non-surgical therapies such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation provide a less invasive option of treatment with comparable oncological outcomes. In this systematic review, the principle, indications, methods of treatment, oncological control, complication and renal function of ablative therapies are critically reviewed. Cryotherapy utilizes the principle of inducing tissue destruction by freezing and thawing using argon and helium gasses, respectively. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) works on the principle of tissue heating. Ablative treatments are particularly useful in the elderly patients, those with comorbidities or in patients with SRMs in solitary kidneys or renal impairment. Ablative therapies have less procedure-related complications and have promising medium-term oncological outcome. Longer-term results are accumulating. Cryotherapy may be a better modality for oncological control than RFA. Ablative therapy has emerged as a viable treatment options for SRMs with recurrence free survival rates approaching that of extirpative surgery. However, there is no consensus in the literature on the best selection criteria and this needs further refinement. Prospective long-term data with regards to oncological control is still needed.

Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To provide recommendations for the management options for patients with small renal masses (SRMs). Methods By using a literature search and prospectively defined study selection, we sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, prospective comparative observational studies, and retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Results Eighty-three studies, including 20 systematic reviews and 63 primary studies, met the eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. Recommendations On the basis of tumor-specific findings and competing risks of mortality, all patients with an SRM should be considered for a biopsy when the results may alter management. Active surveillance should be an initial management option for patients who have significant comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatment that should be offered to all patients for whom an intervention is indicated and who possess a tumor that is amenable to this approach. Percutaneous thermal ablation should be considered an option if complete ablation can reliably be achieved. Radical nephrectomy for SRMs should only be reserved for patients who possess a tumor of significant complexity that is not amenable to PN or for whom PN may result in unacceptable morbidity even when performed at centers with expertise. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) or progressive chronic kidney disease occurs after treatment, especially if associated with proteinuria.

Follow-up after focal therapy in renal masses: an international multidisciplinary Delphi consensus project

PURPOSE

To establish consensus on follow-up (FU) after focal therapy (FT) in renal masses. To formulate recommendations to aid in clinical practice and research.

METHODS

Key topics and questions for consensus were identified from a systematic literature research. A Web-based questionnaire was distributed among participants selected based on their contribution to the literature and/or known expertise. Three rounds according to the Delphi method were performed online. Final discussion was conducted during the "8th International Symposium on Focal Therapy and Imaging in Prostate and Kidney Cancer" among an international multidisciplinary expert panel.

RESULTS

Sixty-two participants completed all three rounds of the online questionnaire. The panel recommended a minimum follow-up of 5 years, preferably extended to 10 years. The first FU was recommended at 3 months, with at least two imaging studies in the first year. Imaging was recommended biannually during the second year and annually thereafter. The panel recommended FU by means of CT scan with slice thickness ≤3 mm (at least three phases with excretory phase if suspicion of collecting system involvement) or mpMRI. Annual checkup for pulmonary metastasis by CT thorax was advised. Outside study protocols, biopsy during follow-up should only be performed in case of suspicion of residual/persistent disease or radiological recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus led to clear FU recommendations after FT of renal masses supported by a multidisciplinary expert panel. In spite of the low level of evidence, these recommendations can guide clinicians and create uniformity in the follow-up practice and for clinical research purposes.

Thermal ablative therapies for treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Small renal masses are commonly diagnosed incidentally. The majority are malignant and require intervention. The gold standard treatment is partial nephrectomy unless the patient has significant co-morbidities when surveillance or ablative therapies are utilised. The latter are relatively novel and their long-term efficacy and safety remain generally poorly understood. We performed a literature review to establish the current evidence on the oncological outcome of thermal ablative techniques in small renal masses treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on indications, tumour characteristics, ablative techniques, oncological outcome, impact on renal function and complications. The vast majority of articles identified were observational studies. There has not been any direct comparison against partial nephrectomy. Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation are the techniques that are more commonly used. They have favourable oncological results on intermediate follow-up and indications that successful outcome is sustained long term. The morbidity and impact on renal function appear to be minimal.

CONCLUSION

Thermal ablative therapies are valid alternatives to partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses in patients unfit for surgery. Prospective long-term data will be needed before the indications for their use expand further.

Management of complications arising from the treatment of small renal masses

This article offers a review of the complications, and management of such complications, associated with different modalities used for the treatment of the small renal mass.

Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Tumors: Long-Term Outcome of 179 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term functional and oncological results between laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in selected clinical T1a (cT1a) renal tumor patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with cT1a renal tumors who had LRFA or LPN at our institution between February 2006 and February 2015. Student's t test was used to compare the perioperative data between the two groups. Survival analyses were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were included in the study. Patients in the LRFA cohort were significantly older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists sore than in the LPN cohort. The LRFA group had a significantly lower mean blood loss than the LPN group (p = 0.03). The percent decrease of GFR in the LRFA group was significantly lower than in the LPN group (p = 0.021). The 5-year overall, cancer-specific and disease-free survival were 93.3 vs. 94.6%, 98.0 vs. 98.5% and 97.1 vs. 97.3%, for LRFA and LPN, respectively (all p value >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent perioperative results, long-term functional and oncological outcomes of LRFA confirm that this technique is safe, nephron sparing and oncologically effective for the treatment of cT1a renal tumors.

Treating the two extremes in renal cell carcinoma: management of small renal masses and cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic disease

The incidental renal mass represents a heterogeneous group that contains both benign and malignant pathologies. The majority of renal cell carcinomas are discovered incidentally, without the presence of symptoms directly related to the mass, and are closely associated with the term small renal masses because of the discovery before the onset of symptoms. In general, small renal masses are defined as 4 cm or smaller, and may account for greater than half of renal cell carcinoma diagnosis. The use of renal mass biopsy may offer additional pathological information but the clinician must be reminded of the technical and diagnostic limitations of renal mass biopsy. Patient-dependent factors, such as life expectancy and comorbidities, guide the management of small renal masses, which include active surveillance, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and ablative techniques (cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation). Partial nephrectomy has demonstrated durable oncologic control for small renal masses while preserving renal function and, if feasible, is the current treatment of choice. In the other extreme of the renal cell carcinomas spectrum and in the presence of metastatic disease, the removal of the renal primary tumor is termed cytoreductive nephrectomy. Two randomized trials (SWOG 8949 and EORTC 30947) have demonstrated a survival benefit with cytoreductive nephrectomy before the initiation of immunotherapy. These two studies have also been the motivation to perform cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era. Currently, there are two ongoing randomized prospective trials accruing to investigate the timing and relevance of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the contemporary setting of targeted therapy.

Population-based assessment of cancer-specific mortality after local tumour ablation or observation for kidney cancer: a competing risks analysis

OBJECTIVES

To examine, using competing risks regression, differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) that might distinguish between local tumour ablation (LTA) and observation (OBS) for patients with kidney cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study focused on 1 860 patients with cT1a kidney cancer treated with either LTA or OBS between 2000 and 2009 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. Propensity-score matching was used. The study outcome was CSM. Multivariable competing risks regression analyses, adjusting for other-cause mortality as well as patient (including comorbidities) and tumour characteristics, were fitted.

RESULTS

Overall, fewer patients underwent LTA than OBS (30 vs 70%; n = 553 vs n = 1 307). Compared with patients in the OBS group, those in the LTA group were younger (median age 77 vs 78 years; P < 0.001), more likely to be white (84 vs 78%; P = 0.005), more frequently married (59 vs 52%; P = 0.02) and more frequently of high socio-economic status (54 vs 45%; P = 0.001). After propensity-score matching, 553 patients who underwent LTA and 553 who underwent OBS remained for subsequent analyses. The mean standardized differences of patient characteristics between the two groups were <10%, indicating a high degree of similarity. After LTA or OBS, the 5-year CSM estimates from Poisson regression-derived smoothed plots were 3.5 and 9.1%, respectively. In multivariable competing risks regression analyses, LTA use was found to have a protective effect on CSM (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.25-0.89]; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for comorbidity and tumour characteristics in elderly patients with kidney cancer, LTA was associated with a clinically and statistically significant protective effect on CSM, compared with OBS. This advantage of LTA deserves consideration when obtaining informed consent.

Comparison of renal function detriments after local tumor ablation or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Local tumor ablation (LTA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) represent treatment alternatives for patients diagnosed with small renal mass and both may result in renal function detriments. The aim of the study was to compare renal function detriments after LTA or PN.

METHODS

A Surveillance epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked retrospective cohort of 2850 T1 kidney cancer patients who underwent LTA or PN was abstracted. Short-term outcomes consisted of 30-day acute kidney injury (AKI) and 30-day dialysis rates. Long-term outcomes consisted of episodes of AKI, mild and moderate-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis and anemia in CKD. Analyses consisted of propensity score matching, logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1122 patients remained. The 30-day incidence of AKI was 4.6 % after LTA and 9.4 % after PN. In multivariable analyses (MVAs), LTA was associated with a lower AKI rate (OR 0.42; p = 0.001). The 30-day incidence of any dialysis was <2 % after either LTA or PN. In MVA, LTA was not associated with a lower rate of any dialysis (OR 0.43; p = 0.2). At long-term assessment, both the unadjusted and adjusted rates of all six examined end points were not different between LTA and PN (all p > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

LTA offers short-term protective effect from AKI. The short-term rates of any dialysis treatment are similar after either LTA or PN. At long-term assessment, LTA and PN renal function detriment rates are not different. Concern for long-term functional outcomes should not be a barrier for PN.

Thermal ablation in renal cell carcinoma management: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of recent developments in the field of thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma and focuses on current standard techniques, new technologies, imaging for ablation guidance and evaluation, and future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging long-term data on cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) show marginally lower oncologic outcomes compared to surgical treatment, balanced by better functional and perioperative outcomes. Reports on residual disease vary widely, influenced by different definitions and strategies in determining ablation failure. Stratifying disease-free survival after RFA according to tumor size suggests 3 cm to be a reasonable cut off for RFA tumor selection. Microwave ablation and high-intensity focal ultrasound are modalities with the potential of creating localized high temperatures. However, difficulties in renal implementation are impairing sufficient ablation results. Irreversible electroporation, although not strictly thermal, is a new technology showing promising results in animal and early human research.

SUMMARY

Although high-level randomized controlled trials comparing thermal ablation techniques are lacking, evidence shows that thermal ablation for small renal masses is a safe procedure for both long-term oncologic and functional outcomes. Thermal ablation continues to be associated with a low risk of residual disease, for which candidates should be properly informed. RFA and cryoablation remain the standard techniques whereas alternative techniques require further studies.