Comparative Study of the Influence of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Urological Laparoscopy on Surgeons' Surgical Performance and Ergonomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical experience of bench surgery combined with autotransplantation after three-dimensional laparoscopic nephrectomy for the treatment of highly complex renal tumor

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic nephrectomy in combination with bench surgery and autotransplantation for treating highly complex renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of six patients with highly complex renal cell carcinoma were collected. All patients underwent 3D laparoscopic nephrectomy in combination with bench surgery and autotransplantation by the same surgeons, two of them had previously undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for contralateral renal cancer.

RESULTS

The total operative time was 366 ± 65 min, the warm ischemia time (WIT) was 1.3 ± 0.4 min, and the cold ischemia time was 121 ± 26 min. While one patient received a diluted autologous blood transfusion, the intraoperative blood loss was 217 ± 194 ml. No increase in the serum creatinine (SCr) level was observed at postoperative day 30 compared with the preoperative time, and none of the patients received dialysis either during the hospital stay or to date. Although one patient underwent nephrectomy due to tumor recurrence in the transplanted kidney, the others reported no tumor recurrence or distant metastases on imaging to date.

CONCLUSION

3D laparoscopic nephrectomy, when combined with bench surgery and autotransplantation, can become a feasible option for treating highly complex renal cell carcinoma cases when expecting to preserve renal function maximally.

Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and User-Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) for 3D Intraoperative Cognitive Navigation (ICON3DTM) System for Urological Procedures

Backgound and objectives: In recent years, the adoption of 3D models for surgical planning and intraoperative guidance has gained a wide diffusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeons' perception and usability of ICON3D^TM platform for robotic and laparoscopic urological surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: During the 10th edition of the Techno-Urology Meeting, surgeons and attendees had the opportunity to test the new ICON3D^TM platform. The capability of the user to manipulate the model with hands/mouse, the software usability, the quality of the 3D model's reproduction, and the quality of its use during the surgery were evaluated with the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and the User-Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Results: Fifty-three participants responded to the questionnaires. Based on the answers to the Health-ITUES questionnaire, ICON3D^TM resulted to have a positive additional value in presurgical/surgical planning with 43.4% and 39.6% of responders that rated 4 (agree) and 5 (strongly agree), respectively. Regarding the UEQ questionnaire, both mouse and infrared hand-tracking system resulted to be easy to use for 99% of the responders, while the software resulted to be easy to use for 93.4% of the responders. Conclusions: In conclusion, ICON3D^TM has been widely appreciated by urologists thanks to its various applications, from preoperative planning to its support for intraoperative decision-making in both robot-assisted and laparoscopic settings.

Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System

Purpose

Accurate laparoscopic bowel length measurement (LBLM), which is used primarily in metabolic surgery, remains a challenge. This study aims to three conventional methods for LBLM, namely using visual judgment (VJ), instrument markings (IM), or premeasured tape (PT) to a novel computer-assisted 3D measurement system (BMS).

Materials and Methods

LBLM methods were compared using a 3D laparoscope on bowel phantoms regarding accuracy (relative error in percent, %), time in seconds (s), and number of bowel grasps. Seventy centimeters were measured seven times. As a control, the first, third, fifth, and seventh measurements were performed with VJ. The interventions IM, PT, and BMS were performed following a randomized order as the second, fourth, and sixth measurements.

Results

In total, 63 people participated. BMS showed better accuracy (2.1±3.7%) compared to VJ (8.7±13.7%, p=0.001), PT (4.3±6.8%, p=0.002), and IM (11±15.3%, p<0.001). Participants performed LBLM in a similar amount of time with BMS (175.7±59.7s) and PT (166.5±63.6s, p=0.35), but VJ (64.0±24.0s, p<0.001) and IM (144.9±55.4s, p=0.002) were faster. Number of bowel grasps as a measure for the risk of bowel lesions was similar for BMS (15.8±3.0) and PT (15.9±4.6, p=0.861), whereas VJ required less (14.1±3.4, p=0.004) and IM required more than BMS (22.2±6.9, p<0.001).

Conclusions

PT had higher accuracy than VJ and IM, and lower number of bowel grasps than IM. BMS shows great potential for more reliable LBLM. Until BMS is available in clinical routine, PT should be preferred for LBLM.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6.

3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective single-surgeon learning curve in the first 200 cases with oncologic and functional results

BACKGROUND

Studies for 3D-laparoscopic prostatectomy (3D-LRP) learning curve and surgical results are lacking. Combining 3D vision to LRP attenuates differences compared to Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with similar mini-invasiveness but lower costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred consecutive men with localized prostate cancer underwent 3D-LRP at Seinäjoki central hospital between 2013 and 2018. Oncological and functional results were documented. Long-term functional evaluation was done using EPIC-26 survey. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess complications during first 3 months. All operations were performed by a single surgeon (M.R.) with no experience of LRP or 3D-LRP. The learning curve was assessed by evaluating urethral anastomosis- and total operative time. Perioperative and postoperative data was collected prospectively during surgery and at subsequent control visits up to minimum of 1 year.

RESULTS

A plateau in anastomosis time was reached after 30 cases and in operative time after 60 cases. Median operative time was 114 min (78-258 min) and median time for anastomosis was 25 min (11-90 min). Median blood loss was 150 ml (10-800 ml); 93.5% of the patients were discharged within the first 3 days. Clavien-Dindo ≥3a complications occurred in 6.5%. Positive surgical margins occurred in 23%. One-year after the operation, 93.3% had PSA ≤ 0.1; 91.9% of the patients were dry or used one daytime pad. EPIC-26 scores were as follows: Urinary incontinence 79.25 (14.5-100), urinary irritative/obstructive 93.75 (31.25-100), bowel 100 (33.33-100), sexual 36.17 (0-100) and hormonal 95 (37.5-100).

CONCLUSION

The learning curve for 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy is comparable to RALP, which makes it a cost-effective alternative with comparable oncological and functional results.